Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2006
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 2,360,982.8 % | |
2 | Russia | 905,656.25 % | |
3 | United States | 518,400 % | |
4 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
5 | Indonesia | 434,660.16 % | |
6 | India | 190,500 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 160,396 % | |
8 | Spain | 147,225.97 % | |
9 | France | 113,100 % | |
10 | Turkey | 93,473.05 % | |
11 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
12 | Italy | 65,879 % | |
13 | Chile | 61,363.086 % | |
14 | Cuba | 51,035.008 % | |
15 | Serbia | 39,679.004 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 38,814.016 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 36,200 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 35,964 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Belarus | 35,700 % | |
21 | Poland | 27,000 % | |
22 | Montenegro | 20,100 % | |
23 | Nepal | 16,741.016 % | |
24 | Lithuania | 15,000 % | |
25 | Romania | 14,900 % | |
26 | Latvia | 13,112.012 % | |
27 | Hungary | 12,521.997 % | |
28 | United Kingdom | 10,500 % | |
29 | North Korea | 10,217.969 % | |
30 | Bhutan | 9,929.004 % | |
31 | Estonia | 9,713.013 % | |
32 | Ireland | 9,002.002 % | |
33 | Japan | 9,000 % | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 6,230.002 % | |
35 | Kenya | 6,226.001 % | |
36 | Georgia | 6,180.005 % | |
37 | Fiji | 6,064.002 % | |
38 | Germany | 5,500 % | |
39 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5,121.002 % | |
40 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.994 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 4,527.002 % | |
42 | Switzerland | 3,853.992 % | |
43 | Ukraine | 3,800 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 3,744 % | |
45 | Tunisia | 3,558.997 % | |
46 | Croatia | 3,500 % | |
47 | Costa Rica | 3,169.995 % | |
48 | Republic of Moldova | 3,010.001 % | |
49 | Mauritania | 2,627.002 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,350 % | |
51 | Belgium | 2,257.001 % | |
52 | South Sudan | 2,200 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 2,047.998 % | |
54 | Iceland | 1,652 % | |
55 | Slovakia | 1,650 % | |
56 | Denmark | 1,474.005 % | |
57 | Czech Republic | 1,472.998 % | |
58 | Slovenia | 1,400 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 1,398.001 % | |
60 | Albania | 1,277.002 % | |
61 | Greece | 1,190.015 % | |
62 | Rwanda | 700.998 % | |
63 | United Arab Emirates | 457.999 % | |
64 | Cabo Verde | 440 % | |
65 | Réunion | 302 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 288.001 % | |
67 | Luxembourg | 200 % | |
68 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
69 | Martinique | 155 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 123 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 117.004 % | |
72 | Israel | 100 % | |
73 | Palau | 98 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 98 % | |
75 | French Polynesia | 91 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 90 % | |
77 | Andorra | 79 % | |
78 | Singapore | 73 % | |
79 | Kuwait | 40 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 34 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 27 % | |
82 | Liechtenstein | 17 % | |
83 | Egypt | 17 % | |
84 | Guernsey | 15 % | |
85 | Cook Islands | 2 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 % | |
87 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
88 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
89 | Aruba | 0 % | |
90 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
92 | Barbados | 0 % | |
93 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
94 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
95 | Botswana | 0 % | |
96 | Burundi | 0 % | |
97 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
98 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
99 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
101 | Greenland | 0 % | |
102 | Grenada | 0 % | |
103 | Guam | 0 % | |
104 | Iran | 0 % | |
105 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
106 | Jersey | 0 % | |
107 | Jordan | 0 % | |
108 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
109 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
110 | Maldives | 0 % | |
111 | Malta | 0 % | |
112 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
113 | Monaco | 0 % | |
114 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
115 | Nauru | 0 % | |
116 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
117 | Oman | 0 % | |
118 | Qatar | 0 % | |
119 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
121 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
122 | San Marino | 0 % | |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
124 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
125 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
126 | Tonga | 0 % | |
127 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
128 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
129 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
130 | Holy See | 0 % | |
131 | Yemen | 0 % | |
132 | British Virgin Islands | -1 % | |
133 | Niue | -6 % | |
134 | Dominica | -19 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | -21 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -22 % | |
137 | Armenia | -35.001 % | |
138 | Sao Tome and Principe | -54 % | |
139 | Antigua and Barbuda | -67 % | |
