Rule of Law Index by Country 2008
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Austria | 98.558 % |
2 | Canada | 96.154 % |
3 | Australia | 95.192 % |
4 | Anguilla | 92.788 % |
5 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 90.385 % |
6 | Belgium | 89.423 % |
7 | Barbados | 88.462 % |
8 | Chile | 87.981 % |
9 | Cyprus | 87.5 % |
10 | Andorra | 87.019 % |
11 | Bahamas | 86.538 % |
12 | American Samoa | 85.096 % |
13 | Cayman Islands | 85.096 % |
14 | Antigua and Barbuda | 80.769 % |
15 | Czech Republic | 78.365 % |
16 | Aruba | 76.442 % |
17 | Bermuda | 76.442 % |
18 | Botswana | 69.231 % |
19 | Cabo Verde | 67.308 % |
20 | Bahrain | 65.385 % |
21 | Brunei Darussalam | 63.942 % |
22 | China, Macao SAR | 63.462 % |
23 | Costa Rica | 62.981 % |
24 | Bhutan | 61.538 % |
25 | Croatia | 55.769 % |
26 | Bulgaria | 51.923 % |
27 | Belize | 50.962 % |
28 | Brazil | 46.635 % |
29 | Armenia | 44.231 % |
30 | Burkina Faso | 43.75 % |
31 | Colombia | 42.308 % |
32 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 40.865 % |
33 | China | 37.981 % |
34 | Benin | 36.538 % |
35 | Albania | 34.135 % |
36 | Argentina | 27.885 % |
37 | Bangladesh | 25.481 % |
38 | Algeria | 24.519 % |
39 | Cuba | 23.077 % |
40 | Azerbaijan | 22.115 % |
41 | Bolivia | 17.308 % |
42 | Burundi | 15.385 % |
43 | Belarus | 13.942 % |
44 | Comoros | 13.462 % |
45 | Cameroon | 12.5 % |
46 | Cambodia | 11.058 % |
47 | Congo | 9.615 % |
48 | Angola | 7.212 % |
49 | Central African Republic | 5.769 % |
50 | Côte d'Ivoire | 5.288 % |
51 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.885 % |
52 | Chad | 2.404 % |
53 | Afghanistan | 0.481 % |
54 | Cook Islands | NaN % |
55 | Denmark | 99.519 % |
56 | Finland | 98.077 % |
57 | Iceland | 97.596 % |
58 | Germany | 94.231 % |
59 | Ireland | 93.75 % |
60 | France | 90.865 % |
61 | Japan | 88.942 % |
62 | Estonia | 85.577 % |
63 | Guam | 85.096 % |
64 | Hungary | 80.288 % |
65 | Greece | 77.404 % |
66 | Israel | 74.038 % |
67 | Latvia | 73.077 % |
68 | Dominica | 71.154 % |
69 | Kuwait | 68.269 % |
70 | French Guiana | 67.788 % |
71 | Italy | 62.5 % |
72 | Kiribati | 60.577 % |
73 | Jordan | 60.096 % |
74 | Grenada | 58.173 % |
75 | India | 57.212 % |
76 | Ghana | 53.365 % |
77 | Egypt | 51.442 % |
78 | Lesotho | 48.077 % |
79 | Georgia | 47.596 % |
80 | Jamaica | 46.154 % |
81 | Gambia | 39.904 % |
82 | Eswatini | 36.058 % |
83 | Fiji | 35.096 % |
84 | Guyana | 34.615 % |
85 | Lebanon | 33.654 % |
86 | Gabon | 32.692 % |
87 | Kosovo | 32.212 % |
88 | Djibouti | 31.25 % |
89 | Indonesia | 30.288 % |
90 | Dominican Republic | 29.327 % |
91 | El Salvador | 28.365 % |
92 | Ethiopia | 26.923 % |
93 | Equatorial Guinea | 21.635 % |
94 | Laos | 21.154 % |
95 | Kazakhstan | 19.712 % |
96 | Honduras | 18.75 % |
97 | Iran | 17.788 % |
98 | Kenya | 16.346 % |
99 | Ecuador | 12.981 % |
100 | Eritrea | 7.692 % |
101 | Greenland | NaN % |
102 | Guatemala | 11.538 % |
103 | Haiti | 8.654 % |
104 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.731 % |
105 | Guinea-Bissau | 6.25 % |
106 | Guinea | 3.846 % |
107 | Iraq | 1.442 % |
108 | Jersey | NaN % |
109 | Norway | 100 % |
110 | New Zealand | 97.115 % |
111 | Luxembourg | 95.673 % |
112 | Netherlands | 94.712 % |
113 | Malta | 91.827 % |
114 | Liechtenstein | 89.904 % |
