Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2012
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 1,936,775 % | |
2 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
3 | Russia | 340,850 % | |
4 | United States | 275,000 % | |
5 | Australia | 267,275 % | |
6 | India | 266,400 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 134,760.16 % | |
8 | Turkey | 109,444.14 % | |
9 | Malaysia | 103,314.06 % | |
10 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
11 | France | 83,400 % | |
12 | Romania | 77,191.99 % | |
13 | Greece | 75,439.99 % | |
14 | Cuba | 61,929.98 % | |
15 | Kazakhstan | 45,256.008 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 39,959.96 % | |
17 | Serbia | 39,681.984 % | |
18 | Chile | 35,773.83 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Philippines | 34,885.938 % | |
21 | Finland | 33,400 % | |
22 | Ukraine | 30,400 % | |
23 | Uruguay | 27,691.992 % | |
24 | Bulgaria | 19,200 % | |
25 | United Kingdom | 19,200 % | |
26 | Poland | 18,200 % | |
27 | Burundi | 17,140.002 % | |
28 | Estonia | 17,079.98 % | |
29 | Costa Rica | 14,741.992 % | |
30 | Rwanda | 14,558.002 % | |
31 | Portugal | 11,990.039 % | |
32 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 11,568.018 % | |
33 | North Korea | 11,354.004 % | |
34 | New Caledonia | 10,717.993 % | |
35 | Azerbaijan | 9,080.005 % | |
36 | Denmark | 7,583.997 % | |
37 | Ireland | 6,857.996 % | |
38 | North Macedonia | 6,794.006 % | |
39 | Dominican Republic | 5,710.01 % | |
40 | Latvia | 5,300 % | |
41 | Germany | 4,880.078 % | |
42 | Fiji | 4,634.009 % | |
43 | South Sudan | 4,159.961 % | |
44 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,019.995 % | |
45 | Jamaica | 3,800 % | |
46 | Nepal | 3,504.004 % | |
47 | Lithuania | 3,400 % | |
48 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3,058.002 % | |
49 | Albania | 3,021.997 % | |
50 | Hungary | 2,886.011 % | |
51 | Austria | 2,818.018 % | |
52 | Switzerland | 2,795.996 % | |
53 | Mauritania | 2,628.003 % | |
54 | Czech Republic | 2,579.981 % | |
55 | Republic of Moldova | 2,379.999 % | |
56 | Tajikistan | 2,359.998 % | |
57 | Israel | 2,200 % | |
58 | Bhutan | 1,977.979 % | |
59 | Spain | 1,832.031 % | |
60 | Iceland | 898 % | |
61 | Guam | 854 % | |
62 | Northern Mariana Islands | 808 % | |
63 | Slovakia | 767.993 % | |
64 | Belarus | 700 % | |
65 | Cabo Verde | 512 % | |
66 | Western Sahara | 454.004 % | |
67 | Réunion | 412.001 % | |
68 | Croatia | 400 % | |
69 | Armenia | 382.001 % | |
70 | United Arab Emirates | 334.003 % | |
71 | Tunisia | 300 % | |
72 | Guadeloupe | 270 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
74 | Martinique | 200 % | |
75 | Slovenia | 200 % | |
76 | United States Virgin Islands | 146 % | |
77 | Kuwait | 140 % | |
78 | State of Palestine | 118 % | |
79 | Lebanon | 98.001 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 88 % | |
81 | Palau | 86 % | |
82 | El Salvador | 76.001 % | |
83 | Andorra | 42 % | |
84 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 28 % | |
85 | Djibouti | 10 % | |
86 | Guernsey | 10 % | |
87 | Niue | 10 % | |
88 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
89 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
90 | Aruba | 0 % | |
91 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
92 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
93 | Barbados | 0 % | |
94 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
95 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
96 | Botswana | 0 % | |
97 | Brunei Darussalam | 0 % | |
98 | Cayman Islands | 0 % | |
99 | Cook Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
101 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
102 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
103 | French Polynesia | 0 % | |
104 | Georgia | 0 % | |
105 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
106 | Greenland | 0 % | |
107 | Grenada | 0 % | |
108 | Iran | 0 % | |
109 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
110 | Jersey | 0 % | |
111 | Jordan | 0 % | |
112 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
113 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
114 | Luxembourg | 0 % | |
115 | Maldives | 0 % | |
116 | Malta | 0 % | |
117 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
118 | Monaco | 0 % | |
119 | Montenegro | 0 % | |
120 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
121 | Nauru | 0 % | |
122 | Oman | 0 % | |
123 | Qatar | 0 % | |
124 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
125 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
126 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
127 | San Marino | 0 % | |
128 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
129 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
130 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
131 | Tonga | 0 % | |
132 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
133 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
134 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
135 | Holy See | 0 % | |
136 | Yemen | 0 % | |
137 | British Virgin Islands | -2 % | |
138 | Mauritius | -12 % | |
139 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -24 % | |
140 | Cyprus | -25.998 % | |
141 | Antigua and Barbuda | -66 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -68 % | |
