Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2007
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 2,360,982.8 % | |
2 | Russia | 905,656.25 % | |
3 | United States | 518,400 % | |
4 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
5 | Indonesia | 434,660.16 % | |
6 | India | 190,500 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 160,396 % | |
8 | Spain | 147,225.97 % | |
9 | France | 113,100 % | |
10 | Turkey | 93,473.05 % | |
11 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
12 | Italy | 65,879 % | |
13 | Chile | 61,363.086 % | |
14 | Cuba | 51,035.008 % | |
15 | Serbia | 39,679.004 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 38,814.016 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 36,200 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 35,964 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Belarus | 35,700 % | |
21 | Poland | 27,000 % | |
22 | Montenegro | 20,100 % | |
23 | Nepal | 16,741.016 % | |
24 | Lithuania | 15,000 % | |
25 | Romania | 14,900 % | |
26 | Latvia | 13,112.012 % | |
27 | Hungary | 12,521.997 % | |
28 | United Kingdom | 10,500 % | |
29 | North Korea | 10,217.969 % | |
30 | Bhutan | 9,929.004 % | |
31 | Estonia | 9,713.013 % | |
32 | Ireland | 9,002.002 % | |
33 | Japan | 9,000 % | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 6,230.002 % | |
35 | Kenya | 6,226.001 % | |
36 | Georgia | 6,180.005 % | |
37 | Fiji | 6,064.002 % | |
38 | Germany | 5,500 % | |
39 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5,121.002 % | |
40 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.994 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 4,527.002 % | |
42 | Switzerland | 3,853.992 % | |
43 | Ukraine | 3,800 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 3,744 % | |
45 | Tunisia | 3,558.997 % | |
46 | Croatia | 3,500 % | |
47 | Costa Rica | 3,169.995 % | |
48 | Republic of Moldova | 3,010.001 % | |
49 | Mauritania | 2,627.002 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,350 % | |
51 | Belgium | 2,257.001 % | |
52 | South Sudan | 2,200 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 2,047.998 % | |
54 | Iceland | 1,652 % | |
55 | Slovakia | 1,650 % | |
56 | Denmark | 1,474.005 % | |
57 | Czech Republic | 1,472.998 % | |
58 | Slovenia | 1,400 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 1,398.001 % | |
60 | Albania | 1,277.002 % | |
61 | Greece | 1,190.015 % | |
62 | Rwanda | 700.998 % | |
63 | United Arab Emirates | 457.999 % | |
64 | Cabo Verde | 440 % | |
65 | Réunion | 302 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 288.001 % | |
67 | Luxembourg | 200 % | |
68 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
69 | Martinique | 155 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 123 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 117.004 % | |
72 | Israel | 100 % | |
73 | Palau | 98 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 98 % | |
75 | French Polynesia | 91 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 90 % | |
77 | Andorra | 79 % | |
78 | Singapore | 73 % | |
79 | Kuwait | 40 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 34 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 27 % | |
82 | Liechtenstein | 17 % | |
83 | Egypt | 17 % | |
84 | Guernsey | 15 % | |
85 | Cook Islands | 2 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 % | |
87 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
88 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
89 | Aruba | 0 % | |
90 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
92 | Barbados | 0 % | |
93 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
94 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
95 | Botswana | 0 % | |
96 | Burundi | 0 % | |
97 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
98 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
99 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
101 | Greenland | 0 % | |
102 | Grenada | 0 % | |
103 | Guam | 0 % | |
104 | Iran | 0 % | |
105 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
106 | Jersey | 0 % | |
107 | Jordan | 0 % | |
108 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
109 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
110 | Maldives | 0 % | |
111 | Malta | 0 % | |
112 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
113 | Monaco | 0 % | |
114 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
115 | Nauru | 0 % | |
116 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
117 | Oman | 0 % | |
118 | Qatar | 0 % | |
119 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
121 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
122 | San Marino | 0 % | |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
124 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
125 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
126 | Tonga | 0 % | |
127 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
128 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
129 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
130 | Holy See | 0 % | |
131 | Yemen | 0 % | |
132 | British Virgin Islands | -1 % | |
133 | Niue | -6 % | |
134 | Dominica | -19 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | -21 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -22 % | |
137 | Armenia | -35.001 % | |
138 | Sao Tome and Principe | -54 % | |
139 | Antigua and Barbuda | -67 % | |
140 | Guadeloupe | -71.999 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | -86 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -154 % | |
143 | Seychelles | -217 % | |
144 | Western Sahara | -231 % | |
145 | New Zealand | -232.031 % | |
146 | Morocco | -296.973 % | |
147 | Libya | -333 % | |
148 | Mauritius | -357 % | |
