Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2001
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.438 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.363 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 85.36 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.466 % | |
5 | Nigeria | 83.182 % | |
6 | Qatar | 82.841 % | |
7 | North Korea | 82.156 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 82.085 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 81.906 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 81.858 % | |
11 | Burundi | 81.858 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.832 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 80.62 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 80.426 % | |
15 | Niger | 79.063 % | |
16 | Iceland | 77.779 % | |
17 | Angola | 77.342 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.084 % | |
19 | Vanuatu | 76.955 % | |
20 | Vietnam | 74.911 % | |
21 | United Arab Emirates | 74.649 % | |
22 | Azerbaijan | 74.597 % | |
23 | Bahamas | 74.375 % | |
24 | South Sudan | 74.374 % | |
25 | Uganda | 74.302 % | |
26 | China | 73.878 % | |
27 | Thailand | 73.553 % | |
28 | Georgia | 73.308 % | |
29 | Kenya | 72.633 % | |
30 | Central African Republic | 72.616 % | |
31 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.536 % | |
32 | Ghana | 72.422 % | |
33 | Lesotho | 71.89 % | |
34 | Benin | 71.791 % | |
35 | Kazakhstan | 70.425 % | |
36 | Mali | 70.255 % | |
37 | Bolivia | 69.981 % | |
38 | Bhutan | 69.733 % | |
39 | Barbados | 69.467 % | |
40 | Timor-Leste | 69.223 % | |
41 | Paraguay | 68.897 % | |
42 | Peru | 68.79 % | |
43 | Chad | 68.606 % | |
44 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.51 % | |
45 | Congo | 68.111 % | |
46 | Netherlands | 67.949 % | |
47 | Switzerland | 67.77 % | |
48 | Colombia | 67.635 % | |
49 | Myanmar | 67.174 % | |
50 | Indonesia | 67.129 % | |
51 | Norway | 67.097 % | |
52 | Guatemala | 66.894 % | |
53 | Kyrgyzstan | 66.292 % | |
54 | Jamaica | 66.113 % | |
55 | Kuwait | 66.088 % | |
56 | Brazil | 66.034 % | |
57 | United States | 65.862 % | |
58 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.625 % | |
59 | Guam | 65.6 % | |
60 | Zimbabwe | 65.524 % | |
61 | Bahrain | 65.521 % | |
62 | Singapore | 65.461 % | |
63 | Denmark | 65.421 % | |
64 | Canada | 65.412 % | |
65 | New Zealand | 65.34 % | |
66 | New Caledonia | 65.248 % | |
67 | China, Macao SAR | 64.912 % | |
68 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 64.834 % | |
69 | Sierra Leone | 64.632 % | |
70 | Ireland | 64.462 % | |
71 | Guinea | 64.35 % | |
72 | Saint Lucia | 64.15 % | |
73 | Venezuela | 64.118 % | |
74 | Ecuador | 64.082 % | |
75 | Honduras | 63.844 % | |
76 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.766 % | |
77 | Australia | 63.444 % | |
78 | Panama | 63.323 % | |
79 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.065 % | |
80 | Haiti | 62.983 % | |
81 | Sweden | 62.688 % | |
82 | United States Virgin Islands | 62.27 % | |
83 | Japan | 61.993 % | |
84 | Finland | 61.92 % | |
85 | Cyprus | 61.912 % | |
86 | Armenia | 61.898 % | |
87 | Rwanda | 61.783 % | |
88 | Laos | 61.695 % | |
89 | Argentina | 61.651 % | |
90 | Uruguay | 61.555 % | |
91 | Portugal | 61.45 % | |
92 | Israel | 61.334 % | |
93 | Philippines | 61.24 % | |
94 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.224 % | |
95 | South Korea | 61.11 % | |
96 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.967 % | |
97 | United Kingdom | 60.966 % | |
98 | El Salvador | 60.947 % | |
99 | Nicaragua | 60.532 % | |
100 | Costa Rica | 60.231 % | |
101 | Slovakia | 60.199 % | |
102 | Albania | 60.132 % | |
103 | Czech Republic | 60.01 % | |
104 | Russia | 59.949 % | |
105 | India | 59.923 % | |
106 | Belarus | 59.793 % | |
107 | Belize | 59.782 % | |
108 | Malaysia | 59.721 % | |
109 | Mongolia | 59.592 % | |
110 | Zambia | 59.498 % | |
111 | Mexico | 58.936 % | |
112 | Botswana | 58.819 % | |
113 | Lithuania | 58.784 % | |
114 | Fiji | 58.67 % | |
115 | Togo | 58.418 % | |
116 | Tonga | 58.365 % | |
117 | French Polynesia | 58.229 % | |
118 | Bangladesh | 58.206 % | |
119 | Estonia | 57.99 % | |
120 | Cabo Verde | 57.988 % | |
121 | Republic of Moldova | 57.946 % | |
122 | Germany | 57.899 % | |
123 | Austria | 57.892 % | |
