Rule of Law Index by Country 2013
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Norway | 100 % |
2 | Finland | 99.531 % |
3 | Sweden | 99.061 % |
4 | Denmark | 98.592 % |
5 | New Zealand | 98.122 % |
6 | Austria | 97.653 % |
7 | Netherlands | 97.183 % |
8 | Luxembourg | 96.714 % |
9 | Switzerland | 96.244 % |
10 | Australia | 95.775 % |
11 | Canada | 95.305 % |
12 | Ireland | 94.836 % |
13 | Singapore | 94.366 % |
14 | United Kingdom | 93.897 % |
15 | Greenland | 93.427 % |
16 | Jersey | 93.427 % |
17 | Iceland | 92.488 % |
18 | Germany | 92.019 % |
19 | Liechtenstein | 91.549 % |
20 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 91.08 % |
21 | United States | 90.61 % |
22 | Belgium | 90.141 % |
23 | Japan | 89.671 % |
24 | France | 89.202 % |
25 | Andorra | 88.732 % |
26 | Anguilla | 88.263 % |
27 | Malta | 87.793 % |
28 | Aruba | 87.324 % |
29 | Chile | 86.854 % |
30 | Estonia | 86.385 % |
31 | French Guiana | 85.915 % |
32 | American Samoa | 85.446 % |
33 | Bermuda | 85.446 % |
34 | Guam | 85.446 % |
35 | Taiwan | 84.038 % |
36 | Barbados | 83.568 % |
37 | Portugal | 83.099 % |
38 | Cyprus | 82.629 % |
39 | Spain | 82.16 % |
40 | Czech Republic | 81.69 % |
41 | Slovenia | 81.221 % |
42 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 80.751 % |
43 | Israel | 80.282 % |
44 | Mauritius | 79.812 % |
45 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 79.343 % |
46 | Qatar | 78.873 % |
47 | South Korea | 78.404 % |
48 | Monaco | 77.934 % |
49 | San Marino | 77.934 % |
50 | Palau | 76.995 % |
51 | Cayman Islands | 76.526 % |
52 | Martinique | 76.056 % |
53 | Réunion | 76.056 % |
54 | United States Virgin Islands | 76.056 % |
55 | Poland | 74.178 % |
56 | Antigua and Barbuda | 73.709 % |
57 | Lithuania | 73.239 % |
58 | Saint Lucia | 72.77 % |
59 | Latvia | 72.3 % |
60 | Samoa | 71.831 % |
61 | Dominica | 71.362 % |
62 | Puerto Rico | 70.892 % |
63 | China, Macao SAR | 70.423 % |
64 | Bahamas | 69.953 % |
65 | Nauru | 69.484 % |
66 | United Arab Emirates | 69.014 % |
67 | Tuvalu | 68.545 % |
68 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.075 % |
69 | Hungary | 67.606 % |
70 | Uruguay | 67.136 % |
71 | Costa Rica | 66.667 % |
72 | Cabo Verde | 66.197 % |
73 | Botswana | 65.728 % |
74 | Oman | 65.258 % |
75 | Greece | 64.789 % |
76 | Slovakia | 64.319 % |
77 | Italy | 63.85 % |
78 | Jordan | 63.38 % |
79 | Vanuatu | 62.911 % |
80 | Kuwait | 62.441 % |
81 | Malaysia | 61.972 % |
82 | Bahrain | 61.502 % |
83 | Namibia | 61.033 % |
84 | Bhutan | 60.563 % |
85 | Marshall Islands | 60.094 % |
86 | Kiribati | 59.624 % |
87 | Grenada | 59.155 % |
88 | Romania | 58.685 % |
89 | Croatia | 58.216 % |
90 | Seychelles | 57.746 % |
91 | Ghana | 57.277 % |
92 | Saudi Arabia | 56.808 % |
93 | South Africa | 56.338 % |
94 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 55.869 % |
95 | Tonga | 55.399 % |
96 | Georgia | 54.93 % |
97 | Turkey | 54.46 % |
98 | Montenegro | 53.991 % |
99 | India | 53.521 % |
100 | Suriname | 53.052 % |
101 | Brazil | 52.582 % |
102 | Thailand | 52.113 % |
103 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.643 % |
104 | Rwanda | 51.174 % |
105 | Bulgaria | 50.704 % |
106 | Malawi | 50.235 % |
107 | Tunisia | 49.765 % |
108 | Lesotho | 49.296 % |
109 | Trinidad and Tobago | 48.826 % |
110 | North Macedonia | 48.357 % |
111 | Senegal | 47.887 % |
112 | Panama | 47.418 % |
