Rule of Law Index by Country 2016
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 96.667 % |
2 | Austria | 95.714 % |
3 | Australia | 94.762 % |
4 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 93.333 % |
5 | Andorra | 90.952 % |
6 | Belgium | 88.571 % |
7 | American Samoa | 87.143 % |
8 | Aruba | 86.19 % |
9 | Czech Republic | 81.429 % |
10 | Chile | 80 % |
11 | China, Macao SAR | 78.095 % |
12 | Bermuda | 77.143 % |
13 | Cayman Islands | 75.714 % |
14 | Barbados | 75.238 % |
15 | Cyprus | 74.762 % |
16 | Brunei Darussalam | 69.524 % |
17 | Bhutan | 69.048 % |
18 | Antigua and Barbuda | 68.571 % |
19 | Costa Rica | 66.19 % |
20 | Bahrain | 65.714 % |
21 | Botswana | 63.333 % |
22 | Croatia | 62.381 % |
23 | Cabo Verde | 59.524 % |
24 | Bahamas | 58.571 % |
25 | Anguilla | 51.429 % |
26 | Bulgaria | 49.524 % |
27 | Armenia | 49.048 % |
28 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 47.143 % |
29 | Brazil | 46.667 % |
30 | Colombia | 45.238 % |
31 | Argentina | 42.381 % |
32 | Albania | 41.905 % |
33 | China | 41.429 % |
34 | Burkina Faso | 35.714 % |
35 | Cuba | 34.762 % |
36 | Azerbaijan | 31.905 % |
37 | Benin | 30 % |
38 | Côte d'Ivoire | 28.095 % |
39 | Bangladesh | 27.619 % |
40 | Belarus | 24.286 % |
41 | Algeria | 18.095 % |
42 | Belize | 17.143 % |
43 | Angola | 16.19 % |
44 | Comoros | 13.81 % |
45 | Cameroon | 13.333 % |
46 | Cambodia | 12.381 % |
47 | Congo | 10.952 % |
48 | Bolivia | 9.524 % |
49 | Chad | 7.143 % |
50 | Burundi | 6.667 % |
51 | Afghanistan | 5.714 % |
52 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 4.762 % |
53 | Central African Republic | 1.905 % |
54 | Cook Islands | NaN % |
55 | Finland | 100 % |
56 | Norway | 99.524 % |
57 | New Zealand | 98.571 % |
58 | Netherlands | 97.143 % |
59 | Luxembourg | 95.238 % |
60 | Liechtenstein | 92.857 % |
61 | Monaco | 90.952 % |
62 | Réunion | 83.81 % |
63 | Portugal | 82.857 % |
64 | Lithuania | 81.905 % |
65 | Malta | 80.952 % |
66 | Palau | 79.524 % |
67 | Martinique | 77.143 % |
68 | Qatar | 76.19 % |
69 | Mauritius | 74.286 % |
70 | Puerto Rico | 73.333 % |
71 | Poland | 71.429 % |
72 | Saint Lucia | 70 % |
73 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 68.095 % |
74 | Namibia | 67.619 % |
75 | Romania | 67.143 % |
76 | Malaysia | 64.286 % |
77 | Oman | 63.81 % |
78 | Marshall Islands | 58.095 % |
79 | Rwanda | 56.667 % |
80 | Panama | 55.238 % |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 53.333 % |
82 | Montenegro | 50 % |
83 | Mongolia | 45.714 % |
84 | Morocco | 44.286 % |
85 | Maldives | 40.952 % |
86 | North Macedonia | 39.524 % |
87 | Malawi | 37.143 % |
88 | Philippines | 36.19 % |
89 | Peru | 33.81 % |
90 | Republic of Moldova | 32.381 % |
91 | Nauru | 31.429 % |
92 | Mexico | 30.952 % |
93 | Nicaragua | 28.571 % |
94 | Niger | 27.143 % |
95 | Paraguay | 26.19 % |
96 | Mauritania | 25.238 % |
97 | Papua New Guinea | 23.81 % |
98 | Mali | 22.857 % |
99 | Nepal | 20.952 % |
100 | Pakistan | 20.476 % |
101 | Madagascar | 19.524 % |
102 | Russia | 19.048 % |
103 | Myanmar | 18.571 % |
104 | Liberia | 17.619 % |
105 | Nigeria | 14.762 % |
106 | Mozambique | 12.857 % |
107 | North Korea | 3.333 % |
