Rule of Law Index by Country 2011
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Finland | 100 % |
2 | Denmark | 99.531 % |
3 | Sweden | 99.061 % |
4 | New Zealand | 98.592 % |
5 | Norway | 98.122 % |
6 | Luxembourg | 97.653 % |
7 | Netherlands | 97.183 % |
8 | Austria | 96.714 % |
9 | Ireland | 96.244 % |
10 | Australia | 95.775 % |
11 | Greenland | 95.305 % |
12 | Jersey | 95.305 % |
13 | Canada | 94.366 % |
14 | Switzerland | 93.897 % |
15 | Iceland | 93.427 % |
16 | Singapore | 92.958 % |
17 | United Kingdom | 92.488 % |
18 | Germany | 92.019 % |
19 | Liechtenstein | 91.549 % |
20 | United States | 91.08 % |
21 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 90.61 % |
22 | Belgium | 90.141 % |
23 | France | 89.671 % |
24 | Andorra | 89.202 % |
25 | Anguilla | 88.732 % |
26 | Aruba | 88.263 % |
27 | Japan | 87.793 % |
28 | Malta | 87.324 % |
29 | Chile | 86.854 % |
30 | French Guiana | 86.385 % |
31 | Estonia | 85.915 % |
32 | Spain | 85.446 % |
33 | American Samoa | 84.977 % |
34 | Bermuda | 84.977 % |
35 | Guam | 84.977 % |
36 | Barbados | 83.568 % |
37 | Cyprus | 83.099 % |
38 | Slovenia | 82.629 % |
39 | Taiwan | 82.16 % |
40 | South Korea | 81.69 % |
41 | Czech Republic | 81.221 % |
42 | Israel | 80.751 % |
43 | Portugal | 80.282 % |
44 | Tuvalu | 79.812 % |
45 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 79.343 % |
46 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 78.873 % |
47 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.404 % |
48 | Monaco | 77.934 % |
49 | San Marino | 77.934 % |
50 | Mauritius | 76.995 % |
51 | Palau | 76.526 % |
52 | Cayman Islands | 76.056 % |
53 | Brunei Darussalam | 75.587 % |
54 | Martinique | 75.117 % |
55 | Réunion | 75.117 % |
56 | United States Virgin Islands | 75.117 % |
57 | Saint Lucia | 73.239 % |
58 | Poland | 72.77 % |
59 | Lithuania | 72.3 % |
60 | Hungary | 71.831 % |
61 | Qatar | 71.362 % |
62 | Latvia | 70.892 % |
63 | Uruguay | 70.423 % |
64 | Puerto Rico | 69.953 % |
65 | Samoa | 69.484 % |
66 | Dominica | 69.014 % |
67 | China, Macao SAR | 68.545 % |
68 | Bahamas | 68.075 % |
69 | Botswana | 67.606 % |
70 | Slovakia | 67.136 % |
71 | Nauru | 66.667 % |
72 | Kuwait | 66.197 % |
73 | Greece | 65.728 % |
74 | Cabo Verde | 65.258 % |
75 | United Arab Emirates | 64.789 % |
76 | Italy | 64.319 % |
77 | Oman | 63.85 % |
78 | Costa Rica | 63.38 % |
79 | Malaysia | 62.911 % |
80 | Bahrain | 62.441 % |
81 | Vanuatu | 61.972 % |
82 | Bhutan | 61.502 % |
83 | Jordan | 61.033 % |
84 | Marshall Islands | 60.563 % |
85 | Grenada | 60.094 % |
86 | Namibia | 59.624 % |
87 | South Africa | 59.155 % |
88 | Kiribati | 58.685 % |
89 | Croatia | 58.216 % |
90 | Romania | 57.746 % |
91 | Saudi Arabia | 57.277 % |
92 | Brazil | 56.808 % |
93 | Panama | 56.338 % |
94 | Turkey | 55.869 % |
95 | Tonga | 55.399 % |
96 | Seychelles | 54.93 % |
97 | Ghana | 54.46 % |
98 | Suriname | 53.991 % |
99 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 53.521 % |
100 | Montenegro | 53.052 % |
101 | India | 52.582 % |
102 | Sri Lanka | 52.113 % |
103 | Georgia | 51.643 % |
104 | Bulgaria | 51.174 % |
105 | Malawi | 50.704 % |
106 | Trinidad and Tobago | 50.235 % |
107 | Tunisia | 49.765 % |
108 | Colombia | 49.296 % |
109 | Thailand | 48.826 % |
