Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2008
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 2,360,982.8 % | |
2 | Russia | 905,656.25 % | |
3 | United States | 518,400 % | |
4 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
5 | Indonesia | 434,660.16 % | |
6 | India | 190,500 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 160,396 % | |
8 | Spain | 147,225.97 % | |
9 | France | 113,100 % | |
10 | Turkey | 93,473.05 % | |
11 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
12 | Italy | 65,879 % | |
13 | Chile | 61,363.086 % | |
14 | Cuba | 51,035.008 % | |
15 | Serbia | 39,679.004 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 38,814.016 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 36,200 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 35,964 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Belarus | 35,700 % | |
21 | Poland | 27,000 % | |
22 | Montenegro | 20,100 % | |
23 | Nepal | 16,741.016 % | |
24 | Lithuania | 15,000 % | |
25 | Romania | 14,900 % | |
26 | Latvia | 13,112.012 % | |
27 | Hungary | 12,521.997 % | |
28 | United Kingdom | 10,500 % | |
29 | North Korea | 10,217.969 % | |
30 | Bhutan | 9,929.004 % | |
31 | Estonia | 9,713.013 % | |
32 | Ireland | 9,002.002 % | |
33 | Japan | 9,000 % | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 6,230.002 % | |
35 | Kenya | 6,226.001 % | |
36 | Georgia | 6,180.005 % | |
37 | Fiji | 6,064.002 % | |
38 | Germany | 5,500 % | |
39 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5,121.002 % | |
40 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.994 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 4,527.002 % | |
42 | Switzerland | 3,853.992 % | |
43 | Ukraine | 3,800 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 3,744 % | |
45 | Tunisia | 3,558.997 % | |
46 | Croatia | 3,500 % | |
47 | Costa Rica | 3,169.995 % | |
48 | Republic of Moldova | 3,010.001 % | |
49 | Mauritania | 2,627.002 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,350 % | |
51 | Belgium | 2,257.001 % | |
52 | South Sudan | 2,200 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 2,047.998 % | |
54 | Iceland | 1,652 % | |
55 | Slovakia | 1,650 % | |
56 | Denmark | 1,474.005 % | |
57 | Czech Republic | 1,472.998 % | |
58 | Slovenia | 1,400 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 1,398.001 % | |
60 | Albania | 1,277.002 % | |
61 | Greece | 1,190.015 % | |
62 | Rwanda | 700.998 % | |
63 | United Arab Emirates | 457.999 % | |
64 | Cabo Verde | 440 % | |
65 | Réunion | 302 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 288.001 % | |
67 | Luxembourg | 200 % | |
68 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
69 | Martinique | 155 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 123 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 117.004 % | |
72 | Israel | 100 % | |
73 | Palau | 98 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 98 % | |
75 | French Polynesia | 91 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 90 % | |
77 | Andorra | 79 % | |
78 | Singapore | 73 % | |
79 | Kuwait | 40 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 34 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 27 % | |
82 | Liechtenstein | 17 % | |
83 | Egypt | 17 % | |
84 | Guernsey | 15 % | |
85 | Cook Islands | 2 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 % | |
87 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
88 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
89 | Aruba | 0 % | |
90 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
92 | Barbados | 0 % | |
93 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
94 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
95 | Botswana | 0 % | |
96 | Burundi | 0 % | |
97 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
98 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
99 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
101 | Greenland | 0 % | |
102 | Grenada | 0 % | |
103 | Guam | 0 % | |
104 | Iran | 0 % | |
105 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
106 | Jersey | 0 % | |
107 | Jordan | 0 % | |
108 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
109 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
110 | Maldives | 0 % | |
111 | Malta | 0 % | |
112 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
113 | Monaco | 0 % | |
114 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
115 | Nauru | 0 % | |
116 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
117 | Oman | 0 % | |
118 | Qatar | 0 % | |
119 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
121 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
122 | San Marino | 0 % | |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
124 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
125 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
126 | Tonga | 0 % | |
127 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
128 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
129 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
130 | Holy See | 0 % | |
131 | Yemen | 0 % | |
132 | British Virgin Islands | -1 % | |
133 | Niue | -6 % | |
134 | Dominica | -19 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | -21 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -22 % | |
137 | Armenia | -35.001 % | |
138 | Sao Tome and Principe | -54 % | |
139 | Antigua and Barbuda | -67 % | |