108 | Libya | 2.857 % |
109 | Niue | NaN % |
110 | Sweden | 99.048 % |
111 | Switzerland | 98.095 % |
112 | Denmark | 97.619 % |
113 | Singapore | 96.19 % |
114 | Greenland | 94.286 % |
115 | Jersey | 94.286 % |
116 | United Kingdom | 92.381 % |
117 | Germany | 91.905 % |
118 | United States | 91.429 % |
119 | San Marino | 90.952 % |
120 | Iceland | 89.524 % |
121 | Ireland | 89.048 % |
122 | Japan | 88.095 % |
123 | France | 87.619 % |
124 | French Guiana | 86.667 % |
125 | Estonia | 85.714 % |
126 | South Korea | 85.238 % |
127 | Taiwan | 84.762 % |
128 | Slovenia | 84.286 % |
129 | Guam | 83.81 % |
130 | Israel | 82.381 % |
131 | Spain | 80.476 % |
132 | Latvia | 79.048 % |
133 | Samoa | 78.571 % |
134 | United Arab Emirates | 77.619 % |
135 | Dominica | 73.81 % |
136 | Grenada | 72.857 % |
137 | Uruguay | 72.381 % |
138 | Slovakia | 71.905 % |
139 | United States Virgin Islands | 70.952 % |
140 | Tuvalu | 70.476 % |
141 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.667 % |
142 | Hungary | 65.238 % |
143 | Vanuatu | 64.762 % |
144 | Italy | 62.857 % |
145 | Georgia | 61.905 % |
146 | Saudi Arabia | 61.429 % |
147 | Tonga | 60.952 % |
148 | Kiribati | 60.476 % |
149 | Seychelles | 60 % |
150 | Jordan | 59.048 % |
151 | Greece | 57.619 % |
152 | Sri Lanka | 57.143 % |
153 | Vietnam | 56.19 % |
154 | South Africa | 55.714 % |
155 | Ghana | 54.762 % |
156 | Tunisia | 54.286 % |
157 | Kuwait | 53.81 % |
158 | Thailand | 52.857 % |
159 | India | 52.381 % |
160 | Fiji | 51.905 % |
161 | Senegal | 50.952 % |
162 | Serbia | 50.476 % |
163 | Jamaica | 48.571 % |
164 | Suriname | 48.095 % |
165 | Lesotho | 47.619 % |
166 | Trinidad and Tobago | 46.19 % |
167 | Uganda | 44.762 % |
168 | Solomon Islands | 43.81 % |
169 | Zambia | 43.333 % |
170 | Guyana | 42.857 % |
171 | Indonesia | 40.476 % |
172 | Turkey | 40 % |
173 | Kosovo | 39.048 % |
174 | State of Palestine | 38.571 % |
175 | Eswatini | 38.095 % |
176 | Dominican Republic | 37.619 % |
177 | Tanzania | 36.667 % |
178 | Kenya | 35.238 % |
179 | Egypt | 34.286 % |
180 | Ethiopia | 33.333 % |
181 | Kazakhstan | 32.857 % |
182 | Gabon | 30.476 % |
183 | Ecuador | 29.524 % |
184 | Togo | 29.048 % |
185 | Sao Tome and Principe | 26.667 % |
186 | Iran | 25.714 % |
187 | El Salvador | 24.762 % |
188 | Gambia | 23.333 % |
189 | Sierra Leone | 22.381 % |
190 | Lebanon | 21.905 % |
191 | Laos | 21.429 % |
192 | Ukraine | 20 % |
193 | Djibouti | 16.667 % |
194 | Haiti | 15.714 % |
195 | Guatemala | 15.238 % |
196 | Kyrgyzstan | 14.286 % |
197 | Uzbekistan | 11.905 % |
198 | Honduras | 11.429 % |
199 | Tajikistan | 10.476 % |
200 | Timor-Leste | 10 % |
201 | Guinea | 9.048 % |
202 | Sudan | 8.571 % |
203 | Equatorial Guinea | 8.095 % |
204 | Zimbabwe | 7.619 % |
205 | Turkmenistan | 6.19 % |
206 | Guinea-Bissau | 5.238 % |
207 | Eritrea | 4.286 % |
208 | Yemen | 3.81 % |
209 | Iraq | 2.381 % |
210 | South Sudan | 1.429 % |
211 | Syrian Arab Republic | 0.952 % |
212 | Venezuela | 0.476 % |
213 | Somalia | 0 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Canada
- #2
Austria
- #3
Australia
- #4
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #5
Andorra
- #6
Belgium
- #7
American Samoa
- #8