110 | Mongolia | 48.357 % |
111 | North Macedonia | 47.887 % |
112 | Lesotho | 47.418 % |
113 | Morocco | 46.948 % |
114 | Rwanda | 46.479 % |
115 | Serbia | 46.009 % |
116 | Republic of Moldova | 45.54 % |
117 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 45.07 % |
118 | Burkina Faso | 44.601 % |
119 | Uganda | 44.131 % |
120 | Jamaica | 43.662 % |
121 | Gabon | 43.192 % |
122 | Niger | 42.723 % |
123 | State of Palestine | 42.254 % |
124 | Armenia | 41.784 % |
125 | Albania | 41.315 % |
126 | China | 40.845 % |
127 | Senegal | 40.376 % |
128 | Zambia | 39.906 % |
129 | Belize | 39.437 % |
130 | Egypt | 38.967 % |
131 | Mali | 38.498 % |
132 | Philippines | 38.028 % |
133 | Guyana | 37.559 % |
134 | Tanzania | 37.089 % |
135 | Solomon Islands | 36.62 % |
136 | Kosovo | 36.15 % |
137 | Eswatini | 35.681 % |
138 | Vietnam | 35.211 % |
139 | Maldives | 34.742 % |
140 | Mexico | 34.272 % |
141 | Gambia | 33.803 % |
142 | Argentina | 33.333 % |
143 | Mozambique | 32.864 % |
144 | Peru | 32.394 % |
145 | Indonesia | 31.925 % |
146 | Lebanon | 31.455 % |
147 | Kazakhstan | 30.986 % |
148 | Benin | 30.516 % |
149 | Sao Tome and Principe | 30.047 % |
150 | Cuba | 29.577 % |
151 | Fiji | 29.108 % |
152 | Nicaragua | 28.638 % |
153 | Bangladesh | 28.169 % |
154 | Niue | 27.7 % |
155 | Ethiopia | 27.23 % |
156 | Russia | 26.761 % |
157 | El Salvador | 26.291 % |
158 | Syrian Arab Republic | 25.822 % |
159 | Paraguay | 25.352 % |
160 | Dominican Republic | 24.883 % |
161 | Papua New Guinea | 24.413 % |
162 | Djibouti | 23.944 % |
163 | Algeria | 23.474 % |
164 | Ukraine | 23.005 % |
165 | Sierra Leone | 22.535 % |
166 | Cook Islands | 22.066 % |
167 | Nepal | 21.596 % |
168 | Togo | 21.127 % |
169 | Madagascar | 20.657 % |
170 | Honduras | 20.188 % |
171 | Pakistan | 19.718 % |
172 | Kenya | 19.249 % |
173 | Mauritania | 18.779 % |
174 | Liberia | 18.31 % |
175 | Azerbaijan | 17.84 % |
176 | Iran | 17.371 % |
177 | Bolivia | 16.901 % |
178 | Laos | 16.432 % |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | 15.962 % |
180 | Guatemala | 15.493 % |
181 | Comoros | 15.023 % |
182 | Cambodia | 14.554 % |
183 | Libya | 14.085 % |
184 | Cameroon | 13.615 % |
185 | Belarus | 13.146 % |
186 | Ecuador | 12.676 % |
187 | Burundi | 12.207 % |
188 | Nigeria | 11.737 % |
189 | Timor-Leste | 11.268 % |
190 | Kyrgyzstan | 10.798 % |
191 | Congo | 10.329 % |
192 | Tajikistan | 9.859 % |
193 | South Sudan | 9.39 % |
194 | Angola | 8.92 % |
195 | Côte d'Ivoire | 8.451 % |
196 | Yemen | 7.981 % |
197 | Sudan | 7.512 % |
198 | Central African Republic | 7.042 % |
199 | Guinea-Bissau | 6.573 % |
200 | Eritrea | 6.103 % |
201 | North Korea | 5.634 % |
202 | Haiti | 5.164 % |
203 | Turkmenistan | 4.695 % |
204 | Myanmar | 4.225 % |
205 | Guinea | 3.756 % |
206 | Uzbekistan | 3.286 % |
207 | Chad | 2.817 % |
208 | Iraq | 2.347 % |
209 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.878 % |
210 | Venezuela | 1.408 % |
211 | Zimbabwe | 0.939 % |
212 | Afghanistan | 0.469 % |
213 | Somalia | 0 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Finland
- #2
Denmark
- #3
Sweden
- #4
New Zealand
- #5
Norway
- #6
Luxembourg
- #7
Netherlands
- #8
Austria
- #9
Ireland
- #10
