Rule of Law Index by Country 1999
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Afghanistan - #2
Albania - #3
Algeria - #4
American Samoa - #5
Andorra - #6
Angola - #7
Anguilla - #8
Antigua and Barbuda - #9
Argentina - #10
Armenia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Zimbabwe - #212
Zambia - #211
Yemen - #210
Vietnam - #209
Venezuela - #208
Vanuatu - #207
Uzbekistan - #206
Uruguay - #205
United States Virgin Islands - #204
United States
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Insights by country
Bahrain
In 1999, Bahrain achieved a notable position in the global landscape with a ranking of 16 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index. Although the actual value for this index was reported as null %, the high rank indicates a relatively strong commitment to the principles of law and governance compared to many other nations.
This ranking can be attributed to several factors, including Bahrain's legal framework, which has been influenced by a combination of Islamic law and civil law traditions. Additionally, the country has historically maintained a relatively stable political environment and developed institutions that uphold laws and regulations, contributing to its favorable ranking.
It is worth noting that Bahrain's emphasis on economic development and modernization during this period may have also played a role in fostering a legal environment conducive to business and investment, further enhancing its Rule of Law standing in the region.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan achieved a notable 14th place ranking out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index in the year 1999. This ranking indicates a relatively strong perception of the rule of law within the country, despite the lack of a specific percentage value associated with this particular statistic.
The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including the country's legal reforms and the establishment of a more structured judicial system following its independence in 1991. However, challenges such as political influence over the judiciary and issues related to human rights persisted, impacting the effectiveness of the rule of law.
In the broader context, Azerbaijan's position in 1999 reflects a transitional phase in the post-Soviet landscape, where many countries were grappling with governance issues and the establishment of democratic norms. Despite this, Azerbaijan's ranking positioned it favorably among its regional peers during that time.
Palau
In the year 1999, Palau was ranked 146th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index. The index value for Palau during this period was recorded as null %, indicating a lack of sufficient data to assess the country's adherence to the rule of law.
This ranking reflects a broader context in which small island nations often face unique challenges in governance and legal frameworks. Factors contributing to Palau's position may include limited resources for legal institutions, geographic isolation, and a relatively small population that can complicate the establishment of comprehensive legal systems.
Despite these challenges, Palau has made efforts towards enhancing its legal frameworks and governance, particularly in the areas of environmental protection and sustainable development, which are critical for its economy and society.
Czech Republic
In 1999, the Czech Republic ranked 54th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, a statistic that reflects the nation's commitment to legal principles and governance. However, the specific value of the index for this year is reported as null%, indicating a lack of quantifiable data for that particular metric.
This ranking can be contextualized within the broader historical landscape of the Czech Republic, which was transitioning from a post-communist society towards a more democratic and rule-based governance structure following the Velvet Revolution of 1989. Factors contributing to its ranking include the establishment of a new legal framework, the strengthening of civil liberties, and efforts to combat corruption.
Despite these advances, challenges remained, such as lingering issues of bureaucratic inefficiency and the need for further judicial reforms, which may have influenced the overall perception of the rule of law in the country. Interestingly, by the late 1990s, the Czech Republic was increasingly recognized for its stable political environment and was on a path towards European Union accession, which would further necessitate adherence to the rule of law standards.
Canada
In 1999, Canada ranked 36th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, indicating a solid standing in terms of legal frameworks and governance. The specific index value for this year is recorded as null %, suggesting that either the data was not available or not applicable for that particular measurement.
The Rule of Law Index assesses various factors such as the effectiveness of law enforcement, the independence of the judiciary, and the protection of fundamental rights. Canada's relatively high ranking reflects its established legal system, democratic governance, and a commitment to upholding human rights, which are foundational to the rule of law.
Several factors contribute to Canada's position in the Rule of Law Index, including its stable political environment, comprehensive legal protections, and a strong emphasis on civil liberties. Additionally, Canada's efforts in promoting transparency and accountability within governmental institutions further bolster its standing in this index. Interestingly, Canada has consistently maintained a high level of respect for the rule of law, which is crucial for fostering public trust and social stability.
Bolivia
In 1999, Bolivia achieved a notable 25th rank out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a significant position within the global context of legal and institutional governance. However, the specific value of the index for Bolivia during this year was recorded as null%, indicating a lack of available data or measurement for that particular statistic.
This ranking suggests that Bolivia was perceived to have a relatively effective legal framework and governance compared to many other countries at the time. Factors contributing to this perception may include the country's efforts in political reforms and the establishment of democratic institutions during the late 1990s, which were pivotal in addressing issues of corruption and enhancing public trust in the legal system.
Additionally, Bolivia’s historical context, including its complex social dynamics and economic challenges, may have influenced its ranking. The country was undergoing significant changes, with increased political participation and activism, particularly from indigenous groups advocating for rights and representation.
Benin
In 1999, Benin achieved a remarkable rank of 22 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, although the specific value for the index was recorded as null%. This ranking indicates a relatively strong adherence to the principles of law and governance compared to many other nations during that period.
This high rank can be attributed to several factors, including Benin's transition to a multi-party democracy in the early 1990s, which led to improvements in political stability and the establishment of legal frameworks that promote justice and human rights. Additionally, the country has been recognized for its efforts to combat corruption and improve governmental transparency.
Interestingly, Benin's position in the Rule of Law Index reflects broader trends in West Africa during the late 1990s, where several countries were undergoing significant political reforms aimed at enhancing civil liberties and institutional integrity. This context not only highlights Benin's achievements but also underscores the importance of ongoing efforts to maintain and strengthen the rule of law in the region.
Oman
In 1999, Oman was ranked 144th out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of law and governance within the country, as the Rule of Law Index measures factors such as the extent to which laws are enacted, enforced, and respected.
The value for Oman in this index was noted as null %, suggesting a lack of data or a particularly low perception of legal and institutional effectiveness at the time. Contributing factors to this situation may include a limited political environment, where governance is predominantly top-down, which can affect the public's access to justice and legal protection.
Additionally, Oman’s socio-political context in 1999 included a relatively recent transition towards modernization and development, which may have impacted the establishment of a robust legal framework. Furthermore, the country has historically faced challenges related to human rights and freedom of expression, which can influence the overall perception of the rule of law.
Bangladesh
In 1999, Bangladesh achieved a notable position by ranking 17th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, indicating a significant perception of legal order and governance within the nation. The actual value for the index was null %, which highlights the challenges in measuring the rule of law due to various socio-political complexities.
This ranking reflects a period when Bangladesh was navigating through political turbulence and striving for institutional reforms. Factors such as corruption, political instability, and judicial inefficiencies often impacted the enforcement of laws and the overall perception of the rule of law.
Additionally, despite the challenges, the high rank suggests a relative strength in some aspects of governance compared to other nations at that time. This can be attributed to ongoing efforts to improve legal frameworks and public administration, which are critical for bolstering the rule of law.
Madagascar
In 1999, Madagascar ranked 114th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting significant challenges in governance and legal frameworks. The specific value for the index was null %, indicating that precise measurements of the rule of law were either not available or not applicable for that year.
This ranking suggests a landscape marked by issues such as political instability, corruption, and limited access to justice, which can undermine the effectiveness of legal institutions. The country faced a transition period in the late 1990s, characterized by social unrest and governance challenges, which likely contributed to its low ranking.
Additionally, factors such as economic difficulties, lack of infrastructure, and insufficient law enforcement resources have historically impeded the establishment of a robust rule of law in Madagascar. Interestingly, Madagascar's biodiversity and unique ecosystems have often clashed with developmental pressures, complicating governance and legal enforcement.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.