Rule of Law Index by Country 2004
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Austria | 96.154 % |
2 | Australia | 95.673 % |
3 | Canada | 94.712 % |
4 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 92.788 % |
5 | Barbados | 91.346 % |
6 | Bahamas | 90.385 % |
7 | China, Macao SAR | 89.904 % |
8 | Belgium | 88.942 % |
9 | Andorra | 87.5 % |
10 | Chile | 86.538 % |
11 | Anguilla | 86.058 % |
12 | Cayman Islands | 86.058 % |
13 | Bermuda | 84.615 % |
14 | Aruba | 80.769 % |
15 | Cyprus | 78.846 % |
16 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.365 % |
17 | American Samoa | 74.519 % |
18 | Czech Republic | 70.192 % |
19 | Bahrain | 69.231 % |
20 | Botswana | 67.788 % |
21 | Costa Rica | 64.423 % |
22 | Brunei Darussalam | 61.058 % |
23 | Cabo Verde | 60.577 % |
24 | Bhutan | 58.654 % |
25 | Croatia | 54.808 % |
26 | Belize | 50.481 % |
27 | Bulgaria | 49.519 % |
28 | Brazil | 41.346 % |
29 | Benin | 39.423 % |
30 | Armenia | 38.462 % |
31 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.5 % |
32 | Burkina Faso | 36.538 % |
33 | China | 35.577 % |
34 | Algeria | 34.135 % |
35 | Bolivia | 33.173 % |
36 | Colombia | 29.808 % |
37 | Albania | 29.327 % |
38 | Argentina | 25.481 % |
39 | Azerbaijan | 19.712 % |
40 | Comoros | 16.827 % |
41 | Cuba | 15.385 % |
42 | Bangladesh | 14.904 % |
43 | Cameroon | 13.462 % |
44 | Belarus | 12.5 % |
45 | Congo | 12.019 % |
46 | Cambodia | 10.577 % |
47 | Chad | 7.692 % |
48 | Côte d'Ivoire | 6.731 % |
49 | Burundi | 5.769 % |
50 | Angola | 5.288 % |
51 | Central African Republic | 4.327 % |
52 | Afghanistan | 2.404 % |
53 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.923 % |
54 | Cook Islands | NaN % |
55 | Finland | 99.519 % |
56 | Denmark | 99.038 % |
57 | Iceland | 98.558 % |
58 | Germany | 93.75 % |
59 | Ireland | 92.308 % |
60 | France | 91.827 % |
61 | Japan | 88.462 % |
62 | Guam | 82.692 % |
63 | Greece | 77.404 % |
64 | Estonia | 76.923 % |
65 | Israel | 75.481 % |
66 | Hungary | 75 % |
67 | Dominica | 69.712 % |
68 | Kiribati | 68.75 % |
69 | Italy | 68.269 % |
70 | Latvia | 66.827 % |
71 | French Guiana | 66.346 % |
72 | Kuwait | 64.904 % |
73 | Jordan | 59.615 % |
74 | Grenada | 59.135 % |
75 | Fiji | 56.731 % |
76 | India | 55.769 % |
77 | Egypt | 52.885 % |
78 | Lesotho | 49.038 % |
79 | Ghana | 48.558 % |
80 | Lebanon | 45.673 % |
81 | Gambia | 42.308 % |
82 | Jamaica | 40.385 % |
83 | Gabon | 37.981 % |
84 | El Salvador | 37.019 % |
85 | Guyana | 33.654 % |
86 | Iran | 31.731 % |
87 | Dominican Republic | 30.769 % |
88 | Indonesia | 28.846 % |
89 | Georgia | 27.885 % |
90 | Ecuador | 25.962 % |
91 | Djibouti | 25 % |
92 | Kyrgyzstan | 23.077 % |
93 | Kosovo | 22.596 % |
94 | Eswatini | 22.115 % |
95 | Honduras | 21.635 % |
96 | Kenya | 20.673 % |
97 | Ethiopia | 20.192 % |
98 | Eritrea | 18.269 % |
99 | Kazakhstan | 14.423 % |
100 | Equatorial Guinea | 11.538 % |
101 | Greenland | NaN % |
102 | Guatemala | 16.346 % |
103 | Guinea-Bissau | 11.058 % |
104 | Laos | 9.135 % |
105 | Guinea | 8.173 % |
106 | Haiti | 1.442 % |
107 | Iraq | 0.481 % |
108 | Jersey | NaN % |
109 | Norway | 100 % |
110 | New Zealand | 97.115 % |
