Rule of Law Index by Country 2007
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 100 % |
2 | Austria | 99.522 % |
3 | Finland | 98.565 % |
4 | Iceland | 97.129 % |
5 | Canada | 96.172 % |
6 | Germany | 95.215 % |
7 | Australia | 94.258 % |
8 | Ireland | 93.78 % |
9 | Anguilla | 92.823 % |
10 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 90.909 % |
11 | France | 90.431 % |
12 | Japan | 89.474 % |
13 | Belgium | 88.995 % |
14 | Barbados | 88.517 % |
15 | Bahamas | 88.038 % |
16 | Chile | 87.56 % |
17 | Andorra | 87.081 % |
18 | Estonia | 85.646 % |
19 | Cyprus | 85.167 % |
20 | American Samoa | 84.689 % |
21 | Cayman Islands | 84.689 % |
22 | Guam | 84.689 % |
23 | Hungary | 80.383 % |
24 | Antigua and Barbuda | 79.904 % |
25 | Czech Republic | 78.947 % |
26 | Greece | 76.555 % |
27 | Aruba | 75.12 % |
28 | Bermuda | 75.12 % |
29 | Israel | 72.727 % |
30 | Kiribati | 72.249 % |
31 | Latvia | 71.292 % |
32 | Dominica | 70.813 % |
33 | Cabo Verde | 69.378 % |
34 | Kuwait | 68.421 % |
35 | French Guiana | 66.986 % |
36 | Botswana | 66.507 % |
37 | Bahrain | 66.029 % |
38 | Cook Islands | 64.115 % |
39 | Italy | 63.636 % |
40 | Brunei Darussalam | 62.201 % |
41 | Bhutan | 61.244 % |
42 | Jordan | 60.287 % |
43 | Costa Rica | 59.809 % |
44 | China, Macao SAR | 58.852 % |
45 | Grenada | 57.895 % |
46 | India | 56.459 % |
47 | Ghana | 55.024 % |
48 | Croatia | 54.545 % |
49 | Belize | 53.11 % |
50 | Bulgaria | 52.632 % |
51 | Egypt | 47.847 % |
52 | Lesotho | 46.89 % |
53 | Gambia | 45.933 % |
54 | Georgia | 44.976 % |
55 | Jamaica | 44.498 % |
56 | Burkina Faso | 42.584 % |
57 | Brazil | 42.105 % |
58 | Colombia | 41.148 % |
59 | Guyana | 40.67 % |
60 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 38.756 % |
61 | Armenia | 37.799 % |
62 | Benin | 36.842 % |
63 | China | 34.45 % |
64 | Argentina | 33.971 % |
65 | Fiji | 32.536 % |
66 | Dominican Republic | 32.057 % |
67 | Lebanon | 31.1 % |
68 | Ethiopia | 30.622 % |
69 | Albania | 30.144 % |
70 | Cuba | 29.665 % |
71 | Eswatini | 29.187 % |
72 | Indonesia | 28.708 % |
73 | Gabon | 27.751 % |
74 | El Salvador | 27.273 % |
75 | Kosovo | 25.837 % |
76 | Djibouti | 25.359 % |
77 | Algeria | 23.923 % |
78 | Bangladesh | 23.445 % |
79 | Bolivia | 22.967 % |
80 | Azerbaijan | 21.531 % |
81 | Honduras | 20.096 % |
82 | Laos | 18.66 % |
83 | Kenya | 17.225 % |
84 | Equatorial Guinea | 16.746 % |
85 | Iran | 15.311 % |
86 | Kazakhstan | 14.833 % |
87 | Ecuador | 14.354 % |
88 | Comoros | 13.876 % |
89 | Burundi | 12.919 % |
90 | Eritrea | 8.612 % |
91 | Greenland | NaN % |
92 | Guatemala | 12.44 % |
93 | Cambodia | 11.962 % |
94 | Belarus | 11.483 % |
95 | Cameroon | 11.005 % |
96 | Congo | 10.048 % |
97 | Kyrgyzstan | 7.656 % |
98 | Guinea-Bissau | 7.177 % |
99 | Haiti | 6.699 % |
100 | Angola | 6.22 % |
101 | Guinea | 5.263 % |
102 | Côte d'Ivoire | 4.785 % |
103 | Chad | 4.306 % |
104 | Central African Republic | 2.392 % |
105 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.914 % |
106 | Iraq | 0.957 % |
107 | Afghanistan | 0.478 % |
108 | Jersey | NaN % |
109 | Norway | 99.043 % |
110 | New Zealand | 96.651 % |
111 | Netherlands | 95.694 % |
112 | Luxembourg | 94.737 % |
113 | Malta | 92.344 % |
114 | Liechtenstein | 89.952 % |
115 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 86.603 % |
116 | Réunion | 84.689 % |
117 | Portugal | 82.297 % |
118 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 79.904 % |
119 | Monaco | 78.469 % |
120 | Palau | 78.469 % |
121 | Marshall Islands | 77.033 % |
122 | Mauritius | 76.077 % |
123 | Saint Lucia | 75.598 % |
124 | Martinique | 75.12 % |
125 | Lithuania | 69.856 % |
