Rule of Law Index by Country 2012
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Norway | 100 % |
2 | Finland | 99.531 % |
3 | Sweden | 99.061 % |
4 | New Zealand | 98.592 % |
5 | Denmark | 98.122 % |
6 | Austria | 97.653 % |
7 | Netherlands | 97.183 % |
8 | Switzerland | 96.714 % |
9 | Luxembourg | 96.244 % |
10 | Australia | 95.775 % |
11 | Canada | 95.305 % |
12 | United Kingdom | 94.836 % |
13 | Ireland | 94.366 % |
14 | Singapore | 93.897 % |
15 | Greenland | 93.427 % |
16 | Jersey | 93.427 % |
17 | Iceland | 92.488 % |
18 | Germany | 92.019 % |
19 | United States | 91.549 % |
20 | Liechtenstein | 91.08 % |
21 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 90.61 % |
22 | Belgium | 90.141 % |
23 | France | 89.671 % |
24 | Andorra | 89.202 % |
25 | Anguilla | 88.732 % |
26 | Japan | 88.263 % |
27 | Malta | 87.793 % |
28 | Aruba | 87.324 % |
29 | Chile | 86.854 % |
30 | French Guiana | 86.385 % |
31 | Estonia | 85.915 % |
32 | American Samoa | 85.446 % |
33 | Bermuda | 85.446 % |
34 | Guam | 85.446 % |
35 | Cyprus | 84.038 % |
36 | Taiwan | 83.568 % |
37 | Spain | 83.099 % |
38 | Portugal | 82.629 % |
39 | Barbados | 82.16 % |
40 | Mauritius | 81.69 % |
41 | Czech Republic | 81.221 % |
42 | Slovenia | 80.751 % |
43 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 80.282 % |
44 | South Korea | 79.812 % |
45 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 79.343 % |
46 | Qatar | 78.873 % |
47 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.404 % |
48 | Israel | 77.934 % |
49 | Monaco | 77.465 % |
50 | San Marino | 77.465 % |
51 | Palau | 76.526 % |
52 | Cayman Islands | 76.056 % |
53 | Lithuania | 75.587 % |
54 | Martinique | 75.117 % |
55 | Réunion | 75.117 % |
56 | United States Virgin Islands | 75.117 % |
57 | Poland | 73.239 % |
58 | Puerto Rico | 72.77 % |
59 | Brunei Darussalam | 72.3 % |
60 | Latvia | 71.831 % |
61 | Samoa | 71.362 % |
62 | Nauru | 70.892 % |
63 | Saint Lucia | 70.423 % |
64 | Dominica | 69.953 % |
65 | China, Macao SAR | 69.484 % |
66 | Uruguay | 69.014 % |
67 | Bahamas | 68.545 % |
68 | Hungary | 68.075 % |
69 | Botswana | 67.606 % |
70 | Tuvalu | 67.136 % |
71 | United Arab Emirates | 66.667 % |
72 | Costa Rica | 66.197 % |
73 | Oman | 65.728 % |
74 | Cabo Verde | 65.258 % |
75 | Slovakia | 64.789 % |
76 | Italy | 64.319 % |
77 | Greece | 63.85 % |
78 | Malaysia | 63.38 % |
79 | Kuwait | 62.911 % |
80 | Jordan | 62.441 % |
81 | Vanuatu | 61.972 % |
82 | Namibia | 61.502 % |
83 | Bhutan | 61.033 % |
84 | Bahrain | 60.563 % |
85 | Grenada | 60.094 % |
86 | Kiribati | 59.624 % |
87 | Croatia | 59.155 % |
88 | Saudi Arabia | 58.685 % |
89 | Marshall Islands | 58.216 % |
90 | Romania | 57.746 % |
91 | South Africa | 57.277 % |
92 | Seychelles | 56.808 % |
93 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 56.338 % |
94 | Ghana | 55.869 % |
95 | Georgia | 55.399 % |
96 | Tonga | 54.93 % |
97 | Turkey | 54.46 % |
98 | Montenegro | 53.991 % |
99 | Suriname | 53.521 % |
100 | India | 53.052 % |
101 | Brazil | 52.582 % |
102 | Sri Lanka | 52.113 % |
103 | Bulgaria | 51.643 % |
104 | Tunisia | 51.174 % |
105 | Trinidad and Tobago | 50.704 % |
106 | Thailand | 50.235 % |
107 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 49.765 % |
108 | Panama | 49.296 % |
109 | Malawi | 48.826 % |
110 | Rwanda | 48.357 % |
111 | North Macedonia | 47.887 % |
112 | Lesotho | 47.418 % |
113 | Senegal | 46.948 % |
