Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2016
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 1,760,750 % | |
2 | Russia | 1,045,200 % | |
3 | India | 296,200 % | |
4 | Canada | 174,762.5 % | |
5 | Australia | 156,721.88 % | |
6 | Greece | 132,959.97 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 123,071.875 % | |
8 | Turkey | 118,011.72 % | |
9 | Indonesia | 106,800 % | |
10 | France | 102,400 % | |
11 | Italy | 90,501.95 % | |
12 | South Africa | 87,566.016 % | |
13 | Spain | 81,342.19 % | |
14 | Thailand | 55,512.11 % | |
15 | Philippines | 42,448.047 % | |
16 | Belarus | 41,909.96 % | |
17 | Kenya | 41,516.016 % | |
18 | Ukraine | 40,000 % | |
19 | Serbia | 39,680.03 % | |
20 | Ghana | 35,719.92 % | |
21 | Albania | 28,764.002 % | |
22 | Kazakhstan | 28,510.01 % | |
23 | Uzbekistan | 27,920.02 % | |
24 | Finland | 26,800 % | |
25 | New Zealand | 23,735.938 % | |
26 | Uruguay | 19,528.004 % | |
27 | Cuba | 18,485.986 % | |
28 | Azerbaijan | 16,659.984 % | |
29 | Nepal | 16,579.98 % | |
30 | Rwanda | 14,560.004 % | |
31 | Bulgaria | 12,600 % | |
32 | United Kingdom | 12,000 % | |
33 | North Korea | 11,354.004 % | |
34 | Pakistan | 10,495.996 % | |
35 | North Macedonia | 9,583.984 % | |
36 | Sri Lanka | 9,431.982 % | |
37 | Poland | 8,840.039 % | |
38 | Ireland | 7,730.005 % | |
39 | Latvia | 7,101.953 % | |
40 | Czech Republic | 6,050 % | |
41 | Romania | 5,617.969 % | |
42 | Germany | 4,800 % | |
43 | Fiji | 4,631.982 % | |
44 | Portugal | 4,511.963 % | |
45 | Estonia | 4,490.039 % | |
46 | Jamaica | 3,885.999 % | |
47 | Croatia | 3,519.995 % | |
48 | Costa Rica | 3,518.018 % | |
49 | Lithuania | 3,037.988 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,818.018 % | |
51 | Mauritania | 2,627.991 % | |
52 | Dominican Republic | 1,904.004 % | |
53 | Slovakia | 1,893.994 % | |
54 | Switzerland | 1,832.007 % | |
55 | Denmark | 1,690.002 % | |
56 | Kyrgyzstan | 1,644.019 % | |
57 | El Salvador | 833.997 % | |
58 | Morocco | 774.023 % | |
59 | Iceland | 686 % | |
60 | Cabo Verde | 620 % | |
61 | Botswana | 459.961 % | |
62 | Netherlands | 450 % | |
63 | Bhutan | 395.996 % | |
64 | United Arab Emirates | 335.999 % | |
65 | Guadeloupe | 270 % | |
66 | Tajikistan | 240.002 % | |
67 | Réunion | 203.999 % | |
68 | Martinique | 200 % | |
69 | Haiti | 160.004 % | |
70 | United States Virgin Islands | 150 % | |
71 | Bahrain | 120 % | |
72 | State of Palestine | 106 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 106 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 95.999 % | |
75 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 90 % | |
76 | Palau | 85.999 % | |
77 | Syrian Arab Republic | 76.001 % | |
78 | Marshall Islands | 62 % | |
79 | Djibouti | 46 % | |
80 | Kuwait | 42 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 30 % | |
82 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.001 % | |
83 | Malta | 22 % | |
84 | Jersey | 14 % | |
85 | Niue | 10 % | |
86 | Guernsey | 10 % | |
87 | Isle of Man | 8 % | |
88 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 2 % | |
89 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
90 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
91 | Aruba | 0 % | |
92 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
93 | Barbados | 0 % | |
94 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
95 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
96 | Brunei Darussalam | 0 % | |
97 | Burundi | 0 % | |
98 | Cayman Islands | 0 % | |
99 | Cook Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
101 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
102 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
103 | French Polynesia | 0 % | |
104 | Georgia | 0 % | |
105 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
106 | Greenland | 0 % | |
107 | Grenada | 0 % | |
108 | Guam | 0 % | |
109 | Iran | 0 % | |
110 | Jordan | 0 % | |
111 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
112 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
113 | Luxembourg | 0 % | |
114 | Maldives | 0 % | |
115 | Monaco | 0 % | |
116 | Montenegro | 0 % | |
117 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
118 | Nauru | 0 % | |
119 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
120 | Oman | 0 % | |
121 | Qatar | 0 % | |
122 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
123 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
124 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
125 | San Marino | 0 % | |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
127 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
128 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
129 | Tonga | 0 % | |
130 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
131 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
132 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
133 | Holy See | 0 % | |
134 | Yemen | 0 % | |
135 | Mauritius | -2 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -24 % | |
137 | Andorra | -26 % | |
138 | Cyprus | -34.003 % | |
139 | Armenia | -36.005 % | |
