Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2018
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 1,760,750 % | |
2 | Russia | 1,045,200 % | |
3 | India | 296,200 % | |
4 | Canada | 174,762.5 % | |
5 | Australia | 156,721.88 % | |
6 | Greece | 132,959.97 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 123,071.875 % | |
8 | Turkey | 118,011.72 % | |
9 | Indonesia | 106,800 % | |
10 | France | 102,400 % | |
11 | Italy | 90,501.95 % | |
12 | South Africa | 87,566.016 % | |
13 | Spain | 81,342.19 % | |
14 | Thailand | 55,512.11 % | |
15 | Philippines | 42,448.047 % | |
16 | Belarus | 41,909.96 % | |
17 | Kenya | 41,516.016 % | |
18 | Ukraine | 40,000 % | |
19 | Serbia | 39,680.03 % | |
20 | Ghana | 35,719.92 % | |
21 | Albania | 28,764.002 % | |
22 | Kazakhstan | 28,510.01 % | |
23 | Uzbekistan | 27,920.02 % | |
24 | Finland | 26,800 % | |
25 | New Zealand | 23,735.938 % | |
26 | Uruguay | 19,528.004 % | |
27 | Cuba | 18,485.986 % | |
28 | Azerbaijan | 16,659.984 % | |
29 | Nepal | 16,579.98 % | |
30 | Rwanda | 14,560.004 % | |
31 | Bulgaria | 12,600 % | |
32 | United Kingdom | 12,000 % | |
33 | North Korea | 11,354.004 % | |
34 | Pakistan | 10,495.996 % | |
35 | North Macedonia | 9,583.984 % | |
36 | Sri Lanka | 9,431.982 % | |
37 | Poland | 8,840.039 % | |
38 | Ireland | 7,730.005 % | |
39 | Latvia | 7,101.953 % | |
40 | Czech Republic | 6,050 % | |
41 | Romania | 5,617.969 % | |
42 | Germany | 4,800 % | |
43 | Fiji | 4,631.982 % | |
44 | Portugal | 4,511.963 % | |
45 | Estonia | 4,490.039 % | |
46 | Jamaica | 3,885.999 % | |
47 | Croatia | 3,519.995 % | |
48 | Costa Rica | 3,518.018 % | |
49 | Lithuania | 3,037.988 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,818.018 % | |
51 | Mauritania | 2,627.991 % | |
52 | Dominican Republic | 1,904.004 % | |
53 | Slovakia | 1,893.994 % | |
54 | Switzerland | 1,832.007 % | |
55 | Denmark | 1,690.002 % | |
56 | Kyrgyzstan | 1,644.019 % | |
57 | El Salvador | 833.997 % | |
58 | Morocco | 774.023 % | |
59 | Iceland | 686 % | |
60 | Cabo Verde | 620 % | |
61 | Botswana | 459.961 % | |
62 | Netherlands | 450 % | |
63 | Bhutan | 395.996 % | |
64 | United Arab Emirates | 335.999 % | |
65 | Guadeloupe | 270 % | |
66 | Tajikistan | 240.002 % | |
67 | Réunion | 203.999 % | |
68 | Martinique | 200 % | |
69 | Haiti | 160.004 % | |
70 | United States Virgin Islands | 150 % | |
71 | Bahrain | 120 % | |
72 | State of Palestine | 106 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 106 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 95.999 % | |
75 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 90 % | |
76 | Palau | 85.999 % | |
77 | Syrian Arab Republic | 76.001 % | |
78 | Marshall Islands | 62 % | |
79 | Djibouti | 46 % | |
80 | Kuwait | 42 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 30 % | |
82 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.001 % | |
83 | Malta | 22 % | |
84 | Jersey | 14 % | |
85 | Niue | 10 % | |
86 | Guernsey | 10 % | |
87 | Isle of Man | 8 % | |
88 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 2 % | |
89 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
90 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
91 | Aruba | 0 % | |
92 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
93 | Barbados | 0 % | |
94 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
95 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
96 | Brunei Darussalam | 0 % | |
97 | Burundi | 0 % | |
98 | Cayman Islands | 0 % | |
99 | Cook Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
101 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
102 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
103 | French Polynesia | 0 % | |
104 | Georgia | 0 % | |
105 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
106 | Greenland | 0 % | |
107 | Grenada | 0 % | |
108 | Guam | 0 % | |
109 | Iran | 0 % | |
110 | Jordan | 0 % | |
111 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
112 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
113 | Luxembourg | 0 % | |
114 | Maldives | 0 % | |
115 | Monaco | 0 % | |
116 | Montenegro | 0 % | |
117 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
118 | Nauru | 0 % | |
119 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
120 | Oman | 0 % | |
121 | Qatar | 0 % | |
122 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
123 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
124 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
125 | San Marino | 0 % | |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
127 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
128 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
129 | Tonga | 0 % | |
130 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
131 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
132 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
133 | Holy See | 0 % | |
