Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2012
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Madagascar | 86.358 % | |
2 | Qatar | 86.27 % | |
3 | Tanzania | 85.174 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.305 % | |
5 | Cambodia | 82.987 % | |
6 | North Korea | 82.072 % | |
7 | Ethiopia | 81.337 % | |
8 | Nigeria | 81.055 % | |
9 | Mozambique | 81.008 % | |
10 | Eritrea | 79.36 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 79.346 % | |
12 | Burundi | 78.701 % | |
13 | Peru | 78.459 % | |
14 | Niger | 77.65 % | |
15 | United Arab Emirates | 77.046 % | |
16 | Angola | 77.037 % | |
17 | Liberia | 76.962 % | |
18 | Vietnam | 76.323 % | |
19 | Iceland | 74.278 % | |
20 | Cameroon | 74.218 % | |
21 | Kenya | 73.94 % | |
22 | Bahamas | 73.797 % | |
23 | South Sudan | 73.565 % | |
24 | Central African Republic | 72.956 % | |
25 | Thailand | 72.825 % | |
26 | Benin | 72.295 % | |
27 | Malawi | 71.85 % | |
28 | Ghana | 71.715 % | |
29 | Bahrain | 71.586 % | |
30 | Paraguay | 71.277 % | |
31 | China, Macao SAR | 70.739 % | |
32 | Kazakhstan | 70.726 % | |
33 | Kuwait | 70.724 % | |
34 | Mali | 70.537 % | |
35 | China | 70.41 % | |
36 | Uganda | 69.919 % | |
37 | Saint Lucia | 69.03 % | |
38 | Colombia | 68.072 % | |
39 | Bolivia | 68.07 % | |
40 | Singapore | 67.943 % | |
41 | Congo | 67.869 % | |
42 | New Zealand | 67.641 % | |
43 | Switzerland | 67.586 % | |
44 | Barbados | 67.569 % | |
45 | Indonesia | 67.416 % | |
46 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 67.269 % | |
47 | Timor-Leste | 67.262 % | |
48 | Norway | 67.075 % | |
49 | Netherlands | 66.779 % | |
50 | Georgia | 66.759 % | |
51 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.672 % | |
52 | Canada | 66.558 % | |
53 | Brunei Darussalam | 66.382 % | |
54 | Oman | 66.11 % | |
55 | Zimbabwe | 66.092 % | |
56 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 66.025 % | |
57 | Lesotho | 65.822 % | |
58 | Haiti | 65.721 % | |
59 | Israel | 65.26 % | |
60 | Australia | 65.245 % | |
61 | Uruguay | 65.223 % | |
62 | Myanmar | 65.144 % | |
63 | Guatemala | 65.118 % | |
64 | Panama | 64.957 % | |
65 | Republic of Moldova | 64.787 % | |
66 | Brazil | 64.409 % | |
67 | Bhutan | 64.4 % | |
68 | Costa Rica | 64.332 % | |
69 | Nicaragua | 64.302 % | |
70 | New Caledonia | 64.171 % | |
71 | Cyprus | 64.036 % | |
72 | Belarus | 63.667 % | |
73 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.622 % | |
74 | Sweden | 63.527 % | |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.323 % | |
76 | Vanuatu | 63.128 % | |
77 | Chad | 63.125 % | |
78 | Venezuela | 63.114 % | |
79 | United States | 63.11 % | |
80 | Russia | 62.964 % | |
81 | Malaysia | 62.952 % | |
82 | Guam | 62.541 % | |
83 | Ecuador | 62.452 % | |
84 | Denmark | 62.418 % | |
85 | Belize | 62.396 % | |
86 | United Kingdom | 61.99 % | |
87 | Philippines | 61.733 % | |
88 | Chile | 61.688 % | |
89 | Fiji | 61.686 % | |
90 | Azerbaijan | 61.594 % | |
91 | Ireland | 61.589 % | |
92 | Armenia | 61.55 % | |
93 | Kyrgyzstan | 61.505 % | |
94 | Estonia | 61.256 % | |
95 | Mexico | 61.221 % | |
96 | Botswana | 61.169 % | |
97 | South Korea | 60.928 % | |
98 | Rwanda | 60.854 % | |
99 | Jamaica | 60.731 % | |
100 | Laos | 60.411 % | |
101 | Argentina | 60.362 % | |
102 | United States Virgin Islands | 60.337 % | |
103 | Austria | 60.207 % | |
104 | El Salvador | 60.197 % | |
105 | Portugal | 60.128 % | |
106 | Equatorial Guinea | 60.008 % | |
107 | Germany | 59.958 % | |
108 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 59.744 % | |
109 | Latvia | 59.677 % | |
110 | Mongolia | 59.654 % | |
111 | Finland | 59.588 % | |
112 | Dominican Republic | 59.431 % | |
113 | Spain | 59.403 % | |
114 | Slovakia | 59.183 % | |