140 | Guadeloupe | -71.999 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | -86 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -154 % | |
143 | Seychelles | -217 % | |
144 | Western Sahara | -231 % | |
145 | New Zealand | -232.031 % | |
146 | Morocco | -296.973 % | |
147 | Libya | -333 % | |
148 | Mauritius | -357 % | |
149 | Haiti | -400 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
151 | Mayotte | -438 % | |
152 | Samoa | -481 % | |
153 | Comoros | -548 % | |
154 | Namibia | -645.02 % | |
155 | Algeria | -675 % | |
156 | Solomon Islands | -738.013 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -898.999 % | |
158 | Iraq | -1,332.001 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Brunei Darussalam | -1,700 % | |
162 | Gabon | -1,835.938 % | |
163 | Vanuatu | -2,384.998 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,958.997 % | |
165 | El Salvador | -2,970.001 % | |
166 | Bangladesh | -3,208.997 % | |
167 | Suriname | -3,996.094 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -4,293.994 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,396.021 % | |
170 | Guyana | -4,441.016 % | |
171 | Norway | -4,919.043 % | |
172 | Gambia | -5,787 % | |
173 | Eritrea | -5,979.004 % | |
174 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
175 | Kazakhstan | -7,475 % | |
176 | Sri Lanka | -7,517.993 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,590.002 % | |
178 | Mongolia | -8,000 % | |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,300 % | |
180 | South Korea | -8,900 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,000 % | |
182 | Portugal | -9,669.019 % | |
183 | Panama | -11,414.99 % | |
184 | Congo | -12,000 % | |
185 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
186 | Pakistan | -15,207.983 % | |
187 | Senegal | -15,545.02 % | |
188 | Cambodia | -19,176.953 % | |
189 | Sierra Leone | -19,727.002 % | |
190 | Finland | -20,364.062 % | |
191 | Papua New Guinea | -21,917.969 % | |
192 | Central African Republic | -34,991.797 % | |
193 | Zambia | -35,800 % | |
194 | Honduras | -38,478.027 % | |
195 | Liberia | -38,898 % | |
196 | Laos | -38,945.02 % | |
197 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
198 | Philippines | -46,953.953 % | |
199 | Guatemala | -47,081.008 % | |
200 | Uganda | -50,146.996 % | |
201 | Guinea | -66,997.02 % | |
202 | Cameroon | -69,700.98 % | |
203 | Ecuador | -70,212.984 % | |
204 | Ethiopia | -72,800 % | |
205 | Malaysia | -74,369.92 % | |
206 | Somalia | -76,750 % | |
207 | Chad | -82,270.016 % | |
208 | Venezuela | -84,952.734 % | |
209 | Nicaragua | -99,320.016 % | |
210 | Mali | -100,546 % | |
211 | Zimbabwe | -105,719.05 % | |
212 | Madagascar | -106,810.06 % | |
213 | Colombia | -113,860.16 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | -116,481.01 % | |
215 | Nigeria | -126,883.01 % | |
216 | Burkina Faso | -134,310.02 % | |
217 | Benin | -141,004.98 % | |
218 | Mexico | -143,800.78 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -158,621.88 % | |
220 | Australia | -173,615.62 % | |
221 | Sudan | -174,140.03 % | |
222 | Mozambique | -267,029.3 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Myanmar | -342,710.94 % | |
225 | Argentina | -371,476.94 % | |
226 | Paraguay | -376,996.1 % | |
227 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
228 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
229 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -674,987.5 % | |
230 | Brazil | -3,563,293.8 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #230
Brazil
- #229
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #228
Angola
- #227
Tanzania
- #226
Paraguay
- #225
Argentina
- #224
Myanmar
- #223
Peru
- #222
Mozambique
- #221
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2006, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate saw China leading the globe with a staggering increase of 2,360,982.8%, while the overall range spanned from -50,147% in Uganda to the aforementioned peak in China. The global average for this metric was 27,717.12%, with a median value of 0%, indicating a wide disparity in forest area changes across different nations.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
Countries like China and India have shown remarkable increases in their forest areas, with rates of 2,360,982.8% and 190,500% respectively. This growth can be attributed to aggressive reforestation policies and economic strategies aimed at sustainable development. In China, the government has invested heavily in tree-planting initiatives as part of its broader environmental policies, which are designed to combat desertification and improve air quality. Similarly, India's forest expansion is driven by governmental programs incentivizing afforestation and community-driven projects that aim to restore forest ecosystems.
Deforestation and Socioeconomic Challenges
On the other hand, countries such as Uganda and Guatemala, with forest area change rates of -50,147% and -47,081.008% respectively, face significant deforestation. This trend is largely due to socioeconomic pressures, including agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and inadequate enforcement of environmental laws. In Uganda, deforestation is exacerbated by the demand for arable land to support a rapidly growing population, while in Guatemala, the lack of effective land management policies has led to increased forest loss.
