Rule of Law Index by Country 2001
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Afghanistan - #2
Albania - #3
Algeria - #4
American Samoa - #5
Andorra - #6
Angola - #7
Anguilla - #8
Antigua and Barbuda - #9
Argentina - #10
Armenia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Zimbabwe - #212
Zambia - #211
Yemen - #210
Vietnam - #209
Venezuela - #208
Vanuatu - #207
Uzbekistan - #206
Uruguay - #205
United States Virgin Islands - #204
United States
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Insights by country
Trinidad and Tobago
In 2001, Trinidad and Tobago ranked 195 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, indicating significant challenges in upholding legal standards and governance. The country recorded a value of null %, reflecting severe deficiencies in the rule of law, which encompasses aspects such as legal transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights.
Several factors may have contributed to this low ranking, including political instability, corruption, and an ineffective judiciary. These issues can undermine public confidence in legal institutions and hinder the ability of citizens to seek justice. Furthermore, social issues, such as crime and inequality, may exacerbate these challenges, leading to a cycle of distrust in the rule of law.
Interestingly, Trinidad and Tobago's governance issues have persisted, with ongoing discussions about reforms to enhance legal frameworks and restore public trust. In the broader Caribbean context, the nation has often been compared to its neighbors, revealing the importance of regional cooperation in addressing such systemic problems.
Estonia
In the year 2001, Estonia ranked 64th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, indicating a moderate level of adherence to the principles of law and governance. The specific value for the index in this year was null %, suggesting that the data may have been incomplete or not reported for Estonia during this period.
This ranking reflects Estonia's ongoing transition from a Soviet-influenced legal system to a more robust framework of governance following its independence in 1991. Factors contributing to this position include the establishment of a democratic government, economic reforms, and efforts to enhance public trust in judicial institutions.
Despite the lack of a precise percentage, Estonia has since developed a reputation for its effective legal system and commitment to the rule of law, which has been crucial for its integration into the European Union and NATO. By 2023, Estonia is recognized for its strong digital governance and transparency, showcasing significant advancements in its legal and institutional frameworks.
Chile
In the year 2001, Chile achieved a commendable 40th rank out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index. Although the specific percentage value of the index was reported as null, the ranking itself indicates a relatively strong adherence to the rule of law compared to many other nations.
This position reflects Chile's commitment to legal frameworks and governance, which have been influenced by its historical context, particularly the transition to democracy after years of authoritarian rule. Factors contributing to this ranking include the establishment of an independent judiciary, respect for human rights, and a stable political environment.
Furthermore, Chile's economic stability and moderate levels of corruption have bolstered its legal institutions, allowing for better enforcement of laws and regulations. In comparison, many countries in Latin America struggle with issues such as political instability and widespread corruption, which can undermine the rule of law.
Bahamas
In the year 2001, the Bahamas achieved a notable position, ranking 15th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index. This ranking reflects a strong adherence to the principles of law, governance, and justice within the nation, although the index did not provide a specific numerical value for the Bahamas.
The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a well-established legal framework, a relatively independent judiciary, and a commitment to upholding democratic principles. The Bahamas has historically emphasized the importance of rule of law in maintaining stability and fostering economic growth, which is crucial for its tourism-dependent economy.
Additionally, the Bahamas has a reputation for low levels of corruption and a legal system that is accessible to its citizens. These aspects contribute positively to the overall governance and public trust in institutions. However, challenges remain, such as addressing issues related to crime and ensuring equitable access to justice for all citizens.
El Salvador
In 2001, El Salvador was ranked 61 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, which is a significant indicator of the state of governance and legal frameworks in the nation. Although the specific value for the index was recorded as null %, this ranking reflects the country's position in relation to other nations regarding the enforcement of laws and the protection of rights.
The ranking can be attributed to several factors, including the aftermath of a brutal civil war that lasted from 1980 to 1992, which left lasting impacts on the country's institutions, governance, and social fabric. Additionally, issues such as corruption, inadequate judicial processes, and limited access to legal resources contributed to challenges in the rule of law.