113 | Zambia | 46.948 % |
114 | Sri Lanka | 46.479 % |
115 | Serbia | 46.009 % |
116 | Jamaica | 45.54 % |
117 | Armenia | 45.07 % |
118 | Morocco | 44.601 % |
119 | Uganda | 44.131 % |
120 | Mongolia | 43.662 % |
121 | Republic of Moldova | 43.192 % |
122 | Colombia | 42.723 % |
123 | State of Palestine | 42.254 % |
124 | Belize | 41.784 % |
125 | Philippines | 41.315 % |
126 | Tanzania | 40.845 % |
127 | Eswatini | 40.376 % |
128 | Solomon Islands | 39.906 % |
129 | Vietnam | 39.437 % |
130 | Albania | 38.967 % |
131 | Gabon | 38.498 % |
132 | Guyana | 38.028 % |
133 | China | 37.559 % |
134 | Burkina Faso | 37.089 % |
135 | Indonesia | 36.62 % |
136 | Dominican Republic | 36.15 % |
137 | Kosovo | 35.681 % |
138 | Mexico | 35.211 % |
139 | Benin | 34.742 % |
140 | Peru | 34.272 % |
141 | El Salvador | 33.803 % |
142 | Gambia | 33.333 % |
143 | Ethiopia | 32.864 % |
144 | Argentina | 32.394 % |
145 | Niger | 31.925 % |
146 | Nicaragua | 31.455 % |
147 | Algeria | 30.986 % |
148 | Cuba | 30.516 % |
149 | Kenya | 30.047 % |
150 | Kazakhstan | 29.577 % |
151 | Nepal | 29.108 % |
152 | Maldives | 28.638 % |
153 | Fiji | 28.169 % |
154 | Lebanon | 27.7 % |
155 | Egypt | 27.23 % |
156 | Mali | 26.761 % |
157 | Azerbaijan | 26.291 % |
158 | Paraguay | 25.822 % |
159 | Sao Tome and Principe | 25.352 % |
160 | Djibouti | 24.883 % |
161 | Niue | 24.413 % |
162 | Laos | 23.944 % |
163 | Mozambique | 23.474 % |
164 | Russia | 23.005 % |
165 | Ukraine | 22.535 % |
166 | Pakistan | 22.066 % |
167 | Sierra Leone | 21.596 % |
168 | Ecuador | 21.127 % |
169 | Bangladesh | 20.657 % |
170 | Belarus | 20.188 % |
171 | Liberia | 19.718 % |
172 | Côte d'Ivoire | 19.249 % |
173 | Madagascar | 18.779 % |
174 | Cook Islands | 18.31 % |
175 | Papua New Guinea | 17.84 % |
176 | Comoros | 17.371 % |
177 | Togo | 16.901 % |
178 | Iran | 16.432 % |
179 | Cambodia | 15.962 % |
180 | Mauritania | 15.493 % |
181 | Bolivia | 15.023 % |
182 | Cameroon | 14.554 % |
183 | Burundi | 14.085 % |
184 | Guatemala | 13.615 % |
185 | Kyrgyzstan | 13.146 % |
186 | Nigeria | 12.676 % |
187 | Congo | 12.207 % |
188 | Equatorial Guinea | 11.737 % |
189 | Honduras | 11.268 % |
190 | Yemen | 10.798 % |
191 | Timor-Leste | 10.329 % |
192 | Uzbekistan | 9.859 % |
193 | Myanmar | 9.39 % |
194 | Libya | 8.92 % |
195 | Tajikistan | 8.451 % |
196 | Sudan | 7.981 % |
197 | Angola | 7.512 % |
198 | Haiti | 7.042 % |
199 | Turkmenistan | 6.573 % |
200 | North Korea | 6.103 % |
201 | Guinea | 5.634 % |
202 | Chad | 5.164 % |
203 | Syrian Arab Republic | 4.695 % |
204 | Eritrea | 4.225 % |
205 | South Sudan | 3.756 % |
206 | Iraq | 3.286 % |
207 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.817 % |
208 | Zimbabwe | 2.347 % |
209 | Afghanistan | 1.878 % |
210 | Guinea-Bissau | 1.408 % |
211 | Venezuela | 0.939 % |
212 | Central African Republic | 0.469 % |
213 | Somalia | 0 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Norway
- #2
Finland
- #3
Sweden
- #4
Denmark
- #5
New Zealand
- #6
Austria
- #7
Netherlands
- #8
Luxembourg
- #9
Switzerland
- #10
Australia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Somalia
- #212
Central African Republic
- #211
Venezuela
- #210
Guinea-Bissau
- #209
Afghanistan
- #208
Zimbabwe
- #207
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #206
Iraq
- #205
South Sudan
- #204
