Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2010
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 86.559 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.492 % | |
3 | Tanzania | 86.305 % | |
4 | Cambodia | 84.751 % | |
5 | Solomon Islands | 84.335 % | |
6 | Mozambique | 82.232 % | |
7 | North Korea | 82.094 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 81.534 % | |
9 | Nigeria | 81.282 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 79.821 % | |
11 | Eritrea | 79.703 % | |
12 | Niger | 79.499 % | |
13 | Peru | 79.241 % | |
14 | Burundi | 78.422 % | |
15 | Angola | 77.26 % | |
16 | Liberia | 77.107 % | |
17 | United Arab Emirates | 76.643 % | |
18 | Vietnam | 76.268 % | |
19 | Cameroon | 76.23 % | |
20 | Malawi | 74.737 % | |
21 | Iceland | 74.685 % | |
22 | Bahamas | 73.845 % | |
23 | South Sudan | 73.761 % | |
24 | Kenya | 73.705 % | |
25 | Uganda | 73.35 % | |
26 | Central African Republic | 72.737 % | |
27 | Benin | 71.865 % | |
28 | Ghana | 71.845 % | |
29 | Bahrain | 71.745 % | |
30 | Thailand | 71.657 % | |
31 | China | 70.96 % | |
32 | Kazakhstan | 70.924 % | |
33 | Mali | 70.413 % | |
34 | China, Macao SAR | 69.986 % | |
35 | Barbados | 68.899 % | |
36 | Kuwait | 68.7 % | |
37 | Bolivia | 68.422 % | |
38 | Bhutan | 68.15 % | |
39 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 67.977 % | |
40 | Paraguay | 67.738 % | |
41 | Congo | 67.735 % | |
42 | Georgia | 67.698 % | |
43 | Timor-Leste | 67.652 % | |
44 | New Zealand | 67.541 % | |
45 | Singapore | 67.37 % | |
46 | Norway | 67.331 % | |
47 | Colombia | 67.079 % | |
48 | Switzerland | 67.013 % | |
49 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.973 % | |
50 | Lesotho | 66.973 % | |
51 | Saint Lucia | 66.783 % | |
52 | Canada | 66.732 % | |
53 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.589 % | |
54 | Indonesia | 66.583 % | |
55 | Brunei Darussalam | 66.558 % | |
56 | Netherlands | 66.501 % | |
57 | Brazil | 66.145 % | |
58 | Zimbabwe | 65.925 % | |
59 | Haiti | 65.62 % | |
60 | Australia | 65.48 % | |
61 | Myanmar | 65.37 % | |
62 | Panama | 64.878 % | |
63 | Vanuatu | 64.385 % | |
64 | New Caledonia | 64.327 % | |
65 | Uruguay | 64.285 % | |
66 | Cyprus | 64.19 % | |
67 | Chad | 64.152 % | |
68 | Venezuela | 63.854 % | |
69 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.815 % | |
70 | United States | 63.732 % | |
71 | Nicaragua | 63.628 % | |
72 | Denmark | 63.604 % | |
73 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.413 % | |
74 | Republic of Moldova | 63.37 % | |
75 | Israel | 63.257 % | |
76 | Sweden | 63.196 % | |
77 | Belarus | 62.826 % | |
78 | Ecuador | 62.684 % | |
79 | Russia | 62.647 % | |
80 | Ireland | 62.597 % | |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | 62.342 % | |
82 | Fiji | 62.026 % | |
83 | Armenia | 61.958 % | |
84 | Belize | 61.926 % | |
85 | Honduras | 61.915 % | |
86 | United Kingdom | 61.801 % | |
87 | Malaysia | 61.602 % | |
88 | Philippines | 61.434 % | |
89 | Guam | 61.4 % | |
90 | Portugal | 61.201 % | |
91 | Rwanda | 60.997 % | |
92 | United States Virgin Islands | 60.898 % | |
93 | Azerbaijan | 60.864 % | |
94 | Sierra Leone | 60.71 % | |
95 | Laos | 60.682 % | |
96 | Estonia | 60.508 % | |
97 | Jamaica | 60.491 % | |
98 | Guatemala | 60.458 % | |
99 | Mexico | 60.391 % | |
100 | Chile | 60.369 % | |
101 | South Korea | 60.334 % | |
102 | Argentina | 60.187 % | |
103 | El Salvador | 59.889 % | |
104 | Austria | 59.876 % | |
105 | Botswana | 59.862 % | |
106 | Finland | 59.714 % | |
107 | Oman | 59.642 % | |
108 | Japan | 59.579 % | |
109 | Slovenia | 59.362 % | |
110 | Spain | 59.357 % | |
111 | Germany | 59.312 % | |
112 | Equatorial Guinea | 59.283 % | |
113 | Costa Rica | 59.214 % | |
114 | Mauritius | 59.203 % | |
