Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2002
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.84 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.475 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 85.698 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.738 % | |
5 | Qatar | 82.944 % | |
6 | Nigeria | 82.942 % | |
7 | North Korea | 82.144 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 82.082 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 81.86 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 81.64 % | |
11 | Burundi | 81.042 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.824 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 80.436 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 80.423 % | |
15 | Niger | 79.117 % | |
16 | Angola | 77.322 % | |
17 | Vanuatu | 77.13 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.074 % | |
19 | Iceland | 76.72 % | |
20 | United Arab Emirates | 74.99 % | |
21 | South Sudan | 74.419 % | |
22 | Vietnam | 74.416 % | |
23 | Bahamas | 74.366 % | |
24 | Uganda | 74.241 % | |
25 | China | 73.563 % | |
26 | Thailand | 73.27 % | |
27 | Kenya | 72.753 % | |
28 | Georgia | 72.627 % | |
29 | Central African Republic | 72.596 % | |
30 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.548 % | |
31 | Azerbaijan | 72.482 % | |
32 | Ghana | 72.358 % | |
33 | Benin | 71.75 % | |
34 | Lesotho | 71.366 % | |
35 | Mali | 70.234 % | |
36 | Kazakhstan | 70.11 % | |
37 | Peru | 69.906 % | |
38 | Bolivia | 69.81 % | |
39 | Timor-Leste | 69.658 % | |
40 | Bhutan | 69.613 % | |
41 | Barbados | 69.499 % | |
42 | Paraguay | 68.749 % | |
43 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.36 % | |
44 | Chad | 68.126 % | |
45 | Congo | 68.103 % | |
46 | Netherlands | 67.872 % | |
47 | Switzerland | 67.75 % | |
48 | Norway | 67.301 % | |
49 | Myanmar | 66.994 % | |
50 | Brazil | 66.975 % | |
51 | Guatemala | 66.953 % | |
52 | Colombia | 66.596 % | |
53 | Kuwait | 66.499 % | |
54 | Kyrgyzstan | 66.447 % | |
55 | Canada | 66.386 % | |
56 | New Zealand | 66.044 % | |
57 | Denmark | 65.984 % | |
58 | Indonesia | 65.977 % | |
59 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.776 % | |
60 | Jamaica | 65.761 % | |
61 | United States | 65.586 % | |
62 | Zimbabwe | 65.493 % | |
63 | Bahrain | 65.238 % | |
64 | New Caledonia | 65.126 % | |
65 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 65.084 % | |
66 | Ecuador | 64.711 % | |
67 | Sierra Leone | 64.639 % | |
68 | Singapore | 64.622 % | |
69 | Saint Lucia | 64.447 % | |
70 | Ireland | 64.428 % | |
71 | Guinea | 64.416 % | |
72 | China, Macao SAR | 64.133 % | |
73 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.722 % | |
74 | Panama | 63.642 % | |
75 | Australia | 63.508 % | |
76 | Venezuela | 63.313 % | |
77 | Honduras | 63.305 % | |
78 | Haiti | 63.196 % | |
79 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.048 % | |
80 | Sweden | 62.651 % | |
81 | Guam | 62.4 % | |
82 | Finland | 62.141 % | |
83 | Portugal | 62.016 % | |
84 | Cyprus | 61.833 % | |
85 | South Korea | 61.617 % | |
86 | Laos | 61.614 % | |
87 | Armenia | 61.551 % | |
88 | Rwanda | 61.528 % | |
89 | United Kingdom | 61.254 % | |
90 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 61.252 % | |
91 | United States Virgin Islands | 61.243 % | |
92 | Japan | 61.234 % | |
93 | Philippines | 61.206 % | |
94 | Nicaragua | 60.881 % | |
95 | Equatorial Guinea | 60.65 % | |
96 | Israel | 60.562 % | |
97 | El Salvador | 60.35 % | |
98 | Russia | 60.295 % | |
99 | Argentina | 60.149 % | |
100 | Belarus | 60.122 % | |
101 | Belize | 60.022 % | |
102 | Uruguay | 59.971 % | |
103 | Slovakia | 59.926 % | |
104 | Malaysia | 59.851 % | |
105 | Czech Republic | 59.813 % | |
106 | India | 59.765 % | |
107 | Costa Rica | 59.76 % | |
108 | Albania | 59.61 % | |
109 | Mongolia | 59.6 % | |
110 | Zambia | 59.441 % | |
111 | Botswana | 59.006 % | |
112 | Austria | 58.691 % | |
113 | Fiji | 58.514 % | |
114 | Mexico | 58.457 % | |
115 | Togo | 58.379 % | |
116 | Slovenia | 58.377 % | |
117 | Mauritius | 58.257 % | |
118 | Bangladesh | 58.207 % | |
119 | Tonga | 58.19 % | |
120 | Lithuania | 58.022 % | |
121 | French Polynesia | 57.882 % | |