115 | Portugal | 83.654 % |
116 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 81.731 % |
117 | Mauritius | 81.25 % |
118 | Saint Lucia | 79.808 % |
119 | Monaco | 79.327 % |
120 | Martinique | 76.442 % |
121 | Réunion | 76.442 % |
122 | Marshall Islands | 73.558 % |
123 | Palau | 72.115 % |
124 | Lithuania | 70.673 % |
125 | Qatar | 70.192 % |
126 | Oman | 68.75 % |
127 | Poland | 66.827 % |
128 | Puerto Rico | 66.346 % |
129 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 64.423 % |
130 | Namibia | 62.019 % |
131 | Nauru | 59.615 % |
132 | Malaysia | 58.654 % |
133 | Romania | 53.846 % |
134 | Montenegro | 52.885 % |
135 | Malawi | 52.404 % |
136 | Maldives | 50 % |
137 | Panama | 49.519 % |
138 | Mali | 45.673 % |
139 | North Macedonia | 45.192 % |
140 | Mongolia | 44.712 % |
141 | Morocco | 41.827 % |
142 | Republic of Moldova | 40.385 % |
143 | Madagascar | 39.423 % |
144 | Rwanda | 38.462 % |
145 | Philippines | 35.577 % |
146 | Mozambique | 33.173 % |
147 | Nepal | 30.769 % |
148 | Niger | 29.808 % |
149 | Mexico | 28.846 % |
150 | Peru | 25.962 % |
151 | Nicaragua | 24.038 % |
152 | Libya | 23.558 % |
153 | Paraguay | 20.673 % |
154 | Papua New Guinea | 20.192 % |
155 | Pakistan | 18.269 % |
156 | Russia | 15.865 % |
157 | Nigeria | 14.904 % |
158 | Liberia | 12.019 % |
159 | Mauritania | 10.577 % |
160 | North Korea | 9.135 % |
161 | Myanmar | 3.365 % |
162 | Niue | NaN % |
163 | Sweden | 99.038 % |
164 | Switzerland | 96.635 % |
165 | United Kingdom | 93.269 % |
166 | United States | 92.308 % |
167 | Singapore | 91.346 % |
168 | Spain | 86.058 % |
169 | Slovenia | 83.173 % |
170 | Tuvalu | 82.692 % |
171 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 82.212 % |
172 | San Marino | 79.327 % |
173 | South Korea | 77.885 % |
174 | Samoa | 76.923 % |
175 | United States Virgin Islands | 76.442 % |
176 | Taiwan | 72.596 % |
177 | Uruguay | 69.712 % |
178 | Slovakia | 65.865 % |
179 | Vanuatu | 64.904 % |
180 | United Arab Emirates | 61.058 % |
181 | Seychelles | 59.135 % |
182 | Tonga | 57.692 % |
183 | Tunisia | 56.731 % |
184 | Saudi Arabia | 56.25 % |
185 | Turkey | 55.288 % |
186 | South Africa | 54.808 % |
187 | Sri Lanka | 54.327 % |
188 | Thailand | 50.481 % |
189 | Trinidad and Tobago | 49.038 % |
190 | Suriname | 48.558 % |
191 | Senegal | 47.115 % |
192 | Uganda | 43.269 % |
193 | Tanzania | 42.788 % |
194 | Zambia | 41.346 % |
195 | Vietnam | 38.942 % |
196 | Serbia | 37.5 % |
197 | Sao Tome and Principe | 37.019 % |
198 | Solomon Islands | 31.731 % |
199 | Ukraine | 27.404 % |
200 | Syrian Arab Republic | 26.442 % |
201 | State of Palestine | 25 % |
202 | Togo | 22.596 % |
203 | Sierra Leone | 19.231 % |
204 | Yemen | 16.827 % |
205 | Timor-Leste | 14.423 % |
206 | Uzbekistan | 10.096 % |
207 | Tajikistan | 8.173 % |
208 | Sudan | 4.808 % |
209 | Turkmenistan | 4.327 % |
210 | Venezuela | 1.923 % |
211 | Somalia | 0 % |
212 | South Sudan | NaN % |
213 | Zimbabwe | 0.962 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Austria
- #2
Canada
- #3
Australia
- #4
Anguilla
- #5
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #6
Belgium
- #7
Barbados
- #8
Chile
- #9
Cyprus
- #10
Andorra
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Zimbabwe
- #212
South Sudan
- #211