114 | Morocco | 46.479 % |
115 | Republic of Moldova | 46.009 % |
116 | Colombia | 45.54 % |
117 | Serbia | 45.07 % |
118 | Jamaica | 44.601 % |
119 | Uganda | 44.131 % |
120 | Zambia | 43.662 % |
121 | Mongolia | 43.192 % |
122 | Gabon | 42.723 % |
123 | Armenia | 42.254 % |
124 | Burkina Faso | 41.784 % |
125 | Belize | 41.315 % |
126 | State of Palestine | 40.845 % |
127 | Guyana | 40.376 % |
128 | Albania | 39.906 % |
129 | Philippines | 39.437 % |
130 | Kosovo | 38.967 % |
131 | Solomon Islands | 38.498 % |
132 | Mexico | 38.028 % |
133 | Eswatini | 37.559 % |
134 | Egypt | 37.089 % |
135 | Tanzania | 36.62 % |
136 | Maldives | 36.15 % |
137 | China | 35.681 % |
138 | Vietnam | 35.211 % |
139 | Benin | 34.742 % |
140 | Peru | 34.272 % |
141 | Indonesia | 33.803 % |
142 | Mozambique | 33.333 % |
143 | Gambia | 32.864 % |
144 | Argentina | 32.394 % |
145 | Niger | 31.925 % |
146 | Mali | 31.455 % |
147 | Fiji | 30.986 % |
148 | Ethiopia | 30.516 % |
149 | Lebanon | 30.047 % |
150 | Cuba | 29.577 % |
151 | Dominican Republic | 29.108 % |
152 | El Salvador | 28.638 % |
153 | Nicaragua | 28.169 % |
154 | Nepal | 27.7 % |
155 | Sao Tome and Principe | 27.23 % |
156 | Kazakhstan | 26.761 % |
157 | Niue | 26.291 % |
158 | Djibouti | 25.822 % |
159 | Paraguay | 25.352 % |
160 | Algeria | 24.883 % |
161 | Ukraine | 24.413 % |
162 | Kenya | 23.944 % |
163 | Papua New Guinea | 23.474 % |
164 | Laos | 23.005 % |
165 | Russia | 22.535 % |
166 | Sierra Leone | 22.066 % |
167 | Azerbaijan | 21.596 % |
168 | Pakistan | 21.127 % |
169 | Liberia | 20.657 % |
170 | Iran | 20.188 % |
171 | Belarus | 19.718 % |
172 | Madagascar | 19.249 % |
173 | Bangladesh | 18.779 % |
174 | Cook Islands | 18.31 % |
175 | Mauritania | 17.84 % |
176 | Togo | 17.371 % |
177 | Libya | 16.901 % |
178 | Cambodia | 16.432 % |
179 | Bolivia | 15.962 % |
180 | Cameroon | 15.493 % |
181 | Equatorial Guinea | 15.023 % |
182 | Ecuador | 14.554 % |
183 | Comoros | 14.085 % |
184 | Guatemala | 13.615 % |
185 | Burundi | 13.146 % |
186 | Côte d'Ivoire | 12.676 % |
187 | Syrian Arab Republic | 12.207 % |
188 | Kyrgyzstan | 11.737 % |
189 | Nigeria | 11.268 % |
190 | Congo | 10.798 % |
191 | Timor-Leste | 10.329 % |
192 | Honduras | 9.859 % |
193 | Tajikistan | 9.39 % |
194 | Sudan | 8.92 % |
195 | Yemen | 8.451 % |
196 | Uzbekistan | 7.981 % |
197 | Angola | 7.512 % |
198 | Haiti | 7.042 % |
199 | North Korea | 6.573 % |
200 | Myanmar | 6.103 % |
201 | Turkmenistan | 5.634 % |
202 | Guinea | 5.164 % |
203 | South Sudan | 4.695 % |
204 | Eritrea | 4.225 % |
205 | Central African Republic | 3.756 % |
206 | Chad | 3.286 % |
207 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.817 % |
208 | Iraq | 2.347 % |
209 | Zimbabwe | 1.878 % |
210 | Afghanistan | 1.408 % |
211 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 0.939 % |
212 | Venezuela | 0.469 % |
213 | Somalia | 0 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Norway
- #2
Finland
- #3
Sweden
- #4
New Zealand
- #5
Denmark
- #6
Austria
- #7
Netherlands
- #8
Switzerland
- #9
Luxembourg
- #10
Australia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Somalia
- #212
Venezuela
- #211
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #210
Afghanistan
- #209
Zimbabwe
- #208
Iraq
- #207
Guinea-Bissau
- #206
Chad
- #205
Central African Republic
- #204
