Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1992
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Burundi | 88.994 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 86.633 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 86.151 % | |
4 | Mozambique | 84.059 % | |
5 | Burkina Faso | 83.732 % | |
6 | Qatar | 83.519 % | |
7 | Nigeria | 83.018 % | |
8 | Solomon Islands | 82.967 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 82.23 % | |
10 | Ethiopia | 81.803 % | |
11 | North Korea | 81.766 % | |
12 | Eritrea | 80.962 % | |
13 | Malawi | 80.75 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 79.919 % | |
15 | Niger | 78.873 % | |
16 | China | 78.234 % | |
17 | Vietnam | 77.87 % | |
18 | Georgia | 77.627 % | |
19 | Angola | 77.342 % | |
20 | Liberia | 77.308 % | |
21 | Vanuatu | 76.974 % | |
22 | Thailand | 75.06 % | |
23 | United Arab Emirates | 74.952 % | |
24 | South Sudan | 74.381 % | |
25 | Lesotho | 73.638 % | |
26 | Uganda | 73.403 % | |
27 | Iceland | 73.251 % | |
28 | Ghana | 72.992 % | |
29 | Kenya | 72.879 % | |
30 | Bahamas | 72.745 % | |
31 | Central African Republic | 72.567 % | |
32 | Azerbaijan | 72.303 % | |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.216 % | |
34 | Benin | 72.16 % | |
35 | Chad | 72.118 % | |
36 | Guam | 71.75 % | |
37 | Timor-Leste | 71.566 % | |
38 | United States Virgin Islands | 70.606 % | |
39 | Kazakhstan | 70.586 % | |
40 | Jamaica | 70.555 % | |
41 | Bhutan | 70.409 % | |
42 | Mali | 70.397 % | |
43 | Albania | 69.36 % | |
44 | Bolivia | 69.285 % | |
45 | Paraguay | 69.105 % | |
46 | Congo | 68.588 % | |
47 | Myanmar | 68.145 % | |
48 | Barbados | 67.696 % | |
49 | Denmark | 67.075 % | |
50 | Colombia | 66.964 % | |
51 | Zimbabwe | 66.896 % | |
52 | Brunei Darussalam | 66.742 % | |
53 | Netherlands | 66.736 % | |
54 | Guatemala | 66.437 % | |
55 | Bahrain | 66.369 % | |
56 | Indonesia | 66.316 % | |
57 | Haiti | 66.087 % | |
58 | Russia | 65.864 % | |
59 | Honduras | 65.792 % | |
60 | Armenia | 65.547 % | |
61 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.498 % | |
62 | Lithuania | 65.409 % | |
63 | Canada | 65.301 % | |
64 | United States | 65.252 % | |
65 | Brazil | 64.982 % | |
66 | New Caledonia | 64.895 % | |
67 | Sweden | 64.88 % | |
68 | Venezuela | 64.756 % | |
69 | Switzerland | 64.73 % | |
70 | Estonia | 64.677 % | |
71 | Sierra Leone | 64.397 % | |
72 | Slovakia | 64.176 % | |
73 | Guinea-Bissau | 64.032 % | |
74 | Japan | 63.989 % | |
75 | Guinea | 63.801 % | |
76 | Kuwait | 63.361 % | |
77 | Ecuador | 63.234 % | |
78 | Saint Lucia | 63.134 % | |
79 | Australia | 63.002 % | |
80 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 62.99 % | |
81 | New Zealand | 62.942 % | |
82 | Kyrgyzstan | 62.891 % | |
83 | Rwanda | 62.756 % | |
84 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 62.403 % | |
85 | Laos | 62.392 % | |
86 | Norway | 62.321 % | |
87 | Singapore | 62.138 % | |
88 | Botswana | 62.137 % | |
89 | Finland | 62.075 % | |
90 | El Salvador | 61.714 % | |
91 | Latvia | 61.571 % | |
92 | United Kingdom | 61.539 % | |
93 | Philippines | 61.46 % | |
94 | Czech Republic | 61.401 % | |
95 | Poland | 61.045 % | |
96 | Equatorial Guinea | 60.797 % | |
97 | Argentina | 60.717 % | |
98 | South Korea | 60.394 % | |
99 | Cyprus | 60.383 % | |
100 | Cabo Verde | 60.367 % | |
101 | Ireland | 60.182 % | |
102 | Mauritius | 60.053 % | |
103 | Guyana | 59.846 % | |
104 | Fiji | 59.728 % | |
105 | Zambia | 59.613 % | |
106 | Trinidad and Tobago | 59.547 % | |
107 | Israel | 59.487 % | |
108 | French Polynesia | 59.349 % | |
109 | Republic of Moldova | 59.148 % | |
110 | Belarus | 59.141 % | |
111 | Germany | 59.076 % | |
112 | Togo | 59.06 % | |
113 | Ukraine | 59.052 % | |
114 | Serbia | 59.009 % | |
115 | Panama | 59.004 % | |
116 | Portugal | 58.955 % | |
117 | Peru | 58.9 % | |
118 | Mexico | 58.715 % | |
119 | Mongolia | 58.398 % | |
120 | China, Macao SAR | 58.244 % | |
121 | Slovenia | 58.219 % | |
122 | South Africa | 58.047 % | |
123 | Oman | 58.022 % | |
124 | India | 57.997 % | |
125 | Nicaragua | 57.83 % | |
126 | Tonga | 57.79 % | |