111 | Luxembourg | 96.635 % |
112 | Netherlands | 95.192 % |
113 | Malta | 89.423 % |
114 | Portugal | 87.981 % |
115 | Liechtenstein | 84.135 % |
116 | Réunion | 83.654 % |
117 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 83.173 % |
118 | Martinique | 81.25 % |
119 | Mauritius | 77.885 % |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 76.442 % |
121 | Marshall Islands | 74.038 % |
122 | Monaco | 74.038 % |
123 | Nauru | 74.038 % |
124 | Palau | 74.038 % |
125 | Saint Lucia | 71.635 % |
126 | Puerto Rico | 71.154 % |
127 | Lithuania | 67.308 % |
128 | Oman | 65.865 % |
129 | Malaysia | 62.981 % |
130 | Poland | 61.538 % |
131 | Qatar | 60.096 % |
132 | Mongolia | 57.692 % |
133 | Namibia | 51.442 % |
134 | Morocco | 50.962 % |
135 | Panama | 50 % |
136 | Malawi | 48.077 % |
137 | Romania | 47.115 % |
138 | North Macedonia | 46.635 % |
139 | Mali | 46.154 % |
140 | Montenegro | 45.192 % |
141 | Madagascar | 43.75 % |
142 | Maldives | 43.269 % |
143 | Republic of Moldova | 42.788 % |
144 | Mexico | 40.865 % |
145 | Peru | 36.058 % |
146 | Philippines | 32.692 % |
147 | Niger | 32.212 % |
148 | Mozambique | 31.25 % |
149 | Nepal | 27.404 % |
150 | Mauritania | 26.923 % |
151 | Papua New Guinea | 26.442 % |
152 | Nicaragua | 24.038 % |
153 | Rwanda | 21.154 % |
154 | Libya | 19.231 % |
155 | Russia | 18.75 % |
156 | Paraguay | 17.788 % |
157 | Pakistan | 17.308 % |
158 | North Korea | 8.654 % |
159 | Nigeria | 6.25 % |
160 | Liberia | 3.846 % |
161 | Myanmar | 0.962 % |
162 | Niue | NaN % |
163 | Switzerland | 98.077 % |
164 | Sweden | 97.596 % |
165 | Singapore | 94.231 % |
166 | United Kingdom | 93.269 % |
167 | United States | 90.865 % |
168 | United States Virgin Islands | 87.019 % |
169 | Spain | 85.096 % |
170 | Samoa | 82.212 % |
171 | Taiwan | 81.731 % |
172 | Slovenia | 79.808 % |
173 | South Korea | 79.327 % |
174 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 76.442 % |
175 | San Marino | 74.038 % |
176 | Tuvalu | 70.673 % |
177 | Seychelles | 65.385 % |
178 | Slovakia | 63.942 % |
179 | Vanuatu | 63.462 % |
180 | Uruguay | 62.5 % |
181 | United Arab Emirates | 62.019 % |
182 | Sri Lanka | 58.173 % |
183 | Turkey | 57.212 % |
184 | Thailand | 56.25 % |
185 | Tunisia | 55.288 % |
186 | Trinidad and Tobago | 54.327 % |
187 | Senegal | 53.846 % |
188 | Tonga | 53.365 % |
189 | Saudi Arabia | 52.404 % |
190 | South Africa | 51.923 % |
191 | Suriname | 47.596 % |
192 | Sao Tome and Principe | 44.712 % |
193 | State of Palestine | 44.231 % |
194 | Tanzania | 41.827 % |
195 | Syrian Arab Republic | 39.904 % |
196 | Zambia | 38.942 % |
197 | Timor-Leste | 35.096 % |
198 | Vietnam | 34.615 % |
199 | Uganda | 30.288 % |
200 | Serbia | 28.365 % |
201 | Sierra Leone | 13.942 % |
202 | South Sudan | NaN % |
203 | Ukraine | 24.519 % |
204 | Solomon Islands | 23.558 % |
205 | Togo | 15.865 % |
206 | Tajikistan | 12.981 % |
207 | Yemen | 10.096 % |
208 | Venezuela | 9.615 % |
209 | Uzbekistan | 7.212 % |
210 | Sudan | 4.808 % |
211 | Turkmenistan | 3.365 % |
212 | Zimbabwe | 2.885 % |
213 | Somalia | 0 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Austria
- #2
Australia
- #3
Canada