115 | Cabo Verde | 59.12 % | |
116 | Guinea | 59.108 % | |
117 | Zambia | 59.062 % | |
118 | Slovakia | 58.835 % | |
119 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 58.823 % | |
120 | Latvia | 58.818 % | |
121 | Mongolia | 58.808 % | |
122 | Bangladesh | 58.576 % | |
123 | Czech Republic | 58.343 % | |
124 | Togo | 58.173 % | |
125 | Luxembourg | 57.054 % | |
126 | Namibia | 56.97 % | |
127 | Dominican Republic | 56.706 % | |
128 | Lithuania | 56.629 % | |
129 | Tonga | 56.5 % | |
130 | Guyana | 56.41 % | |
131 | Ukraine | 56.26 % | |
132 | France | 56.216 % | |
133 | Poland | 56.161 % | |
134 | French Polynesia | 56.156 % | |
135 | Uzbekistan | 55.374 % | |
136 | Albania | 55.202 % | |
137 | Samoa | 54.921 % | |
138 | Cuba | 54.824 % | |
139 | India | 54.766 % | |
140 | Belgium | 54.162 % | |
141 | Bulgaria | 53.503 % | |
142 | Sri Lanka | 53.295 % | |
143 | North Macedonia | 53.189 % | |
144 | Greece | 52.894 % | |
145 | Maldives | 52.789 % | |
146 | Suriname | 52.775 % | |
147 | Croatia | 52.535 % | |
148 | South Africa | 52.265 % | |
149 | Hungary | 51.99 % | |
150 | Eswatini | 51.841 % | |
151 | Saudi Arabia | 51.426 % | |
152 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.154 % | |
153 | Pakistan | 50.997 % | |
154 | Malta | 50.625 % | |
155 | Romania | 50.26 % | |
156 | Serbia | 49.653 % | |
157 | Morocco | 49.61 % | |
158 | Egypt | 49.368 % | |
159 | Gabon | 49.077 % | |
160 | Libya | 48.804 % | |
161 | Turkey | 48.804 % | |
162 | Sudan | 48.742 % | |
163 | Papua New Guinea | 48.343 % | |
164 | Montenegro | 48.26 % | |
165 | Gambia | 48.105 % | |
166 | Italy | 47.994 % | |
167 | Senegal | 47.989 % | |
168 | Tunisia | 47.425 % | |
169 | Afghanistan | 46.815 % | |
170 | Turkmenistan | 46.551 % | |
171 | Lebanon | 44.764 % | |
172 | Mauritania | 43.957 % | |
173 | Algeria | 43.507 % | |
174 | Comoros | 43.224 % | |
175 | Syrian Arab Republic | 42.7 % | |
176 | Iran | 42.296 % | |
177 | Tajikistan | 42.106 % | |
178 | Puerto Rico | 41.9 % | |
179 | Iraq | 41.278 % | |
180 | Nepal | 40.908 % | |
181 | State of Palestine | 39.997 % | |
182 | Yemen | 39.719 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.5 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.438 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.18 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.028 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Tanzania
- #4
Cambodia
- #5
Solomon Islands
- #6
Mozambique
- #7
North Korea
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Nigeria
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
Jordan
- #182
Yemen
- #181
State of Palestine
- #180
Nepal
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Puerto Rico
- #177
Tajikistan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, Qatar led the world in Youth Labor Force Participation Rate, reaching a high of 86.56%, while the global range extended from a minimum of 24.03% to a maximum of 86.56%. The global average for Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2010 stood at 60.90%, offering a benchmark for understanding participation across different regions.
Economic Factors Driving High Participation Rates
Countries with high Youth Labor Force Participation Rates often exhibit unique economic characteristics. For instance, Qatar and Madagascar, with rates of 86.56% and 86.49% respectively, reflect a combination of economic necessity and policy frameworks encouraging youth employment. In Qatar, a robust economy driven by energy exports offers ample job opportunities, attracting a significant number of young workers. Meanwhile, in Madagascar and Tanzania (86.31%), limited educational opportunities and economic necessity drive youth into the labor force early, as families rely on multiple income streams.