Australia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Somalia
- #212
Afghanistan
- #211
Zimbabwe
- #210
Venezuela
- #209
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #208
Iraq
- #207
Chad
- #206
Uzbekistan
- #205
Guinea
- #204
Myanmar
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country for 2011 provides a comprehensive measure of the effectiveness and reliability of legal systems around the world. This index is crucial for understanding how different nations uphold laws, maintain order through their judiciary and law enforcement, and protect citizen rights. In 2011, the index covered 200 countries, offering insights into the public's confidence in legal structures, property rights, and protection from crime and violence. Given the global landscape of 2011, this metric sheds light on international governance and societal stability.
Global Leaders in Rule of Law
In 2011, Finland emerged as the top performer on the Rule of Law Index, achieving a perfect score of 100%. This outstanding result reflects Finland's robust legal framework, transparent judicial processes, and effective law enforcement, providing a model for other nations. Close contenders included Denmark (99.53%), Sweden (99.06%), and New Zealand (98.59%), each demonstrating high levels of legal integrity and public trust in governmental institutions.
These leading countries not only share strong legal systems but also have deeply ingrained democratic values and transparent governance. Their success underscores the importance of cohesive legal frameworks that ensure accountability, fairness, and protection of fundamental rights, which are vital components for fostering stable and prosperous societies.
Challenges in Low-Ranking Countries
On the opposite end of the spectrum, Eritrea stood as the lowest-ranking country with a mere 6.10% in the Rule of Law Index, highlighting severe deficiencies in legal infrastructure and governance. Other countries struggling with similar issues included Guinea-Bissau (6.57%), Central African Republic (7.04%), and Sudan (7.51%).
The common challenges faced by these nations include political instability, weak judicial systems, and inadequate law enforcement, often exacerbated by conflict and economic hardship. These elements create environments where laws are inconsistently applied, and citizen rights are frequently compromised, necessitating urgent reforms to restore public confidence and stability.
Regional Variations and Influences
Examining the Rule of Law Index through a regional lens reveals distinct variations influenced by historical, political, and socio-economic factors. For instance, Nordic countries consistently lead globally, benefiting from long traditions of democratic governance and civic participation. In contrast, many nations in Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East, such as Yemen and Sudan, face ongoing struggles due to systemic corruption and political upheaval.
In 2011, regions such as Western Europe and North America maintained high rankings due to established legal traditions and regulatory frameworks. These regions contrast sharply with parts of Asia and Africa, where the index highlights ongoing challenges in enforcing laws equitably and ensuring judicial independence.