Somalia
- #210
Venezuela
- #209
Turkmenistan
- #208
Sudan
- #207
Tajikistan
- #206
Uzbekistan
- #205
Timor-Leste
- #204
Yemen
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country for 2008 offers a comprehensive look into how nations rank in terms of public confidence in their legal systems, enforcement of laws, and the protection of property rights. This index measures the effectiveness of law enforcement, the fairness of judicial processes, and the protection against crime and violence on a global scale. In an interconnected world where governance quality profoundly affects economic and social development, understanding these rankings provides valuable insights into the global landscape.
Global Leaders and Laggards
In 2008, Norway stood at the pinnacle with a perfect Rule of Law index score of 100%, underscoring its strong legal framework and effective enforcement. Other top performers included Denmark (99.52%), Sweden (99.04%), and Austria (98.56%), all known for robust legal institutions and high levels of transparency and accountability. These countries exemplify how solid rule of law contributes to both national stability and international esteem. Conversely, countries like Guinea (3.85%), Turkmenistan (4.33%), and Sudan (4.81%) were at the lower end of the spectrum. These nations face challenges such as weak judicial systems, corruption, and inadequate enforcement, which hinder their socio-economic growth and development. The stark contrast between the top and bottom performers highlights the global disparity in governance and legal frameworks.
Regional Trends and Dynamics
Examining regional trends reveals interesting patterns. European countries dominate the top tier of the index, showcasing a tradition of legal integrity and effective governance. This is in contrast to several African and Central Asian countries that occupy the lower ranks. The regional differences can be attributed to historical, political, and socio-economic factors. For instance, Europe benefits from a longstanding tradition of legal development and cooperative governance structures like the European Union, which promotes the rule of law as a fundamental principle. Meanwhile, regions plagued by political instability and conflict, such as parts of Africa and Central Asia, struggle to enforce laws effectively. These insights emphasize the need for targeted international support and reforms to bolster legal and institutional frameworks in underperforming regions.
Economic Correlations with Rule of Law
There exists a notable correlation between the Rule of Law index and economic prosperity. Nations with high scores often enjoy robust economies, as seen with countries like New Zealand (97.12%) and Switzerland (96.63%). A strong rule of law environment fosters reliable business climates, encouraging both domestic and foreign investment. Conversely, countries at the lower end of the index often grapple with economic challenges and limited growth prospects. The data suggests that a focus on improving legal institutions could serve as a catalyst for economic development. Historically, improvements in the rule of law have been linked to increases in GDP and foreign direct investment, highlighting the importance of legal reforms for economic progress.