149 | Haiti | -400 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
151 | Mayotte | -438 % | |
152 | Samoa | -481 % | |
153 | Comoros | -548 % | |
154 | Namibia | -645.02 % | |
155 | Algeria | -675 % | |
156 | Solomon Islands | -738.013 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -898.999 % | |
158 | Iraq | -1,332.001 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Brunei Darussalam | -1,700 % | |
162 | Gabon | -1,835.938 % | |
163 | Vanuatu | -2,384.998 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,958.997 % | |
165 | El Salvador | -2,970.001 % | |
166 | Bangladesh | -3,208.997 % | |
167 | Suriname | -3,996.094 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -4,293.994 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,396.021 % | |
170 | Guyana | -4,441.016 % | |
171 | Norway | -4,919.043 % | |
172 | Gambia | -5,787 % | |
173 | Eritrea | -5,979.004 % | |
174 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
175 | Kazakhstan | -7,475 % | |
176 | Sri Lanka | -7,517.993 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,590.002 % | |
178 | Mongolia | -8,000 % | |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,300 % | |
180 | South Korea | -8,900 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,000 % | |
182 | Portugal | -9,669.019 % | |
183 | Panama | -11,414.99 % | |
184 | Congo | -12,000 % | |
185 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
186 | Pakistan | -15,207.983 % | |
187 | Senegal | -15,545.02 % | |
188 | Cambodia | -19,176.953 % | |
189 | Sierra Leone | -19,727.002 % | |
190 | Finland | -20,364.062 % | |
191 | Papua New Guinea | -21,917.969 % | |
192 | Central African Republic | -34,991.797 % | |
193 | Zambia | -35,800 % | |
194 | Honduras | -38,478.027 % | |
195 | Liberia | -38,898 % | |
196 | Laos | -38,945.02 % | |
197 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
198 | Philippines | -46,953.953 % | |
199 | Guatemala | -47,081.008 % | |
200 | Uganda | -50,146.996 % | |
201 | Guinea | -66,997.02 % | |
202 | Cameroon | -69,700.98 % | |
203 | Ecuador | -70,212.984 % | |
204 | Ethiopia | -72,800 % | |
205 | Malaysia | -74,369.92 % | |
206 | Somalia | -76,750 % | |
207 | Chad | -82,270.016 % | |
208 | Venezuela | -84,952.734 % | |
209 | Nicaragua | -99,320.016 % | |
210 | Mali | -100,546 % | |
211 | Zimbabwe | -105,719.05 % | |
212 | Madagascar | -106,810.06 % | |
213 | Colombia | -113,860.16 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | -116,481.01 % | |
215 | Nigeria | -126,883.01 % | |
216 | Burkina Faso | -134,310.02 % | |
217 | Benin | -141,004.98 % | |
218 | Mexico | -143,800.78 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -158,621.88 % | |
220 | Australia | -173,615.62 % | |
221 | Sudan | -174,140.03 % | |
222 | Mozambique | -267,029.3 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Myanmar | -342,710.94 % | |
225 | Argentina | -371,476.94 % | |
226 | Paraguay | -376,996.1 % | |
227 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
228 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
229 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -674,987.5 % | |
230 | Brazil | -3,563,293.8 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #230
Brazil
- #229
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #228
Angola
- #227
Tanzania
- #226
Paraguay
- #225
Argentina
- #224
Myanmar
- #223
Peru
- #222
Mozambique
- #221
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2007, China led the world with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate at 2,360,982.8%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of -50,147.00% to a maximum of 2,360,982.80%. The median change rate was 0.00%, illustrating a balanced global trend between expansion and contraction of forest areas.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
The significant forest area growth in China and other leading countries like Russia (905,656.25%) and the United States (518,400%) can be attributed to robust economic policies emphasizing reforestation and sustainable land management. In China, governmental initiatives such as the Grain for Green Program have prioritized afforestation, converting farmland back to forest to combat soil erosion and improve environmental quality. Similarly, Russia has capitalized on its vast land resources, investing in forest regeneration to maintain its position as a global leader in timber production.
In the United States, forest area expansion is a result of both federal and state-level conservation programs that encourage private landowners to plant trees, supported by tax incentives and grants. The inclusion of Canada (512,606.25%) and India (190,500%) among the top countries further underscores the role of government policy in fostering forest growth. Canada’s sustainable forestry practices and India’s aggressive tree-planting campaigns have been instrumental in achieving these positive results.
Deforestation Drivers in Developing Nations
Conversely, the bottom 10 countries, including Uganda (-50,146.996%) and Guatemala (-47,081.008%), highlight a concerning trend of deforestation driven by economic pressures. In many developing nations, forest areas are being cleared for agriculture, mining, and infrastructure development, which are seen as more immediate economic benefits. In Uganda, for example, the demand for agricultural land and fuelwood continues to accelerate deforestation rates.
Guatemala and the Philippines (-46,953.953%) face similar challenges, where illegal logging and land conversion for agriculture contribute significantly to forest loss. These activities often occur in the absence of strong regulatory frameworks or enforcement, allowing deforestation to proceed unchecked.
