Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2020
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 1,760,750 % | |
2 | Russia | 1,045,200 % | |
3 | India | 296,200 % | |
4 | Canada | 174,762.5 % | |
5 | Australia | 156,721.88 % | |
6 | Greece | 132,959.97 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 123,071.875 % | |
8 | Turkey | 118,011.72 % | |
9 | Indonesia | 106,800 % | |
10 | France | 102,400 % | |
11 | Italy | 90,501.95 % | |
12 | South Africa | 87,566.016 % | |
13 | Spain | 81,342.19 % | |
14 | Thailand | 55,512.11 % | |
15 | Philippines | 42,448.047 % | |
16 | Belarus | 41,909.96 % | |
17 | Kenya | 41,516.016 % | |
18 | Ukraine | 40,000 % | |
19 | Serbia | 39,680.03 % | |
20 | Ghana | 35,719.92 % | |
21 | Albania | 28,764.002 % | |
22 | Kazakhstan | 28,510.01 % | |
23 | Uzbekistan | 27,920.02 % | |
24 | Finland | 26,800 % | |
25 | New Zealand | 23,735.938 % | |
26 | Uruguay | 19,528.004 % | |
27 | Cuba | 18,485.986 % | |
28 | Azerbaijan | 16,659.984 % | |
29 | Nepal | 16,579.98 % | |
30 | Rwanda | 14,560.004 % | |
31 | Bulgaria | 12,600 % | |
32 | United Kingdom | 12,000 % | |
33 | North Korea | 11,354.004 % | |
34 | Pakistan | 10,495.996 % | |
35 | North Macedonia | 9,583.984 % | |
36 | Sri Lanka | 9,431.982 % | |
37 | Poland | 8,840.039 % | |
38 | Ireland | 7,730.005 % | |
39 | Latvia | 7,101.953 % | |
40 | Czech Republic | 6,050 % | |
41 | Romania | 5,617.969 % | |
42 | Germany | 4,800 % | |
43 | Fiji | 4,631.982 % | |
44 | Portugal | 4,511.963 % | |
45 | Estonia | 4,490.039 % | |
46 | Jamaica | 3,885.999 % | |
47 | Croatia | 3,519.995 % | |
48 | Costa Rica | 3,518.018 % | |
49 | Lithuania | 3,037.988 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,818.018 % | |
51 | Mauritania | 2,627.991 % | |
52 | Dominican Republic | 1,904.004 % | |
53 | Slovakia | 1,893.994 % | |
54 | Switzerland | 1,832.007 % | |
55 | Denmark | 1,690.002 % | |
56 | Kyrgyzstan | 1,644.019 % | |
57 | El Salvador | 833.997 % | |
58 | Morocco | 774.023 % | |
59 | Iceland | 686 % | |
60 | Cabo Verde | 620 % | |
61 | Botswana | 459.961 % | |
62 | Netherlands | 450 % | |
63 | Bhutan | 395.996 % | |
64 | United Arab Emirates | 335.999 % | |
65 | Guadeloupe | 270 % | |
66 | Tajikistan | 240.002 % | |
67 | Réunion | 203.999 % | |
68 | Martinique | 200 % | |
69 | Haiti | 160.004 % | |
70 | United States Virgin Islands | 150 % | |
71 | Bahrain | 120 % | |
72 | State of Palestine | 106 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 106 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 95.999 % | |
75 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 90 % | |
76 | Palau | 85.999 % | |
77 | Syrian Arab Republic | 76.001 % | |
78 | Marshall Islands | 62 % | |
79 | Djibouti | 46 % | |
80 | Kuwait | 42 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 30 % | |
82 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.001 % | |
83 | Malta | 22 % | |
84 | Jersey | 14 % | |
85 | Niue | 10 % | |
86 | Guernsey | 10 % | |
87 | Isle of Man | 8 % | |
88 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 2 % | |
89 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
90 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
91 | Aruba | 0 % | |
92 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
93 | Barbados | 0 % | |
94 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
95 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
96 | Brunei Darussalam | 0 % | |
97 | Burundi | 0 % | |
98 | Cayman Islands | 0 % | |
99 | Cook Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
101 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
102 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
103 | French Polynesia | 0 % | |
104 | Georgia | 0 % | |
105 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
106 | Greenland | 0 % | |
107 | Grenada | 0 % | |
108 | Guam | 0 % | |
109 | Iran | 0 % | |
110 | Jordan | 0 % | |
111 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
112 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
113 | Luxembourg | 0 % | |
114 | Maldives | 0 % | |
115 | Monaco | 0 % | |
116 | Montenegro | 0 % | |
117 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
118 | Nauru | 0 % | |
119 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
120 | Oman | 0 % | |
121 | Qatar | 0 % | |
122 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
123 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
124 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
125 | San Marino | 0 % | |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
127 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
128 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
129 | Tonga | 0 % | |
130 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
131 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
132 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
133 | Holy See | 0 % | |
134 | Yemen | 0 % | |
135 | Mauritius | -2 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -24 % | |
137 | Andorra | -26 % | |
138 | Cyprus | -34.003 % | |
139 | Armenia | -36.005 % | |
140 | Dominica | -46 % | |
