Rule of Law Index by Country 2014
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Austria | 96.635 % |
2 | Australia | 96.154 % |
3 | Canada | 95.192 % |
4 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 94.231 % |
5 | Andorra | 90.385 % |
6 | Belgium | 88.942 % |
7 | American Samoa | 87.981 % |
8 | Chile | 86.538 % |
9 | Czech Republic | 84.615 % |
10 | Barbados | 83.173 % |
11 | Cyprus | 82.692 % |
12 | Aruba | 81.731 % |
13 | China, Macao SAR | 79.808 % |
14 | Bahamas | 75.481 % |
15 | Cabo Verde | 75 % |
16 | Cayman Islands | 73.077 % |
17 | Costa Rica | 72.596 % |
18 | Botswana | 71.635 % |
19 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.75 % |
20 | Bhutan | 67.308 % |
21 | Bahrain | 66.827 % |
22 | Croatia | 63.462 % |
23 | Anguilla | 60.096 % |
24 | Bermuda | 60.096 % |
25 | Brazil | 57.692 % |
26 | Bulgaria | 54.327 % |
27 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.923 % |
28 | Antigua and Barbuda | 49.519 % |
29 | Colombia | 45.673 % |
30 | Albania | 44.231 % |
31 | China | 40.385 % |
32 | Armenia | 38.462 % |
33 | Benin | 36.058 % |
34 | Burkina Faso | 33.654 % |
35 | Côte d'Ivoire | 33.173 % |
36 | Cuba | 29.808 % |
37 | Azerbaijan | 28.365 % |
38 | Bangladesh | 24.038 % |
39 | Algeria | 22.596 % |
40 | Belize | 21.635 % |
41 | Belarus | 21.154 % |
42 | Argentina | 19.712 % |
43 | Cameroon | 18.269 % |
44 | Comoros | 17.788 % |
45 | Cambodia | 15.865 % |
46 | Burundi | 14.904 % |
47 | Bolivia | 12.019 % |
48 | Angola | 11.538 % |
49 | Congo | 10.577 % |
50 | Chad | 9.615 % |
51 | Afghanistan | 4.327 % |
52 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.885 % |
53 | Central African Republic | 1.442 % |
54 | Cook Islands | NaN % |
55 | Finland | 100 % |
56 | Denmark | 99.519 % |
57 | Norway | 99.038 % |
58 | New Zealand | 98.558 % |
59 | Netherlands | 97.115 % |
60 | Luxembourg | 95.673 % |
61 | Liechtenstein | 92.308 % |
62 | Malta | 86.058 % |
63 | Réunion | 85.096 % |
64 | Portugal | 84.135 % |
65 | Mauritius | 79.327 % |
66 | Lithuania | 78.846 % |
67 | Poland | 78.365 % |
68 | Qatar | 77.404 % |
69 | Samoa | 76.923 % |
70 | Puerto Rico | 76.442 % |
71 | Saint Lucia | 74.038 % |
72 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 73.558 % |
73 | Malaysia | 71.154 % |
74 | Oman | 69.712 % |
75 | Palau | 65.865 % |
76 | Romania | 64.904 % |
77 | Namibia | 62.981 % |
78 | Rwanda | 61.538 % |
79 | Martinique | 60.096 % |
80 | Montenegro | 58.173 % |
81 | North Macedonia | 57.212 % |
82 | Panama | 56.731 % |
83 | Morocco | 52.404 % |
84 | Marshall Islands | 49.038 % |
85 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 46.635 % |
86 | Republic of Moldova | 46.154 % |
87 | Malawi | 45.192 % |
88 | Mongolia | 43.269 % |
89 | Philippines | 42.308 % |
90 | Mexico | 39.423 % |
91 | Maldives | 35.577 % |
92 | Peru | 34.135 % |
93 | Paraguay | 32.692 % |
94 | Mali | 31.25 % |
95 | Nepal | 30.769 % |
96 | Niger | 30.288 % |
97 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 29.327 % |
98 | Nicaragua | 27.404 % |
99 | Madagascar | 26.442 % |
100 | Pakistan | 25.962 % |
101 | Russia | 25 % |
102 | Papua New Guinea | 24.519 % |
103 | Liberia | 23.077 % |
104 | Mozambique | 22.115 % |
105 | Mauritania | 19.231 % |
106 | Nauru | 13.942 % |
107 | Nigeria | 12.5 % |
108 | Myanmar | 8.173 % |
109 | Libya | 4.808 % |
110 | Monaco | NaN % |
111 | Niue | NaN % |
112 | North Korea | 1.923 % |
113 | San Marino | NaN % |
114 | Switzerland | 98.077 % |
115 | Sweden | 97.596 % |
116 | United Kingdom | 94.712 % |
