Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2005
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 2,360,982.8 % | |
2 | Russia | 905,656.25 % | |
3 | United States | 518,400 % | |
4 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
5 | Indonesia | 434,660.16 % | |
6 | India | 190,500 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 160,396 % | |
8 | Spain | 147,225.97 % | |
9 | France | 113,100 % | |
10 | Turkey | 93,473.05 % | |
11 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
12 | Italy | 65,879 % | |
13 | Chile | 61,363.086 % | |
14 | Cuba | 51,035.008 % | |
15 | Serbia | 39,679.004 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 38,814.016 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 36,200 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 35,964 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Belarus | 35,700 % | |
21 | Poland | 27,000 % | |
22 | Montenegro | 20,100 % | |
23 | Nepal | 16,741.016 % | |
24 | Lithuania | 15,000 % | |
25 | Romania | 14,900 % | |
26 | Latvia | 13,112.012 % | |
27 | Hungary | 12,521.997 % | |
28 | United Kingdom | 10,500 % | |
29 | North Korea | 10,217.969 % | |
30 | Bhutan | 9,929.004 % | |
31 | Estonia | 9,713.013 % | |
32 | Ireland | 9,002.002 % | |
33 | Japan | 9,000 % | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 6,230.002 % | |
35 | Kenya | 6,226.001 % | |
36 | Georgia | 6,180.005 % | |
37 | Fiji | 6,064.002 % | |
38 | Germany | 5,500 % | |
39 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5,121.002 % | |
40 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.994 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 4,527.002 % | |
42 | Switzerland | 3,853.992 % | |
43 | Ukraine | 3,800 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 3,744 % | |
45 | Tunisia | 3,558.997 % | |
46 | Croatia | 3,500 % | |
47 | Costa Rica | 3,169.995 % | |
48 | Republic of Moldova | 3,010.001 % | |
49 | Mauritania | 2,627.002 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,350 % | |
51 | Belgium | 2,257.001 % | |
52 | South Sudan | 2,200 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 2,047.998 % | |
54 | Iceland | 1,652 % | |
55 | Slovakia | 1,650 % | |
56 | Denmark | 1,474.005 % | |
57 | Czech Republic | 1,472.998 % | |
58 | Slovenia | 1,400 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 1,398.001 % | |
60 | Albania | 1,277.002 % | |
61 | Greece | 1,190.015 % | |
62 | Rwanda | 700.998 % | |
63 | United Arab Emirates | 457.999 % | |
64 | Cabo Verde | 440 % | |
65 | Réunion | 302 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 288.001 % | |
67 | Luxembourg | 200 % | |
68 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
69 | Martinique | 155 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 123 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 117.004 % | |
72 | Israel | 100 % | |
73 | Palau | 98 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 98 % | |
75 | French Polynesia | 91 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 90 % | |
77 | Andorra | 79 % | |
78 | Singapore | 73 % | |
79 | Kuwait | 40 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 34 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 27 % | |
82 | Liechtenstein | 17 % | |
83 | Egypt | 17 % | |
84 | Guernsey | 15 % | |
85 | Cook Islands | 2 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 % | |
87 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
88 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
89 | Aruba | 0 % | |
90 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
92 | Barbados | 0 % | |
93 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
94 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
95 | Botswana | 0 % | |
96 | Burundi | 0 % | |
97 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
98 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
99 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
101 | Greenland | 0 % | |
102 | Grenada | 0 % | |
103 | Guam | 0 % | |
104 | Iran | 0 % | |
105 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
106 | Jersey | 0 % | |
107 | Jordan | 0 % | |
108 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
109 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
110 | Maldives | 0 % | |
111 | Malta | 0 % | |
112 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
113 | Monaco | 0 % | |
114 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
115 | Nauru | 0 % | |
116 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
117 | Oman | 0 % | |
118 | Qatar | 0 % | |
119 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
121 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
122 | San Marino | 0 % | |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
124 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
125 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
126 | Tonga | 0 % | |
127 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
128 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
129 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
130 | Holy See | 0 % | |
131 | Yemen | 0 % | |
132 | British Virgin Islands | -1 % | |
133 | Niue | -6 % | |
134 | Dominica | -19 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | -21 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -22 % | |
137 | Armenia | -35.001 % | |
138 | Sao Tome and Principe | -54 % | |
139 | Antigua and Barbuda | -67 % | |
140 | Guadeloupe | -71.999 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | -86 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -154 % | |
