Rule of Law Index by Country 2015
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Austria | 96.19 % |
2 | Canada | 95.714 % |
3 | Australia | 95.238 % |
4 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 94.762 % |
5 | Andorra | 90 % |
6 | Belgium | 88.095 % |
7 | American Samoa | 86.667 % |
8 | Aruba | 85.238 % |
9 | Chile | 84.762 % |
10 | Czech Republic | 83.333 % |
11 | Barbados | 81.905 % |
12 | Cyprus | 80.952 % |
13 | China, Macao SAR | 78.571 % |
14 | Bermuda | 77.143 % |
15 | Cayman Islands | 75.714 % |
16 | Bahamas | 70.952 % |
17 | Cabo Verde | 70.476 % |
18 | Antigua and Barbuda | 70 % |
19 | Bhutan | 69.524 % |
20 | Costa Rica | 69.048 % |
21 | Botswana | 68.095 % |
22 | Bahrain | 65.714 % |
23 | Brunei Darussalam | 65.238 % |
24 | Croatia | 60.476 % |
25 | Anguilla | 54.286 % |
26 | Bulgaria | 51.429 % |
27 | Brazil | 50.476 % |
28 | Colombia | 46.19 % |
29 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 45.714 % |
30 | Albania | 44.286 % |
31 | China | 40.952 % |
32 | Armenia | 38.571 % |
33 | Burkina Faso | 33.81 % |
34 | Benin | 33.333 % |
35 | Côte d'Ivoire | 29.524 % |
36 | Azerbaijan | 28.095 % |
37 | Cuba | 27.619 % |
38 | Argentina | 26.667 % |
39 | Bangladesh | 25.238 % |
40 | Belize | 23.81 % |
41 | Comoros | 21.429 % |
42 | Belarus | 19.048 % |
43 | Algeria | 17.143 % |
44 | Cambodia | 14.286 % |
45 | Cameroon | 13.81 % |
46 | Angola | 12.857 % |
47 | Congo | 11.429 % |
48 | Bolivia | 10.476 % |
49 | Burundi | 10 % |
50 | Chad | 8.571 % |
51 | Afghanistan | 4.286 % |
52 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.381 % |
53 | Central African Republic | 1.429 % |
54 | Cook Islands | NaN % |
55 | Finland | 100 % |
56 | Denmark | 99.524 % |
57 | Norway | 98.571 % |
58 | New Zealand | 98.095 % |
59 | Netherlands | 97.143 % |
60 | Luxembourg | 96.667 % |
61 | Liechtenstein | 91.429 % |
62 | Monaco | 90 % |
63 | Malta | 82.857 % |
64 | Portugal | 82.381 % |
65 | Réunion | 81.429 % |
66 | Lithuania | 80.476 % |
67 | Palau | 79.524 % |
68 | Mauritius | 77.619 % |
69 | Poland | 76.19 % |
70 | Qatar | 74.286 % |
71 | Puerto Rico | 73.333 % |
72 | Saint Lucia | 72.381 % |
73 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 68.571 % |
74 | Malaysia | 66.19 % |
75 | Oman | 64.286 % |
76 | Namibia | 62.381 % |
77 | Romania | 61.429 % |
78 | Rwanda | 58.571 % |
79 | Marshall Islands | 57.143 % |
80 | Montenegro | 56.19 % |
81 | Martinique | 54.286 % |
82 | Panama | 53.333 % |
83 | Morocco | 50.952 % |
84 | North Macedonia | 47.143 % |
85 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 45.238 % |
86 | Malawi | 43.81 % |
87 | Republic of Moldova | 42.381 % |
88 | Mongolia | 41.905 % |
89 | Philippines | 40 % |
90 | Mexico | 39.048 % |
91 | Peru | 37.143 % |
92 | Maldives | 32.857 % |
93 | Niger | 31.905 % |
94 | Nauru | 30.952 % |
95 | Paraguay | 30 % |
96 | Nepal | 29.048 % |
97 | Madagascar | 28.571 % |
98 | Mali | 26.19 % |
99 | Nicaragua | 25.714 % |
100 | Pakistan | 24.286 % |
101 | Russia | 22.857 % |
102 | Papua New Guinea | 20.952 % |
103 | Mozambique | 20.476 % |
104 | Liberia | 19.524 % |
105 | Mauritania | 18.095 % |
106 | Nigeria | 14.762 % |
107 | Myanmar | 7.619 % |
108 | Libya | 3.81 % |
109 | Niue | NaN % |
110 | Sweden | 99.048 % |
