Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2009
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 2,360,982.8 % | |
2 | Russia | 905,656.25 % | |
3 | United States | 518,400 % | |
4 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
5 | Indonesia | 434,660.16 % | |
6 | India | 190,500 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 160,396 % | |
8 | Spain | 147,225.97 % | |
9 | France | 113,100 % | |
10 | Turkey | 93,473.05 % | |
11 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
12 | Italy | 65,879 % | |
13 | Chile | 61,363.086 % | |
14 | Cuba | 51,035.008 % | |
15 | Serbia | 39,679.004 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 38,814.016 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 36,200 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 35,964 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Belarus | 35,700 % | |
21 | Poland | 27,000 % | |
22 | Montenegro | 20,100 % | |
23 | Nepal | 16,741.016 % | |
24 | Lithuania | 15,000 % | |
25 | Romania | 14,900 % | |
26 | Latvia | 13,112.012 % | |
27 | Hungary | 12,521.997 % | |
28 | United Kingdom | 10,500 % | |
29 | North Korea | 10,217.969 % | |
30 | Bhutan | 9,929.004 % | |
31 | Estonia | 9,713.013 % | |
32 | Ireland | 9,002.002 % | |
33 | Japan | 9,000 % | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 6,230.002 % | |
35 | Kenya | 6,226.001 % | |
36 | Georgia | 6,180.005 % | |
37 | Fiji | 6,064.002 % | |
38 | Germany | 5,500 % | |
39 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5,121.002 % | |
40 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.994 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 4,527.002 % | |
42 | Switzerland | 3,853.992 % | |
43 | Ukraine | 3,800 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 3,744 % | |
45 | Tunisia | 3,558.997 % | |
46 | Croatia | 3,500 % | |
47 | Costa Rica | 3,169.995 % | |
48 | Republic of Moldova | 3,010.001 % | |
49 | Mauritania | 2,627.002 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,350 % | |
51 | Belgium | 2,257.001 % | |
52 | South Sudan | 2,200 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 2,047.998 % | |
54 | Iceland | 1,652 % | |
55 | Slovakia | 1,650 % | |
56 | Denmark | 1,474.005 % | |
57 | Czech Republic | 1,472.998 % | |
58 | Slovenia | 1,400 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 1,398.001 % | |
60 | Albania | 1,277.002 % | |
61 | Greece | 1,190.015 % | |
62 | Rwanda | 700.998 % | |
63 | United Arab Emirates | 457.999 % | |
64 | Cabo Verde | 440 % | |
65 | Réunion | 302 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 288.001 % | |
67 | Luxembourg | 200 % | |
68 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
69 | Martinique | 155 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 123 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 117.004 % | |
72 | Israel | 100 % | |
73 | Palau | 98 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 98 % | |
75 | French Polynesia | 91 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 90 % | |
77 | Andorra | 79 % | |
78 | Singapore | 73 % | |
79 | Kuwait | 40 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 34 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 27 % | |
82 | Liechtenstein | 17 % | |
83 | Egypt | 17 % | |
84 | Guernsey | 15 % | |
85 | Cook Islands | 2 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 % | |
87 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
88 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
89 | Aruba | 0 % | |
90 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
92 | Barbados | 0 % | |
93 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
94 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
95 | Botswana | 0 % | |
96 | Burundi | 0 % | |
97 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
98 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
99 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
101 | Greenland | 0 % | |
102 | Grenada | 0 % | |
103 | Guam | 0 % | |
104 | Iran | 0 % | |
105 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
106 | Jersey | 0 % | |
107 | Jordan | 0 % | |
108 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
109 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
110 | Maldives | 0 % | |
111 | Malta | 0 % | |
112 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
113 | Monaco | 0 % | |
114 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
115 | Nauru | 0 % | |
116 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
117 | Oman | 0 % | |
118 | Qatar | 0 % | |
119 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
121 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
122 | San Marino | 0 % | |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
124 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
125 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
126 | Tonga | 0 % | |
127 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
128 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
129 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
130 | Holy See | 0 % | |
131 | Yemen | 0 % | |
132 | British Virgin Islands | -1 % | |
133 | Niue | -6 % | |
134 | Dominica | -19 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | -21 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -22 % | |
137 | Armenia | -35.001 % | |
138 | Sao Tome and Principe | -54 % | |
139 | Antigua and Barbuda | -67 % | |