117 | Germany | 93.75 % |
118 | Singapore | 93.269 % |
119 | Ireland | 92.788 % |
120 | Greenland | 91.827 % |
121 | Jersey | 91.827 % |
122 | Iceland | 90.865 % |
123 | United States | 89.904 % |
124 | Japan | 89.423 % |
125 | France | 88.462 % |
126 | Guam | 87.981 % |
127 | Estonia | 87.019 % |
128 | Taiwan | 85.577 % |
129 | Israel | 83.654 % |
130 | French Guiana | 82.212 % |
131 | South Korea | 81.25 % |
132 | Slovenia | 80.769 % |
133 | Spain | 80.288 % |
134 | Latvia | 77.885 % |
135 | Uruguay | 75.962 % |
136 | United Arab Emirates | 74.519 % |
137 | Dominica | 72.115 % |
138 | Hungary | 70.673 % |
139 | Tuvalu | 70.192 % |
140 | Slovakia | 69.231 % |
141 | Jordan | 68.269 % |
142 | Italy | 67.788 % |
143 | Greece | 66.346 % |
144 | Seychelles | 65.385 % |
145 | Vanuatu | 64.423 % |
146 | Georgia | 63.942 % |
147 | South Africa | 62.5 % |
148 | Saudi Arabia | 62.019 % |
149 | Ghana | 61.058 % |
150 | Kuwait | 60.577 % |
151 | United States Virgin Islands | 60.096 % |
152 | Tunisia | 56.25 % |
153 | India | 55.769 % |
154 | Senegal | 55.288 % |
155 | Turkey | 54.808 % |
156 | Serbia | 53.846 % |
157 | Kiribati | 53.365 % |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 52.885 % |
159 | Suriname | 51.442 % |
160 | Grenada | 50.962 % |
161 | Sri Lanka | 50.481 % |
162 | Tonga | 50 % |
163 | Lesotho | 48.558 % |
164 | Thailand | 48.077 % |
165 | Zambia | 47.596 % |
166 | Jamaica | 47.115 % |
167 | Indonesia | 44.712 % |
168 | Eswatini | 43.75 % |
169 | Vietnam | 42.788 % |
170 | State of Palestine | 41.827 % |
171 | Dominican Republic | 41.346 % |
172 | Uganda | 40.865 % |
173 | Tanzania | 39.904 % |
174 | Kenya | 38.942 % |
175 | Kosovo | 37.981 % |
176 | Ethiopia | 37.5 % |
177 | El Salvador | 37.019 % |
178 | Gabon | 36.538 % |
179 | Solomon Islands | 35.096 % |
180 | Fiji | 34.615 % |
181 | Kazakhstan | 32.212 % |
182 | Guyana | 31.731 % |
183 | Gambia | 28.846 % |
184 | Egypt | 27.885 % |
185 | Lebanon | 26.923 % |
186 | Laos | 25.481 % |
187 | Sao Tome and Principe | 23.558 % |
188 | Ukraine | 20.673 % |
189 | Togo | 20.192 % |
190 | Djibouti | 18.75 % |
191 | Sierra Leone | 17.308 % |
192 | Kyrgyzstan | 16.827 % |
193 | Honduras | 16.346 % |
194 | Guatemala | 15.385 % |
195 | Ecuador | 14.423 % |
196 | Tajikistan | 13.462 % |
197 | Iran | 12.981 % |
198 | Timor-Leste | 11.058 % |
199 | Uzbekistan | 10.096 % |
200 | Sudan | 9.135 % |
201 | Haiti | 8.654 % |
202 | Yemen | 7.692 % |
203 | Equatorial Guinea | 7.212 % |
204 | Guinea-Bissau | 6.731 % |
205 | Turkmenistan | 6.25 % |
206 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5.769 % |
207 | Guinea | 5.288 % |
208 | Zimbabwe | 3.846 % |
209 | Iraq | 3.365 % |
210 | Eritrea | 2.404 % |
211 | South Sudan | 0.962 % |
212 | Venezuela | 0.481 % |
213 | Somalia | 0 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Austria
- #2
Australia
- #3
Canada
- #4
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #5
Andorra
- #6
Belgium
- #7
American Samoa
- #8
Chile
- #9
Czech Republic
- #10
Barbados
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Somalia
- #212
Venezuela
- #211
South Sudan
- #210
Eritrea
- #209
Iraq
- #208
Zimbabwe
- #207
Guinea
- #206
Syrian Arab Republic
- #205
Turkmenistan
- #204
Guinea-Bissau