Yearly Changes and Trends
From the previous year, the Rule of Law Index by Country witnessed notable changes in several nations. Countries such as Niger experienced a significant improvement of 6.70%, indicating positive reforms and increased legal confidence. Similarly, Palau and the Solomon Islands showed notable advancements, reflecting efforts to strengthen governance and legal institutions.
Conversely, countries like Egypt and the Maldives saw drastic decreases, with Egypt's index dropping by 11.27% due to political turmoil and transitional challenges post-Arab Spring. These trends underline the dynamic nature of global governance reforms and the impact of political events on the rule of law.
Conclusion and Future Prospects
The 2011 Rule of Law Index by Country serves as a critical barometer of global justice and governance. It highlights the achievements of countries with strong legal institutions and the ongoing struggles of those facing systemic challenges. Understanding these dynamics is essential for policymakers and international organizations working towards establishing equitable and just societies worldwide.
Looking ahead, the index emphasizes the need for continuous improvements and reforms, especially in countries with low rankings. Strengthening the rule of law remains a priority for ensuring peace, stability, and sustainable development, enabling nations to better address internal challenges and contribute positively to the international community.
Insights by country
India
In 2011, India ranked 101 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 52.58%. This ranking indicates challenges in the effective implementation of laws and the protection of rights within the country.
The relatively low score can be attributed to various factors, including issues related to judicial efficiency, corruption, and enforcement of laws. Additionally, the accessibility of legal services and the public's trust in the legal system are often cited as significant areas needing improvement.
Despite these challenges, India has a rich legal tradition and a comprehensive constitutional framework aimed at upholding the rule of law. The country's ongoing efforts to reform its judicial processes and reduce corruption are essential for improving its position in future assessments.
Hungary
In 2011, Hungary achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 71.83%, ranking 60 out of 213 countries. This score reflects the nation's relative adherence to the principles of law, including factors such as judicial independence, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The index value indicates a moderate level of legal framework effectiveness within Hungary at the time, influenced by its transitioning political landscape following the end of communism in 1989. Factors contributing to this score included the country's constitutional provisions, its legal institutions, and ongoing reforms aimed at enhancing the rule of law.
However, this ranking also suggests challenges, as Hungary faced issues such as political influence over the judiciary and concerns regarding corruption, which could undermine the effectiveness of legal protections. For context, Hungary's score was relatively high compared to some neighboring countries, reflecting its efforts to establish a democratic legal framework during a period of significant political change in Central and Eastern Europe.
Mauritius
Mauritius ranked 50th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2011, with a score of 76.995308%. This ranking indicates a relatively strong adherence to the rule of law when compared to other nations globally.
The high score reflects several factors contributing to the stability and effectiveness of the legal framework in Mauritius, including a well-established judicial system, a commitment to democratic governance, and relatively low levels of corruption. The country has a history of political stability, which has fostered a conducive environment for upholding legal norms and protecting citizens' rights.
In addition, Mauritius has been recognized for its ongoing reforms aimed at enhancing the justice system, improving access to legal representation, and promoting transparency in governance. These efforts support the rule of law and contribute to a favorable environment for both residents and international investors.
Benin
In 2011, Benin was ranked 148 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 30.52%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the country's legal and judicial systems, reflecting issues related to governance, accountability, and the protection of rights.
The relatively low score can be attributed to several factors, including corruption, inadequate enforcement of laws, and limited access to justice. These issues have historically hindered the effective functioning of legal institutions, impacting citizens' trust in the rule of law.
Additionally, Benin's ranking underscores broader regional challenges faced by many West African nations, where similar issues of governance and legal enforcement persist. The country has made strides towards improving its democratic processes, but continues to grapple with systemic weaknesses that affect the rule of law.
Egypt
In 2011, Egypt ranked 130 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, indicating significant challenges in governance and legal processes. The country achieved a score of 38.97%, reflecting issues related to the enforcement of laws, access to justice, and protection of fundamental rights.