140 | Guadeloupe | -71.999 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | -86 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -154 % | |
143 | Seychelles | -217 % | |
144 | Western Sahara | -231 % | |
145 | New Zealand | -232.031 % | |
146 | Morocco | -296.973 % | |
147 | Libya | -333 % | |
148 | Mauritius | -357 % | |
149 | Haiti | -400 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
151 | Mayotte | -438 % | |
152 | Samoa | -481 % | |
153 | Comoros | -548 % | |
154 | Namibia | -645.02 % | |
155 | Algeria | -675 % | |
156 | Solomon Islands | -738.013 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -898.999 % | |
158 | Iraq | -1,332.001 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Brunei Darussalam | -1,700 % | |
162 | Gabon | -1,835.938 % | |
163 | Vanuatu | -2,384.998 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,958.997 % | |
165 | El Salvador | -2,970.001 % | |
166 | Bangladesh | -3,208.997 % | |
167 | Suriname | -3,996.094 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -4,293.994 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,396.021 % | |
170 | Guyana | -4,441.016 % | |
171 | Norway | -4,919.043 % | |
172 | Gambia | -5,787 % | |
173 | Eritrea | -5,979.004 % | |
174 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
175 | Kazakhstan | -7,475 % | |
176 | Sri Lanka | -7,517.993 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,590.002 % | |
178 | Mongolia | -8,000 % | |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,300 % | |
180 | South Korea | -8,900 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,000 % | |
182 | Portugal | -9,669.019 % | |
183 | Panama | -11,414.99 % | |
184 | Congo | -12,000 % | |
185 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
186 | Pakistan | -15,207.983 % | |
187 | Senegal | -15,545.02 % | |
188 | Cambodia | -19,176.953 % | |
189 | Sierra Leone | -19,727.002 % | |
190 | Finland | -20,364.062 % | |
191 | Papua New Guinea | -21,917.969 % | |
192 | Central African Republic | -34,991.797 % | |
193 | Zambia | -35,800 % | |
194 | Honduras | -38,478.027 % | |
195 | Liberia | -38,898 % | |
196 | Laos | -38,945.02 % | |
197 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
198 | Philippines | -46,953.953 % | |
199 | Guatemala | -47,081.008 % | |
200 | Uganda | -50,146.996 % | |
201 | Guinea | -66,997.02 % | |
202 | Cameroon | -69,700.98 % | |
203 | Ecuador | -70,212.984 % | |
204 | Ethiopia | -72,800 % | |
205 | Malaysia | -74,369.92 % | |
206 | Somalia | -76,750 % | |
207 | Chad | -82,270.016 % | |
208 | Venezuela | -84,952.734 % | |
209 | Nicaragua | -99,320.016 % | |
210 | Mali | -100,546 % | |
211 | Zimbabwe | -105,719.05 % | |
212 | Madagascar | -106,810.06 % | |
213 | Colombia | -113,860.16 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | -116,481.01 % | |
215 | Nigeria | -126,883.01 % | |
216 | Burkina Faso | -134,310.02 % | |
217 | Benin | -141,004.98 % | |
218 | Mexico | -143,800.78 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -158,621.88 % | |
220 | Australia | -173,615.62 % | |
221 | Sudan | -174,140.03 % | |
222 | Mozambique | -267,029.3 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Myanmar | -342,710.94 % | |
225 | Argentina | -371,476.94 % | |
226 | Paraguay | -376,996.1 % | |
227 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
228 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
229 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -674,987.5 % | |
230 | Brazil | -3,563,293.8 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #230
Brazil
- #229
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #228
Angola
- #227
Tanzania
- #226
Paraguay
- #225
Argentina
- #224
Myanmar
- #223
Peru
- #222
Mozambique
- #221
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2009, the country with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate was China, with an impressive increase of 2,360,982.8%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of -50,147.00% to a maximum of 2,360,982.80%. The global average change rate stood at 27,717.12%, with a median value of 0.00%, indicating a balanced distribution between forest expansion and reduction worldwide.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
Countries experiencing rapid economic growth often invest in reforestation and sustainable land management. China, leading the world with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 2,360,982.8%, exemplifies this trend. The Chinese government has implemented extensive afforestation and reforestation programs, driven by policy initiatives like the Grain for Green program, which aims to combat desertification and soil erosion. Similarly, India and Vietnam show significant growth rates of 190,500% and 160,396% respectively, reflecting their commitment to reversing deforestation and enhancing biodiversity.
Environmental Policy and Forest Preservation
Environmental policies play a crucial role in forest area change. Countries like Russia and the United States have implemented stringent conservation measures, resulting in positive forest area change rates of 905,656.25% and 518,400%, respectively. These policies include protected area expansions and sustainable forest management practices. In contrast, countries with weaker environmental regulations, such as Guatemala and Uganda, face challenges in forest preservation, with negative change rates of -47,081.008% and -50,146.996%, respectively.