111 | Switzerland | 97.619 % |
112 | Singapore | 94.286 % |
113 | United Kingdom | 93.81 % |
114 | Germany | 93.333 % |
115 | Ireland | 92.857 % |
116 | Greenland | 92.381 % |
117 | Jersey | 92.381 % |
118 | Iceland | 90.952 % |
119 | United States | 90.476 % |
120 | San Marino | 90 % |
121 | Japan | 88.571 % |
122 | France | 87.619 % |
123 | Estonia | 87.143 % |
124 | Guam | 86.667 % |
125 | French Guiana | 85.714 % |
126 | Israel | 84.286 % |
127 | Taiwan | 83.81 % |
128 | Slovenia | 80 % |
129 | South Korea | 79.048 % |
130 | Spain | 78.095 % |
131 | United States Virgin Islands | 77.143 % |
132 | Latvia | 75.238 % |
133 | Samoa | 74.762 % |
134 | Uruguay | 73.81 % |
135 | Dominica | 72.857 % |
136 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 71.905 % |
137 | United Arab Emirates | 71.429 % |
138 | Slovakia | 67.619 % |
139 | Tuvalu | 67.143 % |
140 | Jordan | 66.667 % |
141 | Hungary | 64.762 % |
142 | Seychelles | 63.81 % |
143 | Italy | 63.333 % |
144 | Greece | 62.857 % |
145 | Georgia | 61.905 % |
146 | Grenada | 60.952 % |
147 | Vanuatu | 60 % |
148 | Ghana | 59.524 % |
149 | Saudi Arabia | 59.048 % |
150 | Sri Lanka | 58.095 % |
151 | South Africa | 57.619 % |
152 | Kuwait | 56.667 % |
153 | Tunisia | 55.714 % |
154 | India | 55.238 % |
155 | Serbia | 54.762 % |
156 | Kiribati | 52.857 % |
157 | Trinidad and Tobago | 52.381 % |
158 | Senegal | 51.905 % |
159 | Thailand | 50 % |
160 | Jamaica | 49.524 % |
161 | Lesotho | 49.048 % |
162 | Suriname | 48.571 % |
163 | Tonga | 48.095 % |
164 | Turkey | 47.619 % |
165 | Zambia | 46.667 % |
166 | Eswatini | 44.762 % |
167 | Vietnam | 43.333 % |
168 | Fiji | 42.857 % |
169 | Tanzania | 41.429 % |
170 | Uganda | 40.476 % |
171 | Indonesia | 39.524 % |
172 | Kosovo | 38.095 % |
173 | Solomon Islands | 37.619 % |
174 | Kenya | 36.667 % |
175 | Kazakhstan | 36.19 % |
176 | State of Palestine | 35.714 % |
177 | Ethiopia | 35.238 % |
178 | Dominican Republic | 34.762 % |
179 | Guyana | 34.286 % |
180 | Gabon | 32.381 % |
181 | Egypt | 31.429 % |
182 | El Salvador | 30.476 % |
183 | Gambia | 27.143 % |
184 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.762 % |
185 | Lebanon | 23.333 % |
186 | Laos | 22.381 % |
187 | Togo | 21.905 % |
188 | Ukraine | 20 % |
189 | Sierra Leone | 18.571 % |
190 | Iran | 17.619 % |
191 | Honduras | 16.667 % |
192 | Djibouti | 16.19 % |
193 | Guatemala | 15.714 % |
194 | Ecuador | 15.238 % |
195 | Kyrgyzstan | 13.333 % |
196 | Tajikistan | 12.381 % |
197 | Timor-Leste | 11.905 % |
198 | Uzbekistan | 10.952 % |
199 | Guinea | 9.524 % |
200 | Haiti | 9.048 % |
201 | Sudan | 8.095 % |
202 | Yemen | 7.143 % |
203 | Guinea-Bissau | 6.667 % |
204 | Equatorial Guinea | 6.19 % |
205 | Zimbabwe | 5.714 % |
206 | Turkmenistan | 5.238 % |
207 | Syrian Arab Republic | 4.762 % |
208 | Eritrea | 3.333 % |
209 | Iraq | 2.857 % |
210 | North Korea | 1.905 % |
211 | South Sudan | 0.952 % |
212 | Venezuela | 0.476 % |
213 | Somalia | 0 % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Austria
- #2
Canada
- #3
Australia
- #4
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #5
Andorra
- #6
Belgium
- #7
American Samoa
- #8
Aruba
- #9
Chile
- #10
Czech Republic
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Somalia