Eritrea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index is a critical metric that measures the confidence in the legal system and the enforcement of laws across various countries. In 2013, this index provided a snapshot of governance by evaluating countries based on parameters such as adherence to law, the effectiveness of courts, police efficiency, property rights, and protection against crime and violence. As a global benchmark, it offers insights into the socio-political fabric that underpins economic development and civil liberties worldwide.
Top Performers in the Rule of Law Index 2013
In 2013, Northern European countries dominated the top ranks of the Rule of Law Index, showcasing their exemplary commitment to justice and governance. Norway led the world with a perfect score of 100%, reflecting its robust legal framework and effective law enforcement. Close behind were Finland (99.53%) and Sweden (99.06%), reinforcing the Nordic model's reputation for transparency and accountability. These nations' high rankings signify their steadfast adherence to democratic principles and the trust their populations place in legal institutions. The consistent performance across these countries highlights a regional pattern of effective legal systems underpinned by strong institutional frameworks.
Struggles and Challenges: The Bottom of the Index
At the other end of the spectrum, countries like North Korea and Turkmenistan recorded some of the lowest scores, with 6.10% and 6.57%, respectively. These figures underscore significant challenges such as lack of judicial independence, ineffective law enforcement, and endemic corruption. The low scores reflect the persistent issues of authoritarian governance and suppression of civil liberties, which hinder the development of effective legal institutions. Such environments not only impact the immediate legal landscape but also pose long-term challenges to economic growth and social stability.
Shifts in the Rule of Law: Year-over-Year Changes
In 2013, several countries experienced notable shifts in their Rule of Law Index scores. The Dominican Republic stood out with a substantial increase of 7.04%, indicating improvements in governance and legal systems, likely influenced by reforms aimed at enhancing judicial independence and efficiency. Similarly, Côte d'Ivoire and Ecuador saw significant progress, with both countries increasing their scores by 6.57%, reflecting efforts to stabilize legal institutions and bolster public confidence in the legal system. On the downside, Egypt and Mozambique experienced declines of 9.86%, pointing to political instability and challenges in law enforcement during periods of turmoil and transition.
Policy Impact and Governance
The Rule of Law Index not only measures current status but also reflects the impact of policy decisions and governance. In 2013, countries with higher scores were often those with proactive policies that fostered transparency and accountability. Governments in these regions typically invested in legal reforms and capacity building within judicial systems, reinforcing public confidence. Conversely, countries with lower scores often struggled with policy implementation, where corruption and lack of political will undermined legal frameworks. This dichotomy illustrates how governance quality directly influences the rule of law, affecting everything from foreign investment to human rights.
