Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2000
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.441 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.314 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 85.015 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 83.982 % | |
5 | Nigeria | 83.371 % | |
6 | Burundi | 82.655 % | |
7 | Qatar | 82.635 % | |
8 | North Korea | 82.211 % | |
9 | Burkina Faso | 82.074 % | |
10 | Ethiopia | 82.073 % | |
11 | Cameroon | 81.949 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.843 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 80.76 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 80.429 % | |
15 | Niger | 79.013 % | |
16 | Iceland | 77.862 % | |
17 | Angola | 77.362 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.097 % | |
19 | Vanuatu | 76.82 % | |
20 | Azerbaijan | 76.8 % | |
21 | United Arab Emirates | 74.508 % | |
22 | South Sudan | 74.366 % | |
23 | Bahamas | 74.359 % | |
24 | Uganda | 74.298 % | |
25 | China | 74.19 % | |
26 | Georgia | 74.012 % | |
27 | Thailand | 73.483 % | |
28 | Vietnam | 73.393 % | |
29 | Central African Republic | 72.625 % | |
30 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.527 % | |
31 | Kenya | 72.512 % | |
32 | Ghana | 72.486 % | |
33 | Lesotho | 72.408 % | |
34 | Benin | 71.832 % | |
35 | Kazakhstan | 70.958 % | |
36 | Mali | 70.281 % | |
37 | Bolivia | 70.152 % | |
38 | Bhutan | 69.879 % | |
39 | Timor-Leste | 69.684 % | |
40 | Barbados | 69.35 % | |
41 | Paraguay | 69.156 % | |
42 | Chad | 69.083 % | |
43 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.406 % | |
44 | Congo | 68.248 % | |
45 | Netherlands | 67.804 % | |
46 | Guam | 67.8 % | |
47 | Indonesia | 67.756 % | |
48 | Colombia | 67.625 % | |
49 | Myanmar | 67.339 % | |
50 | Switzerland | 67.296 % | |
51 | Kyrgyzstan | 66.997 % | |
52 | Guatemala | 66.894 % | |
53 | Norway | 66.785 % | |
54 | Jamaica | 66.669 % | |
55 | United States | 66.146 % | |
56 | Kuwait | 65.932 % | |
57 | Brazil | 65.807 % | |
58 | Peru | 65.78 % | |
59 | Denmark | 65.757 % | |
60 | Zimbabwe | 65.614 % | |
61 | China, Macao SAR | 65.52 % | |
62 | Bahrain | 65.507 % | |
63 | Côte d'Ivoire | 65.474 % | |
64 | Singapore | 65.365 % | |
65 | New Caledonia | 65.351 % | |
66 | Canada | 65.291 % | |
67 | New Zealand | 64.765 % | |
68 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 64.686 % | |
69 | Sierra Leone | 64.619 % | |
70 | Honduras | 64.38 % | |
71 | Ireland | 64.358 % | |
72 | Guinea | 64.233 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 64.038 % | |
74 | Venezuela | 64.013 % | |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.813 % | |
76 | Ecuador | 63.449 % | |
77 | Australia | 63.282 % | |
78 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.075 % | |
79 | Panama | 62.998 % | |
80 | Haiti | 62.77 % | |
81 | Japan | 62.442 % | |
82 | Argentina | 62.315 % | |
83 | Armenia | 62.139 % | |
84 | Rwanda | 62.121 % | |
85 | Sweden | 61.994 % | |
86 | Laos | 61.772 % | |
87 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.704 % | |
88 | El Salvador | 61.538 % | |
89 | Finland | 61.407 % | |
90 | Israel | 61.353 % | |
91 | United Kingdom | 61.338 % | |
92 | Russia | 61.272 % | |
93 | Philippines | 61.256 % | |
94 | Albania | 61.163 % | |
95 | Portugal | 60.798 % | |
96 | South Korea | 60.754 % | |
97 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.705 % | |
98 | Czech Republic | 60.415 % | |
99 | Cyprus | 60.361 % | |
100 | Lithuania | 60.184 % | |
101 | Nicaragua | 60.183 % | |
102 | Uruguay | 60.164 % | |
103 | India | 60.079 % | |
104 | Republic of Moldova | 59.912 % | |
105 | United States Virgin Islands | 59.902 % | |
106 | Slovakia | 59.662 % | |
107 | Mexico | 59.571 % | |
108 | Zambia | 59.552 % | |
109 | Malaysia | 59.544 % | |
110 | Belize | 59.541 % | |
111 | Mongolia | 59.506 % | |
112 | Belarus | 59.3 % | |
113 | Estonia | 58.906 % | |
114 | Costa Rica | 58.87 % | |
115 | Mauritius | 58.842 % | |
116 | Fiji | 58.826 % | |
117 | Botswana | 58.6 % | |
118 | French Polynesia | 58.565 % | |
119 | Tonga | 58.554 % | |
120 | Dominican Republic | 58.514 % | |
121 | Togo | 58.469 % | |
122 | Austria | 58.429 % | |
123 | Cabo Verde | 58.254 % | |