140 | Dominica | -46 % | |
141 | Mayotte | -56 % | |
142 | Antigua and Barbuda | -66 % | |
143 | Singapore | -134 % | |
144 | Seychelles | -218 % | |
145 | Libya | -334 % | |
146 | Comoros | -338.001 % | |
147 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
148 | Samoa | -479.999 % | |
149 | Namibia | -645.996 % | |
150 | Algeria | -673.999 % | |
151 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -724.023 % | |
152 | Solomon Islands | -733.984 % | |
153 | Hungary | -764.014 % | |
154 | Slovenia | -834.009 % | |
155 | South Sudan | -900 % | |
156 | Bangladesh | -988.013 % | |
157 | Tunisia | -1,185.999 % | |
158 | Western Sahara | -1,257.996 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Vanuatu | -2,384.009 % | |
162 | Norway | -2,434.18 % | |
163 | Republic of Moldova | -2,639.996 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,961.987 % | |
165 | Panama | -3,013.965 % | |
166 | French Guiana | -3,429.981 % | |
167 | Belgium | -3,755.994 % | |
168 | Ethiopia | -3,900 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,237.988 % | |
170 | Israel | -5,000 % | |
171 | Japan | -5,000 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | -5,214.002 % | |
173 | Gambia | -5,786.002 % | |
174 | Eritrea | -5,979.981 % | |
175 | Chile | -6,153.906 % | |
176 | Iraq | -6,607.996 % | |
177 | Gabon | -6,732.031 % | |
178 | Belize | -7,532.007 % | |
179 | South Korea | -7,800 % | |
180 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,360.01 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,200 % | |
182 | Guyana | -9,203.906 % | |
183 | Niger | -12,420.02 % | |
184 | Guatemala | -13,925.977 % | |
185 | Suriname | -14,630.078 % | |
186 | Senegal | -15,544.141 % | |
187 | Sierra Leone | -19,726.025 % | |
188 | Papua New Guinea | -21,060.156 % | |
189 | Nicaragua | -22,113.965 % | |
190 | Congo | -25,900 % | |
191 | Uganda | -28,095.996 % | |
192 | Laos | -31,338.086 % | |
193 | Benin | -37,382.03 % | |
194 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
195 | Central African Republic | -46,524.22 % | |
196 | Côte d'Ivoire | -54,055.957 % | |
197 | Zimbabwe | -54,332.03 % | |
198 | Malaysia | -55,896.094 % | |
199 | Guinea | -66,996 % | |
200 | Ecuador | -71,622.07 % | |
201 | Zambia | -79,006.25 % | |
202 | Honduras | -82,913.97 % | |
203 | Mali | -100,545.9 % | |
204 | Liberia | -101,429.984 % | |
205 | Venezuela | -108,906.25 % | |
206 | Burkina Faso | -119,859.96 % | |
207 | Madagascar | -120,425.98 % | |
208 | Nigeria | -126,882.03 % | |
209 | Mexico | -127,767.19 % | |
210 | Chad | -127,913.97 % | |
211 | Somalia | -153,900 % | |
212 | United States | -168,000 % | |
213 | Colombia | -168,096.1 % | |
214 | Sudan | -174,140.23 % | |
215 | Cameroon | -178,496.1 % | |
216 | Peru | -179,601.56 % | |
217 | Argentina | -189,685.94 % | |
218 | Cambodia | -193,996.1 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -223,621.88 % | |
220 | Paraguay | -250,745.9 % | |
221 | Mozambique | -267,030.47 % | |
222 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -282,887.5 % | |
223 | Myanmar | -289,711.72 % | |
224 | Tanzania | -469,000 % | |
225 | Angola | -510,031.25 % | |
226 | Brazil | -2,628,412.5 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #226
Brazil
- #225
Angola
- #224
Tanzania
- #223
Myanmar
- #222
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #221
Mozambique
- #220
Paraguay
- #219
Bolivia
- #218
Cambodia
- #217
Argentina
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2016, China led the world with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate, showing an increase of 1,760,750%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of -71,622.07% to a maximum of 1,760,750%. The average change rate across all countries was 20,921.22%, with a median of 0.00%, indicating a diverse spectrum of forest area changes worldwide.
Economic Growth and Forest Expansion
Countries experiencing rapid economic growth often simultaneously see significant changes in their forest areas. China, with its substantial increase of 1,760,750%, exemplifies this trend as it continues to prioritize reforestation and afforestation projects to combat pollution and enhance environmental sustainability. Similarly, India reported a significant increase of 296,200%, driven by national policies aimed at increasing forest cover as part of broader environmental and economic strategies.
In contrast, countries like Malaysia experienced a decline of -55,896.094% in forest area, often attributed to economic activities such as logging and agricultural expansion, which prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term environmental health.
Impact of Environmental Policies
The implementation of robust environmental policies can have a profound impact on forest area change rates. In Russia, a remarkable increase of 1,045,200% was observed, partially due to government initiatives focused on forest conservation and sustainable management. This policy-driven growth highlights the potential for legislative frameworks to positively influence environmental outcomes.