- #212
Venezuela
- #211
South Sudan
- #210
North Korea
- #209
Iraq
- #208
Eritrea
- #207
Syrian Arab Republic
- #206
Turkmenistan
- #205
Zimbabwe
- #204
Equatorial Guinea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Rule of Law Index by Country for 2015 provides a critical lens through which to view global governance, as it evaluates the extent to which citizens of various nations can have confidence in their laws, judicial systems, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence. For 2015, this index offers an invaluable snapshot of worldwide governance standards, highlighting stark differences between nations, and pointing to broader implications for international cooperation and socio-political stability.
Top Performing Countries in 2015
The year 2015 saw Nordic countries leading the Rule of Law Index, with Finland achieving the maximum score of 100%. Close on its heels were Denmark and Sweden, scoring 99.52% and 99.05% respectively. These nations exemplify a robust legal framework supported by transparent governance and strong institutions. In particular, Finland's legal system is often cited for its efficiency and minimal corruption, which fosters an environment of trust and compliance among its citizens. Additionally, countries like Norway, New Zealand, and Switzerland also ranked highly, illustrating their commitment to upholding legal rights and maintaining low crime rates. The high rankings of these countries underscore the correlation between economic prosperity, social stability, and a strong rule of law.
Global Challenges in Lower Ranked Countries
Conversely, countries such as Turkmenistan (5.24%), Zimbabwe (5.71%), and Equatorial Guinea (6.19%) occupied the bottom tier of the index, reflecting significant challenges in governance. These low rankings highlight ongoing issues such as corruption, weak judicial systems, and inadequate law enforcement. For example, in Turkmenistan, the concentration of power and lack of political freedom have led to poor legal transparency and accountability. Such conditions often exacerbate socio-economic inequalities and can result in deteriorating public trust in institutions. The struggles faced by these countries illustrate the importance of international aid and policy interventions aimed at strengthening governance frameworks and legal institutions.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The Rule of Law Index for 2015 also points to significant changes from the previous year. On a global scale, the average change was a slight decrease of 0.41%, signaling a small but concerning decline. Notably, Saint Kitts and Nevis experienced a remarkable improvement, with a 133.8% increase in its score, highlighting successful governance reforms and improved legal structures. Similarly, Antigua and Barbuda and Bermuda saw substantial advancements, illustrating the positive impact of targeted policy reforms and international support. On the other hand, countries like North Macedonia experienced a notable decline of 17.6%, indicating potential political instability and governance challenges. These year-over-year changes emphasize the dynamic nature of governance and the need for continuous monitoring and support to sustain improvements.
