Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1996
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.459 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.104 % | |
3 | Burundi | 86.054 % | |
4 | Mozambique | 83.947 % | |
5 | Nigeria | 83.892 % | |
6 | Qatar | 83.838 % | |
7 | Burkina Faso | 82.919 % | |
8 | Solomon Islands | 82.653 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 82.128 % | |
10 | North Korea | 82.127 % | |
11 | Ethiopia | 81.925 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.843 % | |
13 | Cambodia | 80.516 % | |
14 | Azerbaijan | 80.508 % | |
15 | Eritrea | 80.246 % | |
16 | Niger | 78.865 % | |
17 | Angola | 77.415 % | |
18 | Georgia | 77.311 % | |
19 | Liberia | 77.179 % | |
20 | Vietnam | 77.113 % | |
21 | Vanuatu | 76.898 % | |
22 | China | 76.271 % | |
23 | United Arab Emirates | 76.032 % | |
24 | Thailand | 75.495 % | |
25 | South Sudan | 74.478 % | |
26 | Iceland | 74.382 % | |
27 | Uganda | 73.986 % | |
28 | Bahamas | 73.983 % | |
29 | Lesotho | 73.328 % | |
30 | Ghana | 72.739 % | |
31 | Central African Republic | 72.682 % | |
32 | Kenya | 72.603 % | |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.276 % | |
34 | Benin | 71.996 % | |
35 | Kazakhstan | 71.914 % | |
36 | Timor-Leste | 71.098 % | |
37 | Chad | 70.947 % | |
38 | Mali | 70.388 % | |
39 | Bolivia | 70.341 % | |
40 | Bhutan | 70.187 % | |
41 | Paraguay | 69.966 % | |
42 | Guam | 69.812 % | |
43 | Kyrgyzstan | 69.519 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 68.947 % | |
45 | Barbados | 68.899 % | |
46 | Congo | 68.431 % | |
47 | Colombia | 68.119 % | |
48 | Myanmar | 67.823 % | |
49 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.796 % | |
50 | Switzerland | 67.428 % | |
51 | Kuwait | 67.322 % | |
52 | Netherlands | 66.945 % | |
53 | Indonesia | 66.87 % | |
54 | Guatemala | 66.636 % | |
55 | Zimbabwe | 66.431 % | |
56 | Honduras | 65.911 % | |
57 | United States | 65.775 % | |
58 | New Caledonia | 65.435 % | |
59 | Denmark | 65.394 % | |
60 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.265 % | |
61 | Bahrain | 65.234 % | |
62 | New Zealand | 65.154 % | |
63 | Norway | 64.628 % | |
64 | Haiti | 64.623 % | |
65 | China, Macao SAR | 64.55 % | |
66 | Sierra Leone | 64.505 % | |
67 | Peru | 64.317 % | |
68 | Venezuela | 64.287 % | |
69 | Singapore | 64.226 % | |
70 | Canada | 64.225 % | |
71 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.973 % | |
72 | Brazil | 63.949 % | |
73 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 63.946 % | |
74 | Guinea | 63.928 % | |
75 | Australia | 63.649 % | |
76 | Saint Lucia | 63.587 % | |
77 | Rwanda | 63.504 % | |
78 | Japan | 63.488 % | |
79 | Ecuador | 63.48 % | |
80 | Albania | 63.466 % | |
81 | Armenia | 63.373 % | |
82 | Sweden | 63.004 % | |
83 | Ireland | 62.928 % | |
84 | Trinidad and Tobago | 62.562 % | |
85 | Lithuania | 62.55 % | |
86 | Laos | 62.077 % | |
87 | Argentina | 62 % | |
88 | United States Virgin Islands | 61.78 % | |
89 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.692 % | |
90 | South Korea | 61.669 % | |
91 | Panama | 61.475 % | |
92 | Israel | 61.434 % | |
93 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 61.385 % | |
94 | Philippines | 61.304 % | |
95 | Czech Republic | 61.3 % | |
96 | Estonia | 61.212 % | |
97 | Botswana | 60.894 % | |
98 | El Salvador | 60.814 % | |
99 | Cyprus | 60.791 % | |
100 | United Kingdom | 60.701 % | |
101 | Russia | 60.387 % | |
102 | Uruguay | 60.31 % | |
103 | Slovakia | 60.158 % | |
104 | Latvia | 60.068 % | |
105 | Republic of Moldova | 59.635 % | |
106 | French Polynesia | 59.625 % | |
107 | Zambia | 59.613 % | |
108 | Mauritius | 59.586 % | |
109 | Mexico | 59.464 % | |
110 | Fiji | 59.45 % | |
111 | Tonga | 59.382 % | |
112 | Belarus | 59.347 % | |
113 | Cabo Verde | 59.315 % | |
114 | Finland | 59.234 % | |
115 | Mongolia | 58.967 % | |
116 | Guyana | 58.876 % | |
117 | Togo | 58.792 % | |
118 | India | 58.729 % | |
119 | Portugal | 58.499 % | |
120 | Nicaragua | 58.45 % | |
121 | Austria | 58.394 % | |
122 | Malaysia | 58.15 % | |
123 | Ukraine | 58.133 % | |
124 | Poland | 58.094 % | |
125 | South Africa | 58.037 % | |
126 | Germany | 58.01 % | |