- #4
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #5
Barbados
- #6
Bahamas
- #7
China, Macao SAR
- #8
Belgium
- #9
Andorra
- #10
Chile
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Somalia
- #212
Zimbabwe
- #211
Turkmenistan
- #210
Sudan
- #209
Uzbekistan
- #208
Venezuela
- #207
Yemen
- #206
Tajikistan
- #205
Togo
- #204
Solomon Islands
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country provides a valuable lens through which to examine global governance and legal systems in 2004. This index, expressed in percentile rank, evaluates countries based on confidence in their laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence. Reflecting the stability and effectiveness of a country's legal framework, the Rule of Law Index is a crucial metric for understanding the broader implications of governance across the globe.
Global Overview and Key Insights
In 2004, the Rule of Law Index covered 200 countries, offering a comprehensive look at global legal frameworks. The average score was 51.81%, indicating moderate confidence in legal institutions worldwide. However, there was a pronounced disparity between the highest and lowest-ranked countries. Norway stood out with a perfect score of 100%, exemplifying strong legal institutions and governance. Conversely, Liberia, at the bottom with a score of 3.85%, highlighted significant challenges in maintaining effective rule of law. This wide gap underscores varying levels of development and challenges faced by countries in establishing robust legal systems.
Regional Comparisons and Clustering
Analyzing the regional distribution of the Rule of Law Index reveals significant clustering patterns. Scandinavian countries, including Norway, Finland (99.52%), and Denmark (99.04%), dominated the top ranks, showcasing their consistent emphasis on governance, transparency, and legal accountability. This regional clustering suggests a shared cultural and historical approach to governance that prioritizes the rule of law.
In contrast, several African nations such as Liberia, Central African Republic (4.33%), and Sudan (4.81%) were among the lowest-ranking countries. These scores reflect ongoing challenges such as political instability, conflict, and inadequate institutional frameworks that impede the enforcement of laws and protection of individual rights.
Yearly Trends and Significant Changes
Between 2003 and 2004, the Rule of Law Index experienced an average decline of 1.3%. Notably, some countries exhibited remarkable improvements, with Tunisia increasing its score by 9.02% (19.5%), signaling successful reforms and enhanced governance structures. Similarly, North Macedonia and Papua New Guinea saw significant gains of 8.33% (21.7%) and 7.54% (39.9%) respectively, indicating positive developments in their legal systems and governance.
On the other hand, some countries faced steep declines. The Solomon Islands experienced a dramatic drop of 35.15% (59.9%), reflecting heightened political instability and governance challenges. Vanuatu and French Guiana also faced substantial decreases, highlighting the volatile nature of legal systems in some regions.
