Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2009
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.842 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.529 % | |
3 | Qatar | 86.492 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.509 % | |
5 | Mozambique | 82.821 % | |
6 | North Korea | 82.078 % | |
7 | Cambodia | 82.016 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 81.632 % | |
9 | Nigeria | 81.517 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 80.056 % | |
11 | Eritrea | 79.814 % | |
12 | Niger | 79.471 % | |
13 | Peru | 78.577 % | |
14 | Cameroon | 78.18 % | |
15 | Burundi | 78.159 % | |
16 | Angola | 77.257 % | |
17 | Liberia | 77.112 % | |
18 | United Arab Emirates | 76.596 % | |
19 | Malawi | 76.046 % | |
20 | Vietnam | 76.039 % | |
21 | Iceland | 74.829 % | |
22 | Bahamas | 73.917 % | |
23 | South Sudan | 73.899 % | |
24 | Kenya | 73.587 % | |
25 | Uganda | 73.508 % | |
26 | Thailand | 72.835 % | |
27 | Central African Republic | 72.661 % | |
28 | Ghana | 71.909 % | |
29 | Benin | 71.851 % | |
30 | China | 71.294 % | |
31 | Kazakhstan | 71.022 % | |
32 | Bahrain | 70.705 % | |
33 | Mali | 70.367 % | |
34 | China, Macao SAR | 69.968 % | |
35 | Bhutan | 69.7 % | |
36 | Paraguay | 69.623 % | |
37 | Barbados | 69.162 % | |
38 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 68.931 % | |
39 | Bolivia | 68.598 % | |
40 | Switzerland | 68.275 % | |
41 | Kuwait | 68.218 % | |
42 | Georgia | 68.172 % | |
43 | Timor-Leste | 68.13 % | |
44 | Norway | 68.023 % | |
45 | Vanuatu | 67.794 % | |
46 | Congo | 67.76 % | |
47 | New Zealand | 67.746 % | |
48 | Lesotho | 67.541 % | |
49 | Brazil | 67.401 % | |
50 | Colombia | 66.954 % | |
51 | Canada | 66.952 % | |
52 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.825 % | |
53 | Netherlands | 66.818 % | |
54 | Brunei Darussalam | 66.665 % | |
55 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.588 % | |
56 | Singapore | 66.57 % | |
57 | Saint Lucia | 66.496 % | |
58 | Indonesia | 66.047 % | |
59 | Zimbabwe | 65.83 % | |
60 | Myanmar | 65.543 % | |
61 | Australia | 65.502 % | |
62 | Haiti | 65.265 % | |
63 | Trinidad and Tobago | 64.945 % | |
64 | Uruguay | 64.743 % | |
65 | Chad | 64.661 % | |
66 | Denmark | 64.506 % | |
67 | United States | 64.368 % | |
68 | New Caledonia | 64.342 % | |
69 | Ireland | 64.083 % | |
70 | Venezuela | 64.042 % | |
71 | Ecuador | 64.013 % | |
72 | Cyprus | 63.701 % | |
73 | Panama | 63.521 % | |
74 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.458 % | |
75 | Sweden | 63.36 % | |
76 | Nicaragua | 63.289 % | |
77 | United States Virgin Islands | 62.879 % | |
78 | Israel | 62.874 % | |
79 | Botswana | 62.682 % | |
80 | Russia | 62.659 % | |
81 | Belarus | 62.33 % | |
82 | Jamaica | 62.175 % | |
83 | Kyrgyzstan | 62.06 % | |
84 | United Kingdom | 61.994 % | |
85 | Armenia | 61.895 % | |
86 | Guam | 61.7 % | |
87 | Belize | 61.69 % | |
88 | Sierra Leone | 61.632 % | |
89 | Philippines | 61.435 % | |
90 | Portugal | 61.304 % | |
91 | Malaysia | 61.267 % | |
92 | Rwanda | 61.056 % | |
93 | Fiji | 60.985 % | |
94 | Azerbaijan | 60.983 % | |
95 | Guatemala | 60.905 % | |
96 | Laos | 60.825 % | |
97 | Honduras | 60.807 % | |
98 | Argentina | 60.78 % | |
99 | Estonia | 60.759 % | |
100 | Republic of Moldova | 60.685 % | |
101 | Mexico | 60.556 % | |
102 | Costa Rica | 60.485 % | |
103 | El Salvador | 60.421 % | |
104 | Finland | 60.384 % | |
105 | South Korea | 60.224 % | |
106 | Latvia | 60.074 % | |
107 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 59.976 % | |
108 | Austria | 59.921 % | |
109 | Japan | 59.864 % | |
110 | Guinea | 59.787 % | |
111 | Slovenia | 59.643 % | |
112 | Spain | 59.251 % | |
113 | Germany | 59.211 % | |
114 | Zambia | 59.111 % | |
115 | Equatorial Guinea | 59.045 % | |
116 | Slovakia | 58.702 % | |
117 | Mongolia | 58.679 % | |
118 | Oman | 58.584 % | |
119 | Czech Republic | 58.554 % | |
120 | Bangladesh | 58.45 % | |
121 | Mauritius | 58.433 % | |
122 | Chile | 58.345 % | |
123 | Togo | 58.162 % | |
124 | Luxembourg | 57.457 % | |
125 | Tonga | 56.775 % | |