Eritrea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country is a pivotal measure reflecting the confidence and adherence to laws, functioning of courts, effectiveness of police, security of property rights, and protection from crime and violence across the globe. For the year 2012, this index encapsulates a comprehensive assessment of these elements, providing insights into governance and social infrastructures worldwide. The index is expressed as a percentile rank, with higher percentages indicating stronger rule of law. This article delves into the significant findings from the 2012 data, highlighting top-performing countries, those facing challenges, and the broader implications on governance and international relations.
Top-Tier Leaders in Rule of Law
In 2012, the countries leading the Rule of Law Index set a benchmark for legal transparency and efficacy. Norway stood at the pinnacle with a perfect score of 100%, closely followed by Finland (99.53%) and Sweden (99.06%). These nations exemplified robust legal frameworks, independent judiciary systems, and a high degree of public trust in law enforcement. Their positions in the index reflect longstanding traditions of democratic governance and social equity. Such high rankings often correlate with prosperous economies, suggesting that a strong rule of law can foster economic stability and growth.
Countries Facing Rule of Law Challenges
On the opposite end of the spectrum, Myanmar recorded the lowest score at 6.10%, indicating severe deficiencies in legal and institutional structures. This was closely followed by North Korea (6.57%) and Haiti (7.04%). Countries like these often grapple with political instability, corruption, and inadequate legal protections, which undermine public trust and economic development. The low scores in these regions highlight significant governance challenges that require international cooperation and reform efforts to address systemic issues and improve legal transparency.
Regional Clustering and Patterns
The 2012 Rule of Law Index revealed distinct regional patterns, highlighting stark differences in governance quality. Scandinavian countries dominated the top ranks, emphasizing the region's commitment to transparency and justice. Conversely, many African and some Southeast Asian nations appeared in the lower tiers, reflecting ongoing challenges in establishing effective legal systems. These regional disparities underscore the complex interplay between cultural, political, and historical factors in shaping a country's legal landscape. It is crucial for regional alliances and international organizations to support legal reforms and capacity-building initiatives, tailoring approaches to the unique needs of different regions.
Year-Over-Year Dynamics and Notable Changes
The Rule of Law Index in 2012 also featured intriguing year-over-year dynamics. Qatar experienced the most significant improvement, with a 7.51% increase, reflecting efforts in legal reforms and governance enhancements. Similarly, countries like Senegal, Laos, and Belarus saw notable improvements, indicating positive strides towards stronger legal frameworks. On the other hand, the Syrian Arab Republic suffered a dramatic decline of 13.62%, primarily due to the ongoing civil conflict, which severely weakened institutional integrity and legal order. Understanding these dynamics helps in identifying the impact of political upheavals and reform initiatives on rule of law.