124 | Bangladesh | 58.163 % | |
125 | Germany | 57.989 % | |
126 | Slovenia | 57.557 % | |
127 | South Africa | 57.263 % | |
128 | Ukraine | 57.207 % | |
129 | Guyana | 57.203 % | |
130 | Uzbekistan | 56.977 % | |
131 | Samoa | 56.304 % | |
132 | Oman | 56.175 % | |
133 | Latvia | 56.151 % | |
134 | Chile | 55.909 % | |
135 | Serbia | 55.745 % | |
136 | Sri Lanka | 55.57 % | |
137 | Poland | 55.486 % | |
138 | France | 55.303 % | |
139 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
140 | Maldives | 54.8 % | |
141 | Namibia | 54.13 % | |
142 | Cuba | 53.708 % | |
143 | Luxembourg | 53.417 % | |
144 | Turkmenistan | 53.335 % | |
145 | Eswatini | 53.236 % | |
146 | Spain | 52.889 % | |
147 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 52.811 % | |
148 | North Macedonia | 52.742 % | |
149 | Croatia | 52.632 % | |
150 | Belgium | 52.243 % | |
151 | Greece | 51.442 % | |
152 | Morocco | 51.322 % | |
153 | Hungary | 51.157 % | |
154 | Romania | 51.067 % | |
155 | Syrian Arab Republic | 50.89 % | |
156 | Sudan | 50.838 % | |
157 | Pakistan | 50.41 % | |
158 | Senegal | 50.337 % | |
159 | Bulgaria | 49.952 % | |
160 | Turkey | 49.948 % | |
161 | Malta | 49.69 % | |
162 | Montenegro | 49.316 % | |
163 | Saudi Arabia | 48.995 % | |
164 | Papua New Guinea | 48.498 % | |
165 | Gambia | 48.413 % | |
166 | Gabon | 48.133 % | |
167 | Tunisia | 47.969 % | |
168 | Italy | 47.818 % | |
169 | Suriname | 47.169 % | |
170 | Libya | 46.571 % | |
171 | Afghanistan | 46.562 % | |
172 | Egypt | 46.222 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 46 % | |
174 | Puerto Rico | 45.94 % | |
175 | Yemen | 45.198 % | |
176 | Algeria | 44.275 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.197 % | |
178 | Iran | 44.133 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.096 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.719 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.364 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.254 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.4 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.087 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 34.013 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.185 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Nigeria
- #6
Burundi
- #7
Qatar
- #8
North Korea
- #9
Burkina Faso
- #10
Ethiopia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Iran
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2000, Tanzania led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 86.44%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 24.18% to a maximum of 86.44%. The average youth labor force participation rate worldwide was 61.46%, providing a benchmark for evaluating individual country performances.
Economic Factors Driving High Participation Rates
The countries with the highest youth labor force participation rates, such as Tanzania (86.44%), Madagascar (86.31%), and Mozambique (85.01%), are characterized by economies where agriculture and informal sectors dominate. In these regions, young people often enter the workforce early due to the necessity of contributing to household income. The lack of widespread access to higher education also means that many young individuals have limited opportunities outside of entering the labor market directly. Moreover, in Nigeria, which has a participation rate of 83.37%, the youthful population is a significant contributor to its labor-intensive sectors, which are vital for the country's economy.
Low Participation Rates and Their Underpinnings
Countries with the lowest participation rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe (24.18%) and Djibouti (34.01%), often face different sets of challenges. These can include higher rates of youth unemployment, political instability, or cultural factors that prioritize education over early labor force entry. For instance, in Jordan (39.4%) and the State of Palestine (40.25%), social norms and economic policies tend to encourage prolonged education, delaying labor market entry. Additionally, these regions may have higher barriers to entry in the workforce, such as economic sanctions or limited job availability, which contribute to lower participation rates.