Policy Impact on Forest Area Dynamics
Effective policy implementation has played a crucial role in countries like Vietnam and Turkey, where forest area change rates are 160,396% and 93,473.05% respectively. Vietnam's success is largely due to its government-led reforestation programs, which have transformed degraded lands into productive forests. Turkey has also made significant strides through national afforestation campaigns aimed at increasing forest cover. These examples illustrate how targeted policies can lead to substantial improvements in forest management and expansion.
Stable Forest Areas and Global Implications
Interestingly, several countries, including the United States and Canada, with forest area change rates of 518,400% and 512,606.25% respectively, demonstrate a more stable forest area dynamic. This stability is attributed to longstanding conservation practices, sustainable logging operations, and the integration of forest management into broader environmental strategies. Such stability is crucial for maintaining biodiversity, regulating climate, and supporting global carbon cycles. These nations serve as models for balancing economic development with environmental stewardship.
The Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2006 highlights the diverse challenges and strategies faced by countries worldwide in managing their forest resources. Economic growth, policy frameworks, and socioeconomic conditions are key drivers influencing these trends. As global awareness of environmental issues continues to rise, understanding these dynamics is essential for crafting effective strategies to balance ecological preservation with human development.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2006
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2006?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2006, with a rate of 2,360,983%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2006?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2006, with a rate of -3,563,294%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2006?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2006 was -15,472%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2006?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2006 was 0%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2006?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2006 were China, Russia, and the United States.
How many countries were included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2006?
The dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2006 included 230 countries.
Insights by country
Bhutan
In 2006, Bhutan achieved an impressive 30 global rank for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 9929.004 %. This remarkable figure stands out significantly against global averages, reflecting Bhutan's commitment to environmental sustainability compared to many countries with deforestation challenges. The key drivers of this statistic include Bhutan's strong conservation policies, which prioritize forest preservation as part of its national identity, and its unique geography that supports diverse ecosystems.
Gambia
In 2006, Gambia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -5786.9995 %, ranking #172 out of 230 countries. This drastic decline in forest area is significantly worse than many neighboring countries, reflecting a broader regional challenge in forest conservation. Key drivers include rapid population growth, agricultural expansion, and insufficient environmental policies that fail to protect the country's limited forest resources.
Cayman Islands
In 2006, the Cayman Islands had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -21.000004 %, ranking #135 out of 230 countries. This decline is significant compared to the global average, where many countries are actively increasing their forest areas. The loss of forest cover in the Cayman Islands can be attributed to urban development and tourism expansion, which have led to habitat destruction and land use changes.
Albania
In 2006, Albania achieved a remarkable 60 global rank for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate at 1277.002 %. This figure significantly exceeds the global average, highlighting Albania's unique position in forest recovery efforts compared to many other countries. The high change rate can be attributed to extensive reforestation initiatives and a growing awareness of environmental sustainability following the economic transition in the 1990s.
Madagascar
In 2006, Madagascar had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -106810.06 %, ranking #212 out of 230 countries. This drastic loss of forest area is significantly worse than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include extensive slash-and-burn agriculture, illegal logging, and population pressures that exacerbate land degradation.
Ecuador
Ecuador ranked #203 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -70212.984 % in 2006. This figure is significantly lower than many of its neighbors, reflecting severe deforestation challenges in the region. Key drivers include agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and infrastructure development, which have led to substantial forest loss, particularly in the Amazon rainforest area.
Cameroon
In 2006, Cameroon had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -69700.98 %, ranking #202 out of 230 countries. This rate is significantly worse than many of its neighbors, highlighting a critical environmental challenge. Key drivers include extensive logging activities, agricultural expansion, and insufficient enforcement of environmental regulations, which have led to substantial forest loss in the country.
Martinique
In 2006, Martinique achieved a global rank of #69 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 154.99992 %. This figure is significantly higher than many countries, indicating a robust rate of forest area growth, likely due to effective reforestation efforts and conservation policies. The island's unique geography, combined with a strong emphasis on environmental sustainability, has contributed to this impressive change rate.
Algeria
In 2006, Algeria ranked #155 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -675 %. This significant decline contrasts sharply with the global average, indicating severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include unsustainable agricultural practices, urban expansion, and the impact of climate change on forest ecosystems.
Bolivia
In 2006, Bolivia had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -158621.88 %, ranking #219 out of 230 countries. This drastic rate places Bolivia among the lowest globally, significantly worse than many of its South American neighbors. Deforestation driven by agriculture, logging, and land conversion for cattle ranching has critically impacted Bolivia's forest cover, exacerbated by weak enforcement of environmental regulations.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data