140 | Guadeloupe | -71.999 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | -86 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -154 % | |
143 | Seychelles | -217 % | |
144 | Western Sahara | -231 % | |
145 | New Zealand | -232.031 % | |
146 | Morocco | -296.973 % | |
147 | Libya | -333 % | |
148 | Mauritius | -357 % | |
149 | Haiti | -400 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
151 | Mayotte | -438 % | |
152 | Samoa | -481 % | |
153 | Comoros | -548 % | |
154 | Namibia | -645.02 % | |
155 | Algeria | -675 % | |
156 | Solomon Islands | -738.013 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -898.999 % | |
158 | Iraq | -1,332.001 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Brunei Darussalam | -1,700 % | |
162 | Gabon | -1,835.938 % | |
163 | Vanuatu | -2,384.998 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,958.997 % | |
165 | El Salvador | -2,970.001 % | |
166 | Bangladesh | -3,208.997 % | |
167 | Suriname | -3,996.094 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -4,293.994 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,396.021 % | |
170 | Guyana | -4,441.016 % | |
171 | Norway | -4,919.043 % | |
172 | Gambia | -5,787 % | |
173 | Eritrea | -5,979.004 % | |
174 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
175 | Kazakhstan | -7,475 % | |
176 | Sri Lanka | -7,517.993 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,590.002 % | |
178 | Mongolia | -8,000 % | |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,300 % | |
180 | South Korea | -8,900 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,000 % | |
182 | Portugal | -9,669.019 % | |
183 | Panama | -11,414.99 % | |
184 | Congo | -12,000 % | |
185 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
186 | Pakistan | -15,207.983 % | |
187 | Senegal | -15,545.02 % | |
188 | Cambodia | -19,176.953 % | |
189 | Sierra Leone | -19,727.002 % | |
190 | Finland | -20,364.062 % | |
191 | Papua New Guinea | -21,917.969 % | |
192 | Central African Republic | -34,991.797 % | |
193 | Zambia | -35,800 % | |
194 | Honduras | -38,478.027 % | |
195 | Liberia | -38,898 % | |
196 | Laos | -38,945.02 % | |
197 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
198 | Philippines | -46,953.953 % | |
199 | Guatemala | -47,081.008 % | |
200 | Uganda | -50,146.996 % | |
201 | Guinea | -66,997.02 % | |
202 | Cameroon | -69,700.98 % | |
203 | Ecuador | -70,212.984 % | |
204 | Ethiopia | -72,800 % | |
205 | Malaysia | -74,369.92 % | |
206 | Somalia | -76,750 % | |
207 | Chad | -82,270.016 % | |
208 | Venezuela | -84,952.734 % | |
209 | Nicaragua | -99,320.016 % | |
210 | Mali | -100,546 % | |
211 | Zimbabwe | -105,719.05 % | |
212 | Madagascar | -106,810.06 % | |
213 | Colombia | -113,860.16 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | -116,481.01 % | |
215 | Nigeria | -126,883.01 % | |
216 | Burkina Faso | -134,310.02 % | |
217 | Benin | -141,004.98 % | |
218 | Mexico | -143,800.78 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -158,621.88 % | |
220 | Australia | -173,615.62 % | |
221 | Sudan | -174,140.03 % | |
222 | Mozambique | -267,029.3 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Myanmar | -342,710.94 % | |
225 | Argentina | -371,476.94 % | |
226 | Paraguay | -376,996.1 % | |
227 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
228 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
229 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -674,987.5 % | |
230 | Brazil | -3,563,293.8 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #230
Brazil
- #229
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #228
Angola
- #227
Tanzania
- #226
Paraguay
- #225
Argentina
- #224
Myanmar
- #223
Peru
- #222
Mozambique
- #221
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2008, the country with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate was China, boasting an impressive increase of 2,360,982.8%. In contrast, the global range of forest area change spanned from a minimum of -50,147% to a maximum of 2,360,982.8%. The global average change rate stood at 27,717.12%, while the median value was 0.00%, reflecting the varied dynamics of forest area changes across the world.
Drivers of Growth: Policy and Reforestation Efforts
The positive change in forest areas in certain countries is often a result of deliberate policy measures and extensive reforestation efforts. China, leading the global list, has implemented several large-scale reforestation projects and policies aimed at combating desertification and increasing forest cover. The country's National Forest Conservation Program is a key driver behind its extraordinary forest area increase. Similarly, India and Vietnam, with changes of 190,500% and 160,396% respectively, have benefited from aggressive afforestation policies and community forestry programs that encourage sustainable forest management and expansion.
Economic Development and Forest Area Decline
Conversely, countries experiencing a decline in forest area often face economic pressures that lead to deforestation. In Uganda, with the lowest change rate of -50,146.996%, agricultural expansion and logging have significantly reduced forest cover. Similarly, Guatemala and Philippines, with changes of -47,081.008% and -46,953.953% respectively, are countries where agricultural development and urban expansion have historically led to forest area reduction. Economic activities in these regions often prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability, posing challenges to forest conservation.