Aruba
- #9
Czech Republic
- #10
Chile
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Somalia
- #212
Venezuela
- #211
Syrian Arab Republic
- #210
South Sudan
- #209
Iraq
- #208
Yemen
- #207
Eritrea
- #206
Guinea-Bissau
- #205
Turkmenistan
- #204
Zimbabwe
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The "Rule of Law Index by Country" for the year 2016 offers a comprehensive evaluation of global justice systems. This metric reflects the percentile rank of countries worldwide in terms of legal frameworks, judicial efficiency, police reliability, property rights, and protection from crime and violence. As a vital indicator of governance and stability, the Rule of Law Index provides essential insights into how laws are perceived and respected across different nations. In 2016, the Index covered 200 countries, unveiling significant disparities and trends in the rule of law worldwide.
Stellar Performers: A Closer Look at Leading Nations
In 2016, northern European countries dominated the Rule of Law Index, showcasing robust legal frameworks and high public trust in their legal institutions. Finland emerged as the global leader with a perfect score of 100%, followed closely by Norway and Sweden with scores of 99.52% and 99.05%, respectively. These countries are renowned for their transparent governance, efficient judicial systems, and low levels of corruption. New Zealand, with its score of 98.57%, exemplifies a strong commitment to the rule of law in the Pacific region. Other notable top performers include Switzerland, Denmark, and the Netherlands, each boasting scores above 97%. These nations highlight the positive correlation between economic prosperity, social stability, and adherence to legal principles.
Challenges in the Bottom Tier
Conversely, countries at the lower end of the Index face numerous hurdles in establishing effective rule of law systems. Guinea-Bissau and Afghanistan, with scores of 5.24% and 5.71%, respectively, encounter significant challenges, including political instability, systemic corruption, and weak judicial frameworks. Turkmenistan and Burundi, scoring 6.19% and 6.67%, struggle with authoritarian governance and limited civil liberties. These nations often experience difficulties in enforcing laws, safeguarding human rights, and providing equitable access to justice. Such challenges underscore the need for comprehensive reforms and international assistance to strengthen legal institutions in these regions.
Noteworthy Improvements in 2016
Some countries witnessed remarkable improvements in their rule of law rankings in 2016. Martinique experienced the most significant increase, with a leap of 22.86 percentage points, reflecting substantial reforms and enhanced legal frameworks. Argentina and Ecuador also demonstrated strong progress, with increases of 15.71% and 14.29%, respectively, signaling efforts to combat corruption and bolster judicial independence. Vietnam's rise by 12.86 percentage points underscores its focus on legal reforms and international integration. These improvements indicate a growing recognition of the importance of the rule of law in fostering economic growth and societal stability.