127 | Belize | 57.962 % | |
128 | Dominican Republic | 57.799 % | |
129 | Oman | 57.734 % | |
130 | Bangladesh | 57.69 % | |
131 | Slovenia | 57.613 % | |
132 | Uzbekistan | 57.502 % | |
133 | Serbia | 56.818 % | |
134 | Chile | 56.63 % | |
135 | Samoa | 56.181 % | |
136 | Costa Rica | 55.97 % | |
137 | Sri Lanka | 55.4 % | |
138 | France | 55.351 % | |
139 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
140 | Turkmenistan | 54.587 % | |
141 | Croatia | 54.481 % | |
142 | Eswatini | 54.188 % | |
143 | Namibia | 54.028 % | |
144 | North Macedonia | 54.005 % | |
145 | Turkey | 53.734 % | |
146 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 53.516 % | |
147 | Cuba | 52.92 % | |
148 | Maldives | 52.01 % | |
149 | Sudan | 51.774 % | |
150 | Morocco | 51.275 % | |
151 | Luxembourg | 50.96 % | |
152 | Greece | 50.899 % | |
153 | Hungary | 50.875 % | |
154 | Senegal | 50.615 % | |
155 | Spain | 50.415 % | |
156 | Belgium | 50.399 % | |
157 | Romania | 50.261 % | |
158 | Malta | 50.089 % | |
159 | Montenegro | 49.855 % | |
160 | Saudi Arabia | 49.658 % | |
161 | Bulgaria | 49.443 % | |
162 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.368 % | |
163 | Pakistan | 49.24 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 49.135 % | |
165 | Gambia | 48.314 % | |
166 | Gabon | 48.297 % | |
167 | Papua New Guinea | 48.016 % | |
168 | Suriname | 47.637 % | |
169 | Egypt | 47.279 % | |
170 | Italy | 47.275 % | |
171 | Puerto Rico | 46.88 % | |
172 | Afghanistan | 46.803 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 46.192 % | |
174 | Libya | 45.912 % | |
175 | Algeria | 45.446 % | |
176 | Yemen | 44.855 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.081 % | |
178 | Iran | 43.931 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.315 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.971 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.46 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.322 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.468 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 34.698 % | |
185 | Somalia | 33.96 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.586 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Burundi
- #4
Mozambique
- #5
Nigeria
- #6
Qatar
- #7
Burkina Faso
- #8
Solomon Islands
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
North Korea
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Iran
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1996, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was highest in Tanzania at 86.46%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 24.59% to a maximum of 86.46%. The global average participation rate stood at 61.68%, providing a benchmark for understanding youth engagement in the labor market worldwide.
Economic Factors Influencing High Participation Rates
Several countries with high youth labor force participation rates, such as Tanzania (86.46%), Madagascar (86.10%), and Burundi (86.05%), are characterized by economies where agriculture plays a significant role. In these regions, young people often contribute to family farming operations, which can lead to higher participation rates. Additionally, limited access to education and vocational training can compel youth to enter the workforce early, driving up participation rates.
Conversely, countries with more diversified economies, like Qatar (83.84%), often see high participation due to government policies encouraging youth employment, coupled with strong economic growth that generates ample job opportunities. These factors collectively contribute to the high labor force engagement among young people in these nations.
Low Participation Rates and Socioeconomic Challenges
Countries with lower participation rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe (24.59%), Somalia (33.96%), and Djibouti (34.70%), face unique challenges. High youth unemployment in these regions often stems from political instability, limited job opportunities, and inadequate educational systems. For instance, ongoing conflicts and economic sanctions can severely restrict job availability, discouraging youth from entering the labor market.