126 | Namibia | 56.688 % | |
127 | Lithuania | 56.536 % | |
128 | Guyana | 56.476 % | |
129 | France | 56.31 % | |
130 | Ukraine | 56.253 % | |
131 | French Polynesia | 56.106 % | |
132 | Cabo Verde | 55.841 % | |
133 | India | 55.627 % | |
134 | Cuba | 55.476 % | |
135 | Dominican Republic | 55.47 % | |
136 | Uzbekistan | 55.405 % | |
137 | Poland | 55.253 % | |
138 | Samoa | 55.132 % | |
139 | Albania | 54.993 % | |
140 | North Macedonia | 54.701 % | |
141 | Bulgaria | 54.1 % | |
142 | South Africa | 53.956 % | |
143 | Sri Lanka | 53.523 % | |
144 | Belgium | 53.514 % | |
145 | Croatia | 53.051 % | |
146 | Greece | 52.734 % | |
147 | Suriname | 52.216 % | |
148 | Maldives | 52.099 % | |
149 | Eswatini | 51.989 % | |
150 | Hungary | 51.562 % | |
151 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.312 % | |
152 | Serbia | 50.961 % | |
153 | Pakistan | 50.535 % | |
154 | Morocco | 50.1 % | |
155 | Malta | 50.005 % | |
156 | Saudi Arabia | 49.582 % | |
157 | Gabon | 48.868 % | |
158 | Sudan | 48.694 % | |
159 | Senegal | 48.492 % | |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 48.483 % | |
161 | Libya | 48.367 % | |
162 | Italy | 48.283 % | |
163 | Montenegro | 48.247 % | |
164 | Gambia | 48.12 % | |
165 | Egypt | 47.902 % | |
166 | Turkey | 47.88 % | |
167 | Turkmenistan | 47.227 % | |
168 | Romania | 47.207 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 47.16 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 46.746 % | |
171 | Lebanon | 44.308 % | |
172 | Mauritania | 44.161 % | |
173 | Puerto Rico | 43.2 % | |
174 | Algeria | 43.164 % | |
175 | Iran | 43.032 % | |
176 | Syrian Arab Republic | 42.94 % | |
177 | Comoros | 42.915 % | |
178 | Tajikistan | 42.51 % | |
179 | Iraq | 41.423 % | |
180 | Nepal | 40.953 % | |
181 | Jordan | 40.1 % | |
182 | Yemen | 40.077 % | |
183 | State of Palestine | 39.53 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.473 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.29 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.034 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Qatar
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Mozambique
- #6
North Korea
- #7
Cambodia
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Nigeria
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
State of Palestine
- #182
Yemen
- #181
Jordan
- #180
Nepal
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Tajikistan
- #177
Comoros
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2009, Tanzania led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 86.84%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 24.03% to a maximum of 86.84%. The global average for this metric was 61.00%, providing a snapshot of how engaged young people were in labor markets worldwide.
Economic and Demographic Drivers of High Participation Rates
Countries with the highest youth labor force participation rates, such as Tanzania (86.84%), Madagascar (86.53%), and Qatar (86.49%), often share common economic and demographic characteristics. In many African countries like Tanzania and Madagascar, large agricultural sectors drive youth participation. These economies rely heavily on agriculture, where young people contribute significantly to family income. Additionally, limited access to higher education and vocational training means that entering the workforce is often the default path after basic education.
In contrast, Qatar presents a unique case where high youth participation is fueled by a booming economy, driven by oil and gas revenues. This creates ample employment opportunities, attracting youth into the labor market despite the country's wealth.
Low Participation Rates and Socio-Political Context
On the other end of the spectrum, countries like Sao Tome and Principe (24.03%), Djibouti (33.29%), and Somalia (34.47%) report the lowest youth labor force participation rates. These figures often reflect socio-political challenges and economic instability. For instance, Somalia has faced prolonged conflict, which disrupts both education and employment opportunities for youth.