Policy Impact and Governance Relationships
The Rule of Law Index in 2016 highlights the critical role of policy and governance in shaping legal environments. Countries with high scores often benefit from robust legal frameworks, transparent governance, and effective enforcement of laws. For instance, Finland's exemplary score is attributed to its well-functioning legal infrastructure and public confidence in the rule of law. In contrast, nations with low scores typically face challenges related to weak institutions, lack of transparency, and limited accountability. The disparities in the Index emphasize the necessity for targeted policy interventions and international cooperation to strengthen legal systems in countries struggling with governance issues.
Regional Clustering and Comparisons
Regional trends in the Rule of Law Index reveal intriguing patterns. Europe, particularly the Nordic region, consistently ranks high, reflecting a longstanding tradition of strong legal institutions and rule of law adherence. In contrast, parts of Africa and the Middle East face persistent challenges, with many countries scoring below the global average of 52.63%. These regional differences highlight the influence of historical, cultural, and socio-political factors on the rule of law. Comparisons within regions, such as between New Zealand and its Pacific neighbors, underscore the potential for shared learnings and collaborative efforts to improve legal systems.
The Rule of Law Index by Country in 2016 provides a valuable lens through which to examine global governance and legal frameworks. While top-performing countries set benchmarks for legal excellence, nations at the lower end of the spectrum highlight the urgent need for reform and international support. By understanding these dynamics, policymakers and international organizations can better address the challenges and opportunities faced by countries striving to enhance their rule of law and governance structures.
Insights by country
North Macedonia
In 2016, North Macedonia was ranked 128 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 39.52%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the country's legal and institutional frameworks, reflecting issues related to corruption, judicial independence, and the enforcement of laws.
The relatively low score can be attributed to several factors, including a history of political instability, a lack of effective governance, and systemic corruption that has hampered the development of a robust rule of law. Additionally, public trust in institutions and legal processes has been undermined, further exacerbating these challenges.
Interestingly, the Rule of Law Index highlights a broader trend in the Western Balkans, where similar issues of governance and rule of law persist, often influenced by socio-political dynamics and economic conditions in the region.
Anguilla
In 2016, Anguilla held a rank of 103 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 51.43%. This ranking indicates a moderate level of adherence to the principles of the rule of law, which encompasses factors such as government accountability, legal certainty, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The relatively moderate score can be attributed to several factors, including the territory's small size and limited resources, which may affect the effectiveness of its legal and judicial systems. Additionally, the legal framework in Anguilla, a British Overseas Territory, is influenced by its colonial heritage, which can impact local governance and legal practices.
Interestingly, the Rule of Law Index reflects a broader trend observed in many small island nations where challenges such as economic vulnerability and external dependencies can influence governance structures. Anguilla's score places it in a unique position among its Caribbean neighbors, highlighting both the strengths and challenges inherent in its legal and institutional frameworks.
Kenya
In 2016, Kenya ranked 137 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 35.24%. This ranking reflects significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of fundamental rights within the country.
The relatively low index score can be attributed to various factors, including corruption within the judiciary, inequitable access to legal recourse, and political interference in legal processes. These issues undermine public confidence in the legal system and hinder the effective administration of justice.
Moreover, Kenya's legal framework has faced criticism for ineffective law enforcement and human rights violations, which further contribute to the challenges in achieving a higher rule of law standing. In comparison to neighboring countries, Kenya's position indicates a need for continued reforms to enhance governance and uphold the rule of law.
Honduras
In 2016, Honduras ranked 187 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a 11.43% adherence to the principles of rule of law. This low ranking indicates significant challenges in governance, legal infrastructure, and the protection of rights and liberties for its citizens.
The poor performance in the Rule of Law Index can be attributed to various factors, including high levels of corruption, widespread violence, and inadequate law enforcement. Honduras has faced persistent issues with drug trafficking and gang-related violence, which have undermined public trust in governmental institutions.
Moreover, the country's political instability and social inequality exacerbate the challenges to establishing a robust rule of law. For instance, Honduras has one of the highest homicide rates in the world, which further complicates the enforcement of laws and the protection of civil rights.
