Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1999
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.456 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.262 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 84.663 % | |
4 | Nigeria | 83.604 % | |
5 | Burundi | 83.449 % | |
6 | Solomon Islands | 83.211 % | |
7 | Qatar | 82.664 % | |
8 | Burkina Faso | 82.289 % | |
9 | North Korea | 82.206 % | |
10 | Ethiopia | 82.047 % | |
11 | Cameroon | 81.987 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.858 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 80.723 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 80.432 % | |
15 | Niger | 78.966 % | |
16 | Azerbaijan | 78.122 % | |
17 | Angola | 77.38 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.113 % | |
19 | Vanuatu | 76.899 % | |
20 | Iceland | 76.268 % | |
21 | China | 74.722 % | |
22 | United Arab Emirates | 74.601 % | |
23 | Vietnam | 74.509 % | |
24 | Georgia | 74.446 % | |
25 | South Sudan | 74.385 % | |
26 | Bahamas | 74.321 % | |
27 | Uganda | 74.26 % | |
28 | Thailand | 73.294 % | |
29 | Lesotho | 72.92 % | |
30 | Central African Republic | 72.654 % | |
31 | Timor-Leste | 72.651 % | |
32 | Ghana | 72.549 % | |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.516 % | |
34 | Kenya | 72.391 % | |
35 | Benin | 71.873 % | |
36 | Kazakhstan | 71.425 % | |
37 | Bolivia | 70.322 % | |
38 | Mali | 70.309 % | |
39 | Bhutan | 70.048 % | |
40 | Paraguay | 69.593 % | |
41 | Chad | 69.555 % | |
42 | Barbados | 69.229 % | |
43 | Congo | 68.405 % | |
44 | Guam | 68.309 % | |
45 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.271 % | |
46 | Peru | 68.16 % | |
47 | Switzerland | 67.735 % | |
48 | Kyrgyzstan | 67.689 % | |
49 | Netherlands | 67.537 % | |
50 | Myanmar | 67.535 % | |
51 | Colombia | 67.485 % | |
52 | Jamaica | 67.235 % | |
53 | Indonesia | 67.221 % | |
54 | Guatemala | 66.847 % | |
55 | Norway | 66.393 % | |
56 | Denmark | 66.09 % | |
57 | United States | 66.057 % | |
58 | Kuwait | 66.027 % | |
59 | Honduras | 65.88 % | |
60 | Zimbabwe | 65.746 % | |
61 | China, Macao SAR | 65.717 % | |
62 | Brazil | 65.595 % | |
63 | New Caledonia | 65.383 % | |
64 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.322 % | |
65 | Bahrain | 65.29 % | |
66 | Singapore | 65.265 % | |
67 | Canada | 65.072 % | |
68 | Ecuador | 64.928 % | |
69 | New Zealand | 64.657 % | |
70 | Sierra Leone | 64.591 % | |
71 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 64.563 % | |
72 | Guinea | 64.171 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 63.925 % | |
74 | Venezuela | 63.89 % | |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.858 % | |
76 | Ireland | 63.726 % | |
77 | Haiti | 63.237 % | |
78 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.131 % | |
79 | Australia | 62.908 % | |
80 | Japan | 62.847 % | |
81 | Panama | 62.667 % | |
82 | Sweden | 62.597 % | |
83 | Argentina | 62.542 % | |
84 | Rwanda | 62.501 % | |
85 | Armenia | 62.292 % | |
86 | El Salvador | 62.129 % | |
87 | Albania | 62.061 % | |
88 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.934 % | |
89 | Laos | 61.849 % | |
90 | Philippines | 61.296 % | |
91 | Russia | 61.253 % | |
92 | Lithuania | 61.185 % | |
93 | United Kingdom | 61.091 % | |
94 | Finland | 61.067 % | |
95 | Czech Republic | 61.049 % | |
96 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.929 % | |
97 | Israel | 60.772 % | |
98 | Portugal | 60.645 % | |
99 | Cyprus | 60.484 % | |
100 | South Korea | 60.179 % | |
101 | Republic of Moldova | 60.025 % | |
102 | Nicaragua | 59.832 % | |
103 | Uruguay | 59.794 % | |
104 | India | 59.743 % | |
105 | Mexico | 59.699 % | |
106 | Costa Rica | 59.69 % | |
107 | Zambia | 59.582 % | |
108 | Botswana | 59.377 % | |
109 | Mongolia | 59.327 % | |
110 | Belize | 59.3 % | |
111 | Slovakia | 59.263 % | |
112 | Malaysia | 59.262 % | |
113 | Mauritius | 59.049 % | |
114 | Fiji | 58.983 % | |
115 | Estonia | 58.98 % | |
116 | United States Virgin Islands | 58.935 % | |
117 | French Polynesia | 58.873 % | |
118 | Tonga | 58.751 % | |
119 | Belarus | 58.703 % | |