In Sao Tome and Principe, the low participation rate may be linked to limited economic diversification and opportunities, leading to fewer jobs available for young people. Political and economic instability in Djibouti also contributes to the low engagement of youth in the labor market.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
Analyzing the year-over-year changes, Cambodia saw a significant increase of 3.08% (3.9%), reflecting improvements in economic conditions and labor market policies that encourage youth employment. Similarly, Colombia experienced a rise of 2.80% (4.4%), possibly due to economic reforms that improved job availability for young people.
Conversely, Romania experienced the largest decrease of 3.76% (-7.4%). This drop may be attributed to the global financial crisis's lingering effects, reducing job opportunities and prompting more youth to pursue further education instead. Vanuatu and Ecuador also saw notable declines, at 3.23% (-4.5%) and 2.54% (-3.8%) respectively, which could be linked to economic contractions or shifts in labor demands.
Implications for Policy and Future Trends
The diverse range of youth labor force participation rates across countries highlights the impact of economic structures, educational access, and socio-political stability on youth employment. Countries with high participation rates often benefit from robust agricultural sectors or booming economies, while those with lower rates face challenges such as conflict, limited job markets, or economic instability.
Policymakers aiming to improve youth labor force participation should focus on enhancing education and vocational training, creating job opportunities, and stabilizing socio-political environments. As the global economy evolves, understanding these dynamics will be crucial in fostering inclusive growth and sustainable development for future generations.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2009
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2009?
In 2009, Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate at 86.84%.
What was the lowest youth labor force participation rate recorded in 2009?
The lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2009 was 24.03%, recorded by Sao Tome and Principe.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2009?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2009 was 61%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2009?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2009 was 60.98%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rates in 2009?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rates in 2009 were Tanzania (86.84%), Madagascar (86.53%), and Qatar (86.49%).
How many countries were included in the 2009 youth labor force participation dataset?
The dataset for 2009 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
Dominican Republic
In 2009, the Dominican Republic ranked #135 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 55.47 %. This rate is notably lower than the regional average in Latin America and the Caribbean, where youth participation tends to be higher due to more robust economic opportunities. Contributing factors to this statistic include a significant informal economy and limited access to vocational training, which hinder youth employment prospects in the country.
Mexico
In 2009, Mexico ranked #101 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.556 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's economic reliance on youth employment amidst limited job opportunities. Key drivers include a young population and a labor market that often necessitates early entry into work due to economic pressures and family needs.
Liberia
In 2009, Liberia achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 77.112 %, ranking #17 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. The high participation rate can be attributed to Liberia's youthful demographic, where a significant portion of the population is under 25, and the necessity for economic contribution following years of civil conflict that disrupted traditional employment structures.
Netherlands
In 2009, the Netherlands achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.818%, ranking #53 out of 186 countries. This rate is notable when compared to the European average, reflecting a strong emphasis on integrating youth into the workforce. Key drivers include the countryโs robust vocational training programs and a labor market that encourages youth employment through flexible work arrangements.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2009, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranked #55 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.588%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include the country's relatively high levels of education and vocational training programs aimed at young people, which enhance employability in a diverse economy reliant on agriculture and tourism.
Slovenia
In 2009, Slovenia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.643 %, ranking #111 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the European Union average, indicating challenges in youth employment within the region. Contributing factors include Slovenia's transitional economy post-independence, which has struggled to create sufficient job opportunities for young people, alongside educational mismatches in the labor market.
Belize
In 2009, Belize ranked #87 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.69%. This rate is higher than the average for Central America, indicating a relatively active youth demographic in the labor market. Contributing factors include Belize's young population and the need for economic participation in a developing economy, where many youths seek employment opportunities in tourism and agriculture.
Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe ranked #186 globally in 2009 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 24.034 %. This rate is significantly lower than many countries, indicating a lack of economic opportunities for youth compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include the country's small size, limited job market, and reliance on agriculture, which often does not provide sufficient employment for the growing youth population.
Brazil
In 2009, Brazil ranked #49 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.401%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Brazil's relatively young population and economic structure that encourages youth employment. Factors such as urbanization and a growing service sector have driven increased job opportunities for young Brazilians, despite challenges like regional disparities and economic fluctuations.
Montenegro
In 2009, Montenegro had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 48.247 %, ranking #163 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting significant challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include a struggling economy and high unemployment rates, which disproportionately affect younger demographics, limiting their access to the labor market.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data