141 | Mayotte | -56 % | |
142 | Antigua and Barbuda | -66 % | |
143 | Singapore | -134 % | |
144 | Seychelles | -218 % | |
145 | Libya | -334 % | |
146 | Comoros | -338.001 % | |
147 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
148 | Samoa | -479.999 % | |
149 | Namibia | -645.996 % | |
150 | Algeria | -673.999 % | |
151 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -724.023 % | |
152 | Solomon Islands | -733.984 % | |
153 | Hungary | -764.014 % | |
154 | Slovenia | -834.009 % | |
155 | South Sudan | -900 % | |
156 | Bangladesh | -988.013 % | |
157 | Tunisia | -1,185.999 % | |
158 | Western Sahara | -1,257.996 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Vanuatu | -2,384.009 % | |
162 | Norway | -2,434.18 % | |
163 | Republic of Moldova | -2,639.996 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,961.987 % | |
165 | Panama | -3,013.965 % | |
166 | French Guiana | -3,429.981 % | |
167 | Belgium | -3,755.994 % | |
168 | Ethiopia | -3,900 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,237.988 % | |
170 | Israel | -5,000 % | |
171 | Japan | -5,000 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | -5,214.002 % | |
173 | Gambia | -5,786.002 % | |
174 | Eritrea | -5,979.981 % | |
175 | Chile | -6,153.906 % | |
176 | Iraq | -6,607.996 % | |
177 | Gabon | -6,732.031 % | |
178 | Belize | -7,532.007 % | |
179 | South Korea | -7,800 % | |
180 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,360.01 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,200 % | |
182 | Guyana | -9,203.906 % | |
183 | Niger | -12,420.02 % | |
184 | Guatemala | -13,925.977 % | |
185 | Suriname | -14,630.078 % | |
186 | Senegal | -15,544.141 % | |
187 | Sierra Leone | -19,726.025 % | |
188 | Papua New Guinea | -21,060.156 % | |
189 | Nicaragua | -22,113.965 % | |
190 | Congo | -25,900 % | |
191 | Uganda | -28,095.996 % | |
192 | Laos | -31,338.086 % | |
193 | Benin | -37,382.03 % | |
194 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
195 | Central African Republic | -46,524.22 % | |
196 | Côte d'Ivoire | -54,055.957 % | |
197 | Zimbabwe | -54,332.03 % | |
198 | Malaysia | -55,896.094 % | |
199 | Guinea | -66,996 % | |
200 | Ecuador | -71,622.07 % | |
201 | Zambia | -79,006.25 % | |
202 | Honduras | -82,913.97 % | |
203 | Mali | -100,545.9 % | |
204 | Liberia | -101,429.984 % | |
205 | Venezuela | -108,906.25 % | |
206 | Burkina Faso | -119,859.96 % | |
207 | Madagascar | -120,425.98 % | |
208 | Nigeria | -126,882.03 % | |
209 | Mexico | -127,767.19 % | |
210 | Chad | -127,913.97 % | |
211 | Somalia | -153,900 % | |
212 | United States | -168,000 % | |
213 | Colombia | -168,096.1 % | |
214 | Sudan | -174,140.23 % | |
215 | Cameroon | -178,496.1 % | |
216 | Peru | -179,601.56 % | |
217 | Argentina | -189,685.94 % | |
218 | Cambodia | -193,996.1 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -223,621.88 % | |
220 | Paraguay | -250,745.9 % | |
221 | Mozambique | -267,030.47 % | |
222 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -282,887.5 % | |
223 | Myanmar | -289,711.72 % | |
224 | Tanzania | -469,000 % | |
225 | Angola | -510,031.25 % | |
226 | Brazil | -2,628,412.5 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #226
Brazil
- #225
Angola
- #224
Tanzania
- #223
Myanmar
- #222
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #221
Mozambique
- #220
Paraguay
- #219
Bolivia
- #218
Cambodia
- #217
Argentina
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The country with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2020 was China, with a remarkable increase of 1,760,750 hectares, while the global range spanned from -71,622.07 to 1,760,750.00. The global average change was 20,921.22 hectares, with a median value of 0.00, indicating that many countries either maintained their forest areas or experienced minimal changes.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
Countries with significant economic growth often demonstrate proactive environmental policies, which can lead to forest expansion. China leads with a massive forest area increase of 1,760,750 hectares. This growth is driven by the country's aggressive afforestation campaigns and its commitment to combating desertification. Similarly, India and Vietnam have experienced increases of 296,200 and 123,071.875 hectares, respectively. These countries have implemented extensive reforestation programs and policies to increase green cover as part of their environmental and economic strategies.
Deforestation and Economic Challenges
Conversely, countries facing economic difficulties or political instability often see a reduction in forest areas. Ecuador experienced the most significant decrease, with a forest area reduction of -71,622.07 hectares. This decline is primarily due to agricultural expansion and logging activities. Guinea and Malaysia also faced decreases in forest area by -66,996 and -55,896.094 hectares, respectively. These reductions are often attributed to insufficient enforcement of environmental regulations and the prioritization of economic activities over conservation.