120 | Austria | 58.575 % | |
121 | Togo | 58.537 % | |
122 | Cabo Verde | 58.52 % | |
123 | Dominican Republic | 58.402 % | |
124 | Germany | 58.336 % | |
125 | Slovenia | 58.239 % | |
126 | Bangladesh | 58.076 % | |
127 | Latvia | 57.697 % | |
128 | Guyana | 57.641 % | |
129 | South Africa | 57.509 % | |
130 | Ukraine | 57.439 % | |
131 | Sri Lanka | 57.31 % | |
132 | Uzbekistan | 57.299 % | |
133 | Chile | 56.647 % | |
134 | Oman | 56.609 % | |
135 | Samoa | 56.433 % | |
136 | Serbia | 56.22 % | |
137 | Poland | 56.127 % | |
138 | France | 55.354 % | |
139 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
140 | Maldives | 54.105 % | |
141 | Namibia | 53.92 % | |
142 | Turkmenistan | 53.84 % | |
143 | Cuba | 53.544 % | |
144 | Eswatini | 53.474 % | |
145 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 53.04 % | |
146 | Croatia | 53.023 % | |
147 | Turkey | 52.7 % | |
148 | North Macedonia | 52.587 % | |
149 | Luxembourg | 52.254 % | |
150 | Belgium | 51.87 % | |
151 | Spain | 51.771 % | |
152 | Greece | 51.58 % | |
153 | Morocco | 51.314 % | |
154 | Sudan | 51.107 % | |
155 | Romania | 51.028 % | |
156 | Hungary | 50.908 % | |
157 | Senegal | 50.399 % | |
158 | Syrian Arab Republic | 50.305 % | |
159 | Malta | 50.258 % | |
160 | Bulgaria | 50.184 % | |
161 | Pakistan | 50.18 % | |
162 | Montenegro | 49.522 % | |
163 | Gambia | 48.399 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 48.378 % | |
165 | Papua New Guinea | 48.371 % | |
166 | Saudi Arabia | 48.221 % | |
167 | Gabon | 48.15 % | |
168 | Italy | 47.798 % | |
169 | Egypt | 47.52 % | |
170 | Puerto Rico | 47.33 % | |
171 | Suriname | 46.61 % | |
172 | Afghanistan | 46.609 % | |
173 | Libya | 46.528 % | |
174 | Mauritania | 46.048 % | |
175 | Yemen | 45.991 % | |
176 | Algeria | 44.492 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.169 % | |
178 | Iran | 44.012 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.151 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.822 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.385 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.131 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.431 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 34.135 % | |
185 | Somalia | 34.059 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.306 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Nigeria
- #5
Burundi
- #6
Solomon Islands
- #7
Qatar
- #8
Burkina Faso
- #9
North Korea
- #10
Ethiopia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Iran
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1999, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was highest in Tanzania at 86.46%, while globally the rate ranged from a minimum of 24.31% to a maximum of 86.46%. The global average participation rate stood at 61.60%, providing a benchmark for understanding youth engagement in the labor market during this period.
Economic Context and Youth Labor Force Participation
The high Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in countries like Tanzania and Madagascar, both exceeding 86%, can be attributed to economic structures heavily reliant on agriculture and informal sectors. In such economies, young people often join the workforce early due to limited access to education and the necessity to contribute to household incomes. Conversely, countries like Sao Tome and Principe and Somalia, with participation rates as low as 24.31% and 34.06% respectively, may reflect higher barriers to youth employment, such as ongoing conflict, economic instability, or policies that limit youth employment opportunities.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also play a critical role in shaping youth labor force participation. In Burundi and Burkina Faso, both with rates over 82%, large rural populations and limited urbanization often push youth into labor markets at a younger age. Conversely, in the State of Palestine and Jordan, with participation rates of 40.13% and 39.43% respectively, there may be cultural and educational factors that encourage extended schooling, delaying entry into the labor market.