Notable Yearly Changes and Developments
The year-over-year changes in the Rule of Law index for 2008 reveal both improvements and declines. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines showed the most significant increase, with an impressive rise of 11.88 points, reflecting efforts to strengthen legal institutions and enforcement. Other countries with notable improvements include Oman and Eswatini, indicating strides towards better governance. On the flip side, Micronesia experienced a sharp decline of 22.18 points, highlighting challenges in maintaining legal standards and enforcement. Such fluctuations can be attributed to political shifts, reforms, or setbacks in governance. Monitoring these changes helps identify areas where targeted interventions could stabilize or improve conditions.
Policy Implications and Future Outlook
Understanding the Rule of Law index is crucial for policymakers, as it directly affects international relations, investment climates, and societal well-being. Countries scoring lower on the index may face increased pressure to reform, as strong legal systems are often prerequisites for entering global trade agreements and forming alliances. Moving forward, the global community must focus on supporting reforms that enhance the rule of law in lower-ranking nations. Such efforts could involve international partnerships, technical assistance, and capacity-building measures tailored to specific national contexts. As we look to the future, the evolution of the Rule of Law index will continue to reflect the dynamic interplay between governance, economic growth, and societal progress.
Insights by country
Greenland
In 2008, Greenland ranked 209 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, a concerning position that highlights significant challenges within its legal and governance frameworks. The actual value for this index was noted as null %, indicating a lack of available data or a severe deficiency in the enforcement of rule of law principles.
This low ranking may be attributed to several factors, including the island's remote geography, limited governance infrastructure, and the complexities of managing a sparsely populated territory with unique social and cultural dynamics. Furthermore, issues such as the influence of indigenous rights, environmental concerns, and economic challenges can complicate the establishment of a robust legal system.
Interestingly, Greenland's governance operates under the Kingdom of Denmark, which can further impact its legal standing and the enforcement of laws. As a result, the region experiences distinct challenges compared to other countries with more developed legal frameworks and governance structures.
Denmark
In 2008, Denmark achieved an impressive Rule of Law Index score of 99.52%, ranking 2nd out of 213 countries. This high ranking underscores Denmark's strong adherence to the rule of law, characterized by effective governance, a robust legal framework, and a high level of public trust in the judicial system.
The factors contributing to this remarkable score include Denmark's transparent legal processes, efficient law enforcement agencies, and a well-established system of checks and balances that promote accountability and prevent corruption. Additionally, the country's commitment to human rights and civil liberties further enhances its legal framework.
Interestingly, Denmark consistently ranks among the top nations in various global indices, including those measuring happiness and social welfare, which often correlate with strong rule of law and governance standards. This consistency reflects the broader societal values that prioritize justice and equality.
Japan
In 2008, Japan ranked 24th out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, achieving a score of 88.94%. This high ranking reflects Japan's robust legal framework and effective judicial system, which are critical components of its governance structure.
The relatively high score can be attributed to several factors, including a strong tradition of the rule of law, low levels of corruption, and an efficient law enforcement mechanism. Moreover, Japan's commitment to human rights and civil liberties further contributes to its favorable standing in the rule of law context.
Interestingly, Japan's legal system is characterized by a unique blend of civil law traditions and customary practices, which enhances its ability to maintain public order and uphold justice. This is complemented by the general societal respect for laws and regulations, which fosters a stable environment for both citizens and businesses.
Gabon
In 2008, Gabon was ranked 140 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a score of 32.69%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of law and the protection of fundamental rights within the country.
The low score can be attributed to factors such as corruption, inadequate judicial independence, and limited access to legal resources, which undermine citizens' trust in legal institutions. Furthermore, Gabon has faced issues related to political instability and governance, which have hindered the effective implementation of legal frameworks.
As a Central African nation, Gabon's struggle with the rule of law is not unique, as many countries in the region face similar challenges. However, improving the rule of law is crucial for fostering economic development, attracting foreign investment, and enhancing overall governance.
Honduras
In 2008, Honduras ranked 169 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, indicating a significant challenge in terms of governance and legal frameworks. The country's score of 18.75% reflects widespread issues related to the enforcement of laws, judicial independence, and the protection of fundamental rights.
