Rule of Law Index by Country 2010
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Finland | 100 % |
2 | Denmark | 99.052 % |
3 | Austria | 96.682 % |
4 | Canada | 96.209 % |
5 | Ireland | 95.261 % |
6 | Australia | 94.787 % |
7 | Greenland | 93.839 % |
8 | Iceland | 93.365 % |
9 | Germany | 92.891 % |
10 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 90.995 % |
11 | France | 90.521 % |
12 | Belgium | 90.047 % |
13 | Aruba | 89.573 % |
14 | Anguilla | 88.626 % |
15 | Japan | 88.152 % |
16 | Chile | 87.678 % |
17 | Cyprus | 87.204 % |
18 | Andorra | 86.73 % |
19 | French Guiana | 86.256 % |
20 | Estonia | 85.308 % |
21 | American Samoa | 84.834 % |
22 | Bermuda | 84.834 % |
23 | Guam | 84.834 % |
24 | Barbados | 83.412 % |
25 | Antigua and Barbuda | 80.095 % |
26 | Czech Republic | 79.621 % |
27 | Israel | 79.147 % |
28 | Cayman Islands | 78.673 % |
29 | Brunei Darussalam | 72.512 % |
30 | Hungary | 72.038 % |
31 | Latvia | 71.09 % |
32 | Dominica | 70.142 % |
33 | China, Macao SAR | 69.668 % |
34 | Bahamas | 69.194 % |
35 | Botswana | 67.773 % |
36 | Kuwait | 67.299 % |
37 | Greece | 66.825 % |
38 | Costa Rica | 65.403 % |
39 | Cabo Verde | 64.929 % |
40 | Italy | 63.981 % |
41 | Bahrain | 63.507 % |
42 | Bhutan | 60.664 % |
43 | Jordan | 59.716 % |
44 | Grenada | 58.768 % |
45 | Croatia | 56.872 % |
46 | Kiribati | 56.398 % |
47 | Brazil | 55.45 % |
48 | Ghana | 54.028 % |
49 | India | 53.555 % |
50 | Bulgaria | 51.659 % |
51 | Egypt | 50.237 % |
52 | Burkina Faso | 49.763 % |
53 | Georgia | 48.815 % |
54 | Colombia | 46.919 % |
55 | Belize | 46.445 % |
56 | Lesotho | 45.972 % |
57 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.076 % |
58 | Albania | 42.654 % |
59 | Jamaica | 40.758 % |
60 | Gabon | 39.81 % |
61 | Eswatini | 39.336 % |
62 | China | 38.863 % |
63 | Guyana | 38.389 % |
64 | Armenia | 37.915 % |
65 | Gambia | 34.123 % |
66 | Argentina | 32.701 % |
67 | Kosovo | 32.227 % |
68 | Lebanon | 31.754 % |
69 | Indonesia | 30.806 % |
70 | Benin | 30.332 % |
71 | Kazakhstan | 29.384 % |
72 | Cuba | 28.91 % |
73 | Fiji | 27.488 % |
74 | Djibouti | 27.014 % |
75 | Bangladesh | 26.066 % |
76 | Ethiopia | 25.592 % |
77 | Algeria | 25.118 % |
78 | Dominican Republic | 23.223 % |
79 | El Salvador | 22.749 % |
80 | Honduras | 22.275 % |
81 | Azerbaijan | 21.327 % |
82 | Cook Islands | 20.379 % |
83 | Guatemala | 18.957 % |
84 | Kenya | 18.009 % |
85 | Laos | 16.588 % |
86 | Equatorial Guinea | 15.64 % |
87 | Iran | 15.166 % |
88 | Bolivia | 14.692 % |
89 | Belarus | 14.218 % |
90 | Comoros | 13.744 % |
91 | Cameroon | 13.27 % |
92 | Cambodia | 12.322 % |
93 | Ecuador | 11.848 % |
94 | Burundi | 10.427 % |
95 | Congo | 9.479 % |
96 | Côte d'Ivoire | 9.005 % |
97 | Kyrgyzstan | 8.531 % |
98 | Angola | 8.057 % |
99 | Central African Republic | 7.583 % |
100 | Guinea-Bissau | 7.109 % |
101 | Eritrea | 6.161 % |
102 | Haiti | 5.213 % |
103 | Guinea | 3.791 % |
104 | Chad | 3.318 % |
105 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.37 % |
106 | Iraq | 1.422 % |
107 | Afghanistan | 0.474 % |
108 | Jersey | NaN % |
109 | Sweden | 99.526 % |
110 | Norway | 98.578 % |
111 | New Zealand | 98.104 % |
112 | Luxembourg | 97.63 % |
113 | Netherlands | 97.156 % |
