Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2014
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 1,936,775 % | |
2 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
3 | Russia | 340,850 % | |
4 | United States | 275,000 % | |
5 | Australia | 267,275 % | |
6 | India | 266,400 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 134,760.16 % | |
8 | Turkey | 109,444.14 % | |
9 | Malaysia | 103,314.06 % | |
10 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
11 | France | 83,400 % | |
12 | Romania | 77,191.99 % | |
13 | Greece | 75,439.99 % | |
14 | Cuba | 61,929.98 % | |
15 | Kazakhstan | 45,256.008 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 39,959.96 % | |
17 | Serbia | 39,681.984 % | |
18 | Chile | 35,773.83 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Philippines | 34,885.938 % | |
21 | Finland | 33,400 % | |
22 | Ukraine | 30,400 % | |
23 | Uruguay | 27,691.992 % | |
24 | Bulgaria | 19,200 % | |
25 | United Kingdom | 19,200 % | |
26 | Poland | 18,200 % | |
27 | Burundi | 17,140.002 % | |
28 | Estonia | 17,079.98 % | |
29 | Costa Rica | 14,741.992 % | |
30 | Rwanda | 14,558.002 % | |
31 | Portugal | 11,990.039 % | |
32 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 11,568.018 % | |
33 | North Korea | 11,354.004 % | |
34 | New Caledonia | 10,717.993 % | |
35 | Azerbaijan | 9,080.005 % | |
36 | Denmark | 7,583.997 % | |
37 | Ireland | 6,857.996 % | |
38 | North Macedonia | 6,794.006 % | |
39 | Dominican Republic | 5,710.01 % | |
40 | Latvia | 5,300 % | |
41 | Germany | 4,880.078 % | |
42 | Fiji | 4,634.009 % | |
43 | South Sudan | 4,159.961 % | |
44 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,019.995 % | |
45 | Jamaica | 3,800 % | |
46 | Nepal | 3,504.004 % | |
47 | Lithuania | 3,400 % | |
48 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3,058.002 % | |
49 | Albania | 3,021.997 % | |
50 | Hungary | 2,886.011 % | |
51 | Austria | 2,818.018 % | |
52 | Switzerland | 2,795.996 % | |
53 | Mauritania | 2,628.003 % | |
54 | Czech Republic | 2,579.981 % | |
55 | Republic of Moldova | 2,379.999 % | |
56 | Tajikistan | 2,359.998 % | |
57 | Israel | 2,200 % | |
58 | Bhutan | 1,977.979 % | |
59 | Spain | 1,832.031 % | |
60 | Iceland | 898 % | |
61 | Guam | 854 % | |
62 | Northern Mariana Islands | 808 % | |
63 | Slovakia | 767.993 % | |
64 | Belarus | 700 % | |
65 | Cabo Verde | 512 % | |
66 | Western Sahara | 454.004 % | |
67 | Réunion | 412.001 % | |
68 | Croatia | 400 % | |
69 | Armenia | 382.001 % | |
70 | United Arab Emirates | 334.003 % | |
71 | Tunisia | 300 % | |
72 | Guadeloupe | 270 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
74 | Martinique | 200 % | |
75 | Slovenia | 200 % | |
76 | United States Virgin Islands | 146 % | |
77 | Kuwait | 140 % | |
78 | State of Palestine | 118 % | |
79 | Lebanon | 98.001 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 88 % | |
81 | Palau | 86 % | |
82 | El Salvador | 76.001 % | |
83 | Andorra | 42 % | |
84 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 28 % | |
85 | Djibouti | 10 % | |
86 | Guernsey | 10 % | |
87 | Niue | 10 % | |
88 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
89 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
90 | Aruba | 0 % | |
91 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
92 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
93 | Barbados | 0 % | |
94 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
95 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
96 | Botswana | 0 % | |
97 | Brunei Darussalam | 0 % | |
98 | Cayman Islands | 0 % | |
99 | Cook Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
101 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
102 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
103 | French Polynesia | 0 % | |
104 | Georgia | 0 % | |
105 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
106 | Greenland | 0 % | |
107 | Grenada | 0 % | |
108 | Iran | 0 % | |
109 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
110 | Jersey | 0 % | |
111 | Jordan | 0 % | |
112 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
113 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
114 | Luxembourg | 0 % | |
115 | Maldives | 0 % | |
116 | Malta | 0 % | |
117 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
118 | Monaco | 0 % | |
119 | Montenegro | 0 % | |
120 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
121 | Nauru | 0 % | |
122 | Oman | 0 % | |
123 | Qatar | 0 % | |
124 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
125 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
126 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
127 | San Marino | 0 % | |
128 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
129 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
130 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
131 | Tonga | 0 % | |
132 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
133 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
134 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
135 | Holy See | 0 % | |
136 | Yemen | 0 % | |
137 | British Virgin Islands | -2 % | |
138 | Mauritius | -12 % | |
139 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -24 % | |
140 | Cyprus | -25.998 % | |