126 | Puerto Rico | 67.464 % |
127 | Qatar | 65.55 % |
128 | Nauru | 64.593 % |
129 | Poland | 62.679 % |
130 | Oman | 61.722 % |
131 | Malaysia | 60.766 % |
132 | Namibia | 57.416 % |
133 | Romania | 52.153 % |
134 | Maldives | 51.675 % |
135 | Malawi | 50.239 % |
136 | Panama | 49.761 % |
137 | Mali | 49.282 % |
138 | Montenegro | 48.804 % |
139 | Morocco | 46.411 % |
140 | Mongolia | 45.455 % |
141 | Madagascar | 43.062 % |
142 | North Macedonia | 41.627 % |
143 | Philippines | 39.713 % |
144 | Republic of Moldova | 37.321 % |
145 | Mexico | 35.885 % |
146 | Rwanda | 35.407 % |
147 | Nepal | 34.928 % |
148 | Mozambique | 33.493 % |
149 | Niger | 33.014 % |
150 | Mauritania | 28.23 % |
151 | Peru | 26.316 % |
152 | Nicaragua | 24.402 % |
153 | Papua New Guinea | 22.01 % |
154 | Pakistan | 21.053 % |
155 | Liberia | 20.574 % |
156 | Libya | 19.139 % |
157 | Paraguay | 18.182 % |
158 | Russia | 15.789 % |
159 | Nigeria | 13.397 % |
160 | North Korea | 9.091 % |
161 | Myanmar | 3.828 % |
162 | Niue | NaN % |
163 | Sweden | 98.086 % |
164 | Switzerland | 97.608 % |
165 | United Kingdom | 93.301 % |
166 | United States | 91.866 % |
167 | Singapore | 91.388 % |
168 | Spain | 86.124 % |
169 | South Korea | 82.775 % |
170 | Tuvalu | 81.818 % |
171 | Samoa | 81.34 % |
172 | Slovenia | 80.861 % |
173 | San Marino | 78.469 % |
174 | United States Virgin Islands | 75.12 % |
175 | Taiwan | 71.77 % |
176 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 70.335 % |
177 | Uruguay | 68.9 % |
178 | Vanuatu | 67.943 % |
179 | Tonga | 65.072 % |
180 | Slovakia | 63.158 % |
181 | Seychelles | 59.33 % |
182 | United Arab Emirates | 58.373 % |
183 | Sri Lanka | 56.938 % |
184 | Tunisia | 55.981 % |
185 | Saudi Arabia | 55.502 % |
186 | South Africa | 54.067 % |
187 | Turkey | 53.589 % |
188 | Thailand | 51.196 % |
189 | Trinidad and Tobago | 50.718 % |
190 | Senegal | 48.325 % |
191 | Suriname | 47.368 % |
192 | Uganda | 44.019 % |
193 | Tanzania | 43.541 % |
194 | Sao Tome and Principe | 40.191 % |
195 | Serbia | 39.234 % |
196 | Vietnam | 38.278 % |
197 | Zambia | 36.364 % |
198 | State of Palestine | 31.579 % |
199 | Ukraine | 26.794 % |
200 | Solomon Islands | 24.88 % |
201 | Syrian Arab Republic | 22.488 % |
202 | Togo | 19.617 % |
203 | Yemen | 17.703 % |
204 | Sierra Leone | 16.268 % |
205 | Timor-Leste | 10.526 % |
206 | Uzbekistan | 9.569 % |
207 | Tajikistan | 8.134 % |
208 | Sudan | 5.742 % |
209 | Turkmenistan | 3.349 % |
210 | Venezuela | 2.871 % |
211 | Somalia | 0 % |
212 | South Sudan | NaN % |
213 | Zimbabwe | 1.435 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Denmark
- #2
Austria
- #3
Finland
- #4
Iceland
- #5
Canada
- #6
Germany
- #7
Australia
- #8
Ireland
- #9
Anguilla
- #10
China, Hong Kong SAR
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Zimbabwe
- #212
South Sudan
- #211
Somalia
- #210
Venezuela
- #209
Turkmenistan
- #208
Sudan
- #207
Tajikistan
- #206
Uzbekistan
- #205
Timor-Leste
- #204
Sierra Leone
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country for 2007 offers a comprehensive snapshot of the global landscape in terms of legal frameworks and their effectiveness across different nations. This metric is pivotal as it gauges the extent to which legal systems in various countries adhere to principles such as accountability, fairness, and transparency. By analyzing the Rule of Law percentile rank, we can understand the confidence populations have in their laws, courts, police, property rights, and overall protection from crime and violence. In 2007, this index provided valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of governmental structures worldwide.
