Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2003
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 2,360,982.8 % | |
2 | Russia | 905,656.25 % | |
3 | United States | 518,400 % | |
4 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
5 | Indonesia | 434,660.16 % | |
6 | India | 190,500 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 160,396 % | |
8 | Spain | 147,225.97 % | |
9 | France | 113,100 % | |
10 | Turkey | 93,473.05 % | |
11 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
12 | Italy | 65,879 % | |
13 | Chile | 61,363.086 % | |
14 | Cuba | 51,035.008 % | |
15 | Serbia | 39,679.004 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 38,814.016 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 36,200 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 35,964 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Belarus | 35,700 % | |
21 | Poland | 27,000 % | |
22 | Montenegro | 20,100 % | |
23 | Nepal | 16,741.016 % | |
24 | Lithuania | 15,000 % | |
25 | Romania | 14,900 % | |
26 | Latvia | 13,112.012 % | |
27 | Hungary | 12,521.997 % | |
28 | United Kingdom | 10,500 % | |
29 | North Korea | 10,217.969 % | |
30 | Bhutan | 9,929.004 % | |
31 | Estonia | 9,713.013 % | |
32 | Ireland | 9,002.002 % | |
33 | Japan | 9,000 % | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 6,230.002 % | |
35 | Kenya | 6,226.001 % | |
36 | Georgia | 6,180.005 % | |
37 | Fiji | 6,064.002 % | |
38 | Germany | 5,500 % | |
39 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5,121.002 % | |
40 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.994 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 4,527.002 % | |
42 | Switzerland | 3,853.992 % | |
43 | Ukraine | 3,800 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 3,744 % | |
45 | Tunisia | 3,558.997 % | |
46 | Croatia | 3,500 % | |
47 | Costa Rica | 3,169.995 % | |
48 | Republic of Moldova | 3,010.001 % | |
49 | Mauritania | 2,627.002 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,350 % | |
51 | Belgium | 2,257.001 % | |
52 | South Sudan | 2,200 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 2,047.998 % | |
54 | Iceland | 1,652 % | |
55 | Slovakia | 1,650 % | |
56 | Denmark | 1,474.005 % | |
57 | Czech Republic | 1,472.998 % | |
58 | Slovenia | 1,400 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 1,398.001 % | |
60 | Albania | 1,277.002 % | |
61 | Greece | 1,190.015 % | |
62 | Rwanda | 700.998 % | |
63 | United Arab Emirates | 457.999 % | |
64 | Cabo Verde | 440 % | |
65 | Réunion | 302 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 288.001 % | |
67 | Luxembourg | 200 % | |
68 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
69 | Martinique | 155 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 123 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 117.004 % | |
72 | Israel | 100 % | |
73 | Palau | 98 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 98 % | |
75 | French Polynesia | 91 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 90 % | |
77 | Andorra | 79 % | |
78 | Singapore | 73 % | |
79 | Kuwait | 40 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 34 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 27 % | |
82 | Liechtenstein | 17 % | |
83 | Egypt | 17 % | |
84 | Guernsey | 15 % | |
85 | Cook Islands | 2 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 % | |
87 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
88 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
89 | Aruba | 0 % | |
90 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
92 | Barbados | 0 % | |
93 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
94 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
95 | Botswana | 0 % | |
96 | Burundi | 0 % | |
97 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
98 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
99 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
101 | Greenland | 0 % | |
102 | Grenada | 0 % | |
103 | Guam | 0 % | |
104 | Iran | 0 % | |
105 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
106 | Jersey | 0 % | |
107 | Jordan | 0 % | |
108 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
109 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
110 | Maldives | 0 % | |
111 | Malta | 0 % | |
112 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
113 | Monaco | 0 % | |
114 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
115 | Nauru | 0 % | |
116 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
117 | Oman | 0 % | |
118 | Qatar | 0 % | |
119 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
121 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
122 | San Marino | 0 % | |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
124 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
125 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
126 | Tonga | 0 % | |
127 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
128 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
129 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
130 | Holy See | 0 % | |
131 | Yemen | 0 % | |
132 | British Virgin Islands | -1 % | |
133 | Niue | -6 % | |
134 | Dominica | -19 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | -21 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -22 % | |
137 | Armenia | -35.001 % | |