114 | United Kingdom | 95.735 % |
115 | Switzerland | 94.313 % |
116 | United States | 92.417 % |
117 | Singapore | 91.943 % |
118 | Liechtenstein | 91.469 % |
119 | Malta | 89.1 % |
120 | Spain | 85.782 % |
121 | Portugal | 82.938 % |
122 | South Korea | 82.464 % |
123 | Taiwan | 81.991 % |
124 | Slovenia | 81.517 % |
125 | Tuvalu | 81.043 % |
126 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 80.569 % |
127 | Mauritius | 78.199 % |
128 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 77.725 % |
129 | Monaco | 77.251 % |
130 | San Marino | 77.251 % |
131 | Saint Lucia | 76.303 % |
132 | Martinique | 75.829 % |
133 | Réunion | 75.829 % |
134 | United States Virgin Islands | 75.829 % |
135 | Qatar | 73.934 % |
136 | Uruguay | 73.46 % |
137 | Lithuania | 72.986 % |
138 | Puerto Rico | 71.564 % |
139 | Palau | 70.616 % |
140 | Poland | 68.72 % |
141 | Samoa | 68.246 % |
142 | Slovakia | 66.351 % |
143 | Oman | 65.877 % |
144 | Nauru | 64.455 % |
145 | Marshall Islands | 63.033 % |
146 | Malaysia | 62.559 % |
147 | United Arab Emirates | 62.085 % |
148 | Vanuatu | 61.611 % |
149 | Namibia | 61.137 % |
150 | Saudi Arabia | 60.19 % |
151 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 59.242 % |
152 | Romania | 58.294 % |
153 | Tonga | 57.82 % |
154 | South Africa | 57.346 % |
155 | Seychelles | 55.924 % |
156 | Turkey | 54.976 % |
157 | Tunisia | 54.502 % |
158 | Suriname | 53.081 % |
159 | Montenegro | 52.607 % |
160 | Panama | 52.133 % |
161 | Sri Lanka | 51.185 % |
162 | Malawi | 50.711 % |
163 | Trinidad and Tobago | 49.289 % |
164 | State of Palestine | 48.341 % |
165 | Morocco | 47.867 % |
166 | Thailand | 47.393 % |
167 | North Macedonia | 45.498 % |
168 | Maldives | 45.024 % |
169 | Rwanda | 44.55 % |
170 | Republic of Moldova | 43.602 % |
171 | Mongolia | 43.128 % |
172 | Uganda | 42.18 % |
173 | Senegal | 41.706 % |
174 | Serbia | 41.232 % |
175 | Mali | 40.284 % |
176 | Tanzania | 37.441 % |
177 | Mozambique | 36.967 % |
178 | Zambia | 36.493 % |
179 | Niger | 36.019 % |
180 | Mexico | 35.545 % |
181 | Philippines | 35.071 % |
182 | Peru | 34.597 % |
183 | Vietnam | 33.649 % |
184 | Syrian Arab Republic | 33.175 % |
185 | Solomon Islands | 31.28 % |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 29.858 % |
187 | Pakistan | 28.436 % |
188 | Niue | 27.962 % |
189 | Russia | 26.54 % |
190 | Paraguay | 24.645 % |
191 | Nicaragua | 24.171 % |
192 | Ukraine | 23.697 % |
193 | Madagascar | 21.801 % |
194 | Mauritania | 20.853 % |
195 | Papua New Guinea | 19.905 % |
196 | Togo | 19.431 % |
197 | Sierra Leone | 18.483 % |
198 | Nepal | 17.536 % |
199 | Liberia | 17.062 % |
200 | Libya | 16.114 % |
201 | Yemen | 12.796 % |
202 | Nigeria | 11.374 % |
203 | Timor-Leste | 10.9 % |
204 | Tajikistan | 9.953 % |
205 | Sudan | 6.635 % |
206 | North Korea | 5.687 % |
207 | Uzbekistan | 4.739 % |
208 | Turkmenistan | 4.265 % |
209 | Myanmar | 2.844 % |
210 | Venezuela | 1.896 % |
211 | Somalia | 0 % |
212 | South Sudan | NaN % |
213 | Zimbabwe | 0.948 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Finland
- #2
Denmark
- #3
Austria
- #4
Canada
- #5
Ireland
- #6
Australia
- #7
Greenland
- #8
Iceland
- #9
Germany
- #10
China, Hong Kong SAR
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Zimbabwe