Global Leaders in Rule of Law
In 2007, Denmark emerged as the epitome of the rule of law, achieving a perfect score of 100%. This reflects the country's robust legal framework and the high trust its citizens place in public institutions. Following closely were Austria (99.52%), Norway (99.04%), and Finland (98.56%), all of which demonstrated exceptional governance and legal integrity. These nations exemplify how strong judicial systems and effective law enforcement can foster societal trust and economic prosperity. The presence of these countries at the top of the list underscores their commitment to maintaining high standards of legal protection and equity.
Challenges Faced by Struggling Nations
Conversely, several countries faced significant challenges in establishing a sound rule of law. Chad scored the lowest with a percentile of 4.31%, reflecting severe issues with legal enforcement and public trust. Other countries, including Côte d'Ivoire (4.78%) and Guinea (5.26%), also struggled with similar challenges, marked by weak institutional frameworks and pervasive corruption. These countries' lower standings highlight the urgent need for reforms to enhance legal structures and improve governance.
Regional Variations and Clustering
Analyzing regional patterns, Northern European countries notably dominated the top of the index, demonstrating the successful integration of democratic principles and legal standards. In contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa displayed a clustering of countries towards the lower end of the spectrum, indicating regional systemic challenges such as political instability and underdeveloped legal institutions. The disparity in scores between continents offers a clear illustration of the geographical divide in governance effectiveness and the rule of law, prompting discussions on regional support and developmental aid to bridge these gaps.
Notable Yearly Changes in 2007
The year 2007 witnessed some remarkable changes in Rule of Law scores across different countries. Andorra experienced the most significant positive shift, with an impressive increase of 12.92%, indicating substantial improvements in its legal and institutional frameworks. On the other hand, Fiji saw a dramatic decline of 22.01%, which can be attributed to political turbulence and disruptions in its governance structures. These fluctuations emphasize the impact of political stability and reform on the rule of law, demonstrating how shifts in governance can dramatically affect public trust and legal integrity.
Policy Implications and Future Directions
Understanding the rule of law dynamics in 2007 provides critical insights for policymakers aiming to enhance governance and institutional strength. High-performing countries serve as models, showing how comprehensive legal systems and clear property and human rights protections can foster societal well-being. For nations lagging behind, these results highlight the pressing need for international support and policy frameworks aimed at strengthening judicial independence and reducing corruption. As global awareness of governance standards increases, focusing on sustainable legal reforms can drive significant improvements in the rule of law worldwide.
In summary, the Rule of Law Index by Country in 2007 underscores the diverse governance landscapes across the globe, from countries with exemplary legal systems to those needing significant reforms. By examining these patterns and trends, we gain valuable perspectives on the interplay between governance and societal confidence, offering pathways for nations to strengthen their legal foundations in the pursuit of justice and equity.
Insights by country
Egypt
In 2007, Egypt ranked 109 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 47.84%. This ranking reflects significant challenges in the enforcement of law and justice in the country, indicating that the rule of law was perceived as relatively weak compared to other nations.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including a history of political instability, limitations on judicial independence, and issues related to corruption within law enforcement agencies. Additionally, the socio-political landscape, characterized by restrictions on civil liberties and human rights, further complicates the enforcement of laws.
Interestingly, Egypt's position in the Rule of Law Index has implications for foreign investment and economic development, as a robust legal framework is essential for fostering a stable business environment. The country's legal challenges during this period highlight the need for reforms to strengthen governance and uphold the rule of law.
Hungary
In 2007, Hungary achieved a notable rank of 42 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a strong adherence to legal principles and governance. The country's score of 80.38% indicates a robust legal framework and effective judicial system compared to many other nations.
This high ranking can be attributed to Hungary's historical commitment to democratic governance and the rule of law, particularly following its transition to a market economy in the early 1990s. Factors such as a relatively independent judiciary, respect for human rights, and a functioning system of checks and balances contributed to this positive assessment.
However, it's important to note that Hungary's rule of law has faced challenges in subsequent years, including concerns about judicial independence and political influence, which have sparked debates about the sustainability of its legal framework. Overall, the 2007 index serves as a reference point for understanding the evolution of rule of law in Hungary in the context of its democratic development.
Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan was ranked 193 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2007. The country achieved a score of 7.655502%, indicating significant challenges in upholding the rule of law and ensuring legal fairness and accountability.
This low ranking can be attributed to various factors, including political instability, corruption within the judiciary, and limitations on civil liberties. The aftermath of the Tulip Revolution in 2005 led to a period of turbulence that affected governance and the effectiveness of legal institutions.