134 | Yemen | 0 % | |
135 | Mauritius | -2 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -24 % | |
137 | Andorra | -26 % | |
138 | Cyprus | -34.003 % | |
139 | Armenia | -36.005 % | |
140 | Dominica | -46 % | |
141 | Mayotte | -56 % | |
142 | Antigua and Barbuda | -66 % | |
143 | Singapore | -134 % | |
144 | Seychelles | -218 % | |
145 | Libya | -334 % | |
146 | Comoros | -338.001 % | |
147 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
148 | Samoa | -479.999 % | |
149 | Namibia | -645.996 % | |
150 | Algeria | -673.999 % | |
151 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -724.023 % | |
152 | Solomon Islands | -733.984 % | |
153 | Hungary | -764.014 % | |
154 | Slovenia | -834.009 % | |
155 | South Sudan | -900 % | |
156 | Bangladesh | -988.013 % | |
157 | Tunisia | -1,185.999 % | |
158 | Western Sahara | -1,257.996 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Vanuatu | -2,384.009 % | |
162 | Norway | -2,434.18 % | |
163 | Republic of Moldova | -2,639.996 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,961.987 % | |
165 | Panama | -3,013.965 % | |
166 | French Guiana | -3,429.981 % | |
167 | Belgium | -3,755.994 % | |
168 | Ethiopia | -3,900 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,237.988 % | |
170 | Israel | -5,000 % | |
171 | Japan | -5,000 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | -5,214.002 % | |
173 | Gambia | -5,786.002 % | |
174 | Eritrea | -5,979.981 % | |
175 | Chile | -6,153.906 % | |
176 | Iraq | -6,607.996 % | |
177 | Gabon | -6,732.031 % | |
178 | Belize | -7,532.007 % | |
179 | South Korea | -7,800 % | |
180 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,360.01 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,200 % | |
182 | Guyana | -9,203.906 % | |
183 | Niger | -12,420.02 % | |
184 | Guatemala | -13,925.977 % | |
185 | Suriname | -14,630.078 % | |
186 | Senegal | -15,544.141 % | |
187 | Sierra Leone | -19,726.025 % | |
188 | Papua New Guinea | -21,060.156 % | |
189 | Nicaragua | -22,113.965 % | |
190 | Congo | -25,900 % | |
191 | Uganda | -28,095.996 % | |
192 | Laos | -31,338.086 % | |
193 | Benin | -37,382.03 % | |
194 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
195 | Central African Republic | -46,524.22 % | |
196 | Côte d'Ivoire | -54,055.957 % | |
197 | Zimbabwe | -54,332.03 % | |
198 | Malaysia | -55,896.094 % | |
199 | Guinea | -66,996 % | |
200 | Ecuador | -71,622.07 % | |
201 | Zambia | -79,006.25 % | |
202 | Honduras | -82,913.97 % | |
203 | Mali | -100,545.9 % | |
204 | Liberia | -101,429.984 % | |
205 | Venezuela | -108,906.25 % | |
206 | Burkina Faso | -119,859.96 % | |
207 | Madagascar | -120,425.98 % | |
208 | Nigeria | -126,882.03 % | |
209 | Mexico | -127,767.19 % | |
210 | Chad | -127,913.97 % | |
211 | Somalia | -153,900 % | |
212 | United States | -168,000 % | |
213 | Colombia | -168,096.1 % | |
214 | Sudan | -174,140.23 % | |
215 | Cameroon | -178,496.1 % | |
216 | Peru | -179,601.56 % | |
217 | Argentina | -189,685.94 % | |
218 | Cambodia | -193,996.1 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -223,621.88 % | |
220 | Paraguay | -250,745.9 % | |
221 | Mozambique | -267,030.47 % | |
222 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -282,887.5 % | |
223 | Myanmar | -289,711.72 % | |
224 | Tanzania | -469,000 % | |
225 | Angola | -510,031.25 % | |
226 | Brazil | -2,628,412.5 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #226
Brazil
- #225
Angola
- #224
Tanzania
- #223
Myanmar
- #222
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #221
Mozambique
- #220
Paraguay
- #219
Bolivia
- #218
Cambodia
- #217
Argentina
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2018, the country with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate was China, with an impressive increase of 1,760,750 hectares, while the global range spanned from -71,622.07 in Ecuador to 1,760,750 in China. The global median change rate was 0.00%, indicating that while some countries experienced significant forest gains or losses, many others saw little to no change.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
The data reveals that countries experiencing rapid economic growth, such as China and India, also lead in forest expansion. China's forest area increased by 1,760,750 hectares, which can be attributed to aggressive reforestation policies and investments in green infrastructure as part of its economic development plans. Similarly, India saw an increase of 296,200 hectares, driven by government initiatives aimed at increasing forest cover to combat climate change and improve biodiversity.
Conversely, countries with less economic stability, such as Ecuador and Zimbabwe, experienced significant forest loss, with reductions of 71,622.07 and 54,332.03 hectares, respectively. These losses are often linked to economic pressures that drive deforestation for agriculture and resource extraction.