122 | Germany | 57.79 % | |
123 | Latvia | 57.761 % | |
124 | Cabo Verde | 57.721 % | |
125 | Dominican Republic | 57.568 % | |
126 | Republic of Moldova | 57.225 % | |
127 | Estonia | 56.958 % | |
128 | South Africa | 56.748 % | |
129 | Ukraine | 56.743 % | |
130 | Uzbekistan | 56.46 % | |
131 | Guyana | 56.261 % | |
132 | Oman | 55.921 % | |
133 | Samoa | 55.855 % | |
134 | France | 55.399 % | |
135 | Poland | 55.377 % | |
136 | Sri Lanka | 55.116 % | |
137 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
138 | Serbia | 54.857 % | |
139 | Namibia | 54.701 % | |
140 | Chile | 54.512 % | |
141 | Luxembourg | 54.237 % | |
142 | Maldives | 54.202 % | |
143 | Cuba | 53.793 % | |
144 | Spain | 53.661 % | |
145 | Turkmenistan | 53.258 % | |
146 | North Macedonia | 53.026 % | |
147 | Eswatini | 52.857 % | |
148 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 52.444 % | |
149 | Hungary | 51.765 % | |
150 | Croatia | 51.762 % | |
151 | Belgium | 51.102 % | |
152 | Greece | 51.014 % | |
153 | Bulgaria | 50.96 % | |
154 | Romania | 50.716 % | |
155 | Morocco | 50.69 % | |
156 | Pakistan | 50.45 % | |
157 | Sudan | 50.272 % | |
158 | Senegal | 50.195 % | |
159 | Malta | 50.036 % | |
160 | Turkey | 49.577 % | |
161 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.023 % | |
162 | Montenegro | 48.991 % | |
163 | Papua New Guinea | 48.645 % | |
164 | Gambia | 48.34 % | |
165 | Suriname | 48.289 % | |
166 | Italy | 48.244 % | |
167 | Gabon | 48.076 % | |
168 | Saudi Arabia | 47.976 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 47.16 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 46.505 % | |
171 | Libya | 46.408 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | 46.2 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 45.59 % | |
174 | Iran | 44.572 % | |
175 | Lebanon | 44.14 % | |
176 | Algeria | 43.864 % | |
177 | Yemen | 43.724 % | |
178 | Egypt | 43.19 % | |
179 | Iraq | 41.987 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.595 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.328 % | |
182 | Jordan | 38.4 % | |
183 | State of Palestine | 35.907 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.143 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.794 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.087 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Qatar
- #6
Nigeria
- #7
North Korea
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
State of Palestine
- #182
Jordan
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Egypt
- #177
Yemen
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2002, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Tanzania at 86.84%, while the global range for this metric spanned from 24.09% to 86.84%. The global average participation rate stood at 61.23%, highlighting significant disparities in youth engagement in the labor market across different regions.
Economic and Cultural Influences on Youth Labor Participation
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2002 reflects diverse economic and cultural contexts. Countries like Tanzania (86.84%), Madagascar (86.475%), and Mozambique (85.698%) exhibit high participation rates, often driven by economic necessity. In these countries, agriculture plays a significant role in the economy, and youth are integral to family-run agricultural activities, which increases their participation in the labor force.
Conversely, countries such as Sao Tome and Principe (24.09%), Djibouti (33.79%), and Somalia (34.14%) show much lower participation rates. In these cases, factors such as limited job opportunities, political instability, and the prioritization of education over immediate employment contribute to lower youth engagement in the labor market.
Impact of Education and Policy on Participation Rates
Educational policies and economic development strategies significantly impact youth labor force participation. Countries with robust educational systems and youth empowerment policies, such as Qatar (82.944%) and North Korea (82.144%), exhibit high participation rates, as these policies often integrate work-study programs and vocational training that facilitate youth entry into the labor market.