138 | Sao Tome and Principe | -54 % | |
139 | Antigua and Barbuda | -67 % | |
140 | Guadeloupe | -71.999 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | -86 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -154 % | |
143 | Seychelles | -217 % | |
144 | Western Sahara | -231 % | |
145 | New Zealand | -232.031 % | |
146 | Morocco | -296.973 % | |
147 | Libya | -333 % | |
148 | Mauritius | -357 % | |
149 | Haiti | -400 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
151 | Mayotte | -438 % | |
152 | Samoa | -481 % | |
153 | Comoros | -548 % | |
154 | Namibia | -645.02 % | |
155 | Algeria | -675 % | |
156 | Solomon Islands | -738.013 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -898.999 % | |
158 | Iraq | -1,332.001 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Brunei Darussalam | -1,700 % | |
162 | Gabon | -1,835.938 % | |
163 | Vanuatu | -2,384.998 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,958.997 % | |
165 | El Salvador | -2,970.001 % | |
166 | Bangladesh | -3,208.997 % | |
167 | Suriname | -3,996.094 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -4,293.994 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,396.021 % | |
170 | Guyana | -4,441.016 % | |
171 | Norway | -4,919.043 % | |
172 | Gambia | -5,787 % | |
173 | Eritrea | -5,979.004 % | |
174 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
175 | Kazakhstan | -7,475 % | |
176 | Sri Lanka | -7,517.993 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,590.002 % | |
178 | Mongolia | -8,000 % | |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,300 % | |
180 | South Korea | -8,900 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,000 % | |
182 | Portugal | -9,669.019 % | |
183 | Panama | -11,414.99 % | |
184 | Congo | -12,000 % | |
185 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
186 | Pakistan | -15,207.983 % | |
187 | Senegal | -15,545.02 % | |
188 | Cambodia | -19,176.953 % | |
189 | Sierra Leone | -19,727.002 % | |
190 | Finland | -20,364.062 % | |
191 | Papua New Guinea | -21,917.969 % | |
192 | Central African Republic | -34,991.797 % | |
193 | Zambia | -35,800 % | |
194 | Honduras | -38,478.027 % | |
195 | Liberia | -38,898 % | |
196 | Laos | -38,945.02 % | |
197 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
198 | Philippines | -46,953.953 % | |
199 | Guatemala | -47,081.008 % | |
200 | Uganda | -50,146.996 % | |
201 | Guinea | -66,997.02 % | |
202 | Cameroon | -69,700.98 % | |
203 | Ecuador | -70,212.984 % | |
204 | Ethiopia | -72,800 % | |
205 | Malaysia | -74,369.92 % | |
206 | Somalia | -76,750 % | |
207 | Chad | -82,270.016 % | |
208 | Venezuela | -84,952.734 % | |
209 | Nicaragua | -99,320.016 % | |
210 | Mali | -100,546 % | |
211 | Zimbabwe | -105,719.05 % | |
212 | Madagascar | -106,810.06 % | |
213 | Colombia | -113,860.16 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | -116,481.01 % | |
215 | Nigeria | -126,883.01 % | |
216 | Burkina Faso | -134,310.02 % | |
217 | Benin | -141,004.98 % | |
218 | Mexico | -143,800.78 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -158,621.88 % | |
220 | Australia | -173,615.62 % | |
221 | Sudan | -174,140.03 % | |
222 | Mozambique | -267,029.3 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Myanmar | -342,710.94 % | |
225 | Argentina | -371,476.94 % | |
226 | Paraguay | -376,996.1 % | |
227 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
228 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
229 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -674,987.5 % | |
230 | Brazil | -3,563,293.8 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #230
Brazil
- #229
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #228
Angola
- #227
Tanzania
- #226
Paraguay
- #225
Argentina
- #224
Myanmar
- #223
Peru
- #222
Mozambique
- #221
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2003, the country leading the Annual Forest Area Change Rate was China with a staggering increase of 2,360,982.8%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of -50,147% to a maximum of 2,360,982.8%. The average change across the 200 countries with available data was 27,717.12%, with a median value of 0.00%, indicating a balance between countries experiencing forest expansion and deforestation.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
The significant increase in China's forest area change rate can be attributed to aggressive afforestation policies and economic growth enabling large-scale environmental initiatives. With a rate of 2,360,982.8%, China's efforts dwarf those of other leading countries like Russia at 905,656.25% and the United States at 518,400%. These countries have leveraged economic resources to implement extensive reforestation projects. In contrast, India, with an increase of 190,500%, showcases a similar trend but on a smaller scale, focusing on community-driven afforestation efforts.
Deforestation and Its Drivers
At the opposite end, countries such as Uganda and Guatemala experienced severe deforestation, with rates of -50,146.996% and -47,081.008%, respectively. The primary drivers in these regions often include agricultural expansion, logging, and insufficient environmental regulation. Philippines and Malawi, with deforestation rates of -46,953.953% and -42,000%, also reflect similar patterns where economic pressures outweigh conservation efforts.