Regional Comparisons and Insights
Regional analysis of the Rule of Law Index in 2013 reveals stark contrasts and valuable insights. Europe, particularly Northern and Western Europe, exhibited the highest levels of legal integrity, aligning with strong democratic traditions and economic stability. In contrast, regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia struggled with lower scores, often due to political unrest, corruption, and weak legal frameworks. These regional differences highlight the correlation between geographic location, historical governance practices, and the current state of legal systems. Understanding these patterns can provide a roadmap for international organizations aiming to implement targeted reforms and strengthen the rule of law globally.
The Rule of Law Index by Country in 2013 offers a comprehensive view of global governance and legal systems, highlighting both achievements and areas needing improvement. As countries navigate the complexities of legal reforms and governance, this index serves as a vital tool for policymakers and international bodies striving to foster justice and equality worldwide.
Insights by country
Thailand
In 2013, Thailand ranked 102nd out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 52.11%. This ranking reflects the country's challenges in upholding the rule of law, which encompasses aspects such as justice, governance, and the protection of fundamental rights.
Several factors may contribute to this statistic, including political instability, corruption, and issues related to the judicial system. Thailand has experienced significant political turmoil, including coups and protests, which can disrupt legal processes and undermine public confidence in institutions.
Additionally, issues such as corruption and inequality can adversely affect the rule of law, with marginalized communities often facing greater barriers to accessing justice. This context highlights the ongoing challenges Thailand faces in improving its rule of law framework and ensuring equitable legal protections for all citizens.
Gambia
In 2013, Gambia ranked 142nd out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a score of 33.33%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the country's adherence to legal principles, including the effectiveness of law enforcement and the independence of the judiciary.
The low score can be attributed to several factors, including a lack of judicial independence, widespread corruption, and limited access to legal recourse for the population. Such conditions undermine the rule of law and contribute to public distrust in legal institutions.
Interestingly, Gambia's situation is part of a broader trend observed in many countries within the region, where governance issues often impede the establishment of a robust legal framework. This highlights the ongoing challenges faced by nations striving to improve their legal systems and uphold human rights.
Eswatini
In 2013, Eswatini ranked 127 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, achieving a score of 40.38%. This ranking indicates challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of rights within the country, reflecting a legal environment that may be perceived as inconsistent or lacking in transparency.
The relatively low score can be attributed to several factors, including a centralized political system, limited judicial independence, and constraints on civil liberties. These elements contribute to a perception of inadequate accountability and protection of individual rights, which are crucial components of the rule of law.
Additionally, it is important to note that Eswatini's governance structure is characterized by a monarchy, which can influence the implementation of laws and the administration of justice. This context is essential for understanding the implications of the Rule of Law Index on the country's overall governance and societal stability.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria ranked 105 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2013, with a score of 50.704224%. This position indicates a moderate level of adherence to the principles of the rule of law, which encompasses factors such as accountability, legal certainty, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The relatively low ranking can be attributed to various challenges including issues with judicial independence, corruption, and the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies. These factors have historically undermined public trust in governmental institutions and the legal framework.
In the broader context, Bulgaria's score reflects ongoing reforms aimed at strengthening the judiciary and combating corruption, which have been emphasized by both the European Union and local stakeholders. Notably, Bulgaria is one of the few EU countries that has faced significant scrutiny regarding its legal and institutional frameworks.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2013, Equatorial Guinea ranked 188 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, indicating a significant deficiency in adherence to legal principles and governance. The country's score of 11.737089% reflects widespread challenges in the legal system, including issues related to corruption, lack of judicial independence, and limited access to justice for its citizens.
The low ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a highly centralized and authoritarian political structure, where power is concentrated in the hands of a few, and a lack of transparency in government operations. Additionally, pervasive corruption undermines accountability and public trust in legal institutions, creating an environment where the rule of law is not consistently applied.