Policy and Governance Impact
The Rule of Law Index in 2004 illustrates the profound impact of policy and governance on legal systems worldwide. Countries with strong political institutions and effective policy frameworks, such as Switzerland (98.08%) and Sweden (97.60%), consistently rank higher in the index. This correlation emphasizes the importance of transparent governance and accountable leadership in fostering a reliable legal environment.
Conversely, countries with weak institutional structures, often exacerbated by political turmoil or corruption, struggle to maintain effective rule of law. The index highlights the necessity for comprehensive reforms and international support to enhance governance and legal frameworks in these nations.
Economic Correlations and Development
The correlation between economic development and the Rule of Law Index is apparent in 2004. Countries that rank high in the index, such as Luxembourg (96.63%) and New Zealand (97.12%), typically enjoy robust economies and high standards of living. This relationship underscores the role of stable legal systems in fostering economic growth by providing a secure environment for businesses and investments.
In contrast, countries at the lower end of the index often face economic challenges, as unstable legal frameworks deter investment and economic development. This highlights the crucial need for countries to strengthen their legal systems to create conducive environments for economic advancement.
Overall, the Rule of Law Index by Country in 2004 offers critical insights into the state of global governance and legal systems. It underscores the importance of effective policy frameworks, regional cooperation, and economic correlations in shaping a robust rule of law, essential for sustainable development and international stability.
Insights by country
Iceland
Iceland achieved a remarkable 4th place ranking in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2004, with a score of 98.56%. This high ranking reflects the country's strong commitment to legal integrity, transparency, and effective governance.
The high score can be attributed to several factors, including a well-functioning judiciary, low levels of corruption, and strong protection of civil liberties. Iceland's political stability and social cohesion further contribute to its robust legal framework, fostering a society where the rule of law is respected and upheld.
In addition to its impressive rank, Iceland is known for its progressive policies, including gender equality and environmental sustainability, which are closely linked to its overall governance and rule of law. This combination of factors positions Iceland as a leading example of effective governance in the global context.
Benin
In 2004, Benin ranked 126 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 39.42%. This ranking reflects challenges in the enforcement of laws, the independence of the judiciary, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The relatively low score can be attributed to factors such as political instability, limited resources for law enforcement, and issues with corruption within the legal system. These elements hinder effective governance and contribute to a perception of inadequate legal protections for citizens.
Furthermore, despite being a stable democracy in the West African region, Benin's struggle with institutional weaknesses has implications for social justice and economic development. The country has made efforts to improve its rule of law in subsequent years, but the legacy of past governance issues continues to influence its current legal framework.
Guatemala
In 2004, Guatemala ranked 174 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, which reflects significant challenges in governance and legal frameworks within the nation. The country recorded a notably low score of 16.35%, indicating substantial issues related to the enforcement of laws, access to justice, and protection of fundamental rights.
The low ranking can be attributed to various factors, including a history of civil conflict, widespread corruption, and inadequate law enforcement mechanisms. Additionally, Guatemala has struggled with issues such as high levels of violence, particularly related to organized crime and gang activity, which further erodes public trust in legal institutions.
Despite these challenges, Guatemala has a rich cultural heritage and is recognized for its biodiversity and archaeological sites, which play a crucial role in the nation's economy and identity, often overshadowed by the prevailing issues of governance and rule of law.
Greenland
In the year 2004, Greenland ranked 209th out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, indicating a significant deficiency in the adherence to legal principles and governance. The index value for Greenland was recorded as null %, further illustrating a lack of measurable compliance with fundamental rule of law standards.
This low ranking can be attributed to several factors, including the remote geographical location of Greenland, which poses challenges for effective governance and law enforcement. Additionally, the impact of historical colonial policies and socio-economic issues, such as limited infrastructure and a small population, may have contributed to a weakened legal framework.
Interestingly, Greenland's governance is influenced by its status as an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, which may complicate the implementation of legal reforms and local governance structures. This context highlights the complexities faced by regions with unique political and social landscapes in striving for improved rule of law.