Additionally, Kyrgyzstan's struggles with economic difficulties and a transition from a Soviet-style system to a market economy contributed to the erosion of legal frameworks and enforcement. This situation highlights the ongoing need for judicial reforms and the strengthening of legal institutions to improve governance and enhance the rule of law in the country.
Japan
In 2007, Japan ranked 23rd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a robust adherence to legal principles and governance. The country achieved a noteworthy score of 89.47%, indicating a strong commitment to the rule of law and the effective functioning of its judicial system.
This high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including Japan's well-established legal framework, low levels of corruption, and efficient law enforcement agencies. The country is known for its strict regulatory environment and a judiciary that is perceived as independent and fair, contributing to a stable societal order.
Additionally, Japan's cultural emphasis on social harmony and community cohesion plays a significant role in maintaining public order and compliance with laws. The nation consistently shows low crime rates, which can also be linked to the effectiveness of its legal institutions and community-based approaches to crime prevention.
Eswatini
In 2007, Eswatini ranked 148 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a value of 29.186604%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of civil liberties within the nation.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including a lack of judicial independence, limited access to legal remedies, and insufficient protections for fundamental rights. Additionally, the political context of Eswatini, being an absolute monarchy, may contribute to the weaker institutional frameworks that uphold the rule of law.
This situation is compounded by socio-economic issues such as high poverty rates and limited educational opportunities, which can undermine public trust in legal institutions and diminish civic engagement. Furthermore, Eswatini's unique legal system, which incorporates both customary and statutory laws, can lead to inconsistencies in the application of justice.
Germany
In 2007, Germany achieved a remarkable Rule of Law Index score of 95.215309%, ranking 11th out of 213 countries. This high score reflects the country's strong legal framework, protection of fundamental rights, and effective judicial processes, contributing to a robust rule of law.
The strength of Germany's legal system is underpinned by its commitment to democratic principles, a well-functioning judiciary, and effective law enforcement agencies. These factors have fostered a societal environment where laws are respected and enforced, ensuring fairness and justice.
Additionally, Germany's emphasis on education, public awareness of legal rights, and active civil society organizations play crucial roles in maintaining its high ranking. Interestingly, Germany's position in the Rule of Law Index has consistently been among the highest in the world, reflecting its stable governance and commitment to upholding the rule of law over the years.
Georgia
In 2007, Georgia held the 115th position out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 44.98%. This ranking reflects the country's ongoing challenges in establishing a robust legal framework following the tumultuous political and social changes experienced in the early 2000s.
The relatively low score indicates significant issues regarding the enforcement of laws, judicial independence, and accountability, which can be traced back to the aftermath of the Rose Revolution in 2003. The government undertook reforms aimed at reducing corruption and improving governance; however, the transition was fraught with difficulties, including political instability and societal unrest.
Additionally, factors such as a lack of public trust in institutions and ongoing regional conflicts have contributed to the challenges in establishing the rule of law in Georgia. Despite these hurdles, the country has made strides in legal reform since then, yet the 2007 index highlights the ongoing need for comprehensive improvements in the legal system and governance.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2007, Equatorial Guinea ranked 174 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 16.746412%. This low ranking reflects significant challenges in the country's legal and governance systems, indicating a lack of effective rule of law and justice.
The poor performance can be attributed to a variety of factors, including government corruption, lack of judicial independence, and limited political pluralism. The concentration of power within a small ruling elite has undermined democratic processes and the protection of fundamental rights.
Moreover, Equatorial Guinea is one of the richest countries in Africa in terms of per capita income, largely due to its oil reserves; however, this wealth has not translated into improved governance or legal frameworks, further exacerbating the issues related to the rule of law.
Dominican Republic
In 2007, the Dominican Republic ranked 142nd out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 32.06%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the enforcement of laws and the protection of rights within the country.
The low score reflects issues such as corruption, limited access to justice, and inadequate law enforcement mechanisms. Factors contributing to this situation include institutional weaknesses, economic disparities, and a history of political instability that undermines public trust in legal systems.
Additionally, the Dominican Republic has faced ongoing challenges related to crime rates and social inequality, which can exacerbate the effectiveness of the rule of law. As a result, improving the rule of law has remained a crucial area for development to ensure better governance and social stability in the nation.
India
In 2007, India ranked 91 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 56.46%. This ranking reflects the country's challenges in ensuring legal transparency, citizen rights, and the effective functioning of its judiciary.
Several factors contribute to this statistic, including the backlog of cases in the judicial system, limited access to legal representation for disadvantaged populations, and varying enforcement of laws across regions. Additionally, issues such as corruption and bureaucratic inefficiency have historically undermined the rule of law.
Notably, India's Rule of Law Index score indicates a need for judicial reforms and improvements in governance to enhance citizen trust and legal efficacy. In comparison, countries with a higher index score typically exhibit robust legal frameworks, greater accountability, and respect for human rights.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.