Regional Disparities and Influences
Analyzing regional patterns reveals that African countries prominently feature among those with high youth labor force participation rates. This trend can be attributed to demographic factors, such as high fertility rates resulting in youthful populations, and economic structures that are heavily reliant on agriculture and informal sectors. Conversely, in Middle Eastern countries like Iran (44.13%) and Lebanon (44.20%), participation rates are lower, influenced by more diverse economies and greater emphasis on education. These differences underscore how economic structures and social policies impact youth engagement in the labor market.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The year-over-year changes in youth labor force participation rates reveal shifts influenced by economic policies and global economic conditions. Notably, Iceland experienced the largest increase of 1.59% (2.1%), possibly due to policy initiatives aimed at integrating more young people into the workforce. Similarly, Luxembourg and Spain saw increases of 1.16% and 1.12% respectively, reflecting efforts to boost youth employment through education and training programs.
Conversely, Timor-Leste saw the most significant decrease of -2.97% (-4.1%), and Turkey experienced a -2.75% (-5.2%) decline. These reductions may be attributed to economic downturns or shifts in policy that reduced job availability for young people. In Peru and Sri Lanka, decreases of -2.38% and -1.74% respectively indicate potential economic challenges that discourage or prevent youth from entering the labor market. Such trends highlight the sensitivity of youth labor participation to broader economic conditions and policy environments.
The analysis of the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2000 reveals a complex interplay of economic, social, and policy factors that influence the extent of youth engagement in the labor market. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for formulating policies that effectively address the challenges and opportunities faced by young people worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2000
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2000?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2000 with 86.44%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2000?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2000 with 24.18%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2000?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2000 was 61.46%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2000?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2000 was 61.21%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation in 2000?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation in 2000 were Tanzania, Madagascar, and Mozambique.
How many countries are included in the dataset for youth labor force participation in 2000?
The dataset for youth labor force participation in 2000 includes 186 countries.
Insights by country
Haiti
In 2000, Haiti had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.77 %, ranking #80 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than many countries in the region, reflecting a pressing need for income among the youth in a nation facing economic challenges. High levels of poverty and limited educational opportunities drive young Haitians into the labor market, often in informal sectors, as they seek to support their families.
Benin
In 2000, Benin achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 71.832%, ranking #34 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic and economic structure. The high participation is driven by a combination of limited educational opportunities and the necessity for families to engage in income-generating activities from a young age.
Greece
In 2000, Greece ranked #151 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 51.442 %. This figure is notably lower than many European neighbors, reflecting broader economic challenges in the region. Contributing factors include high youth unemployment rates and limited job opportunities, which have historically hindered young people's entry into the labor market.
Finland
In 2000, Finland's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 61.407 %, ranking #89 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to more economically robust nations. Contributing factors include Finland's strong emphasis on education, which may delay entry into the workforce, as well as a competitive job market that favors experienced workers over younger candidates.
Malawi
In 2000, Malawi achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 80.843 %, ranking #12 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country’s youthful population and economic reliance on agriculture. Factors such as limited access to education and a high demand for labor in rural areas drive many young individuals into the workforce early, often in informal sectors.
Saudi Arabia
In 2000, Saudi Arabia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 48.995 %, ranking #163 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in integrating youth into the labor market. Contributing factors include a rapidly growing youth population, limited job opportunities in the private sector, and economic reliance on oil, which often does not absorb large numbers of young workers.
Nepal
Nepal ranked #181 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 41.364% in 2000. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by youth in finding employment opportunities. Contributing factors include a predominantly agrarian economy, limited industrial development, and high levels of rural poverty, which restrict access to jobs for young people. Additionally, geographic barriers and educational disparities further hinder youth employment in the country.
Portugal
In 2000, Portugal ranked #95 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.798%. This rate was relatively low compared to the European Union average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities within the country. The high youth unemployment rate can be attributed to economic restructuring and a shift towards a more service-oriented economy, which often struggles to absorb young workers. Additionally, educational policies and vocational training programs were still evolving during this period, impacting youth readiness for the labor market.
Netherlands
In 2000, the Netherlands achieved a global rank of #45 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.804%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a robust labor market for young individuals compared to many other countries. Key drivers include the Netherlands' strong vocational training programs and youth employment policies that encourage early workforce entry, facilitating a smooth transition from education to employment.
China
In 2000, China ranked #25 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 74.19%. This rate was significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's rapid economic growth and urbanization during this period. Key drivers of this high participation included a large youth population eager to enter the workforce and government policies promoting industrialization and education reforms that equipped young people with necessary skills.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data