Policy Impact on Forest Area Change
Policy initiatives play a crucial role in shaping forest area change rates. Countries like Vietnam with a rate of 160,396% have seen success through government-led reforestation programs and international partnerships. Similarly, Turkey at 93,473.05% has benefited from strategic forest management policies. Meanwhile, Zambia and the Central African Republic, with declines of -35,800% and -34,991.797%, struggle with policy implementation due to economic constraints and governance challenges.
Global Patterns and Implications
The data reveals a stark contrast in forest area change rates, reflecting broader socio-economic and environmental differences. Countries with robust economies and strong policy frameworks, like China and Russia, are able to expand forest areas significantly. In contrast, nations facing economic hardships or lacking effective environmental policies, such as Uganda and Guatemala, tend to experience higher rates of deforestation. These patterns underscore the importance of sustainable development policies that balance economic growth with environmental conservation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2003
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2003?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2003 with 2,360,983 %.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2003?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2003 with -3,563,294 %.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2003?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2003 was -15,472 %.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2003?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2003 was 0 %.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2003?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2003 were China, Russia, and the United States.
How many countries were included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2003?
The dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2003 included 230 countries.
Insights by country
Malaysia
In 2003, Malaysia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -74369.92 %, ranking #205 out of 230 countries. This drastic decline highlights Malaysia's struggle with deforestation, which is significantly higher than the global average. Key drivers include rapid urbanization, agricultural expansion, and logging activities, which have led to substantial loss of forested areas.
Rwanda
In 2003, Rwanda achieved a remarkable 62nd global rank with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 700.9979 %. This figure is significantly higher than many countries in the region, reflecting Rwanda's aggressive reforestation efforts compared to its neighbors. Key drivers of this change include government initiatives aimed at restoring forest cover and addressing environmental degradation, alongside a strong commitment to sustainable land management practices.
Tonga
Tonga's Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2003 was 0 %, ranking it #125 out of 230 countries. This figure indicates that Tonga maintained its forest area, contrasting with many Pacific neighbors that faced significant deforestation challenges. The stability can be attributed to Tonga's small land area and a cultural emphasis on environmental conservation, which helps protect its limited forest resources.
Guinea-Bissau
In 2003, Guinea-Bissau had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -4396.0205 %, ranking #169 out of 230 countries. This rate reflects one of the most severe deforestation trends globally, driven largely by slash-and-burn agriculture, illegal logging, and the overexploitation of forest resources. The country's reliance on agriculture, coupled with weak enforcement of environmental regulations, exacerbates the loss of forest cover.
Republic of Moldova
In 2003, the Republic of Moldova achieved a global rank of #48 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 3010.0005 %. This figure is notably higher than many regional neighbors, indicating a significant rate of forest area change. Contributing factors include Moldova's ongoing reforestation efforts and policies aimed at restoring natural habitats following periods of deforestation in the 1990s.
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba achieved a global rank of #114 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 % in 2003. This rate is notably low compared to many countries, reflecting a lack of significant deforestation or afforestation activities. The islands' small land area and limited agricultural development contribute to this stability, as does their focus on preserving natural habitats and biodiversity.
Norway
In 2003, Norway had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -4919.043 %, ranking #171 out of 230 countries. This significant decline in forest area change is notably worse than many of its Nordic neighbors, reflecting a broader trend of environmental pressures in the region. Key drivers include the expansion of urban areas and infrastructure, alongside policies that have not effectively mitigated deforestation impacts.
Anguilla
In 2003, Anguilla had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #120 out of 230 countries. This rate is notably lower than many Caribbean neighbors, which often experience deforestation due to agricultural expansion. Anguilla's stable forest area can be attributed to its small land size and limited agricultural activities, coupled with a focus on preserving its natural environment for tourism.
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
In 2003, Saint Pierre and Miquelon had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -21.99999 %, ranking #136 out of 230 countries. This rate is significantly lower than many other territories, indicating a concerning trend in forest area loss. The primary drivers for this decline include limited land space for forest growth and economic activities that prioritize development over conservation in this small archipelago. Additionally, its geographic isolation contributes to challenges in sustainable forest management.
Turkey
In 2003, Turkey achieved a global rank of #10 with an impressive Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 93473.05 %. This figure significantly exceeds the global average, reflecting Turkey's aggressive reforestation efforts compared to many countries. Key drivers include government policies promoting afforestation and the restoration of degraded lands, alongside a growing awareness of environmental issues among the population.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data