141 | Antigua and Barbuda | -66 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -68 % | |
143 | Mayotte | -72 % | |
144 | Dominica | -112 % | |
145 | Belgium | -114.001 % | |
146 | Seychelles | -218 % | |
147 | Singapore | -254 % | |
148 | New Zealand | -301.953 % | |
149 | Libya | -334 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -424.002 % | |
151 | Samoa | -480.002 % | |
152 | Comoros | -548 % | |
153 | Sao Tome and Principe | -594 % | |
154 | Namibia | -643.945 % | |
155 | Puerto Rico | -654.004 % | |
156 | Algeria | -673.999 % | |
157 | Solomon Islands | -737.988 % | |
158 | Bangladesh | -987.988 % | |
159 | Mongolia | -1,114.063 % | |
160 | Morocco | -1,160.059 % | |
161 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
162 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
163 | Netherlands | -1,730.005 % | |
164 | Vanuatu | -2,383.997 % | |
165 | Togo | -2,960.01 % | |
166 | Haiti | -3,180.005 % | |
167 | Norway | -3,261.914 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -3,300 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,237.988 % | |
170 | Japan | -4,400 % | |
171 | Papua New Guinea | -4,605.469 % | |
172 | Suriname | -4,681.836 % | |
173 | Gambia | -5,785.999 % | |
174 | Eritrea | -5,980.005 % | |
175 | Panama | -6,375.977 % | |
176 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,532.007 % | |
178 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,472.021 % | |
179 | Iraq | -9,138 % | |
180 | South Korea | -10,000 % | |
181 | Sri Lanka | -11,541.992 % | |
182 | Guyana | -11,690.234 % | |
183 | Gabon | -12,125.781 % | |
184 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
185 | Senegal | -15,543.945 % | |
186 | Guatemala | -16,924.023 % | |
187 | Sweden | -18,600 % | |
188 | Sierra Leone | -19,725.977 % | |
189 | Congo | -20,339.844 % | |
190 | Nicaragua | -22,120.02 % | |
191 | Italy | -24,208.008 % | |
192 | Pakistan | -25,756.006 % | |
193 | Central African Republic | -34,992.188 % | |
194 | Ecuador | -41,833.984 % | |
195 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
196 | Honduras | -43,537.99 % | |
197 | Uganda | -50,146.047 % | |
198 | Cameroon | -56,000 % | |
199 | Laos | -58,237.89 % | |
200 | Ethiopia | -59,040.234 % | |
201 | Zimbabwe | -59,666.016 % | |
202 | Guinea | -66,998.05 % | |
203 | Colombia | -93,595.31 % | |
204 | Kenya | -98,918.016 % | |
205 | Mali | -100,546.09 % | |
206 | Venezuela | -100,564.06 % | |
207 | Côte d'Ivoire | -109,858.01 % | |
208 | Liberia | -116,641.99 % | |
209 | Burkina Faso | -119,860.06 % | |
210 | Mexico | -122,478.125 % | |
211 | Nigeria | -126,883.984 % | |
212 | Chad | -127,916.016 % | |
213 | Benin | -151,426.03 % | |
214 | Somalia | -153,900 % | |
215 | Madagascar | -160,132.03 % | |
216 | Bolivia | -162,514.06 % | |
217 | Sudan | -174,139.84 % | |
218 | Zambia | -188,179.69 % | |
219 | Indonesia | -255,460.94 % | |
220 | Argentina | -256,685.94 % | |
221 | Mozambique | -267,027.34 % | |
222 | Myanmar | -289,712.12 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Cambodia | -348,482.03 % | |
225 | Paraguay | -354,016 % | |
226 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
227 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
228 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -1,004,496.9 % | |
229 | Brazil | -1,915,700 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #229
Brazil
- #228
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #227
Angola
- #226
Tanzania
- #225
Paraguay
- #224
Cambodia
- #223
Peru
- #222
Myanmar
- #221
Mozambique
- #220
Argentina
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2014, China led the world with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate, boasting an increase of 1,936,775%, while the global range varied from a minimum of -59,040.23% to a maximum of 1,936,775%. The global average change rate stood at 21,124.74%, with a median of 0.00%, indicating a polarized distribution of forest area changes across countries.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
Countries experiencing significant economic growth often invest in reforestation and sustainable forestry practices. China, with its leading increase of 1,936,775%, exemplifies this trend through its aggressive afforestation programs aimed at combating desertification and improving air quality. Similarly, India recorded a notable increase of 266,400%, driven by national policies promoting forest conservation and expansion to meet environmental goals.
In contrast, nations like Russia and Canada have vast forested areas that naturally contribute to their positive change rates of 340,850% and 512,606.25% respectively. These countries benefit from large tracts of boreal forests that have been relatively stable or expanding due to minimal human interference and effective management strategies.
Deforestation Drivers in Developing Regions
Conversely, developing countries often face challenges that lead to deforestation, impacting their annual forest area change rates negatively. Ethiopia experienced the greatest decrease, with a rate of -59,040.234%, largely due to agricultural expansion and fuelwood extraction. Similarly, Laos and Cameroon saw decreases of -58,237.89% and -56,000% respectively, driven by logging and conversion of forest land to agriculture.