Policy and Societal Impacts
Policies and societal norms significantly influence youth labor force participation. North Korea, with a high rate of 82.21%, reflects state-driven labor policies where all citizens, including youth, are expected to contribute to the workforce. In contrast, Lebanon's lower rate of 44.17% can be linked to a stronger emphasis on education and professional training, postponing labor force entry. Additionally, the presence of robust social safety nets or youth unemployment benefits can also reduce immediate pressures on youth to enter the workforce.
Year-over-Year Trends and Changes
Analyzing year-over-year changes, Russia exhibited the most significant increase in youth labor force participation, rising by 3.14%, likely due to post-Soviet economic adjustments and increased labor demand. Meanwhile, Turkmenistan saw the most substantial decrease of -2.14%, potentially reflecting shifts in government policy or economic restructuring. Other notable increases occurred in Egypt and Timor-Leste, with rises of 1.52% and 1.47% respectively, possibly due to policy reforms encouraging youth employment. In contrast, declines in Albania and the United States Virgin Islands, at -1.65% and -1.49%, may indicate economic downturns or increased educational enrollment during this period.
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1999 highlights the diverse economic, cultural, and policy landscapes influencing young people's engagement in the labor market across the globe. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing targeted strategies to improve youth employment outcomes and harness the potential of young populations worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1999
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1999?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1999, with 86.46%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1999?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1999, at 24.31%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1999?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1999 was 61.6%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1999?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1999 was 61.08%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation in 1999?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation in 1999 were Tanzania (86.46%), Madagascar (86.26%), and Mozambique (84.66%).
What was the range of youth labor force participation rates in 1999?
In 1999, the youth labor force participation rates ranged from 24.31% in Sao Tome and Principe to 86.46% in Tanzania.
Insights by country
South Africa
In 1999, South Africa had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 57.509%, ranking #129 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in job creation for young people. High levels of unemployment and economic disparities, particularly in post-apartheid South Africa, limited opportunities for youth engagement in the labor market.
Singapore
In 1999, Singapore achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.265%, ranking #66 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strong emphasis on education and workforce readiness. The high participation rate can be attributed to Singapore's robust economic policies, which prioritize skill development and vocational training, alongside a demographic structure that encourages youth engagement in the labor market.
Togo
Togo's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1999 was 58.537 %, ranking it #121 out of 186 countries. This rate reflects a significant engagement of youth in the labor market, particularly when compared to many other West African nations struggling with higher youth unemployment. Key drivers for this participation include Togo's agricultural economy, where many young people contribute to family farms, and limited access to higher education, which often necessitates early entry into the workforce.
Malta
In 1999, Malta ranked #159 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.258 %. This figure was notably lower than the European Union average, indicating challenges in youth employment within the region. Contributing factors included Malta's small economy and limited job opportunities for young people, which were compounded by a lack of vocational training programs tailored to the needs of the labor market.
Norway
In 1999, Norway achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.393%, ranking #55 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Norway's robust economy and strong emphasis on education and vocational training. The high participation rate can be attributed to the country's effective labor market policies and a strong welfare system that supports youth employment initiatives.
Republic of Moldova
In 1999, the Republic of Moldova had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.025 %, ranking #101 out of 186 countries. This rate was relatively high compared to neighboring countries, indicating a significant engagement of youth in the labor market during a period of economic transition. The high participation can be attributed to the country's post-Soviet economic reforms and the necessity for families to supplement incomes in a challenging economic environment.
Romania
In 1999, Romania's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 51.028%, ranking #155 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Economic transition post-communism, coupled with high youth unemployment and limited job creation in the early years of market reform, contributed to this low participation rate.
Rwanda
In 1999, Rwanda had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.501 %, ranking #84 out of 186 countries. This rate was higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting the country's significant youth demographic. Economic recovery efforts following the 1994 genocide, coupled with initiatives to engage young people in agriculture and informal sectors, were key drivers of this participation rate.
Timor-Leste
In 1999, Timor-Leste achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 72.651 %, ranking #31 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographics and urgent need for economic engagement following its independence. The high participation rate can be attributed to a significant influx of young people into the labor market, driven by the post-conflict reconstruction efforts and the necessity for economic development in a newly sovereign nation.
Syrian Arab Republic
In 1999, the Syrian Arab Republic had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.305 %, ranking #158 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in economic opportunities for youth in the region. Contributing factors include a lack of diversified job markets and ongoing political instability, which limited employment prospects and educational advancements for younger generations.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data