Policy Impacts on Forest Area Change
Government policies play a crucial role in determining the direction of forest area changes. In countries like Russia and Australia, which saw increases of 1,045,200 and 156,721.88 hectares, respectively, policies focusing on sustainable forest management and conservation have been pivotal. These policies include reforestation incentives and stricter controls on deforestation. On the other hand, countries such as Zimbabwe and Côte d'Ivoire, with decreases of -54,332.03 and -54,055.957 hectares, respectively, struggle with policy enforcement, leading to continued deforestation.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also influence forest area changes. Countries with large rural populations often face pressure on forest lands due to the need for agricultural expansion. For instance, Uganda and Malawi saw reductions of -28,095.996 and -42,000 hectares, respectively, as communities expand agricultural activities to support growing populations. In contrast, countries with vast uninhabited or sparsely populated areas, such as Canada and Russia, can maintain or increase their forest areas more easily due to less pressure on land resources.
In conclusion, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2020 reveals significant disparities among countries, driven by economic conditions, government policies, and demographic pressures. While some nations make strides in increasing their forest areas through strategic initiatives, others continue to face challenges that lead to deforestation. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing effective global strategies to combat deforestation and promote sustainable land management.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2020
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2020?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2020, with a rate of 1,760,750%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2020?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2020, with a rate of -2,628,412%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate in 2020?
The average annual forest area change rate in 2020 was -14,331%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2020?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2020 was 0%.
How many countries were included in the dataset for the annual forest area change rate in 2020?
The dataset for the annual forest area change rate in 2020 included 226 countries.
What is the range of annual forest area change rates among the countries in 2020?
The range of annual forest area change rates in 2020 spans from China's 1,760,750% to Brazil's -2,628,412%.
Insights by country
Spain
In 2020, Spain achieved a remarkable rank of #13 globally for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate at 81342.19 %. This rate significantly surpasses the global average, indicating a robust increase in forest area compared to many countries. Key drivers include Spain's extensive reforestation initiatives and a strong commitment to environmental sustainability, supported by both governmental policies and community engagement in forest management.
Morocco
In 2020, Morocco achieved a global rank of #58 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 774.02344 %. This rate is significantly higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting Morocco's ongoing efforts in reforestation and forest management. Key drivers include government policies aimed at combating desertification and promoting sustainable land use, alongside initiatives to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2020, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines achieved a global rank of #88 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 2.0000458 %. This rate is relatively favorable compared to many Caribbean nations, reflecting a commitment to sustainable forestry practices. The country's diverse ecosystems and ongoing conservation efforts, coupled with its small population, contribute to maintaining its forested areas despite pressures from development and climate change.
Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe achieved an impressive rank of #82 in the world for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2020, with a remarkable value of 24.00055 %. This rate significantly exceeds the global average, showcasing the country's commitment to forest conservation compared to many nations facing deforestation challenges. The high change rate is largely driven by the government's focus on sustainable land management practices and the preservation of its rich biodiversity, which is vital for its economy and ecological health.
Norway
In 2020, Norway ranked #162 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -2434.1797 %. This figure is significantly lower than many of its Nordic neighbors, reflecting a concerning trend in forest area loss. Key drivers of this decline include industrial development and policies that prioritize economic growth over environmental conservation, impacting Norway's rich forest ecosystems.
Northern Mariana Islands
In 2020, the Northern Mariana Islands ranked #121 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating minimal change in forest area compared to countries with more dynamic forestry management practices. The lack of significant forest area change is primarily due to the islands' small land area and limited agricultural expansion, as well as conservation efforts aimed at preserving existing ecosystems.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked #187 globally with an annual forest area change rate of -19726.025 % in 2020. This figure indicates a severe loss of forest cover, significantly exceeding the global average of deforestation rates, which highlights the country's critical environmental challenges. Factors contributing to this drastic change include extensive agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and a lack of effective environmental policies.
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
In 2020, Saint Pierre and Miquelon had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -24 %, ranking #136 out of 226 countries. This significant loss contrasts with many regions that experience stable or positive forest growth rates. The decline is largely attributed to limited land area and development pressures, as the territory faces challenges related to its small population and economic reliance on fishing and tourism, which can impact land use policies.
Paraguay
In 2020, Paraguay ranked #220 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -250745.9 %. This drastic rate is among the worst in the world, signaling significant deforestation challenges compared to regional neighbors like Brazil, which has also faced severe forest loss but ranks higher. Key drivers of this alarming statistic include extensive agricultural expansion, particularly for soy cultivation, as well as inadequate enforcement of environmental protections.
San Marino
In 2020, San Marino had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #127 out of 226 countries. This rate is notably lower than many of its European neighbors, reflecting a stable forest area amidst limited land for expansion. The lack of significant forestry activity is influenced by San Marino's small geographic size and high population density, which prioritize urban development over forest conservation.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data