Zero-Sum Trends and Environmental Policy
Interestingly, the median value of 0.00% suggests a zero-sum trend in many regions, where forest gains and losses are balanced. Countries like the United States and Canada, with values of 518,400% and 512,606.25% respectively, have managed to maintain this balance through effective environmental policies and sustainable forestry practices. These countries have established frameworks that support both conservation and responsible resource use, allowing them to maintain their forest areas despite economic pressures.
Global Implications and Future Outlook
The data on the Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2008 highlights significant geographic and policy-driven disparities. While countries like China and India showcase the potential of policy-driven reforestation, others like Uganda and Guatemala underscore the adverse effects of economic activities on forest cover. The average global change rate of 27,717.12% reflects a complex interplay of economic, environmental, and policy factors. Moving forward, the challenge lies in replicating successful strategies from countries with positive growth, while addressing the socio-economic drivers of deforestation in others, to achieve global environmental sustainability.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2008
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2008?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2008, with a rate of 2,360,983%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2008?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2008, with a rate of -3,563,294%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate in 2008?
The average annual forest area change rate across countries in 2008 was -15,472%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2008?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2008 was 0%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2008?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2008 were China, Russia, and the United States.
How many countries are included in the 2008 annual forest area change rate dataset?
The dataset for the annual forest area change rate in 2008 includes 230 countries.
Insights by country
Zambia
Zambia ranked #193 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -35800 % in 2008. This figure highlights Zambia's significant deforestation challenges, particularly when compared to higher-ranked countries that manage to maintain or increase their forest areas. Key drivers of this alarming rate include extensive agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and inadequate enforcement of environmental regulations, which have severely impacted the country's forest ecosystems.
Angola
In 2008, Angola had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -510029.7 %, ranking #228 out of 230 countries. This drastic decline in forest area is significantly worse than many of its neighbors and highlights a critical environmental issue. The primary drivers include extensive deforestation for agriculture and logging, coupled with ongoing economic challenges that prioritize short-term gains over sustainable practices.
Indonesia
In 2008, Indonesia ranked #5 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 434660.16 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating extensive deforestation trends within the country. Key drivers include rapid agricultural expansion, particularly for palm oil production, and illegal logging activities that have severely impacted forest cover. Additionally, Indonesia's vast tropical rainforest ecosystems face pressure from both domestic and international demand for land and resources.
Maldives
In 2008, the Maldives had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #105 out of 230 countries. This rate is notably lower than many neighboring countries in South Asia, which often experience deforestation due to agricultural expansion. The Maldives' unique geographic makeup, consisting of over 1,000 islands, limits large-scale deforestation, while its focus on tourism and environmental conservation policies helps maintain its forest areas.
Austria
In 2008, Austria achieved a global rank of #50 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 2350 %. This figure is notably higher than many neighbors in Central Europe, reflecting a robust commitment to reforestation and sustainable forestry practices. Austria's extensive forest management policies, combined with its mountainous terrain that supports diverse ecosystems, contribute significantly to this impressive statistic.
Namibia
In 2008, Namibia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -645.01953 %, ranking #154 out of 230 countries. This rate indicates significant deforestation, which is exacerbated by factors such as agricultural expansion and land conversion for livestock grazing. Additionally, Namibia's harsh climatic conditions and water scarcity further limit forest regeneration, contributing to this alarming rate of forest area loss.
Myanmar
In 2008, Myanmar ranked #224 globally with an alarming -342710.94 % for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate. This figure places Myanmar among the lowest in the world, reflecting a severe deforestation crisis exacerbated by agricultural expansion and illegal logging. The lack of effective environmental policies and ongoing political instability have further hindered conservation efforts, leading to significant loss of forest cover.
Belize
In 2008, Belize had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -7590.0024 %, ranking #177 out of 230 countries. This significant deforestation rate is concerning, especially when compared to neighboring countries in Central America, which generally experience less severe forest loss. Key drivers include agricultural expansion, particularly for sugarcane and citrus production, alongside illegal logging practices that have intensified over the years.
Luxembourg
In 2008, Luxembourg achieved a remarkable Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 200 %, ranking #67 out of 230 countries. This rate significantly outpaces many neighboring countries in Western Europe, highlighting Luxembourg's proactive reforestation efforts. Key drivers include the country's commitment to sustainable land management and policies aimed at increasing green spaces in urban areas.
Italy
In 2008, Italy achieved a global rank of #12 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 65879 %. This figure is significantly higher than many European neighbors, indicating a robust increase in forest area compared to the global average. Key drivers for this growth include Italy's strong reforestation policies and a commitment to sustainable forestry practices, which have been prioritized to combat environmental degradation and enhance biodiversity.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data