Policy Influence on Forest Area Changes
National policies play a critical role in forest area changes. In Australia, the increase of 156,721.88 hectares can be partially attributed to policies promoting sustainable forestry and land management practices. Likewise, Vietnam increased its forest area by 123,071.875 hectares, supported by government-led reforestation programs aimed at restoring degraded lands and enhancing carbon sinks.
In contrast, Malaysia faced a decrease of 55,896.094 hectares, largely due to policies that have allowed extensive logging and conversion of forest land for palm oil plantations. This highlights how policy decisions can either bolster or hinder forest conservation efforts.
Geographic and Environmental Factors
Geographic and environmental factors also influence forest area change rates. Russia, with its vast boreal forests, recorded an increase of 1,045,200 hectares. This is partly due to its large land area and relatively low population density, which reduces pressure on forest resources. On the other hand, Guinea and Côte d'Ivoire saw decreases of 66,996 and 54,055.957 hectares, respectively, driven by agricultural expansion in densely populated regions.
Additionally, climatic conditions can affect forest growth and regeneration. Countries with favorable climates for forestry, such as Canada, which saw an increase of 174,762.5 hectares, benefit from natural regeneration processes, whereas those facing adverse climatic conditions may struggle to maintain or increase forest areas.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Implications
Despite the dramatic figures, the year-over-year average change in the annual forest area was 0.00%, suggesting stability on a global scale. However, the stability masks significant regional variations. The absence of change in countries like Turkey (with an increase of 118,011.72 hectares) and Indonesia (with 106,800 hectares) indicates that while some countries are making strides in reforestation, others are not improving or are worsening.
These trends underscore the importance of continued investment in sustainable forest management and international cooperation to address the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation. As the world grapples with climate change, understanding and influencing the factors behind these changes is crucial for achieving global environmental goals.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2018
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2018?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2018, with a rate of 1,760,750%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2018?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2018, with a rate of -2,628,412%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2018?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2018 was -14,331%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2018?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2018 was 0%.
How many countries are included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2018?
The dataset includes 226 countries for the annual forest area change rate in 2018.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2018?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2018 were China, Russia, and India.
Insights by country
Armenia
In 2018, Armenia ranked #139 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -36.00464 %. This decline is significantly worse than the global average, indicating considerable deforestation challenges. Major factors contributing to this rate include illegal logging, agricultural expansion, and the impact of climate change on forest ecosystems.
Marshall Islands
In 2018, the Marshall Islands achieved a global rank of #78 with an impressive Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 62.000084 %. This rate is significantly higher than many countries, indicating a robust growth in forest areas compared to global trends. The primary drivers for this change include the government's commitment to sustainable forestry practices and the country's unique geographic conditions, which support diverse ecosystems.
Honduras
In 2018, Honduras had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -82913.97 %, ranking #202 out of 226 countries. This drastic decline in forest area is significantly worse than many of its Central American neighbors, which often face similar deforestation challenges. Key drivers of this loss include illegal logging, agricultural expansion, and inadequate enforcement of environmental regulations.
Chad
In 2018, Chad ranked #210 globally with an alarming annual forest area change rate of -127913.97 %. This figure places Chad among the countries with the most significant deforestation rates, far exceeding the global average of forest loss. Contributing factors include extensive agricultural expansion, unsustainable logging practices, and the impacts of climate change, which exacerbate land degradation and reduce forest cover.
Cook Islands
In 2018, the Cook Islands had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #96 out of 226 countries. This rate is notably lower than many Pacific Island nations, which often face significant deforestation challenges. The Cook Islands' stable forest area can be attributed to its small population and effective conservation policies that prioritize environmental sustainability. Additionally, the country's geographic isolation limits large-scale agricultural expansion, preserving its forested areas.
Comoros
In 2018, Comoros had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -338.0005 %, ranking #146 out of 226 countries. This figure is significantly worse than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a critical environmental challenge. The rapid deforestation in Comoros is largely driven by agricultural expansion and unsustainable logging practices, compounded by economic pressures on local communities reliant on forest resources.
Indonesia
In 2018, Indonesia achieved a global rank of #9 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 106800 %. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting Indonesia's unique challenges in forest management compared to its Southeast Asian neighbors. Key drivers of this statistic include extensive deforestation for palm oil production and logging, alongside rapid urbanization that pressures forested areas.
Cuba
Cuba achieved a global rank of #27 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 18485.986 % in 2018. This figure is notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting significant reforestation efforts. Key drivers include government policies aimed at environmental restoration and the promotion of sustainable agriculture, which have led to increased forest coverage across the island.
Kiribati
In 2018, Kiribati ranked #102 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %. This rate is notably lower than many Pacific island neighbors, which often experience more significant deforestation or reforestation efforts. Kiribati's geographic characteristics, including its low-lying atolls and limited land area, contribute to the lack of forest cover and the challenges of sustaining forest growth.
French Guiana
In 2018, French Guiana had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -3429.9805 %, ranking #166 out of 226 countries. This dramatic loss contrasts sharply with many neighboring countries in South America, which often experience less severe deforestation rates. The primary drivers of this decline include illegal logging and land conversion for agriculture, exacerbated by limited enforcement of environmental regulations in the region.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data