124 | Slovenia | 57.789 % | |
125 | Mauritius | 57.566 % | |
126 | Dominican Republic | 57.276 % | |
127 | South Africa | 57.007 % | |
128 | Ukraine | 56.975 % | |
129 | Uzbekistan | 56.763 % | |
130 | Guyana | 56.744 % | |
131 | Latvia | 56.414 % | |
132 | Poland | 56.236 % | |
133 | Samoa | 56.046 % | |
134 | Oman | 55.885 % | |
135 | Sri Lanka | 55.343 % | |
136 | Serbia | 55.28 % | |
137 | France | 55.122 % | |
138 | Chile | 55.014 % | |
139 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
140 | Maldives | 54.501 % | |
141 | Namibia | 54.416 % | |
142 | Cuba | 53.785 % | |
143 | Luxembourg | 53.167 % | |
144 | Eswatini | 53.031 % | |
145 | Turkmenistan | 53 % | |
146 | North Macedonia | 52.908 % | |
147 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 52.619 % | |
148 | Croatia | 52.23 % | |
149 | Spain | 52.093 % | |
150 | Hungary | 51.479 % | |
151 | Bulgaria | 51.474 % | |
152 | Morocco | 51.27 % | |
153 | Romania | 50.892 % | |
154 | Belgium | 50.791 % | |
155 | Greece | 50.72 % | |
156 | Sudan | 50.558 % | |
157 | Pakistan | 50.43 % | |
158 | Senegal | 50.277 % | |
159 | Malta | 50.221 % | |
160 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.956 % | |
161 | Turkey | 49.822 % | |
162 | Montenegro | 49.196 % | |
163 | Papua New Guinea | 48.572 % | |
164 | Gambia | 48.423 % | |
165 | Saudi Arabia | 48.37 % | |
166 | Gabon | 48.083 % | |
167 | Italy | 47.882 % | |
168 | Suriname | 47.729 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 47.563 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 46.526 % | |
171 | Libya | 46.448 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | 46.07 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 45.795 % | |
174 | Egypt | 44.93 % | |
175 | Yemen | 44.442 % | |
176 | Iran | 44.327 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.167 % | |
178 | Algeria | 44.076 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.041 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.646 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.347 % | |
182 | Jordan | 38.8 % | |
183 | State of Palestine | 36.626 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.114 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.898 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.114 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Nigeria
- #6
Qatar
- #7
North Korea
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
State of Palestine
- #182
Jordan
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Algeria
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, Tanzania led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 86.44%, while the global range spanned from 24.11% to 86.44%. The average participation rate across 186 countries stood at 61.35%, providing a benchmark for understanding the engagement of young people in the labor market during that year.
Economic and Demographic Influences on Participation Rates
The variation in Youth Labor Force Participation Rate across different countries in 2001 can be attributed to several economic and demographic factors. In countries like Tanzania and Madagascar, where the participation rates were among the highest, the predominant agricultural economies necessitate the involvement of young people in the workforce. With rates of 86.44% and 86.36% respectively, these countries reflect a trend where economic necessity drives youth into labor markets at an early age.
In contrast, countries with lower participation rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe at 24.11% and Djibouti at 33.90%, often exhibit different economic structures. These nations may have higher educational enrollment rates, delaying entry into the workforce, or economic conditions that do not require as many young people to work.
Impact of Policy and Education on Youth Employment
Government policies and educational systems significantly impact youth labor force participation. Countries like Qatar and North Korea, with high participation rates of 82.84% and 82.16% respectively, might reflect policies that encourage or necessitate youth employment. Conversely, countries with extensive educational opportunities or social support systems, such as Jordan with a rate of 38.80%, tend to have lower participation rates due to a focus on prolonged education.