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country is a crucial metric that measures the confidence citizens have in their legal systems, law enforcement, and the protection of property rights. In 2014, this index offered a global snapshot of governance quality across 200 countries, highlighting statistical trends and regional comparisons that are essential for understanding international governance dynamics. This metric is particularly significant as it reflects a country's stability and safety, impacting economic development and social cohesion.
Global Overview of the Rule of Law in 2014
In 2014, the Rule of Law Index measured the percentile rank of countries, spanning from Finland's perfect score of 100% to Afghanistan's low of 4.33%. The global average stood at 52.18%, with a median of 52.40%, indicating significant disparities between nations. Leading countries such as Denmark, Norway, and New Zealand scored above 98%, demonstrating robust legal frameworks and high public confidence in governance. In contrast, countries like Libya, Guinea, and Syria fell below 6%, highlighting the challenges they faced in maintaining legal order and public safety amidst political turmoil. These disparities underline the varied capacity of nations to uphold rule of law, often influenced by historical, cultural, and economic factors.
Regional Disparities and Governance Quality
Examining the Rule of Law Index across different regions reveals stark contrasts. European countries dominated the top ranks, with nations like Finland, Denmark, and Norway consistently scoring high. This reflects the region's long-standing tradition of strong legal institutions and democratic governance. Meanwhile, African and Middle Eastern countries occupied the lower tiers, with war-torn nations such as Afghanistan and Syria struggling to maintain basic legal structures amidst conflict. In Asia, countries showed mixed results; while Japan and South Korea performed well, Myanmar and Afghanistan faced significant challenges. These regional disparities illustrate the complex interplay between political stability and the effectiveness of legal systems.
Year-on-Year Trends and Notable Changes
The 2014 data also highlighted interesting year-on-year changes in the Rule of Law Index. Côte d'Ivoire experienced the most significant improvement, with a 13.92% increase, showcasing efforts towards strengthening governance post-civil conflict. Rwanda and China, Macao SAR, also saw notable improvements, indicating positive reforms and increased confidence in legal institutions. Conversely, Nauru experienced a dramatic decline of 55.54%, reflecting potential governance issues and public dissatisfaction. Such variations underscore the dynamic nature of governance and the potential for both rapid improvement and significant setbacks.
Policy Implications and Future Projections
The findings from the 2014 Rule of Law Index carry important policy implications for governments worldwide. High-scoring countries often serve as models for effective governance, while struggling nations must address systemic issues to improve their legal institutions. International organizations and policymakers can use these insights to tailor interventions and aid programs that support legal reforms and capacity-building in low-performing countries. As nations work towards improving their rule of law, the potential for economic growth and enhanced social stability increases, providing a foundation for sustainable development. Future projections suggest that countries investing in comprehensive legal reforms and strengthening civic institutions may experience significant improvements in their rule of law standings, leading to broader positive impacts on their society and economy.