These patterns are indicative of economic pressures where forested land is often cleared to make way for agricultural development and urban expansion. Without robust policies and economic alternatives, these countries struggle to maintain their forest cover.
Policy Impact on Forest Sustainability
Government policies play a crucial role in determining a country's forest area change rate. Vietnam has shown a positive trend with an increase of 134,760.16%, thanks to policies that emphasize reforestation and forest protection. Similarly, Turkey and Malaysia, with increases of 109,444.14% and 103,314.06% respectively, have implemented successful reforestation projects and sustainable forest management practices.
In contrast, countries like Uganda and Honduras, with decreases of -50,146.047% and -43,537.99%, demonstrate how lack of effective forestry policies can exacerbate deforestation. These nations face challenges in enforcing existing regulations, often due to limited resources and competing economic interests.
Year-over-Year Stability and Anomalies
The year-over-year data shows an average change of 0.00%, indicating stability in forest area changes at a global level. However, this masks significant variations among countries. While top performers like China and Canada showed no change in their leading positions, reflecting consistent policy and economic support, countries experiencing decreases such as Pakistan and Italy with rates of -25,756.006% and -24,208.008% respectively, highlight ongoing challenges in forest conservation efforts.
Such anomalies often arise from sudden policy shifts or economic crises that divert attention and resources away from environmental priorities. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing targeted interventions to promote forest sustainability worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2014
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2014?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2014 with 1,936,775%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2014?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2014 with -1,915,700%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2014?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2014 was -17,088%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2014?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2014 was 0%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2014?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2014 were China, Canada, and Russia.
How many countries were included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2014?
The dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2014 included 229 countries.
Insights by country
Trinidad and Tobago
In 2014, Trinidad and Tobago had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -424.00208 %, ranking #150 out of 229 countries. This significant decline in forest area is notably worse than the global average, reflecting serious environmental challenges. Key drivers include urban expansion, agricultural practices, and a lack of comprehensive forest management policies, which have led to extensive deforestation in the country.
Djibouti
In 2014, Djibouti achieved an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 10.000038 %, ranking #85 out of 229 countries. This rate is notably higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting Djibouti's efforts in reforestation and land rehabilitation initiatives. The country's arid climate and limited natural forest cover make these efforts crucial for combating desertification and improving biodiversity.
Martinique
In 2014, Martinique achieved a global rank of #74 with an impressive 200 % Annual Forest Area Change Rate. This figure is significantly higher than many Caribbean nations, reflecting a proactive approach to reforestation and land management. The island's unique geographic conditions and commitment to preserving its biodiversity, alongside government initiatives to restore forested areas, have contributed to this remarkable growth.
Turkmenistan
In 2014, Turkmenistan had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #131 out of 229 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a lack of forest area expansion or regeneration. The country's arid climate and limited forest management policies contribute to this stagnation, as economic activities are often focused on agriculture and energy production rather than forestry.
Tonga
Tonga's Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2014 was 0 %, ranking it #130 out of 229 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating a stable forest area compared to nations with significant deforestation issues. The preservation of forest areas in Tonga can be attributed to its small landmass and a focus on sustainable land management practices, which are essential for maintaining its natural resources and biodiversity.
United States
The United States achieved a remarkable 4 global rank for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2014, with a value of 275000 %. This rate significantly surpasses the global average, highlighting the country's extensive reforestation efforts compared to nations with declining forest areas. Key drivers of this statistic include federal policies promoting sustainable forestry practices and the vast, diverse ecosystems across the country that facilitate regeneration.
United Arab Emirates
The United Arab Emirates ranked #70 globally in 2014 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 334.0027 %. This figure is significantly higher than many countries in the region, reflecting a commitment to afforestation amidst urban development. The rapid increase can be attributed to government initiatives aimed at enhancing green spaces and combating desertification, alongside investments in sustainable urban planning.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked #188 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -19725.977 % in 2014. This rate is among the lowest compared to its neighbors, reflecting significant deforestation challenges in the region.
The primary drivers of this alarming statistic include extensive logging, agricultural expansion, and mining activities, which have led to substantial forest loss. Additionally, weak enforcement of environmental regulations has exacerbated the situation, hindering efforts to preserve the country's vital forest resources.
Eritrea
Eritrea ranked #174 globally in 2014 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -5980.005 %. This figure is significantly worse than many countries in the region, reflecting severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include the country's prolonged conflict, which has hindered effective land management and conservation efforts, alongside high rates of poverty that limit sustainable agricultural practices.
Uzbekistan
In 2014, Uzbekistan achieved a remarkable 16th global rank for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 39959.96 %. This figure significantly surpasses many other countries, indicating a dramatic increase in forest area compared to the global average. The primary drivers behind this statistic include Uzbekistan's extensive reforestation efforts aimed at combating desertification and promoting biodiversity, alongside government policies prioritizing environmental sustainability.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data