Policy and Governance Impact
The Rule of Law Index is not just a measure of legal efficacy but also a reflection of wider governance strategies and policy impacts. Countries with high scores typically exhibit effective policy implementation, indicating a strong correlation between good governance practices and robust legal systems. This relationship suggests that nations seeking to improve their rule of law standings must focus on comprehensive policy reforms, addressing corruption, enhancing judicial independence, and ensuring law enforcement accountability. As such, the 2012 data serves as a vital tool for policymakers and international bodies aiming to foster global legal and governance standards.
The Rule of Law Index by Country in 2012 provides a nuanced understanding of global legal landscapes, highlighting both exemplary and struggling systems. By examining this index, stakeholders can identify areas for improvement, celebrate successes, and align international efforts towards strengthening the rule of law worldwide. As legal systems evolve, ongoing analysis and attention to these metrics remain crucial in promoting justice, equity, and peace across nations.
Insights by country
Russia
In 2012, Russia ranked 165th out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, indicating significant challenges in the adherence to legal principles. The country achieved a score of 22.54%, reflecting a considerable deficit in the rule of law and governance.
This low ranking can be attributed to various factors, including corruption, lack of judicial independence, and limited civil liberties. The concentration of power in the executive branch and the influence of political interests over the judiciary have undermined the effectiveness and impartiality of legal institutions.
Additionally, the political climate in Russia during this period was marked by increasing restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly, which further compromised the rule of law. These conditions contributed to an environment where legal protections were often not upheld, leading to public distrust in the legal system.
Bangladesh
In 2012, Bangladesh ranked 173rd out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 18.779343%. This low ranking indicates significant challenges regarding the rule of law and governance within the country. Factors contributing to this situation include political instability, corruption, and inadequate access to justice, which hinder the effective enforcement of laws and the protection of rights.
The rule of law is essential for fostering democratic governance and economic development. In Bangladesh, the lack of a robust legal framework often results in human rights violations and limited accountability for government actions. Additionally, societal issues such as poverty and social stratification exacerbate the difficulties faced by citizens in seeking legal redress.
Compared to its regional neighbors, Bangladesh's rule of law index reflects a broader struggle within South Asia, where many countries face similar challenges in governance and law enforcement. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving the overall stability and prosperity of the nation.
Nigeria
Nigeria was ranked 189 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index in 2012, highlighting significant challenges within its legal and governance systems. The country achieved a score of 11.27%, indicating a severe deficiency in the enforcement of laws, protection of fundamental rights, and the effectiveness of its justice system.
This low ranking can be attributed to various factors, including corruption, political instability, inadequate law enforcement, and a lack of public trust in judicial institutions. Additionally, Nigeria has faced ongoing issues related to insurgency, particularly from groups such as Boko Haram, which have further complicated the rule of law and security situation in the country.
Interestingly, Nigeria's challenges in the rule of law resonate with broader trends observed in many developing nations, where governance structures often struggle to uphold legal standards. According to the World Bank, improving the rule of law is critical for fostering economic development and ensuring social stability.
Mali
Mali was ranked 146 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2012, with an overall score of 31.46%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of human rights within the country.
The low score reflects issues such as political instability, a lack of effective governance, and widespread corruption, which have historically undermined the rule of law in Mali. Additionally, the 2012 coup d'état further exacerbated these problems, leading to a breakdown in law and order and increased violence in certain regions.
Relatedly, Mali has faced ongoing challenges with security and human rights, particularly in the northern regions where separatist movements and extremist groups have gained influence. This situation has contributed to the overall low performance in legal and institutional frameworks, highlighting the need for comprehensive reforms to strengthen the rule of law.