Conclusion
The Rule of Law Index by Country in 2014 provides a critical lens through which to view global governance and legal frameworks. With its detailed measurement of legal confidence and effectiveness, the index highlights both achievements and challenges faced by nations around the world. By analyzing regional disparities, year-on-year trends, and the policy implications of these findings, stakeholders can better understand the complexities of governance and the pathways to enhancing the rule of law globally. As countries strive to elevate their legal standards, the potential benefits extend far beyond legal systems, impacting economic prosperity and social harmony.
Insights by country
Antigua and Barbuda
In 2014, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 106th out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 49.51923%. This ranking reflects the country's performance in various aspects of governance, including the effectiveness of its legal framework and the impartiality of its judiciary.
The relatively moderate score indicates challenges in the rule of law, which may stem from factors such as limited resources for the judicial system, potential corruption, and the influence of political dynamics on legal proceedings. These issues can undermine public confidence in the legal system and affect the protection of individual rights.
Interestingly, Antigua and Barbuda's score is comparable to several other Caribbean nations, which often face similar challenges related to governance and law enforcement. The Rule of Law Index serves as a critical tool for assessing the state of justice and governance globally, highlighting areas for improvement and reform.
Ethiopia
Ethiopia ranked 131 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index in 2014, with a score of 37.5%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of rights within the country. The relatively low score reflects issues such as judicial independence, corruption, and limited access to justice, which have hindered the establishment of a robust rule of law.
Factors contributing to this situation include a history of political repression, ethnic tensions, and a lack of democratic governance, which have often undermined the legal framework and institutional integrity. Additionally, the influence of the ruling party on the judiciary has raised concerns regarding impartiality and fairness in legal proceedings.
In comparison to other countries in the region, Ethiopia's score highlights a broader context of governance challenges in East Africa, where many nations face similar issues regarding rule of law and human rights. Strengthening the legal system and promoting transparency are essential for improving Ethiopia's position on future Rule of Law Index assessments.
Tuvalu
In 2014, Tuvalu achieved a notable ranking of 63rd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 70.19%. This positioning reflects a relatively strong adherence to the principles of law, governance, and justice within the context of its small population and geographic isolation.
The Rule of Law Index evaluates factors such as the effectiveness of the judiciary, the protection of fundamental rights, and the accountability of government officials. Tuvalu's score suggests that while it maintains a stable governance structure, challenges remain, particularly in areas like legal accessibility and the enforcement of laws.
Factors contributing to Tuvalu's performance include its traditional governance systems, community-based approaches to conflict resolution, and the influence of international law and treaties, which help bolster its legal framework. However, the island nation also faces vulnerabilities due to climate change and economic dependencies that may impact its rule of law in the future.
Central African Republic
The Central African Republic (CAR) ranked 206 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2014, reflecting severe challenges in governance and legal frameworks. With an index value of 1.442308%, CAR exhibited one of the lowest adherence to the rule of law globally.
This low ranking can be attributed to a range of factors, including prolonged civil conflict, weak institutions, and pervasive corruption. The political instability and violence that have plagued CAR have severely undermined public trust in legal systems and law enforcement agencies.
Furthermore, the situation is exacerbated by widespread poverty and lack of access to education, which contribute to the inability of citizens to seek justice or support their rights effectively. As of the same year, CAR was also facing humanitarian crises, with significant portions of the population displaced due to ongoing violence, further complicating the rule of law and governance.
Denmark
In 2014, Denmark achieved a remarkable Rule of Law Index score of 99.52%, ranking 2nd out of 213 countries. This high score reflects the nation's robust legal framework, effective judicial system, and strong protection of civil liberties.