Bhutan
In 2016, Bhutan achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 69.05%, ranking 66 out of 213 countries. This score reflects a relatively strong adherence to the principles of rule of law in comparison to many other nations, indicating a stable legal framework and respect for legal processes.
Several factors contribute to Bhutan's favorable ranking, including its commitment to democratic governance and the enforcement of laws that protect individual rights and liberties. Additionally, the country has made significant strides in judicial independence and access to justice, which are essential components of the rule of law.
Interestingly, Bhutan's emphasis on Gross National Happiness (GNH) as a development philosophy may also play a role in fostering a legal environment that prioritizes the well-being of its citizens, promoting stability and social cohesion. These elements combined help explain Bhutan's notable position in the Rule of Law Index for 2016.
Afghanistan
In 2016, Afghanistan ranked 199 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a significant challenge in governance and legal frameworks. The country's score was a mere 5.714286%, indicating severe deficiencies in legal accountability, the enforcement of laws, and access to justice.
This low ranking can be attributed to a range of factors, including ongoing conflict, widespread corruption, and a lack of effective governmental institutions. The persistent instability resulting from decades of war has undermined the rule of law, making it difficult for citizens to rely on legal protections or to seek redress for grievances.
Moreover, the socio-economic conditions in Afghanistan further complicate the implementation of rule of law, with high levels of poverty and limited access to education hindering public awareness of legal rights. Compounding these issues are cultural practices and tribal customs that often supersede formal legal systems, leaving many vulnerable to abuses of power.
Albania
In 2016, Albania ranked 123rd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a score of 41.90%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of fundamental rights within the country.
Several factors contribute to Albania's position in this index, including a history of political instability, corruption, and insufficient judicial independence. The rule of law is often undermined by inadequate legal frameworks, which hinder effective governance and public trust in institutions.
Moreover, Albania's struggles with organized crime and a weak economy further exacerbate issues related to the rule of law. As a candidate for European Union membership, the country has been urged to improve its legal structures and governance to enhance its standing in future assessments.
France
In 2016, France achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 87.62%, ranking 27th out of 213 countries. This score reflects the country's commitment to upholding the rule of law, characterized by the effective implementation of laws, protection of fundamental rights, and the functioning of government institutions.
The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a robust judicial system, well-established legal frameworks, and a generally high level of transparency in governance. France's strong civil society and active engagement in legal reforms further contribute to its favorable position on the index.
Interestingly, the Rule of Law Index is influenced by various dimensions, such as the absence of corruption, the accessibility of justice, and the protection of personal freedoms, all of which are integral to the democratic fabric of France. The country has historically placed a strong emphasis on individual rights and liberties, which bolsters its rule of law standing.
Dominican Republic
In 2016, the Dominican Republic ranked 132 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 37.62%. This ranking reflects challenges related to the effective enforcement of laws, access to justice, and the protection of fundamental rights within the country.
Factors contributing to this low ranking include issues such as corruption, inadequate judicial processes, and limited governmental accountability. Additionally, the country has faced challenges in areas like crime and violence, which can undermine public trust in law enforcement and the judiciary.
The Dominican Republic's performance on the Rule of Law Index is indicative of broader systemic issues that affect governance and civil society, highlighting the need for reforms to improve the rule of law and strengthen institutions.
Ghana
In 2016, Ghana was ranked 96 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a score of 54.76%. This ranking indicates a moderate level of adherence to the rule of law, which encompasses factors such as the effectiveness of legal frameworks, the impartiality of the judiciary, and the protection of fundamental rights.
Several factors contribute to Ghana's positioning in the Rule of Law Index, including challenges related to judicial independence, corruption, and the enforcement of laws. While Ghana has made significant strides in democratic governance since the early 1990s, issues such as political interference in judicial matters and the need for further legal reforms continue to impact its rule of law landscape.
Interestingly, Ghana's ranking places it among countries that have made considerable progress in governance compared to its regional peers in West Africa, where rule of law challenges are more pronounced. This underscores the importance of ongoing efforts to enhance institutional integrity and public trust in the legal system.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.