143 | Seychelles | -217 % | |
144 | Western Sahara | -231 % | |
145 | New Zealand | -232.031 % | |
146 | Morocco | -296.973 % | |
147 | Libya | -333 % | |
148 | Mauritius | -357 % | |
149 | Haiti | -400 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
151 | Mayotte | -438 % | |
152 | Samoa | -481 % | |
153 | Comoros | -548 % | |
154 | Namibia | -645.02 % | |
155 | Algeria | -675 % | |
156 | Solomon Islands | -738.013 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -898.999 % | |
158 | Iraq | -1,332.001 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Brunei Darussalam | -1,700 % | |
162 | Gabon | -1,835.938 % | |
163 | Vanuatu | -2,384.998 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,958.997 % | |
165 | El Salvador | -2,970.001 % | |
166 | Bangladesh | -3,208.997 % | |
167 | Suriname | -3,996.094 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -4,293.994 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,396.021 % | |
170 | Guyana | -4,441.016 % | |
171 | Norway | -4,919.043 % | |
172 | Gambia | -5,787 % | |
173 | Eritrea | -5,979.004 % | |
174 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
175 | Kazakhstan | -7,475 % | |
176 | Sri Lanka | -7,517.993 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,590.002 % | |
178 | Mongolia | -8,000 % | |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,300 % | |
180 | South Korea | -8,900 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,000 % | |
182 | Portugal | -9,669.019 % | |
183 | Panama | -11,414.99 % | |
184 | Congo | -12,000 % | |
185 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
186 | Pakistan | -15,207.983 % | |
187 | Senegal | -15,545.02 % | |
188 | Cambodia | -19,176.953 % | |
189 | Sierra Leone | -19,727.002 % | |
190 | Finland | -20,364.062 % | |
191 | Papua New Guinea | -21,917.969 % | |
192 | Central African Republic | -34,991.797 % | |
193 | Zambia | -35,800 % | |
194 | Honduras | -38,478.027 % | |
195 | Liberia | -38,898 % | |
196 | Laos | -38,945.02 % | |
197 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
198 | Philippines | -46,953.953 % | |
199 | Guatemala | -47,081.008 % | |
200 | Uganda | -50,146.996 % | |
201 | Guinea | -66,997.02 % | |
202 | Cameroon | -69,700.98 % | |
203 | Ecuador | -70,212.984 % | |
204 | Ethiopia | -72,800 % | |
205 | Malaysia | -74,369.92 % | |
206 | Somalia | -76,750 % | |
207 | Chad | -82,270.016 % | |
208 | Venezuela | -84,952.734 % | |
209 | Nicaragua | -99,320.016 % | |
210 | Mali | -100,546 % | |
211 | Zimbabwe | -105,719.05 % | |
212 | Madagascar | -106,810.06 % | |
213 | Colombia | -113,860.16 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | -116,481.01 % | |
215 | Nigeria | -126,883.01 % | |
216 | Burkina Faso | -134,310.02 % | |
217 | Benin | -141,004.98 % | |
218 | Mexico | -143,800.78 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -158,621.88 % | |
220 | Australia | -173,615.62 % | |
221 | Sudan | -174,140.03 % | |
222 | Mozambique | -267,029.3 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Myanmar | -342,710.94 % | |
225 | Argentina | -371,476.94 % | |
226 | Paraguay | -376,996.1 % | |
227 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
228 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
229 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -674,987.5 % | |
230 | Brazil | -3,563,293.8 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #230
Brazil
- #229
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #228
Angola
- #227
Tanzania
- #226
Paraguay
- #225
Argentina
- #224
Myanmar
- #223
Peru
- #222
Mozambique
- #221
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
China led the world in Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2005, with a remarkable increase of 2,360,982.8%. The global range spanned from a minimum of -50,147.00% to a maximum of 2,360,982.8%. The average change rate across the 200 countries with available data was 27,717.12%, while the median stood at 0.00%, indicating a wide variance in forest area changes worldwide.
Economic Drivers of Forest Expansion
The significant increase in forest area in certain countries can often be attributed to economic policies and incentives aimed at forest conservation and reforestation. China serves as a prime example, with its aggressive afforestation programs supported by government policies aimed at combating desertification and promoting sustainable forest management. China's vast increase of 2,360,982.8% underscores the impact of such initiatives.
Similarly, Vietnam and India demonstrated substantial increases, with rates of 160,396% and 190,500%, respectively. Both countries have implemented national programs to increase forest cover as part of broader environmental and economic strategies. This suggests a strong link between policy-driven economic incentives and forest expansion.
Geographic and Environmental Factors
Geographic factors also play a critical role in influencing forest area change rates. Countries with expansive land areas and diverse ecosystems, such as Russia and Canada, reported high increases of 905,656.25% and 512,606.25%, respectively. These countries benefit from vast expanses of land suitable for natural forest growth and reforestation efforts.
Conversely, countries like Uganda and Guatemala faced significant reductions in forest area, with rates of -50,146.996% and -47,081.008%. These reductions are often due to deforestation driven by agricultural expansion, logging, and other land-use changes, highlighting the environmental pressures that can lead to forest loss.