Bahamas
The Bahamas ranked 21 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2004, achieving a notable score of 90.38%. This impressive ranking reflects the country's strong legal framework, which supports the enforcement of laws and the protection of individual rights.
Factors contributing to the high ranking include a stable political environment, an independent judiciary, and a commitment to democratic governance. The legal system in the Bahamas is based on English common law, which provides a robust structure for upholding justice and ensuring accountability.
Moreover, the Bahamas benefits from a relatively low level of corruption and a strong respect for property rights, which further enhances its rule of law. As a popular tourist destination, the emphasis on legal protections is crucial for maintaining both domestic stability and international confidence.
Lebanon
In 2004, Lebanon ranked 113th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 45.67%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and protection of rights within the country.
The relatively low score and ranking can be attributed to a variety of factors, including political instability, sectarian tensions, and the aftermath of the civil war, which had lasting impacts on the legal framework and governance. Additionally, the presence of non-state actors and external influences further complicated the rule of law.
Lebanon's legal system has struggled with issues such as corruption, inefficiency, and lack of access to justice, which have hindered the effective implementation of laws. Despite these challenges, Lebanon has a rich legal tradition and a vibrant civil society that continues to advocate for reforms and improvements in governance.
Botswana
In 2004, Botswana achieved a noteworthy Rule of Law Index score of 67.79%, ranking it 67th out of 213 countries. This score reflects the nation's commitment to upholding legal frameworks and ensuring justice within its borders.
Botswana's high rank can be attributed to its relatively stable political environment, adherence to democratic processes, and a robust legal system that emphasizes the protection of human rights. These factors contribute to a sense of security and trust in public institutions.
Additionally, Botswana has been recognized for its efforts in combating corruption and promoting transparency, which are crucial elements in maintaining the rule of law. The country is often cited as a model for good governance in Africa, demonstrating that effective governance can lead to increased legal integrity and public confidence.
Afghanistan
In 2004, Afghanistan ranked 203rd out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, reflecting significant challenges in governance and legal frameworks. The country's score of 2.403846% indicates a dire situation regarding the enforcement of laws and the protection of fundamental rights.
This low ranking is largely attributed to the aftermath of decades of conflict, including civil war and the Taliban's rule, which severely undermined the legal and institutional structures of the state. As a result, issues such as widespread corruption, lack of access to justice, and insecurity deeply affected the everyday lives of Afghan citizens.
Moreover, the ongoing instability and the presence of various militant groups have created an environment where the rule of law remains weak. According to the World Bank, factors such as poverty, lack of education, and limited economic opportunities further exacerbate the challenges facing Afghanistan in establishing a functional legal system.
Iran
In 2004, Iran was ranked 142nd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 31.73%. This ranking indicates a significant concern regarding the adherence to the rule of law within the country, reflecting challenges in governance, judicial independence, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including political repression, limited freedom of expression, and a judiciary that is often perceived as influenced by political powers. These elements contribute to a lack of public trust in legal institutions and a perception of injustice among citizens.
Moreover, the Rule of Law Index is affected by broader socio-political dynamics, including international sanctions and internal governance issues, which can hinder the effective implementation of laws and regulations. In contrast to many countries in the region, Iran's legal framework has struggled with consistency and fairness, impacting overall societal stability.
Djibouti
In 2004, Djibouti ranked 156 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, indicating significant challenges in governance and legal processes. The country's score of 25% reflects a considerable deficiency in the enforcement of laws, protection of fundamental rights, and the independence of the judiciary.
This low ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a history of political instability, limited political pluralism, and the concentration of power within a small elite. Additionally, issues such as corruption and inadequate legal infrastructure further undermine the rule of law in Djibouti.
It is noteworthy that Djibouti's strategic location at the crossroads of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden has made it a focal point for international military bases, which can influence local governance and law enforcement dynamics.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.