Low Participation Rates and Socio-Political Influences
At the lower end of the spectrum, countries like Sao Tome and Principe (24.03%) and Djibouti (33.18%) illustrate how socio-political factors can depress youth labor participation. In Sao Tome and Principe, economic development is constrained, and reliance on subsistence agriculture limits formal employment opportunities for youth. Similarly, in Djibouti, high unemployment rates and limited industrial development restrict youth employment. Additionally, in regions like the State of Palestine (39.99%), political instability and restricted economic activity contribute to lower participation rates.
Year-Over-Year Changes: Movers and Shakers
The year-over-year analysis reveals significant changes in certain countries. Cabo Verde saw the most considerable increase, with a rise of 3.28% (5.9%), driven by economic reforms and investments in youth employment programs. Romania also experienced a notable increase of 3.05% (6.5%), reflecting policy shifts to integrate young people into the labor market. Conversely, Vanuatu experienced the largest decrease of -3.41% (-5.0%), possibly due to economic downturns or natural disasters impacting job availability. Countries like Botswana (-2.82%) and the United States Virgin Islands (-1.98%) also saw decreases, highlighting regional economic challenges.
Impact of Education and Urbanization
Educational attainment and urbanization levels significantly influence youth labor force participation. Countries with advanced education systems, such as Jordan (39.5%) and Puerto Rico (41.9%), often have lower youth participation rates as young individuals pursue higher education before entering the workforce. Urbanization plays a dual role; while it can provide more job opportunities, it also correlates with higher educational aspirations. In North Korea (82.09%), despite limited data, state policies likely emphasize labor participation over prolonged education.
Overall, the 2010 Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data underscores the complex interplay of economic, educational, and policy factors shaping young people's engagement in the labor market. By examining these nuances, policymakers can better tailor strategies to enhance youth employment opportunities globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2010
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2010?
Qatar had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2010, with 86.56%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2010?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2010, with 24.03%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2010?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2010 was 60.9%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2010?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2010 was 60.79%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2010?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2010 were Qatar, Madagascar, and Tanzania.
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2010?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2010 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
Djibouti
In 2010, Djibouti had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 33.18%, ranking #185 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting broader regional challenges in youth employment. Contributing factors include Djibouti's limited economic diversification, high unemployment rates, and a young population that struggles to find job opportunities in a small economy heavily reliant on services and trade.
Vanuatu
In 2010, Vanuatu achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 64.385 %, ranking #63 out of 186 countries. This rate is relatively high compared to many Pacific Island nations, highlighting the region's unique labor dynamics. Contributing factors include Vanuatu's youthful population and a growing tourism sector, which creates job opportunities for young people, despite challenges such as limited economic diversification.
Haiti
In 2010, Haiti's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 65.62%, ranking #59 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many nations. Economic necessity, driven by high unemployment and limited opportunities, compels many young Haitians to seek work, often in informal sectors.
Egypt
In 2010, Egypt's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 49.368 %, ranking #158 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities within the country. Contributing factors include a high youth population, economic instability, and limited job creation in sectors that typically employ young workers.
Philippines
In 2010, the Philippines recorded a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.434%, ranking #88 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant engagement of young people in the labor market. Contributing factors include a young demographic profile and a growing economy that encourages youth employment, particularly in sectors like services and agriculture.
Germany
In 2010, Germany had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.312%, ranking #111 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges faced by young workers in the labor market. Key factors influencing this statistic include Germany's strong emphasis on vocational training, which often delays entry into the workforce, and a competitive job market that can limit opportunities for youth.
Algeria
In 2010, Algeria ranked #173 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 43.507%. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to countries with more robust economies. Key drivers of this statistic include Algeria's high youth unemployment rate, which is influenced by a reliance on oil and gas exports, and a lack of diversification in its economy, limiting job creation for young people.
Honduras
In 2010, Honduras had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.915 %, ranking #85 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a young population demographic and economic challenges that drive early workforce entry, as many families rely on additional income sources.
Madagascar
In 2010, Madagascar achieved a remarkable rank of #2 globally for its Youth Labor Force Participation Rate, standing at 86.492%. This high participation rate is significantly above the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a predominantly young population and economic activities in agriculture, which often rely on family labor, providing opportunities for young individuals to participate in the workforce.
Bahrain
Bahrain's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2010 was 71.745 %, ranking it #29 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market. Key drivers include Bahrain's relatively diverse economy and proactive labor policies aimed at integrating young people into various sectors, particularly in finance and services.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data