This low ranking can be attributed to various factors, including pervasive corruption within governmental institutions, inadequate law enforcement, and a judiciary that often lacks impartiality. Additionally, high levels of poverty and social inequality contribute to a climate where crime and violence are prevalent, undermining the rule of law.
It is noteworthy that Honduras has historically faced challenges in maintaining political stability, which further complicates efforts to strengthen legal systems. The country's struggles with crime, particularly gang violence, have exacerbated the difficulties in establishing a robust rule of law.
Afghanistan
In 2008, Afghanistan ranked 207 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a critical state of governance and legal infrastructure. The country's score of 0.480769% indicates profound challenges in maintaining law and order, protecting fundamental rights, and ensuring justice.
The low ranking can be attributed to several factors, including the ongoing conflict, political instability, and widespread corruption within government institutions. The legacy of decades of war has severely undermined the legal framework and enforcement mechanisms necessary for upholding the rule of law.
Furthermore, the lack of effective governance, coupled with limited access to legal resources and protection for citizens, has resulted in a pervasive culture of impunity. This situation has made it difficult for the Afghan population to seek redress or protection under the law, further entrenching the cycle of violence and instability.
Bolivia
In 2008, Bolivia ranked 172nd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 17.31%. This low ranking reflects significant challenges in the country's legal and institutional frameworks, where issues such as corruption, lack of judicial independence, and ineffective law enforcement are prevalent.
The Rule of Law Index measures factors such as government accountability, the absence of corruption, and the protection of fundamental rights, indicating a severe deficiency in these areas within Bolivia during this time. Contributing factors include political instability, social unrest, and a history of weak governance, which have undermined public trust in legal institutions.
Furthermore, Bolivia's struggles with economic inequality and poverty have exacerbated the challenges of establishing a robust rule of law, leading to widespread perceptions of injustice among its population. These dynamics highlight the need for comprehensive reforms to strengthen legal systems and promote equitable access to justice.
Lesotho
In 2008, Lesotho ranked 108 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 48.08%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in governance, legal frameworks, and the enforcement of laws within the country.
The relatively low score reflects issues such as corruption, political instability, and limited access to justice, which have historically plagued Lesotho's legal system. Additionally, socioeconomic factors such as high unemployment rates and poverty contribute to the population's distrust in legal institutions.
It is noteworthy that Lesotho's ranking in the Rule of Law Index is indicative of broader regional challenges, as many countries in Southern Africa face similar obstacles related to governance and law enforcement, impacting overall regional stability and development.
Lebanon
In 2008, Lebanon was ranked 138 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 33.65%. This relatively low ranking reflects significant challenges in the country's legal and institutional frameworks, affecting the overall adherence to the rule of law.
The score indicates persistent issues such as political instability, sectarian divisions, and corruption, which have historically undermined the effectiveness of legal institutions in Lebanon. These factors contribute to a lack of public trust in the judiciary and law enforcement, further exacerbating the challenges faced by the rule of law.
Moreover, Lebanon's complex political landscape, characterized by a power-sharing arrangement among various sects, complicates governance and the enforcement of laws, leading to inconsistent application of justice. Interestingly, the ongoing political and economic crises that began in late 2019 have further highlighted the weaknesses in the rule of law, showcasing the need for comprehensive reforms to improve governance and restore public confidence.
Colombia
In 2008, Colombia ranked 120th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a value of 42.31%. This ranking reflects significant challenges in governance, legal fairness, and public order within the country.
The relatively low score can be attributed to various factors, including persistent violence from armed groups, corruption within institutions, and inadequate access to justice. These issues have historically undermined the rule of law and public trust in the legal system.
Additionally, Colombia has faced ongoing struggles with drug trafficking and organized crime, which have further complicated law enforcement efforts. The country's efforts to strengthen legal institutions and promote human rights are ongoing, as it seeks to improve its standing in future assessments.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.