In State of Palestine, where the youth labor force participation fell by 3.63%, reaching 36.63%, political instability and limited job opportunities could have influenced the ability of young people to engage in the labor market.
Year-Over-Year Changes and Economic Shifts
Analyzing year-over-year changes in youth labor participation provides insights into dynamic economic shifts. Peru witnessed a significant increase of 3.01% (4.6%), attributed possibly to economic reforms and growing sectors that absorbed more young workers. Similarly, the United States Virgin Islands reported a rise of 2.37% (4.0%), potentially driven by tourism and service sector growth.
Conversely, Azerbaijan and Guam experienced decreases of 2.20% (-2.9% and -3.2% respectively), which might be linked to economic contractions or shifts in labor market demands that reduced the need for young workers.
Regional Patterns and Economic Context
Geographical regions exhibit distinct patterns in youth labor force participation. African nations, including Mozambique and Ethiopia with rates of 85.36% and 82.08%, often reflect high participation due to subsistence farming and limited educational access. In contrast, the Middle East and parts of Asia, such as Lebanon at 44.17%, show lower rates, potentially due to higher educational pursuits and urbanization.
The diverse economic landscapes and cultural norms across regions shape how young people engage with the labor market. Understanding these nuances helps in crafting policies that balance educational opportunities with labor market needs, ensuring that young populations can contribute effectively to their economies.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2001
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2001?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2001, with 86.44%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2001?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2001, with 24.11%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across countries in 2001?
The average youth labor force participation rate across countries in 2001 was 61.35%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2001?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2001 was 61.23%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rates in 2001?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rates in 2001 were Tanzania (86.44%), Madagascar (86.36%), and Mozambique (85.36%).
How many countries are included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2001?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2001 includes 186 countries.
Insights by country
United States Virgin Islands
The United States Virgin Islands ranked #82 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.27 % in 2001. This figure is notable when compared to the global average, highlighting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include the islands' reliance on tourism and limited economic diversification, which can restrict job availability for young people entering the workforce.
Sweden
In 2001, Sweden had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.688 %, ranking #81 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment compared to higher-ranking nations like Switzerland. Key drivers behind this participation rate include Sweden's strong emphasis on education and vocational training, which can delay entry into the labor market as young people pursue higher qualifications.
Senegal
In 2001, Senegal had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.277%, ranking #158 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than many neighboring West African nations, reflecting broader regional challenges in youth employment. Contributing factors include high levels of informal employment and limited access to quality education and vocational training, which hinder the transition of young people into the labor market.
Sudan
In 2001, Sudan had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.558 %, ranking #156 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting significant challenges in the labor market for young people. Contributing factors include prolonged conflict and economic instability, which have hindered job creation and limited educational opportunities for the youth population.
Suriname
In 2001, Suriname had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 47.729%, ranking #168 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include Suriname's economic reliance on a narrow range of industries, which limits job creation, and demographic trends that see a significant portion of the youth population facing barriers to entering the labor market.
Singapore
In 2001, Singapore achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.461%, ranking #62 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a strong emphasis on education and vocational training. The country's economic policies encourage youth employment through initiatives that promote skill development and entrepreneurship, aligning with Singapore's status as a global financial hub.
Saudi Arabia
In 2001, Saudi Arabia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 48.37%, ranking #165 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Key drivers include a rapidly growing youth population and limited diversification in the economy, which has historically relied heavily on oil revenues and has not fully absorbed the increasing number of young job seekers.
South Korea
In 2001, South Korea's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 61.11%, ranking #95 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment compared to nations with higher participation rates. Key drivers of this statistic included the country's rapid economic development, which often prioritized skilled labor, and a competitive job market that placed significant emphasis on education and qualifications for young workers.
Angola
In 2001, Angola achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 77.342%, ranking #17 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's demographic dynamics where a large proportion of the population is young and actively engaged in the workforce. Key drivers of this high participation include Angola's post-war economic recovery, which has created numerous job opportunities, particularly in agriculture and construction sectors.
Belgium
In 2001, Belgium had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.791 %, ranking #154 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the European average, reflecting challenges in integrating young people into the workforce. Key factors influencing this statistic include Belgium's complex labor market regulations and high levels of youth unemployment, which can deter employers from hiring young workers.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data