127 | Uruguay | 57.6 % | |
128 | Dominican Republic | 57.282 % | |
129 | Uzbekistan | 57.276 % | |
130 | Bangladesh | 57.069 % | |
131 | Austria | 56.94 % | |
132 | Croatia | 56.798 % | |
133 | Malaysia | 56.68 % | |
134 | Sri Lanka | 56.62 % | |
135 | Samoa | 56.365 % | |
136 | Belize | 56.01 % | |
137 | Turkey | 55.99 % | |
138 | North Macedonia | 55.806 % | |
139 | Costa Rica | 55.66 % | |
140 | France | 55.162 % | |
141 | Namibia | 55.092 % | |
142 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 55.09 % | |
143 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
144 | Chile | 54.247 % | |
145 | Eswatini | 54.112 % | |
146 | Luxembourg | 52.959 % | |
147 | Cuba | 52.258 % | |
148 | Saudi Arabia | 51.346 % | |
149 | Morocco | 51.27 % | |
150 | Hungary | 51.119 % | |
151 | Montenegro | 51.033 % | |
152 | Senegal | 50.978 % | |
153 | Syrian Arab Republic | 50.831 % | |
154 | Turkmenistan | 50.766 % | |
155 | Romania | 50.7 % | |
156 | Sudan | 50.51 % | |
157 | Maldives | 50.236 % | |
158 | Bulgaria | 50.065 % | |
159 | Malta | 49.891 % | |
160 | Spain | 49.796 % | |
161 | Pakistan | 49.68 % | |
162 | Greece | 49.62 % | |
163 | Belgium | 49.523 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 49.095 % | |
165 | Gabon | 48.558 % | |
166 | Italy | 48.522 % | |
167 | Papua New Guinea | 48.278 % | |
168 | Gambia | 48.245 % | |
169 | Suriname | 48.219 % | |
170 | Egypt | 47.19 % | |
171 | Afghanistan | 47.087 % | |
172 | Mauritania | 46.384 % | |
173 | Iran | 46.307 % | |
174 | Algeria | 45.799 % | |
175 | Libya | 45.584 % | |
176 | Puerto Rico | 45.57 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.601 % | |
178 | Yemen | 44.142 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.377 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.745 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.557 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.316 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.401 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 35.002 % | |
185 | Somalia | 33.862 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.702 % |
- #1
Burundi
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Mozambique
- #5
Burkina Faso
- #6
Qatar
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
Solomon Islands
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
Ethiopia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Yemen
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1992, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Burundi with a rate of 88.99%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 24.70% to a maximum of 88.99%. The global average for this metric was 61.68%, providing a benchmark for understanding how individual countries compare to worldwide trends.
Economic Influences on Youth Labor Participation
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate is often influenced by the economic conditions of a country. In 1992, Burundi, Tanzania (86.63%), and Madagascar (86.15%) had some of the highest rates. These high rates can be attributed to the agrarian nature of these economies, where young people often contribute to family farming activities. The necessity for additional household income in low-income regions also drives higher participation among youth.
In contrast, countries like Sao Tome and Principe (24.70%) and Somalia (33.86%) exhibited much lower participation rates. This could be linked to economic instability or conflict, limiting opportunities and access to jobs for young people. Additionally, these countries may also experience higher school enrollment rates, which inversely affect labor participation.
Demographic and Cultural Factors
Demographics and cultural norms play a significant role in shaping youth labor participation. In countries like Nigeria (83.02%) and Cameroon (82.23%), the large youth populations and cultural emphasis on early workforce entry contribute to elevated participation rates. These nations often have fewer barriers to entry into the labor market for young individuals, allowing them to engage in both formal and informal work sectors.