115 | Cabo Verde | 59.137 % | |
116 | Japan | 59.012 % | |
117 | Zambia | 58.972 % | |
118 | Sierra Leone | 58.842 % | |
119 | Mauritius | 58.69 % | |
120 | Czech Republic | 58.641 % | |
121 | Honduras | 58.4 % | |
122 | Luxembourg | 58.202 % | |
123 | Togo | 58.187 % | |
124 | Slovenia | 57.83 % | |
125 | Lithuania | 57.746 % | |
126 | Guinea | 57.742 % | |
127 | Bangladesh | 57.647 % | |
128 | Namibia | 57.533 % | |
129 | Albania | 56.995 % | |
130 | Poland | 56.765 % | |
131 | Ukraine | 56.273 % | |
132 | French Polynesia | 56.264 % | |
133 | France | 56.226 % | |
134 | Guyana | 56.198 % | |
135 | Tonga | 55.894 % | |
136 | Uzbekistan | 55.798 % | |
137 | Saudi Arabia | 55.395 % | |
138 | Cuba | 55.088 % | |
139 | Samoa | 54.872 % | |
140 | North Macedonia | 54.271 % | |
141 | Maldives | 54.164 % | |
142 | Suriname | 53.893 % | |
143 | India | 53.509 % | |
144 | Belgium | 53.328 % | |
145 | Bulgaria | 53.174 % | |
146 | Hungary | 52.869 % | |
147 | Malta | 52.657 % | |
148 | Sri Lanka | 52.57 % | |
149 | South Africa | 52.507 % | |
150 | Greece | 51.893 % | |
151 | Eswatini | 51.6 % | |
152 | Croatia | 51.325 % | |
153 | Pakistan | 51.113 % | |
154 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 50.68 % | |
155 | Serbia | 50.154 % | |
156 | Romania | 50.042 % | |
157 | Turkey | 49.958 % | |
158 | Gabon | 49.615 % | |
159 | Montenegro | 49.436 % | |
160 | Libya | 49.153 % | |
161 | Papua New Guinea | 49.059 % | |
162 | Italy | 48.809 % | |
163 | Egypt | 48.494 % | |
164 | Morocco | 48.41 % | |
165 | Tunisia | 48.251 % | |
166 | Gambia | 47.949 % | |
167 | Sudan | 47.835 % | |
168 | Senegal | 46.986 % | |
169 | Afghanistan | 46.956 % | |
170 | Lebanon | 45.677 % | |
171 | Turkmenistan | 44.819 % | |
172 | Comoros | 43.845 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 43.551 % | |
174 | Algeria | 43.11 % | |
175 | Iran | 41.768 % | |
176 | State of Palestine | 41.679 % | |
177 | Tajikistan | 41.301 % | |
178 | Iraq | 40.987 % | |
179 | Nepal | 40.697 % | |
180 | Puerto Rico | 39.897 % | |
181 | Syrian Arab Republic | 39.2 % | |
182 | Yemen | 38.213 % | |
183 | Jordan | 38 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.232 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 32.962 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.011 % |
- #1
Madagascar
- #2
Qatar
- #3
Tanzania
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Cambodia
- #6
North Korea
- #7
Ethiopia
- #8
Nigeria
- #9
Mozambique
- #10
Eritrea
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
Jordan
- #182
Yemen
- #181
Syrian Arab Republic
- #180
Puerto Rico
- #179
Nepal
- #178
Iraq
- #177
Tajikistan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2012, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was highest in Madagascar at 86.36%, with the global range spanning from 24.01% to 86.36%. The global average was 60.93%, providing a benchmark for understanding youth engagement in the labor market worldwide.
Economic Conditions and Youth Labor Force Participation
The variation in youth labor force participation rates across countries is deeply intertwined with economic conditions. For instance, in Madagascar and Tanzania, where rates are above 85%, limited educational opportunities and economic necessity drive young people into the workforce early. These economies rely heavily on agriculture and informal sectors, which typically employ large numbers of youth.
Conversely, countries with lower participation rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe at 24.01% and Jordan at 38%, often exhibit more robust educational systems or economic structures that do not demand early entry into the workforce. In these instances, youth may pursue extended education, which delays their labor market entry.