143 | Mayotte | -72 % | |
144 | Dominica | -112 % | |
145 | Belgium | -114.001 % | |
146 | Seychelles | -218 % | |
147 | Singapore | -254 % | |
148 | New Zealand | -301.953 % | |
149 | Libya | -334 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -424.002 % | |
151 | Samoa | -480.002 % | |
152 | Comoros | -548 % | |
153 | Sao Tome and Principe | -594 % | |
154 | Namibia | -643.945 % | |
155 | Puerto Rico | -654.004 % | |
156 | Algeria | -673.999 % | |
157 | Solomon Islands | -737.988 % | |
158 | Bangladesh | -987.988 % | |
159 | Mongolia | -1,114.063 % | |
160 | Morocco | -1,160.059 % | |
161 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
162 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
163 | Netherlands | -1,730.005 % | |
164 | Vanuatu | -2,383.997 % | |
165 | Togo | -2,960.01 % | |
166 | Haiti | -3,180.005 % | |
167 | Norway | -3,261.914 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -3,300 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,237.988 % | |
170 | Japan | -4,400 % | |
171 | Papua New Guinea | -4,605.469 % | |
172 | Suriname | -4,681.836 % | |
173 | Gambia | -5,785.999 % | |
174 | Eritrea | -5,980.005 % | |
175 | Panama | -6,375.977 % | |
176 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,532.007 % | |
178 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,472.021 % | |
179 | Iraq | -9,138 % | |
180 | South Korea | -10,000 % | |
181 | Sri Lanka | -11,541.992 % | |
182 | Guyana | -11,690.234 % | |
183 | Gabon | -12,125.781 % | |
184 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
185 | Senegal | -15,543.945 % | |
186 | Guatemala | -16,924.023 % | |
187 | Sweden | -18,600 % | |
188 | Sierra Leone | -19,725.977 % | |
189 | Congo | -20,339.844 % | |
190 | Nicaragua | -22,120.02 % | |
191 | Italy | -24,208.008 % | |
192 | Pakistan | -25,756.006 % | |
193 | Central African Republic | -34,992.188 % | |
194 | Ecuador | -41,833.984 % | |
195 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
196 | Honduras | -43,537.99 % | |
197 | Uganda | -50,146.047 % | |
198 | Cameroon | -56,000 % | |
199 | Laos | -58,237.89 % | |
200 | Ethiopia | -59,040.234 % | |
201 | Zimbabwe | -59,666.016 % | |
202 | Guinea | -66,998.05 % | |
203 | Colombia | -93,595.31 % | |
204 | Kenya | -98,918.016 % | |
205 | Mali | -100,546.09 % | |
206 | Venezuela | -100,564.06 % | |
207 | Côte d'Ivoire | -109,858.01 % | |
208 | Liberia | -116,641.99 % | |
209 | Burkina Faso | -119,860.06 % | |
210 | Mexico | -122,478.125 % | |
211 | Nigeria | -126,883.984 % | |
212 | Chad | -127,916.016 % | |
213 | Benin | -151,426.03 % | |
214 | Somalia | -153,900 % | |
215 | Madagascar | -160,132.03 % | |
216 | Bolivia | -162,514.06 % | |
217 | Sudan | -174,139.84 % | |
218 | Zambia | -188,179.69 % | |
219 | Indonesia | -255,460.94 % | |
220 | Argentina | -256,685.94 % | |
221 | Mozambique | -267,027.34 % | |
222 | Myanmar | -289,712.12 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Cambodia | -348,482.03 % | |
225 | Paraguay | -354,016 % | |
226 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
227 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
228 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -1,004,496.9 % | |
229 | Brazil | -1,915,700 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #229
Brazil
- #228
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #227
Angola
- #226
Tanzania
- #225
Paraguay
- #224
Cambodia
- #223
Peru
- #222
Myanmar
- #221
Mozambique
- #220
Argentina
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2012, the country with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate was China, with an impressive increase of 1,936,775%. The global range for this metric spanned from a minimum of -59,040.23% to a maximum of 1,936,775%. The average rate of change worldwide was 21,124.74%, while the median stood at 0.00%, highlighting significant disparities in forest area changes across different nations.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
The dramatic increase in forest area in China can be attributed to aggressive reforestation policies and economic incentives aimed at combating desertification and improving air quality. The Chinese government's commitment to environmental restoration is reflected in its ambitious tree-planting campaigns. Similarly, India, with a forest area change rate of 266,400%, has implemented extensive afforestation projects as part of its environmental policy initiatives, balancing rapid industrial growth with ecological sustainability.
Vietnam also stands out with a change rate of 134,760.16%, driven by government-led reforestation efforts and community forestry programs that aim to restore degraded lands and support rural livelihoods. These countries illustrate how economic growth can coincide with environmental stewardship through targeted policy measures.
Deforestation Challenges in Developing Nations
In contrast, several developing countries faced significant deforestation challenges in 2012. Ethiopia experienced the most severe reduction in forest area, with a change rate of -59,040.234%. This decline is largely due to agricultural expansion, increased demand for fuelwood, and inadequate enforcement of conservation policies. Similarly, Laos and Cameroon, with change rates of -58,237.89% and -56,000%, respectively, faced pressures from logging and agricultural encroachment.