In some Middle Eastern countries like Jordan (39.47%) and the State of Palestine (40.32%), cultural and social norms may also influence lower female labor force participation, further reducing overall youth engagement in the labor market.
Year-over-Year Trends and Major Changes
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals noteworthy shifts. Switzerland experienced the most significant increase, with a rise of 3.34% (5.2%), driven by economic reforms and policies promoting youth employment. Similarly, Peru saw a 1.40% (2.2%) increase, likely due to governmental efforts to integrate young workers into the formal economy.
On the other hand, the United States Virgin Islands experienced the largest decrease, with a drop of 4.21% (-6.4%). This decline may be attributed to economic downturns or shifts in industry demand, affecting youth employment opportunities. Other countries like Costa Rica and Brazil also saw declines, possibly due to economic instability or structural changes in labor markets.
Implications and Policy Considerations
The data highlights significant disparities in youth labor force participation rates across different regions, underscoring the need for targeted policy interventions. For countries with high participation rates driven by necessity rather than choice, investing in education and vocational training could help shift young people into more stable and rewarding job sectors. Conversely, nations with low participation rates might benefit from policies that create job opportunities and encourage youth employment, particularly for young women.
Understanding the underlying causes of these participation rates is crucial for developing effective strategies that promote sustainable economic growth and improve youth employment outcomes worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1996
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1996?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1996, with 86.46%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1996?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1996, at 24.59%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across countries in 1996?
The average youth labor force participation rate across the 186 countries in 1996 was 61.68%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1996?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1996 was 61.34%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 1996?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 1996 were Tanzania (86.46%), Madagascar (86.1%), and Burundi (86.05%).
What was the range of youth labor force participation rates in 1996?
The range of youth labor force participation rates in 1996 was from 24.59% in Sao Tome and Principe to 86.46% in Tanzania.
Insights by country
Iraq
In 1996, Iraq had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 42.315%, ranking #179 out of 186 countries. This figure is significantly lower than many of its neighbors, reflecting challenges in the region's economic stability during the aftermath of the Gulf War. High youth unemployment and a lack of job opportunities were driven by ongoing conflict, economic sanctions, and limited investment in education and vocational training.
Japan
In 1996, Japan ranked #78 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 63.488%. This figure was notably lower than the top-ranked country, which often sees participation rates exceeding 80%. Contributing factors include Japan's strong emphasis on education, which often delays entry into the workforce, and a demographic shift towards an aging population, impacting the availability of youth labor. Additionally, cultural norms surrounding employment and career paths influence youth engagement in the labor market.
Myanmar
In 1996, Myanmar had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.823%, ranking #48 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic profile. The significant participation can be attributed to economic factors, including a largely agrarian economy that requires substantial labor input from young individuals, as well as limited educational opportunities that push youth into the workforce early.
Libya
In 1996, Libya had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 45.912%, ranking #174 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting broader regional challenges in youth employment. Contributing factors include the country's economic instability due to political turmoil and limited job opportunities in a transitioning economy, which disproportionately affect young people entering the workforce.
Guatemala
In 1996, Guatemala had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.636%, ranking #54 out of 186 countries. This rate is notable when compared to the global average, indicating a relatively high engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include Guatemala's youthful demographic profile and economic conditions that necessitate early workforce entry, often driven by family needs and limited access to education.
Belarus
In 1996, Belarus had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.347%, ranking #112 out of 186 countries. This rate was relatively high compared to some neighboring countries, indicating a significant engagement of youth in the labor market during a period of economic transition. The participation was driven by the need for additional family income amidst economic instability and a shift towards a market-oriented economy following the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Ecuador
In 1996, Ecuador had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 63.48%, ranking #79 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the workforce. Contributing factors include a youthful population and economic conditions that necessitate early entry into the labor market, often driven by family needs in a developing economy.
Congo
In 1996, Congo achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 68.431%, ranking #46 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a demographic trend where a large proportion of the youth population is engaged in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful population and economic conditions that necessitate early entry into the workforce, often driven by the need for family income in a developing economy.
Cambodia
In 1996, Cambodia achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 80.516 %, ranking #13 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Key drivers of this high participation include the country's youthful demographic profile and the necessity for families to supplement household income in a recovering economy post-Khmer Rouge era.
China
In 1996, China achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 76.271 %, ranking #22 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's rapid economic development and demographic trends. The large youth population and the demand for labor in the booming manufacturing sector were key drivers, as urbanization and economic reforms created numerous job opportunities for young people.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data