Policy Impact and Governance Relationships
Analyzing the Rule of Law Index through the lens of policy impact reveals how effective governance can shape societal outcomes. Countries with higher rankings often implement policies that ensure transparency, accountability, and equal access to justice. For example, the comprehensive legal reforms in Nordic countries have been effective in mitigating corruption and fostering civic engagement. Conversely, nations with lower scores frequently grapple with ineffective policies that fail to protect citizens' rights. In such contexts, international partnerships and supportive policies from global organizations can be pivotal in facilitating legal and institutional reforms, encouraging better governance practices, and ultimately improving rule of law standards.
Regional Clustering and Continental Comparisons
Examining the 2015 Rule of Law Index reveals significant regional variations. Europe, particularly the Nordic region, consistently performs well, reflecting a regional tradition of strong governance and legal frameworks. In contrast, African nations, many of which are at the lower end of the index, often face challenges related to political instability and economic constraints, which impede the development of robust legal systems. These regional patterns highlight the influence of historical, cultural, and economic factors on governance. For instance, post-colonial histories and ongoing conflicts in certain regions can significantly affect governance quality. Understanding these regional dynamics is crucial for tailored policy interventions that address specific governance challenges and promote sustainable development.
The Rule of Law Index by Country for 2015 underscores the profound importance of legal frameworks in shaping national prosperity and stability. By examining the contrasting performance of countries and regions, the index offers valuable insights into the successes and challenges of global governance. These insights are essential for policymakers, international organizations, and civil society as they work towards strengthening legal institutions and enhancing justice worldwide.
Insights by country
Dominican Republic
The Dominican Republic ranked 138 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2015, with a score of 34.76%. This position reflects significant challenges in terms of judicial effectiveness, corruption, and the protection of fundamental rights within the country.
The relatively low score indicates issues such as a lack of public trust in law enforcement and judicial institutions, which can be influenced by factors like political instability, economic inequality, and widespread corruption. These elements contribute to a perception of inadequate rule of law and limited access to justice for many citizens.
Additionally, the Dominican Republic has faced ongoing challenges related to human rights and systemic violence, which can undermine the enforcement of laws and diminish the effectiveness of legal protections. It is noteworthy that improving the rule of law is essential for fostering a stable and equitable society, as it is closely linked to the overall development and governance of the nation.
Togo
Togo was ranked 165th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index for the year 2015, reflecting a score of 21.90%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the country's adherence to legal principles, including the effectiveness of law enforcement and the judiciary.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including weak judicial independence, political interference, and limited access to legal resources. These issues may hinder citizens' ability to seek justice and protect their rights effectively.
Moreover, Togo's historical context, characterized by periods of political instability and authoritarian governance, has contributed to a lack of trust in public institutions, which is critical for establishing a strong rule of law. In comparison to other nations, Togo's legal framework continues to evolve, but progress remains slow.
Jamaica
In 2015, Jamaica held a position of 107 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a score of 49.52%. This ranking indicates challenges in the effective implementation of law and governance within the country, highlighting areas where the rule of law may not be consistently upheld.
The relatively low score can be attributed to factors such as corruption, inefficiencies in the judicial system, and issues related to law enforcement. These elements contribute to a perception of insecurity and a lack of public trust in legal institutions, which can undermine the rule of law.
Moreover, Jamaica's historical context, characterized by social and economic disparities, has also played a significant role in shaping the legal landscape. The country continues to grapple with issues such as crime rates and violence, which further complicate the enforcement of laws and the protection of citizens' rights.
Kazakhstan
In 2015, Kazakhstan ranked 135 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 36.19%. This positioning indicates significant challenges in the country's adherence to the principles of the rule of law, which encompasses factors such as judicial independence, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The relatively low score reflects several underlying issues, including concerns over government transparency, limited political pluralism, and the centralization of power. Moreover, Kazakhstan's legal system has been criticized for its lack of impartiality and the influence of state authorities over judicial processes.
In the broader context, the Rule of Law Index serves as a crucial indicator for assessing governance and civil liberties, and Kazakhstan's performance highlights the need for reforms to enhance legal frameworks and strengthen institutions to promote justice and equality.