Deforestation Challenges in Developing Nations
Many developing nations struggle with deforestation due to economic pressures and land-use changes. Uganda and Guatemala are among the countries with the most significant forest area reductions, with rates of -50,146.996% and -47,081.008%. The demand for agricultural land, combined with logging activities, often drives these reductions. Indonesia, despite having a positive change rate of 434,660.16%, continues to face deforestation challenges due to palm oil production and illegal logging, highlighting the complex balance between economic development and environmental sustainability.
Stability in Forest Area Change Rates
The data indicates minimal year-over-year changes, with the average change reported as 0.00%. This stability suggests that while some countries make significant progress in forest expansion, others face persistent deforestation issues, resulting in an overall equilibrium. Countries like Spain and France, with change rates of 147,225.97% and 113,100% respectively, demonstrate steady increases due to effective forest management and conservation efforts. Conversely, nations such as Philippines and Malawi show negative rates of -46,953.953% and -42,000%, indicating ongoing deforestation pressures.
In conclusion, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2009 presents a complex picture of global forest dynamics, influenced by economic growth, environmental policies, and developmental challenges. While some countries make strides in afforestation and sustainable land management, others continue to grapple with deforestation, underscoring the need for international cooperation and policy innovation to achieve balanced and sustainable forest management worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2009
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2009?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2009 with 2,360,983 %.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2009?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2009 with -3,563,294 %.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2009?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2009 was -15,472 %.
What was the median annual forest area change rate among countries in 2009?
The median annual forest area change rate among countries in 2009 was 0 %.
How many countries are included in the dataset for the annual forest area change rate in 2009?
The dataset for the annual forest area change rate in 2009 includes 230 countries.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2009?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2009 were China, Russia, and the United States.
Insights by country
Aruba
In 2009, Aruba had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #112 out of 230 countries. This rate is notably lower than many Caribbean nations, which often face deforestation challenges. The lack of significant forest area change in Aruba can be attributed to its small land area, urban development priorities, and limited agricultural activities that typically drive deforestation elsewhere.
Madagascar
In 2009, Madagascar had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -106810.06 %, ranking #212 out of 230 countries. This drastic loss of forest area far exceeds that of many neighboring countries and reflects one of the highest deforestation rates globally. Key drivers include extensive agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and population pressures that lead to habitat destruction and land conversion for farming.
Réunion
In 2009, Réunion achieved a global rank of #65 with an impressive Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 301.99966%. This rate is significantly higher than many regions, indicating a robust commitment to forest conservation and reforestation efforts. The island's unique biodiversity and geographic isolation have fostered strong environmental policies aimed at preserving its natural habitats, alongside initiatives to restore forested areas impacted by agriculture and urbanization.
Mexico
In 2009, Mexico had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -143800.78 %, ranking #218 out of 230 countries. This figure is significantly worse than many of its regional neighbors, highlighting severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include illegal logging, agricultural expansion, and urbanization, which have led to substantial forest loss across the country.
Curaçao
Curaçao achieved an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 % in 2009, ranking #111 out of 230 countries. This rate is notably lower than many Caribbean nations, where deforestation rates often fluctuate due to agricultural expansion and urban development. The island's limited land area and focus on tourism over agriculture contribute to its stable forest area, as there is less pressure to convert forested land for farming or infrastructure.
Burkina Faso
In 2009, Burkina Faso had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -134310.02 %, ranking #216 out of 230 countries. This significant decline in forest area is among the worst globally, with many neighboring countries showing more stable rates. Key drivers include severe deforestation due to agricultural expansion, overgrazing, and wood extraction for fuel, exacerbated by climate change impacts on the region.
Switzerland
In 2009, Switzerland achieved a global rank of #42 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 3853.9917 %. This rate is significantly higher than many of its European neighbors, reflecting a proactive approach to forest management and conservation. Switzerland's mountainous terrain and commitment to environmental sustainability have driven policies that promote reforestation and the preservation of natural habitats.
Pakistan
In 2009, Pakistan ranked #186 globally with an alarming annual forest area change rate of -15207.983 %. This drastic decline positions Pakistan among the lowest in the world, reflecting severe deforestation trends compared to regional averages. Key drivers include rapid urbanization, agricultural expansion, and inadequate forest management policies, which have contributed to significant loss of forest cover.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked #189 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -19727.002 % in 2009. This drastic loss of forest area is one of the highest rates reported, significantly worse than many neighboring countries. Deforestation in Sierra Leone has been driven by factors such as illegal logging, agricultural expansion, and the aftermath of civil conflict, which has hindered sustainable land management practices.
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
In 2009, Micronesia (Fed. States of) achieved a global rank of #81 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 26.999664 %. This rate is significantly higher than many countries, reflecting a unique environmental dynamic within the Pacific region. The high change rate is driven by factors such as the country's small land area, reliance on subsistence agriculture, and ongoing development pressures that impact forest cover.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data