Conversely, in nations such as Jordan (39.40%) and the State of Palestine (40.32%), cultural factors such as the prioritization of education and gender roles might reduce youth participation. In these regions, young people may stay in school longer, delaying their entry into the labor force.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
While the average global change in youth labor force participation from previous years was negligible at 0.0%, some countries experienced significant shifts. Azerbaijan saw the largest increase with a 3.7% rise, attributed to economic reforms that created more opportunities for young workers. Similarly, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan had increases of 3.9% and 4.7% respectively, likely due to transitions from centrally planned to more market-oriented economies, resulting in increased labor demands.
On the downside, Sri Lanka experienced a decrease of -4.1%, potentially due to economic downturns affecting job availability. Estonia and Portugal also saw declines of -3.1% and -3.3%, which may be linked to structural economic changes and shifts towards higher educational attainment before workforce entry.
Policy Implications and Future Outlook
The variations in Youth Labor Force Participation Rates across countries in 1992 highlight the impact of economic structures, cultural norms, and policy environments. Countries with high participation rates like Burundi and Tanzania might benefit from policies that support educational opportunities, balancing work and study. Conversely, nations with lower rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe, could focus on creating more job opportunities for young people to boost economic growth.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to foster environments where young people can both contribute to and benefit from economic activities. Future strategies should consider the balance between education and labor, ensuring that youth are equipped with the skills needed for the evolving labor markets.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1992
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1992?
Burundi had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1992, with 88.99%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1992?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1992, at 24.7%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1992?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1992 was 61.68%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1992?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1992 was 61.43%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 1992?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 1992 were Burundi (88.99%), Tanzania (86.63%), and Madagascar (86.15%).
What was the range of youth labor force participation rates in 1992?
The range of youth labor force participation rates in 1992 was from 24.7% in Sao Tome and Principe to 88.99% in Burundi.
Insights by country
Tajikistan
Tajikistan had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 55.008 % in 1992, ranking #143 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by the country during its post-Soviet transition. Economic instability, high unemployment, and limited opportunities for youth were significant factors contributing to this statistic, as Tajikistan was grappling with the aftermath of civil conflict and a struggling economy.
Bangladesh
In 1992, Bangladesh had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 57.069 %, ranking #130 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant reliance on youth labor in developing economies. Key drivers of this participation include a large youth demographic and the necessity for family income support in a country where many live below the poverty line.
Argentina
In 1992, Argentina had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.717 %, ranking #97 out of 186 countries. This rate was relatively high compared to many countries in the region, reflecting the economic necessity for youth to contribute to family incomes during a period of economic instability. Key drivers behind this participation included Argentina's economic challenges in the early 1990s, which pushed young individuals into the labor market, and a demographic trend of a large youth population seeking employment opportunities.
Cambodia
In 1992, Cambodia achieved a remarkable 14 global rank with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 79.919 %. This figure was significantly higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market. Key drivers of this high participation rate included a youthful demographic profile and the need for economic recovery following decades of conflict, which necessitated the involvement of young people in various sectors.
Guatemala
In 1992, Guatemala achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.437 %, ranking #54 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include Guatemala's youthful demographic profile and the necessity for income in many households, which drives young individuals to seek employment opportunities early. Additionally, economic conditions have historically compelled families to rely on the earnings of younger members.
Congo
In 1992, Congo achieved a global rank of #46 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 68.588%. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic profile. Economic factors such as limited access to education and a high demand for labor in informal sectors have driven many young individuals into the workforce.
Guam
In 1992, Guam achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 71.75 %, ranking #36 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market. Key drivers for this high participation include Guam's strategic location as a U.S. territory, which fosters economic opportunities through tourism and military presence, as well as a relatively young population eager to enter the workforce.
Costa Rica
Costa Rica's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1992 was 55.66%, ranking #139 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, highlighting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include a focus on education over immediate labor market entry and a relatively stable economy that prioritizes skilled labor, which may limit entry-level positions for young people.
Cyprus
In 1992, Cyprus had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.383 %, ranking #99 out of 186 countries. This rate was relatively high compared to many European nations, reflecting a robust educational system that encourages youth employment. Economic factors, including the tourism and service sectors, played a significant role in absorbing young workers, while demographic trends indicated a youthful population eager to enter the labor market.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1992 was 60.367 %, ranking it #100 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than many other nations in the region, reflecting the country's unique demographic dynamics. The significant participation is driven by a youthful population and economic shifts towards sectors that engage younger workers, particularly in tourism and agriculture.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data