In contrast, countries like Egypt (43.19%) and Yemen (43.724%) show lower participation rates, partly due to economic challenges and a focus on educational attainment without corresponding job creation strategies. These regions often face barriers such as high unemployment rates, which discourage youth from actively seeking employment.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
Analyzing year-over-year changes, the average global Youth Labor Force Participation Rate decreased by 0.2% in 2002. Notable increases were observed in Spain (+1.57%), Latvia (+1.35%), and Peru (+1.12%). These increases can be attributed to economic recovery and labor market reforms that encouraged youth employment.
Conversely, Guam experienced the most significant decrease, with a -4.9% change. Economic downturns and shifts in labor demand contributed to this decline. Similarly, Azerbaijan (-2.11%) and Egypt (-1.74%) saw reductions in youth participation, likely due to economic instability and insufficient job creation to absorb new labor market entrants.
Regional Patterns and Economic Development
Regional patterns in youth labor force participation are closely linked to economic development levels. In Africa, countries like Nigeria (82.942%) and Ethiopia (82.082%) exhibit high participation rates, driven by the necessity for youth to contribute to family incomes. In contrast, Middle Eastern countries such as Jordan (38.4%) and the State of Palestine (35.907%) have lower participation rates, influenced by political instability and limited job opportunities.
In the Asia-Pacific region, the Solomon Islands (84.738%) shows a high participation rate, reflecting reliance on subsistence agriculture and limited formal employment opportunities. Meanwhile, countries with developed economies, such as Canada, demonstrated moderate increases in participation due to policies that integrate youth into the workforce through education and training programs.
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2002 underscores the complex interplay of economic, cultural, and policy factors influencing youth employment across the globe. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to enhance youth engagement in the labor market and address regional disparities.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2002
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2002?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2002, with 86.84%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2002?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2002, with 24.09%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2002?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2002 was 61.23%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2002?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2002 was 61.04%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2002?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2002 were Tanzania with 86.84%, Madagascar with 86.47%, and Mozambique with 85.7%.
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2002?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2002 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
Morocco
In 2002, Morocco ranked #155 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.69%. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment across the region. Key factors influencing this statistic include high youth unemployment rates driven by economic constraints and a lack of job opportunities in various sectors, particularly in rural areas where economic activity is limited.
Liberia
In 2002, Liberia achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 77.074 %, ranking #18 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful population and economic conditions. The high participation rate can be attributed to a combination of limited educational opportunities and the necessity for young individuals to contribute to household incomes in a post-conflict recovery environment.
Maldives
In 2002, the Maldives had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 54.202 %, ranking #142 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include the Maldives' reliance on tourism, which often limits job availability for young people in diverse sectors, and a small population that impacts the overall labor market dynamics.
Gabon
In 2002, Gabon had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 48.076%, ranking #167 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly below the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include Gabon's reliance on oil exports, which limits job creation in other sectors, and a relatively small population that may exacerbate competition for available positions. Additionally, educational and vocational training programs may not align with market demands, further impacting youth employment rates.
El Salvador
In 2002, El Salvador had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.35 %, ranking #97 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than that of many neighboring countries, reflecting the region's economic conditions. Key drivers for this participation include a significant youth population and the necessity for families to supplement household income in a country with high levels of poverty and limited job opportunities.
Malawi
In 2002, Malawi achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 80.824%, ranking #12 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a young population and a reliance on agriculture, which often employs young individuals in various capacities. Additionally, limited educational opportunities may drive youth to enter the workforce earlier than in other nations.
Timor-Leste
In 2002, Timor-Leste achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 69.658 %, ranking #39 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than many of its Southeast Asian neighbors, reflecting a youthful demographic eager to enter the workforce. The significant participation can be attributed to the country's post-independence recovery efforts, which prioritized youth engagement in economic activities as a means of rebuilding and fostering development.
New Zealand
In 2002, New Zealand ranked #56 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.044 %. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include New Zealand's robust education system, which emphasizes vocational training, and a relatively low unemployment rate during that period, fostering opportunities for young workers.
Paraguay
In 2002, Paraguay achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 68.749%, ranking #42 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic structure. Economic factors, such as a reliance on agriculture and informal labor markets, have driven many young Paraguayans to enter the workforce early, often to support their families.
Russia
In 2002, Russia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.295 %, ranking #98 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to many higher-ranked nations. Economic transitions following the Soviet Union's collapse, along with a focus on education over immediate workforce entry, contributed to this relatively low participation rate.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data