Palau
In 2015, Palau achieved a commendable 44th rank out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 79.52%. This ranking reflects Palau's strong commitment to upholding legal principles, protection of human rights, and ensuring access to justice for its citizens.
The high score can be attributed to several factors, including a stable democratic governance structure, a relatively low level of corruption, and effective judicial processes. Furthermore, Palau's unique cultural context emphasizes respect for the law and community values, which contributes to its positive legal environment.
Interestingly, the Rule of Law Index evaluates various dimensions such as government accountability, the independence of the judiciary, and the protection of fundamental rights, indicating that Palau performs well across these critical areas compared to many other nations in the Pacific region.
Malawi
In 2015, Malawi ranked 119 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a score of 43.81%. This ranking indicates significant challenges in the country's adherence to legal principles, including the effectiveness of law enforcement, judicial independence, and the protection of fundamental rights.
Several factors contribute to Malawi's position on the Rule of Law Index. Issues such as corruption, limited resources for the judiciary, and political interference often undermine the legal framework. Additionally, the country's struggle with poverty and social inequality can exacerbate legal disparities, limiting access to justice for marginalized populations.
Malawi's score on the Rule of Law Index is indicative of broader governance challenges, with the country facing difficulties in ensuring accountability and transparency within its institutions. Furthermore, the legal environment in Malawi is impacted by a historical context of colonialism and post-independence governance issues, which have shaped the current state of the rule of law.
Jersey
In 2015, Jersey ranked 18th out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, reflecting a strong adherence to legal principles and governance. The island achieved an impressive score of 92.38%, indicative of a robust legal framework and effective law enforcement mechanisms.
This high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a well-established judicial system, transparency in governance, and a commitment to human rights. Jersey's legal system is rooted in English common law, which reinforces the rule of law and provides a stable environment for both residents and businesses.
Additionally, Jersey's status as a leading offshore financial center contributes to its emphasis on regulatory compliance and the protection of property rights, further enhancing its rule of law. The island is known for its low levels of corruption and strong institutions, which foster public trust and civic engagement.
Morocco
In 2015, Morocco ranked 104 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 50.95%. This positioning indicates a moderate level of adherence to the principles of rule of law, which encompasses aspects such as judicial effectiveness, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights.
The relatively low score and ranking can be attributed to several factors, including challenges in the judiciary's independence, issues related to corruption, and limitations on civil liberties. Additionally, Morocco has faced criticism regarding the treatment of political dissent and the press, which may hinder the overall perception of the rule of law in the country.
Interestingly, Morocco's score is reflective of a broader regional trend, as many North African countries struggle with similar rule of law issues, highlighting the necessity for reform and improvement in governance to enhance citizens' trust in legal systems.
Burkina Faso
In 2015, Burkina Faso was ranked 140 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, indicating significant challenges in governance and legal processes. The country's score stood at 33.81%, reflecting a weak adherence to the rule of law and institutional integrity.
This low ranking can be attributed to several factors, including political instability, corruption, and limited access to justice. The transitional government that emerged after the political upheaval in 2014 struggled to establish effective legal frameworks and maintain order, impacting citizens' trust in the judicial system.
Additional context reveals that Burkina Faso faces ongoing challenges such as ethnic tensions, economic difficulties, and security threats from militant groups, all of which further complicate the rule of law. These issues highlight the broader regional context in the Sahel, where similar governance challenges are prevalent.
Italy
In 2015, Italy ranked 78th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, with a score of 63.33%. This ranking reflects the country's performance in various dimensions of the rule of law, including the accountability of government officials, the effectiveness of law enforcement, and the protection of fundamental rights.
Several factors contribute to Italy's ranking, including challenges related to corruption, organized crime, and the efficiency of its judicial system. Corruption remains a significant issue, often undermining public trust and the overall effectiveness of legal frameworks.
Interestingly, Italy's position in the Rule of Law Index is indicative of broader European trends, where various countries face similar challenges related to governance and public administration. As a member of the European Union, Italy's legal and institutional frameworks are subject to scrutiny, impacting its domestic and international standing.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.