The strong performance in the Rule of Law Index can be attributed to several factors, including Denmark's well-established democratic institutions, low levels of corruption, and a high degree of transparency in governance. Additionally, the Danish population enjoys a high level of trust in the legal system, which contributes to compliance with laws and regulations.
Denmark's commitment to human rights, equality before the law, and accessible legal resources further underscores its exemplary status in upholding the rule of law. Notably, Denmark has consistently ranked among the top countries globally in various governance and quality of life indices, showcasing its overall high standards of living and social stability.
China, Hong Kong SAR
In 2014, Hong Kong SAR achieved a remarkable Rule of Law Index score of 94.23%, ranking 13th out of 213 countries assessed. This high ranking reflects the region's strong legal framework, independent judiciary, and robust enforcement of laws, which are essential components of the rule of law.
The impressive score can be attributed to several factors, including a long-standing legal tradition influenced by British common law, a high degree of judicial independence, and a well-established system of checks and balances. Additionally, the emphasis on anti-corruption measures and public accountability has contributed to maintaining a stable legal environment.
Interestingly, Hong Kong’s ranking in the Rule of Law Index has positioned it as a leader in the Asia-Pacific region, often compared to other developed economies. This score significantly contrasts with the mainland Chinese legal system, which faces criticisms regarding human rights and judicial independence, highlighting the unique governance structure within Hong Kong SAR.
Iraq
Iraq ranked 202 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2014, indicating significant challenges in governance and legal enforcement. The country recorded a value of 3.365385%, reflecting serious issues regarding the rule of law, including the protection of fundamental rights and the effectiveness of public institutions.
This low ranking can be attributed to a range of factors, including ongoing political instability, the aftermath of years of conflict, and the influence of non-state actors in the region. Corruption, lack of accountability, and a fragmented judicial system further exacerbate the challenges faced by citizens in accessing justice.
Notably, Iraq's situation illustrates broader regional challenges, as many countries in the Middle East and North Africa face similar issues related to governance and human rights. The Rule of Law Index serves as an important tool for assessing the effectiveness of legal systems and the protection of rights globally.
Algeria
In 2014, Algeria ranked 162nd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 22.596153%. This low ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of fundamental rights within the country.
The Rule of Law Index measures various aspects of governance, including the accountability of government officials, the independence of the judiciary, and the absence of corruption. In Algeria, factors such as political instability, limited judicial independence, and restrictions on civil liberties have contributed to its poor performance in this index.
Additionally, Algeria's socio-political landscape, characterized by protests against the government and calls for reform, reflects a public demand for improved rule of law and governance. Such dynamics are essential in understanding the broader context of the country's legal framework and the challenges it faces in upholding the rule of law.
Cuba
Cuba ranked 147th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2014, with a score of 29.81%. This ranking reflects significant challenges in the enforcement of laws, judicial independence, and protection of fundamental rights within the country.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including the centralized control of the government over legal processes, the lack of an independent judiciary, and restrictions on freedom of expression. These elements contribute to a legal environment where the rule of law is perceived as weak, impacting citizens' trust in legal institutions.
In comparison with the global average, Cuba's low ranking highlights the ongoing struggles for human rights and legal reforms. The country's historical context, including decades of political isolation and economic challenges, further complicates the establishment of a robust legal framework.
Dominica
In 2014, Dominica achieved a notable position with a Rule of Law Index value of 72.12%, ranking 59th out of 213 countries. This index measures the extent to which laws are publicized, equally enforced, and independently adjudicated, as well as how well the government adheres to these laws.
The relatively high ranking indicates a strong legal framework and respect for judicial processes within the country, which promotes stability and encourages investment. Factors contributing to this positive assessment may include a well-functioning judiciary, low levels of corruption, and the presence of civil liberties that support individual rights.
Additionally, Dominica's commitment to maintaining the rule of law can be seen in its democratic governance and active civil society, which work to uphold legal standards and promote transparency. Such elements not only contribute to the country's ranking but also enhance its reputation as a safe destination for tourists and foreign investors.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.