Puerto Rico
In 2012, Puerto Rico achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 72.77%, ranking 58th out of 213 countries. This index reflects the extent to which laws are publicly promulgated, equally enforced, and independently adjudicated, as well as the accessibility and fairness of the justice system.
The relatively high ranking indicates a robust legal framework and functioning judiciary compared to many other jurisdictions. However, challenges such as economic distress, political instability, and the impact of external governance from the United States have influenced the perception and effectiveness of the rule of law in the territory.
Factors contributing to Puerto Rico's rule of law status include its historical context as a U.S. territory, where federal laws interplay with local regulations, and socio-economic issues such as high unemployment rates and public debt, which can undermine public trust in institutions. Notably, the island's unique political status often complicates governance and legal reforms.
South Africa
In 2012, South Africa achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 57.28%, ranking 91 out of 213 countries. This score reflects various aspects of governance, legal frameworks, and the protection of fundamental rights within the nation.
South Africa's relatively moderate ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a complex legal system influenced by its history of apartheid, ongoing challenges with corruption, and issues surrounding law enforcement efficacy. Despite a robust constitutional framework, the implementation of laws and access to justice often face obstacles.
Moreover, the country grapples with social inequalities and crime, which can undermine public confidence in the rule of law. Interestingly, South Africa's position within the index highlights the ongoing struggle for equitable legal protection and the rule of law that is essential for sustainable development and social stability.
Mauritius
In 2012, Mauritius achieved a strong position, ranking 40th out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 81.69014%. This ranking highlights Mauritius as one of the leading nations in Africa regarding adherence to the rule of law, reflecting its commitment to democratic governance and the protection of civil liberties.
The high score of Mauritius can be attributed to several key factors, including a well-established legal framework, an independent judiciary, and a relatively low level of corruption in public institutions. These elements contribute to the public's trust in the legal system and the enforcement of laws.
Additionally, Mauritius has consistently demonstrated political stability and a commitment to human rights, which further enhances its rule of law. Interesting to note, Mauritius is often cited as a model for other African nations, showcasing that effective governance and rule of law can coexist with economic development.
Malta
In 2012, Malta achieved a commendable rank of 27 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 87.79%. This high ranking indicates a strong adherence to the principles of law, including the protection of fundamental rights, accountability, and the transparency of government institutions.
The favorable Rule of Law Index for Malta can be attributed to several factors, including its stable political environment, efficient judicial system, and robust legal framework. The country has a long-standing commitment to democratic governance and respect for human rights, which contribute to its high score.
Additionally, Malta's membership in the European Union since 2004 has bolstered its legal standards and practices, aligning them with broader European norms. This integration has facilitated improved regulatory frameworks and strengthened the rule of law in various sectors, enhancing public confidence in the justice system.
Liechtenstein
In 2012, Liechtenstein achieved a commendable 20th rank out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting its strong adherence to legal principles and governance. The country scored an impressive 91.08% on the index, indicating a high level of respect for the rule of law, effective judicial systems, and accountability of public officials.
This high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including Liechtenstein's efficient legal framework, low levels of corruption, and a stable political environment. The principality's commitment to maintaining a fair and impartial judiciary has significantly contributed to its positive standing in the Rule of Law Index.
Additionally, Liechtenstein benefits from its small size and population, which facilitate greater transparency and community engagement in governance. The country is known for its strong economic performance and low crime rates, further reinforcing its reputation as a nation where the rule of law is effectively upheld.
Mozambique
Mozambique ranked 142nd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2012, with a score of 33.33%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of rights, reflecting a weak legal framework and limited access to justice for its citizens.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including corruption within the judicial system, political instability, and insufficient resources allocated to law enforcement agencies. These issues have hindered the establishment of a robust legal environment, resulting in violations of human rights and reduced public trust in governmental institutions.
In addition to these challenges, Mozambique has historically faced difficulties related to poverty and underdevelopment, which exacerbate the rule of law situation. Notably, the country has been recovering from a prolonged civil conflict, which has left a legacy of governance issues that continue to affect its legal and institutional frameworks.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.