Impact of Social and Cultural Factors
Social and cultural norms significantly influence youth labor participation. In Qatar, where the rate is 86.27%, the high participation can be attributed to the country's economic model, which encourages early work experience as part of career development strategies. In contrast, Jordan and Yemen, with participation rates of 38% and 38.21% respectively, face cultural norms that prioritize education and family commitments over early employment.
Countries such as North Korea and Eritrea, with rates of 82.07% and 79.36% respectively, illustrate how state policies and economic structures can mandate early workforce participation as part of national development strategies.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The data from 2012 indicates minimal average year-over-year change in youth labor force participation at -0.04%. However, some countries experienced significant shifts. Uganda saw the most substantial decrease of -10.24%, likely due to policy changes or increased educational opportunities that encouraged youth to remain in school longer.
On the other hand, Guatemala and Costa Rica experienced the largest increases, both at +3.71%. These increases may reflect economic growth or changes in labor market policies that incentivized youth employment. In Israel, the participation rate rose by 2.22%, potentially due to economic policies aimed at integrating youth into the workforce more effectively.
Policy Influence on Youth Labor Participation
Government policies play a critical role in shaping youth labor force participation. In countries like Oman and Paraguay, where increases of +3.35% and +3.36% were recorded, policies promoting vocational training and youth employment programs have likely contributed to these trends. These policies aim to equip young people with skills that align with market demands, thereby enhancing their employability.
In contrast, countries experiencing declines, such as Bhutan with a decrease of -3.01%, may be focusing on education reforms that encourage youth to pursue higher education before entering the labor market.
Overall, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2012 reflects a complex interplay of economic, social, and policy factors. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to balance the benefits of early workforce engagement with the long-term advantages of education and skill development.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2012
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2012?
Madagascar had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2012, with 86.36%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2012?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2012, with 24.01%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2012?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2012 was 60.93%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2012?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2012 was 61.38%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2012?
In 2012, the top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate were Madagascar (86.36%), Qatar (86.27%), and Tanzania (85.17%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2012?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2012 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
Norway
In 2012, Norway's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 67.075%, ranking #48 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strong emphasis on education and vocational training. Norway's robust welfare system and high standard of living provide young individuals with opportunities to enter the labor market, while policies encouraging youth employment contribute to this favorable statistic.
Belize
In 2012, Belize ranked #85 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.396 %. This figure is relatively high compared to the global average, indicating a significant engagement of young individuals in the labor market. The participation rate can be attributed to Belize's youthful population and the necessity for many families to rely on additional income sources amidst economic challenges.
Australia
In 2012, Australia ranked #60 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.245%. This rate is notably higher than the bottom-ranked countries, reflecting a relatively engaged youth workforce compared to regions with lower participation. Key drivers for this statistic include Australia's strong education system and economic policies that encourage youth employment, particularly in sectors such as tourism and retail.
Argentina
In 2012, Argentina ranked #101 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.362%. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to countries with higher participation rates. Contributing factors include Argentina's economic fluctuations and high youth unemployment rates, which have historically hindered job creation for young people.
France
In 2012, France had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.226 %, ranking #133 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the European average, reflecting challenges in youth employment compared to its neighbors. Contributing factors include high youth unemployment rates, economic stagnation, and stringent labor market regulations that can hinder job creation for young people.
Cuba
Cuba's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2012 was 55.088%, ranking the country #138 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in job creation for young individuals. Economic restrictions and a centralized labor market contribute to limited opportunities for youth employment in Cuba, impacting their ability to enter the workforce effectively.
Botswana
Botswana's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2012 was 61.169 %, ranking it #96 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many other nations. Key drivers of this participation include Botswana's relatively stable economy, which has been bolstered by diamond mining and tourism, as well as government initiatives aimed at promoting vocational training and employment opportunities for young people.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2012 was 59.137 %, ranking it #115 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to more developed nations. Factors contributing to this statistic include the country's limited economic diversification and reliance on tourism, which can restrict job opportunities for young people.
Cameroon
In 2012, Cameroon achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 74.218 %, ranking #20 out of 186 countries. This participation rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful demographic profile, with a large proportion of the population under 30, and economic activities in agriculture that often require youthful labor. Additionally, government initiatives aimed at promoting vocational training have further encouraged youth employment.
Myanmar
In 2012, Myanmar had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.144 %, ranking #62 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. The country's youthful demographic, with a large proportion of its population under 30, drives this participation, alongside economic challenges that necessitate early entry into the workforce. Additionally, limited access to higher education options further compels young individuals to seek employment opportunities sooner.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data