Equatorial Guinea's situation is further complicated by its rich natural resources, particularly oil, which has led to significant wealth for a small elite while the majority of the population remains in poverty. This wealth disparity exacerbates social tensions and hinders efforts for reform and improvement in governance and legal frameworks.
French Guiana
In 2013, French Guiana achieved a notable Rule of Law Index score of 85.92%, ranking 31st out of 213 countries. This high score indicates a strong adherence to the principles of law, including effective enforcement, judicial independence, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The favorable ranking can be attributed to several factors, including its status as an overseas department of France, which subjects it to French legal standards and governance structures. This connection to France ensures a relatively stable legal environment and access to resources that promote rule of law.
Additionally, French Guiana benefits from a diverse population and a commitment to democratic values, further enhancing its legal framework. Comparatively, other regions with lower rule of law indices often struggle with issues such as corruption, political instability, and inadequate legal protections.
Burundi
In 2013, Burundi ranked 183rd out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, reflecting severe challenges in governance and legal frameworks. The country recorded a Rule of Law Index value of 14.08%, indicating significant deficiencies in rule of law, access to justice, and respect for human rights.
This low ranking can be attributed to various factors, including a history of political instability, ethnic conflict, and weak institutional capacity. The aftermath of the civil war, which lasted from 1993 to 2005, has left enduring impacts on the legal and political landscape, contributing to a lack of effective law enforcement and judicial independence.
Moreover, corruption and limited public trust in governmental institutions further exacerbate the situation, hindering the protection of citizens' rights and the enforcement of laws. In comparison to regional peers, Burundi's governance challenges highlight the necessity for comprehensive reforms to improve the rule of law and foster a more stable society.
Denmark
Denmark ranked 4th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2013, with a remarkable score of 98.59%. This high ranking reflects the country's robust legal framework, strong respect for human rights, and effective government institutions that uphold the rule of law.
The impressive score can be attributed to several factors, including a high level of public trust in the judicial system, low levels of corruption, and a strong commitment to democratic governance. Additionally, Denmark's emphasis on transparency and accountability in both public and private sectors contributes significantly to its legal stability.
As a further context, Denmark consistently performs well in various international indices, often being recognized for its high quality of life, low crime rates, and strong social welfare systems, which are integral components of its effective rule of law.
Panama
In 2013, Panama achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 47.42%, ranking 112th out of 213 countries. This index measures the extent to which countries adhere to the rule of law, encompassing factors such as the effectiveness of the judiciary, enforcement of laws, and protection of fundamental rights.
The relatively low score indicates challenges in the legal and judicial systems, which may be influenced by issues such as corruption, inefficiencies in the legal process, and limited access to justice for certain segments of the population. Additionally, Panama's political landscape and historical context, including past military rule and ongoing governance issues, can further complicate the enforcement of laws and public trust in institutions.
Moreover, the Rule of Law Index reflects broader societal conditions, as nations with strong rule of law typically experience higher levels of economic stability and citizen satisfaction. Enhancing the rule of law in Panama could be pivotal for promoting sustainable development and attracting foreign investment.
Nauru
Nauru achieved a notable position in the global landscape with a Rule of Law Index value of 69.48%, ranking 65th out of 213 countries in the year 2013. This ranking reflects the effectiveness of the legal system, the protection of rights, and the overall adherence to the rule of law within the island nation.
The relatively high score suggests that Nauru has made significant strides in establishing a legal framework that supports justice and governance. Contributing factors to this performance may include the country’s small population, which facilitates more direct governance and accountability, as well as its reliance on international partnerships for legal and political stability.
Interestingly, Nauru's legal environment has faced challenges, including issues related to human rights and the treatment of asylum seekers, which could impact future assessments of the rule of law. Nevertheless, its ranking in 2013 indicates a positive trajectory in its commitment to uphold legal principles and ensure citizen rights.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.