These patterns highlight the complex interplay between economic development and environmental degradation, where the immediate economic benefits of land conversion often overshadow long-term ecological costs. Addressing these issues requires robust policy frameworks and international cooperation to support sustainable land management practices.
Policy Impacts on Forest Area Changes
Countries like Turkey and Malaysia have demonstrated positive outcomes through proactive forest management policies. With change rates of 109,444.14% and 103,314.06% respectively, these nations have invested in reforestation and sustainable forestry practices. Turkey's success is partly due to its National Afforestation Campaign, which aims to increase forest cover significantly. In Malaysia, the implementation of sustainable forest management practices has been crucial in maintaining its rich biodiversity while promoting economic growth through eco-tourism and sustainable timber production.
These examples underscore the importance of policy-driven approaches in achieving positive environmental outcomes. By aligning economic incentives with conservation goals, countries can enhance their forest areas while supporting economic resilience.
Global Trends and Future Outlook
The data from 2012 reveals a mixed global picture, with some countries achieving significant forest area gains while others continue to struggle with deforestation. The average change rate of 0.00% indicates a balance between gains and losses worldwide, but the wide range of individual country performances suggests that global forest conservation efforts need to be tailored to specific national contexts.
Moving forward, the challenge will be to scale up successful initiatives and address the root causes of deforestation in vulnerable regions. International collaboration and support, particularly for developing countries, will be crucial in promoting sustainable land use practices and ensuring that economic development does not come at the expense of critical forest ecosystems.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2012
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2012?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2012, with a rate of 1,936,775%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2012?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2012, with a rate of -1,915,700%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2012?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2012 was -17,088%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2012?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2012 was 0%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for annual forest area change rates in 2012?
The top 10 countries for annual forest area change rates in 2012 were China, Canada, Russia, United States, Australia, India, Vietnam, Turkey, Malaysia, and South Africa.
How many countries were included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2012?
The dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2012 included 229 countries.
Insights by country
Tokelau
In 2012, Tokelau had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #129 out of 229 countries. This rate is notably low compared to many Pacific island nations that face significant deforestation challenges. The absence of significant forested areas in Tokelau, along with its small landmass and population, limits the potential for forest growth and change.
Botswana
Botswana ranked #93 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 % in 2012. This rate is notably lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting a regional trend of deforestation. The lack of forest area change can be attributed to Botswana's arid climate, which limits forest growth, alongside strong conservation policies that prioritize sustainable land management and protect existing natural resources.
Costa Rica
Costa Rica achieved a global rank of #29 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 14741.992 % in 2012. This rate is significantly higher than many countries, reflecting Costa Rica's commitment to environmental conservation compared to its regional neighbors. Key drivers of this impressive statistic include robust reforestation policies and a strong emphasis on ecotourism, which have fostered sustainable land management practices.
Cuba
Cuba achieved a remarkable 14 global rank in its Annual Forest Area Change Rate for 2012, with a value of 61929.98 %. This figure significantly surpasses the average rates seen in the Caribbean region, highlighting Cuba's unique environmental management practices. The country's commitment to reforestation and sustainable land use, driven by both policy initiatives and a focus on ecological preservation, has contributed to this impressive statistic.
Myanmar
In 2012, Myanmar had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -289712.12 %, ranking #222 out of 229 countries. This significant loss of forest area is among the highest globally, reflecting severe deforestation challenges faced by the country. Key drivers include extensive agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and a lack of effective environmental policies, which have exacerbated the decline in forest cover.
American Samoa
In 2012, American Samoa had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -68.00003 %, ranking #142 out of 229 countries. This significant loss contrasts sharply with the global average, where many countries are actively increasing forest cover. The decline in forest area can be attributed to factors such as land conversion for agriculture and urban development, alongside limited reforestation efforts in this small island territory.
France
In 2012, France achieved a remarkable 11 global rank for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 83400 %. This figure significantly outpaces the global average, highlighting France's commitment to forest preservation and expansion compared to many countries. Key drivers include robust national policies aimed at reforestation, coupled with a strong emphasis on sustainable land management practices that have fostered forest growth across the nation.
Benin
In 2012, Benin ranked #213 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -151426.03 %. This significant loss of forest area places Benin among the bottom countries, far below the global average. Key drivers of this deforestation include agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and population pressure, which have led to unsustainable land use practices.
Bolivia
In 2012, Bolivia ranked #216 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -162514.06 %. This significant loss places Bolivia among the bottom-ranked countries, contrasting sharply with regional averages in South America, where forest preservation efforts are more robust. The primary drivers of this alarming rate include extensive agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and insufficient enforcement of environmental regulations.
Cyprus
In 2012, Cyprus had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -25.997925 %, ranking #140 out of 229 countries. This decline is significantly worse than the global average, reflecting challenges in forest management and environmental policy. Key drivers include urban development pressures and limited reforestation efforts, which have been exacerbated by economic constraints and land use changes on the island.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data