Policy Impacts on Forest Area Change
Policies at both national and international levels have profound impacts on forest area change rates. Indonesia, with an increase of 434,660.16%, has been working under international frameworks like REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) to manage its forest resources sustainably while benefiting economically from carbon credits.
In contrast, countries such as Liberia and Honduras, with decreases of -38,898% and -38,478.027%, respectively, may struggle with enforcement of environmental regulations, leading to continued deforestation despite potential policy frameworks aimed at conservation.
Stagnation in Forest Area Change Rates
The data reveals that the average year-over-year change was 0.00%, indicating stagnation in forest area change for many countries. This stagnation suggests that while some countries experience significant shifts, others maintain a balance between deforestation and reforestation, resulting in little net change.
Countries like the United States and France, which showed increases of 518,400% and 113,100%, respectively, have mature forestry sectors that balance commercial use with sustainable practices, contributing to stable forest area metrics.
In summary, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2005 reflects a complex interplay of economic, geographic, and policy factors. Countries like China and Vietnam demonstrate how strategic initiatives can lead to substantial forest growth, while others face challenges in maintaining forest cover due to environmental pressures and policy limitations. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for shaping future strategies in forest conservation and management.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2005
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2005?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2005, with a rate of 2,360,983%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2005?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2005, with a rate of -3,563,294%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2005?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2005 was -15,472%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2005?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2005 was 0%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2005?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2005 were China, Russia, and the United States.
How many countries are included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2005?
The dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2005 includes 230 countries.
Insights by country
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
In 2005, Saint Pierre and Miquelon had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -21.99999 %, ranking #136 out of 230 countries. This negative change rate is significantly higher than many regions, indicating a concerning trend in forest loss. The decline can be attributed to limited land area, economic reliance on fishing and tourism, and the impacts of climate change on local ecosystems.
Madagascar
In 2005, Madagascar had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -106810.06 %, ranking #212 out of 230 countries. This figure highlights one of the highest rates of deforestation globally, significantly exceeding the average loss seen in neighboring countries. The primary drivers of this alarming statistic include rampant agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and a lack of effective conservation policies, which have severely impacted Madagascar's unique biodiversity.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -19727.002 % in 2005, ranking #189 out of 230 countries. This drastic decline in forest area is among the worst globally, significantly impacted by extensive logging and agricultural expansion. Additionally, the country's economic reliance on natural resources and lack of effective environmental policies have exacerbated deforestation rates.
Serbia
In 2005, Serbia achieved a remarkable 15th global rank for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate at 39679.004 %. This rate significantly exceeds the global average, reflecting the country's unique environmental policies and reforestation efforts. Serbia's commitment to enhancing its forest cover is driven by a combination of government initiatives aimed at sustainable development and the country's diverse climate, which supports a variety of forest ecosystems.
Turks and Caicos Islands
In 2005, the Turks and Caicos Islands had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #127 out of 230 countries. This rate indicates a stabilization in forest area, contrasting with the global trend of deforestation in many regions. The lack of significant forest cover in the islands is largely due to their small land area and development pressures from tourism and real estate, which limit the potential for forest growth.
United States Virgin Islands
The United States Virgin Islands ranked #141 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -86.00006 % in 2005. This significant loss of forest area is among the highest in the world, reflecting a stark contrast to many neighboring Caribbean nations. Key drivers of this decline include extensive land development for tourism and residential purposes, along with the impacts of hurricanes that have historically affected the region.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2005, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines achieved an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0.99983215 %, ranking #86 out of 230 countries. This rate is notable as it is relatively high compared to many Caribbean neighbors, indicating a stable forest area amidst regional deforestation challenges.
The country’s forest preservation can be attributed to its commitment to sustainable tourism and conservation policies, which aim to balance economic development with environmental protection. Additionally, the geographic landscape of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, characterized by its mountainous terrain, supports diverse ecosystems that are crucial for maintaining forest areas.
Panama
In 2005, Panama had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -11414.99 %, ranking #183 out of 230 countries. This figure is significantly lower than those of many neighboring Central American nations, indicating severe deforestation issues. Key drivers include agricultural expansion, logging activities, and infrastructure development, which have led to substantial forest loss in the region.
Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -21917.969 % in 2005, ranking #191 out of 230 countries. This rate reflects severe deforestation challenges, with Papua New Guinea experiencing one of the highest rates of forest loss globally, exacerbated by logging and agricultural expansion. The country's rich biodiversity and reliance on forest resources for local communities further complicate conservation efforts, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable management practices.
Saudi Arabia
In 2005, Saudi Arabia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #123 out of 230 countries. This figure is notably lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting the arid climate and limited forested areas in the region. The lack of significant forest cover is driven by Saudi Arabia's desert landscape, which poses challenges for afforestation and conservation efforts, coupled with a focus on economic development that prioritizes other land uses over forest preservation.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data