During this period, El Salvador was also experiencing high levels of violence and crime, which further undermined legal structures and public trust in law enforcement. The country's efforts to strengthen the rule of law were ongoing, as it sought to address these systemic issues and foster a more stable legal environment for its citizens.
Luxembourg
In the year 2001, Luxembourg was ranked 113 out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index. This ranking reflects a value of null %, indicating that the specific assessment of rule of law in the country was either not applicable or not measured at that time.
Despite being noted for its robust legal framework and democratic governance, the low ranking suggests challenges in certain areas of the rule of law, which could include issues related to judicial independence, corruption, or enforcement of laws. The context of this ranking could also be influenced by the relatively small size of Luxembourg, which can affect the dynamics of legal processes and governance.
Moreover, Luxembourg's political landscape is characterized by stability and a strong economy, which typically supports adherence to the rule of law. However, the 2001 ranking may highlight the need for reforms in specific legal or administrative domains to improve the overall legal environment and public trust in justice systems.
Laos
In 2001, Laos ranked 105th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index, indicating significant challenges in governance and legal frameworks. The value for the index was recorded as null, suggesting a lack of reliable data or severe deficiencies in the rule of law within the country.
This ranking reflects various systemic issues, including limited access to justice, weak enforcement of laws, and the influence of corruption on legal processes. The political landscape of Laos, marked by a single-party system under the Lao People's Revolutionary Party, may contribute to the challenges faced in establishing a robust rule of law.
Additionally, the socioeconomic conditions in Laos, characterized by widespread poverty and limited resources, further complicate the enforcement of laws and protections for citizens. Such factors are critical in understanding the broader context of governance and civil rights in the nation during this period.
Bangladesh
In the year 2001, Bangladesh was ranked 17th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index by Country. This ranking indicates a notable position in terms of the rule of law, despite the absence of a specific percentage value for the index in that year.
The Rule of Law Index reflects various factors, including the effectiveness of law enforcement, judicial independence, and the protection of fundamental rights. Bangladesh's relatively high ranking can be attributed to efforts in legal reform and civil society activism, which have aimed to enhance governance and accountability.
However, challenges such as political instability, corruption, and limited access to justice may have influenced the country's overall legal environment. Furthermore, the societal context, including economic conditions and public perceptions of the legal system, plays a crucial role in shaping the rule of law in Bangladesh.
Belarus
In the year 2001, Belarus ranked 19 out of 213 countries on the Rule of Law Index, showcasing a significant position despite having a value of null %. This ranking indicates that while Belarus was considered relatively strong in terms of the rule of law, the absence of a measurable value suggests issues related to data collection or transparency in the legal framework.
The Rule of Law Index evaluates factors such as the effectiveness of law enforcement, the independence of the judiciary, and the protection of fundamental rights. In Belarus, potential contributing factors to this ranking include a centralized political system under President Alexander Lukashenko, which has been characterized by limited political pluralism and constraints on civil liberties.
Additionally, the socio-political climate in Belarus during this period was marked by significant restrictions on media freedom and political opposition, which may have influenced perceptions of the rule of law. Despite these challenges, Belarus's ranking at the time positioned it relatively favorably compared to other nations, reflecting a complex interplay of governance, societal expectations, and international relations.
Angola
In 2001, Angola was ranked 6th out of 213 countries in the Rule of Law Index by Country, a notable position that highlights significant concerns regarding governance and legal systems. The Rule of Law Index is a measure of how the law is applied and enforced, affecting citizens' security, accountability, and overall access to justice.
The ranking reflects Angola's tumultuous history, particularly the long civil war that ravaged the nation until the early 2000s, which has deeply influenced its legal and political institutions. Factors contributing to this ranking may include institutional weaknesses, corruption, and limited access to justice, which have historically undermined the rule of law.
Despite the high ranking, the index value for Angola in 2001 was recorded as null, indicating a lack of sufficient data or metrics to accurately measure the rule of law at that time. This underscores the ongoing challenges in establishing a robust legal framework amidst recovery from conflict and the need for ongoing reforms to strengthen governance and legal accountability.
Data Source
Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
A global compilation of data capturing household, business, and citizen perceptions of the quality of governance in more than 200 economies.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Rule of Law Index by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.