- #212
South Sudan
- #211
Somalia
- #210
Venezuela
- #209
Myanmar
- #208
Turkmenistan
- #207
Uzbekistan
- #206
North Korea
- #205
Sudan
- #204
Tajikistan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country for 2010 serves as a crucial barometer for gauging the extent to which diverse nations adhere to the principles of legal equity, fairness in judiciary processes, and the protection of human rights. This index reflects societal confidence in laws, judicial systems, police, and property rights, as well as the degree of protection from crime and violence. Understanding this index is vital for assessing governance and societal structures worldwide.
Northern Hemisphere Dominance in Legal Adherence
The 2010 Rule of Law Index highlights a clear trend where Northern Hemisphere nations, particularly European countries, dominated the upper echelons of the index. Finland emerged as the pinnacle of legal trustworthiness with a perfect score of 100%. Closely following were Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, with scores above 98%, showcasing their exemplary commitment to maintaining robust legal frameworks and justice systems. This pattern underscores the correlation between strong economic foundations and effective legal systems, with Scandinavian nations leading the charge in legal transparency and citizen protection.
Emerging Challenges in Africa and Asia
Contrastingly, countries in Africa and parts of Asia struggled with maintaining similar standards. Haiti, with a score of 5.21%, along with North Korea and Eritrea, appeared at the bottom of the list. These low scores underscore systemic issues such as political instability, corruption, and insufficient legal infrastructure. The presence of numerous African nations like Sudan and Guinea-Bissau in the lower ranks indicates widespread challenges related to governance and civil society engagement. These regions face ongoing struggles with authoritative governance and lack of legal reforms, impacting their Rule of Law scores adversely.
Impact of Policy Reforms on Legal Systems
Examining policy reforms and their impacts reveals noteworthy improvements in countries like Rwanda and Pakistan, with increases of 7.58% and 6.16%, respectively. These significant upticks can be attributed to concerted efforts in policy reform and international support to bolster legal structures. Rwanda’s focus on economic development and anti-corruption measures, alongside Pakistan's judicial improvements, contribute to these positive changes, highlighting how targeted reforms can enhance legal confidence and societal trust.
Historical Context and Trends
In the context of historical trends, the 2010 data reflects a slight global average decline of 0.01% from the previous year. This marginal decrease suggests a broader trend of incremental changes rather than drastic shifts in many countries' legal standings. However, significant decreases were observed in the Cook Islands and Madagascar, where scores fell by over 6%, pointing to internal challenges and perhaps setbacks in governance reforms. Meanwhile, nations like Bermuda experienced substantial progress, setting examples of how legal clarity can rapidly improve under stable governance.