Policy and Conservation Efforts
Despite these challenges, some countries are making strides in conservation efforts to reverse negative trends. For instance, Indonesia (434,660.16%) has implemented a moratorium on new forest concessions and peatland development, aiming to curb the rapid deforestation rates that have historically plagued the region. Similarly, Vietnam (160,396%) has seen success through community forestry initiatives that engage local populations in sustainable forest management.
These examples illustrate the critical role of policy intervention and community involvement in managing forest resources sustainably. Countries like Spain (147,225.97%) and France (113,100%) have also shown that a combination of strict regulation, public awareness campaigns, and financial incentives can effectively promote forest expansion.
The Role of Global Partnerships
International cooperation and partnerships have also played a pivotal role in supporting countries to manage their forest areas. Programs funded by international organizations and developed nations often provide the financial and technical support necessary for effective implementation of reforestation and conservation projects. Turkey (93,473.05%) has benefited from such partnerships, which have supported its efforts in maintaining and expanding forest cover through a combination of local and international resources.
As these examples show, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate is not merely a reflection of environmental conditions but also a testament to the economic, political, and social frameworks within which countries operate. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effectively addressing global deforestation and promoting sustainable forest management practices worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2007
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2007?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2007, with a rate of 2,360,983%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2007?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2007, with a rate of -3,563,294%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2007?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2007 was -15,472%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2007?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2007 was 0%.
How many countries are included in the 2007 dataset for annual forest area change rate?
The dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2007 includes 230 countries.
What is the range of annual forest area change rates among the countries in 2007?
The range of annual forest area change rates in 2007 spans from the highest at 2,360,983% for China to the lowest at -3,563,294% for Brazil.
Insights by country
Belize
In 2007, Belize had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -7590.0024 %, ranking #177 out of 230 countries. This rate is significantly worse than many of its Central American neighbors, reflecting a concerning trend in deforestation. Key drivers include agricultural expansion, particularly for sugarcane and banana plantations, alongside illegal logging activities that have escalated in recent years.
Saudi Arabia
In 2007, Saudi Arabia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #123 out of 230 countries. This rate is notably lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting a broader regional challenge in forest conservation. The lack of forest area change can be attributed to the country's arid climate, which limits natural forest growth, alongside urbanization and economic development that prioritize other land uses over afforestation.
Armenia
In 2007, Armenia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -35.00061 %, ranking #137 out of 230 countries. This decline is significantly worse than the global average, reflecting serious environmental challenges. Key drivers include deforestation for agricultural expansion, urban development, and the impacts of climate change on the country's mountainous terrain.
American Samoa
In 2007, American Samoa had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -153.99991 %, ranking #142 out of 230 countries. This drastic decline is significantly worse than the global average, reflecting severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include land conversion for agriculture and urban development, compounded by limited enforcement of environmental regulations.
Namibia
In 2007, Namibia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -645.01953 %, ranking #154 out of 230 countries. This rate significantly contrasts with the global average, indicating severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers of this decline include land use changes for agriculture and livestock, coupled with limited forest management policies.
Slovenia
In 2007, Slovenia achieved a global rank of #58 with an impressive Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 1400 %. This rate significantly surpasses many countries, reflecting Slovenia's commitment to sustainable forestry practices compared to its regional neighbors. The country's extensive forest coverage, which constitutes over half of its land area, is supported by strong environmental policies and a focus on conservation, contributing to this remarkable change rate.
Albania
In 2007, Albania achieved a remarkable global rank of #60 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 1277.002 %. This figure significantly surpasses many neighboring countries, highlighting Albania's unique reforestation efforts compared to the regional average. The country's aggressive policies aimed at restoring forested areas, combined with its diverse and mountainous geography, have contributed to this exceptional growth rate.
Serbia
In 2007, Serbia achieved a global rank of #15 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 39679.004 %. This rate is significantly higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a notable increase in forest area compared to countries with less favorable environmental policies.
The remarkable change can be attributed to Serbia's ongoing reforestation efforts and the implementation of policies aimed at enhancing forest management. Additionally, the country's diverse geography supports a variety of forest ecosystems, contributing to this substantial growth in forested areas.
Bahrain
Bahrain's Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2007 was 0 %, ranking it #89 out of 230 countries. This rate is notably lower than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting Bahrain's limited land area and urban development priorities. The absence of significant forested areas is primarily driven by the country's small geographic size, high population density, and a focus on economic growth that prioritizes infrastructure over reforestation efforts.
Colombia
In 2007, Colombia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -113860.16 %, ranking #213 out of 230 countries. This drastic decline in forest area is significantly worse than many of its neighbors, reflecting a broader trend of deforestation in the region. Key drivers include illegal logging, agricultural expansion, and armed conflict, which have led to extensive land degradation and loss of biodiversity.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data