Conversely, countries like Zimbabwe and Côte d'Ivoire, which reported decreases of -54,332.03% and -54,055.957% respectively, often face challenges such as political instability and insufficient policy enforcement, leading to continued deforestation.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Significant Changes
Analyzing year-over-year trends reveals critical insights into forest dynamics. Russia experienced the largest increase in forest area, with a change of +704,350%, reflecting successful policy interventions and a commitment to expanding forest cover. In stark contrast, Canada saw a substantial decrease of -337,843.75%, highlighting the ongoing challenges of balancing resource extraction with environmental conservation.
Other notable changes include Spain, with an impressive increase of +79,510.16%, driven by reforestation efforts, and Malaysia with a significant decline of -159,210.15%, emphasizing the continuing impact of deforestation for palm oil plantations.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also play crucial roles in shaping forest area change rates. Australia, with an increase of 156,721.88%, benefits from vast tracts of land suitable for reforestation, while its demographic policies support environmental conservation efforts.
In Vietnam, an increase of 123,071.875% can be linked to successful community-based forest management initiatives that engage local populations in sustainable practices. On the other hand, countries like Uganda with a decrease of -28,095.996%, face demographic pressures such as population growth, leading to increased demand for land and subsequent deforestation.
In conclusion, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2016 reflects a complex interplay of economic growth, environmental policies, and demographic factors. Countries like China and Russia demonstrate the potential for positive change through strategic policy implementation, while others face significant challenges that require concerted efforts to reverse deforestation trends.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2016
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2016?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2016, with a rate of 1,760,750%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2016?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2016, with a rate of -2,628,412%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2016?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2016 was -14,331%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2016?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2016 was 0%.
How many countries were included in the dataset for the annual forest area change rate in 2016?
The dataset included 226 countries for the annual forest area change rate in 2016.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2016?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2016 were China, Russia, and India.
Insights by country
Bahrain
Bahrain ranked #71 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 120.00001 % in 2016. This figure is significantly higher than many neighboring countries, highlighting Bahrain's unique approach to afforestation in a region typically characterized by arid landscapes. The key drivers behind this remarkable rate include government initiatives aimed at increasing green spaces and environmental awareness among the population, coupled with urban planning that integrates greenery into development projects.
France
In 2016, France achieved a global rank of #10 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 102400 %. This remarkable rate is significantly higher than many countries, indicating a strong commitment to forest management and reforestation efforts. Key drivers include France's robust environmental policies and initiatives aimed at increasing forest cover, as well as its diverse ecosystems that support various tree species.
Wallis and Futuna Islands
In 2016, Wallis and Futuna Islands achieved an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 89.99996 %, ranking #75 out of 226 countries. This remarkable figure is significantly higher than many countries in the Pacific region, indicating a strong commitment to forest conservation. The islands' limited land area and low population density contribute to their ability to maintain a high percentage of forest cover, supported by local policies aimed at preserving their unique ecosystems.
Holy See
In 2016, Holy See had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #106 out of 226 countries. This rate is notably lower than many other nations, particularly as countries with extensive forest cover, like Brazil, experience significant changes due to deforestation and reforestation efforts. The lack of forest area change in Holy See can be attributed to its small geographic size and urban environment, which limit the presence of forests and the potential for substantial forest area fluctuations.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka achieved a global rank of #36 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 9431.982 % in 2016. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a remarkable transformation in forest management practices. The key drivers behind this impressive rate include extensive reforestation initiatives and government policies aimed at restoring degraded lands following years of deforestation due to agriculture and urbanization.
Mali
Mali ranked #203 globally in 2016 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -100545.9 %. This drastic decline in forest area is among the worst worldwide, indicative of severe deforestation challenges faced by the country. Key drivers include agricultural expansion, particularly for subsistence farming, and inadequate forest management policies, which have led to significant loss of tree cover in recent years.
Mauritania
Mauritania achieved a global rank of #51 in 2016 for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate, with a remarkable value of 2627.9907 %. This figure is significantly higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting a unique environmental situation. The rapid increase in forest area is largely attributed to government initiatives aimed at reforestation and sustainable land management practices, which have been crucial in combating desertification in this predominantly arid nation.
Hungary
In 2016, Hungary ranked #153 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -764.0137 %. This figure is significantly lower than many of its European neighbors, reflecting broader regional challenges in forest conservation. Key drivers for this decline include urbanization pressures, agricultural expansion, and insufficient reforestation efforts in the context of Hungary's economic policies.
Belize
In 2016, Belize ranked #178 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -7532.007 %. This significant deforestation rate is notably higher than many Central American neighbors, indicating severe environmental challenges. Key drivers include agricultural expansion and logging activities, which have led to substantial forest loss, impacting biodiversity and local ecosystems.
State of Palestine
The State of Palestine achieved a rank of #72 for its Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 106.00014 % in 2016. This rate is significantly higher than many countries in the region, indicating a unique trend in forest expansion compared to its neighbors. Key drivers include targeted reforestation initiatives and local policies aimed at environmental restoration amidst challenging geopolitical circumstances.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data