Regional Comparisons and Disparities
Regional disparities within the Rule of Law Index in 2010 emphasize the varied state of governance across continents. European and North American nations generally scored higher, indicating stronger adherence to legal frameworks and higher public confidence in institutional integrity. In stark contrast, many African and some Asian countries exhibit lower scores, highlighting ongoing struggles with corruption, political instability, and inadequate judicial systems. These disparities are often compounded by economic conditions, with wealthier nations typically able to invest more in their legal and institutional frameworks to maintain higher standards of law and order.
In conclusion, the 2010 Rule of Law Index by Country provides a comprehensive snapshot of global legal standings, revealing both the strengths and vulnerabilities present in different world regions. It emphasizes the need for continuous improvement in governance and legal systems, especially in countries where legal confidence remains low. As nations strive toward development and stability, the Rule of Law Index will continue to serve as a crucial measure of progress and integrity within global legal frameworks.
Insights by country
Tunisia
Tunisia ranked 96 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2010, with a score of 54.50%. This positioning reflects a moderate level of adherence to the principles of law, encompassing factors such as access to justice, the effectiveness of law enforcement, and the accountability of public officials.
The score indicates that Tunisia faced challenges in its judicial processes and governance structures, which were influenced by a historical backdrop of political repression and limited civil liberties prior to the Arab Spring. The year 2010 was particularly significant as it precedes the widespread protests that initiated profound political changes in the country.
Factors contributing to Tunisia's Rule of Law Index score included issues related to corruption, inadequate legal protections for citizens, and a lack of transparency in government practices. As the country transitioned towards greater democratization in subsequent years, these aspects were central to ongoing reforms aimed at improving the rule of law and restoring public trust in institutions.
Finland
In 2010, Finland achieved a remarkable status by securing the first rank in the Rule of Law Index, with a perfect score of 100% among 213 countries. This outstanding performance underscores Finland's robust legal framework and commitment to upholding the rule of law, characterized by effective governance and respect for fundamental rights.
The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a transparent judicial system, low levels of corruption, and high public trust in governmental institutions. Finland's social policies, which emphasize equality and access to justice, further enhance its legal environment, fostering a culture where laws are applied consistently and fairly.
In addition, Finland's strong education system and civic engagement contribute to an informed citizenry that actively participates in democratic processes, thereby reinforcing the rule of law. Interestingly, Finland's consistent performance in global rankings of governance and quality of life reflects its commitment to maintaining high standards in legal and institutional integrity.
Bahamas
In 2010, the Bahamas achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 69.19%, ranking it 65th out of 213 countries. This score indicates a relatively strong adherence to the rule of law compared to many other nations, reflecting effective legal frameworks and institutions.
The Bahamas' position on the Rule of Law Index can be attributed to factors such as a well-established legal system, the presence of an independent judiciary, and a commitment to upholding civil liberties. However, challenges like corruption, limited resources, and disparities in access to justice may impact the overall effectiveness of law enforcement and legal processes.
Additionally, the country benefits from its status as a popular tourist destination, which encourages a focus on maintaining public safety and legal order. The legal framework in the Bahamas is influenced by its historical ties to the British legal system, which continues to shape its governance and rule of law practices.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2010, Equatorial Guinea was ranked 178 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 15.639811%. This low ranking reflects significant challenges related to governance, legal frameworks, and the enforcement of laws within the country.
The Rule of Law Index measures various aspects of legal systems, including the effectiveness of the judiciary, the protection of fundamental rights, and the absence of corruption. In Equatorial Guinea, factors such as authoritarian governance, limited judicial independence, and widespread corruption contribute to its poor standing. The concentration of power within the ruling elite has often led to a lack of accountability and transparency in governmental institutions.
Moreover, the country’s rich natural resources have not translated into improved legal frameworks or civil liberties for the population. Instead, the wealth generated from oil and gas has often been associated with economic inequality and a lack of investment in social services, further exacerbating issues related to the rule of law and human rights.