This ranking occurred during a tumultuous period in Egypt's history, marked by the Arab Spring and the subsequent political upheaval. Factors contributing to the low score included widespread corruption, limited judicial independence, and a lack of accountability within government institutions.
The Rule of Law Index highlights the importance of legal frameworks and their implementation in ensuring justice and governance. Comparatively, many countries in the region faced similar challenges, demonstrating a broader context of governance issues in the Middle East and North Africa during this time.
France
In 2011, France ranked 23rd out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 89.67%. This position reflects the country's strong commitment to upholding the rule of law, characterized by an independent judiciary, effective enforcement of laws, and a robust legal framework.
The high score indicates that France generally enjoys a well-functioning legal system, where citizens have access to justice and their rights are protected. Contributing factors to this ranking include France's long-established legal traditions, democratic governance, and active civil society, which collectively foster an environment where the rule of law is respected.
Interestingly, France's legal system is influenced by its civil law tradition, which emphasizes codification and systematic statutes, contrasting with common law systems found in other countries. This structural approach aids in maintaining clarity and predictability in legal proceedings, further enhancing its rule of law standing.
South Africa
In 2011, South Africa was ranked 87 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a value of 59.15493%. This index measures the extent to which a country adheres to the rule of law, including factors such as the effectiveness of the judiciary, the accountability of government officials, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The relatively moderate ranking of South Africa can be attributed to various challenges, including issues related to corruption, political instability, and social inequality. Despite having a constitution that upholds democratic principles and human rights, the implementation and enforcement of laws have faced significant hurdles.
Additionally, South Africa has experienced ongoing struggles with crime rates and social unrest, which can undermine public trust in legal institutions. For instance, high levels of violent crime and pervasive corruption have compounded the difficulties in achieving a robust rule of law, impacting overall governance and societal well-being.
Antigua and Barbuda
In 2011, Antigua and Barbuda achieved a notable Rule of Law Index score of 78.4%, ranking 47th out of 213 countries. This high ranking reflects the country's relative adherence to the principles of justice, accountability, and the rule of law, which are essential for fostering a stable and democratic society.
The strong performance in the Rule of Law Index can be attributed to factors such as a well-established legal framework, an independent judiciary, and effective law enforcement agencies. These elements contribute to the protection of individual rights and the enforcement of laws without bias or corruption.
Additionally, Antigua and Barbuda's geographical positioning and tourism-driven economy may also play a role in promoting a favorable legal environment, as a stable rule of law is crucial for attracting foreign investment and maintaining a thriving tourism sector.
Burkina Faso
In 2011, Burkina Faso was ranked 118 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 44.6%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the country's legal and institutional frameworks, which impact the overall governance and protection of rights.
The relatively low score can be attributed to factors such as political instability, inadequate judicial independence, and limited access to legal resources. Additionally, issues such as corruption within public institutions and a lack of enforcement of laws further undermine the rule of law in the nation.
Despite these challenges, Burkina Faso has shown resilience and a commitment to improving governance, as reflected in its efforts to enhance legal frameworks and civil society engagement in the years following 2011. Understanding these dynamics is crucial, as they play a vital role in shaping the country’s development trajectory and citizen well-being.
Martinique
In 2011, Martinique achieved a notable position with a Rule of Law Index score of 75.12%, ranking 54 out of 213 countries. This score reflects the island's strong legal framework and the effectiveness of its judicial system, which contribute to a stable environment for both residents and businesses.
The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including the incorporation of French legal standards and the effective enforcement of laws, which ensure that rights are protected and disputes are resolved fairly. Additionally, Martinique benefits from being an overseas region of France, which provides it with resources and governance structures that support the rule of law.
Interestingly, the Rule of Law Index serves as an important indicator of governance and societal health, and a higher score is often associated with lower levels of corruption and greater public trust in government institutions. Martinique's performance in this index highlights its relative stability compared to other nations in the Caribbean region.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.