Guyana
In 2010, Guyana achieved a Rule of Law Index score of 38.39%, ranking it 130 out of 213 countries. This index reflects the country's challenges in upholding the rule of law, encompassing aspects such as the effectiveness of law enforcement, judicial independence, and the protection of fundamental rights.
Several factors contribute to Guyana's relatively low score, including issues related to corruption, limited access to justice, and the influence of political instability on legal processes. Furthermore, socio-economic challenges such as poverty and inequality may exacerbate the difficulties in maintaining a consistent rule of law.
In comparison to its regional counterparts, Guyana's position highlights the ongoing struggles within the legal framework, which can affect foreign investment and overall governance in the country. Addressing these challenges is essential to improve the rule of law and foster a more stable environment for its citizens.
Israel
In 2010, Israel ranked 45th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 79.15%. This positioning reflects a relatively strong adherence to the principles of justice, transparency, and accountability within the country's legal framework.
The high score can be attributed to several factors, including a robust judicial system, an independent judiciary, and a vibrant civil society that actively participates in legal and political processes. However, the complexities of Israel's geopolitical situation and ongoing conflict can pose challenges to the consistent application of the rule of law.
Moreover, Israel's commitment to democratic principles and human rights, alongside its legal protections for freedom of expression and assembly, contributes to its favorable ranking. Despite this, issues such as minority rights and the legal status of territories remain points of contention that could impact the overall perception of the rule of law in the country.
Kuwait
Kuwait ranked 69th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2010, with a score of 67.30%. This ranking reflects the country's performance in various dimensions of the rule of law, including the accountability of government officials, the protection of fundamental rights, and the effectiveness of the judiciary.
The relatively high score indicates a moderate level of legal fairness and transparency compared to other nations. Factors contributing to Kuwait's score may include its established legal framework, the presence of a parliamentary system, and active civil society engagement, which collectively influence governance and the rule of law.
Furthermore, Kuwait's ranking highlights challenges such as political instability and limitations on freedom of expression, which can impact the overall legal environment. In comparison to its Gulf neighbors, Kuwait has historically maintained a more open political landscape, yet it still faces issues related to citizen rights and judicial independence.
Angola
In 2010, Angola was ranked 194 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, indicating significant challenges within its legal framework. The country achieved a score of 8.056872%, reflecting a weak adherence to the principles of law, including limitation of government power, protection of fundamental rights, and effective justice mechanisms.
This low ranking can be attributed to a combination of factors, including a history of civil conflict, political instability, and pervasive corruption. The Angolan legal system has faced criticisms regarding its independence and effectiveness, which undermines public trust and compliance with the law.
Moreover, Angola's governance issues are compounded by socio-economic factors such as high poverty rates and inequality, which further hinder the establishment of a robust rule of law. The country's ongoing struggles with governance and legal reform highlight the need for systemic changes to improve the overall rule of law environment.
Gambia
In 2010, Gambia was ranked 139 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a score of 34.12%. This relatively low ranking indicates significant challenges in the country's adherence to the principles of the rule of law, which encompasses factors such as judicial independence, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including a history of political repression, limited judicial independence, and concerns regarding the integrity of law enforcement agencies. These elements contribute to a perception of weak governance and a lack of public trust in legal institutions.
Additionally, Gambia's political landscape has been marked by authoritarian rule, which undermines the development of a robust legal framework. Such conditions not only affect local governance but also impede foreign investment and economic growth, further entrenching the cycle of underdevelopment.
Indonesia
In 2010, Indonesia was ranked 146 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 30.81%. This ranking highlights significant challenges in the country's legal and institutional frameworks, which are essential components of governance and societal trust.
The relatively low score reflects issues such as corruption, lack of judicial independence, and inadequate enforcement of laws. These factors undermine citizens' confidence in the legal system and contribute to a perception of injustice and inequality before the law.
Furthermore, Indonesia's diverse population and complex socio-political landscape can complicate the implementation of effective legal frameworks. Historical factors, including the legacy of authoritarian governance and ongoing regional disparities, also play a role in shaping the country's rule of law.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.