Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2017
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 1,760,750 % | |
2 | Russia | 1,045,200 % | |
3 | India | 296,200 % | |
4 | Canada | 174,762.5 % | |
5 | Australia | 156,721.88 % | |
6 | Greece | 132,959.97 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 123,071.875 % | |
8 | Turkey | 118,011.72 % | |
9 | Indonesia | 106,800 % | |
10 | France | 102,400 % | |
11 | Italy | 90,501.95 % | |
12 | South Africa | 87,566.016 % | |
13 | Spain | 81,342.19 % | |
14 | Thailand | 55,512.11 % | |
15 | Philippines | 42,448.047 % | |
16 | Belarus | 41,909.96 % | |
17 | Kenya | 41,516.016 % | |
18 | Ukraine | 40,000 % | |
19 | Serbia | 39,680.03 % | |
20 | Ghana | 35,719.92 % | |
21 | Albania | 28,764.002 % | |
22 | Kazakhstan | 28,510.01 % | |
23 | Uzbekistan | 27,920.02 % | |
24 | Finland | 26,800 % | |
25 | New Zealand | 23,735.938 % | |
26 | Uruguay | 19,528.004 % | |
27 | Cuba | 18,485.986 % | |
28 | Azerbaijan | 16,659.984 % | |
29 | Nepal | 16,579.98 % | |
30 | Rwanda | 14,560.004 % | |
31 | Bulgaria | 12,600 % | |
32 | United Kingdom | 12,000 % | |
33 | North Korea | 11,354.004 % | |
34 | Pakistan | 10,495.996 % | |
35 | North Macedonia | 9,583.984 % | |
36 | Sri Lanka | 9,431.982 % | |
37 | Poland | 8,840.039 % | |
38 | Ireland | 7,730.005 % | |
39 | Latvia | 7,101.953 % | |
40 | Czech Republic | 6,050 % | |
41 | Romania | 5,617.969 % | |
42 | Germany | 4,800 % | |
43 | Fiji | 4,631.982 % | |
44 | Portugal | 4,511.963 % | |
45 | Estonia | 4,490.039 % | |
46 | Jamaica | 3,885.999 % | |
47 | Croatia | 3,519.995 % | |
48 | Costa Rica | 3,518.018 % | |
49 | Lithuania | 3,037.988 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,818.018 % | |
51 | Mauritania | 2,627.991 % | |
52 | Dominican Republic | 1,904.004 % | |
53 | Slovakia | 1,893.994 % | |
54 | Switzerland | 1,832.007 % | |
55 | Denmark | 1,690.002 % | |
56 | Kyrgyzstan | 1,644.019 % | |
57 | El Salvador | 833.997 % | |
58 | Morocco | 774.023 % | |
59 | Iceland | 686 % | |
60 | Cabo Verde | 620 % | |
61 | Botswana | 459.961 % | |
62 | Netherlands | 450 % | |
63 | Bhutan | 395.996 % | |
64 | United Arab Emirates | 335.999 % | |
65 | Guadeloupe | 270 % | |
66 | Tajikistan | 240.002 % | |
67 | Réunion | 203.999 % | |
68 | Martinique | 200 % | |
69 | Haiti | 160.004 % | |
70 | United States Virgin Islands | 150 % | |
71 | Bahrain | 120 % | |
72 | State of Palestine | 106 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 106 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 95.999 % | |
75 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 90 % | |
76 | Palau | 85.999 % | |
77 | Syrian Arab Republic | 76.001 % | |
78 | Marshall Islands | 62 % | |
79 | Djibouti | 46 % | |
80 | Kuwait | 42 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 30 % | |
82 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.001 % | |
83 | Malta | 22 % | |
84 | Jersey | 14 % | |
85 | Niue | 10 % | |
86 | Guernsey | 10 % | |
87 | Isle of Man | 8 % | |
88 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 2 % | |
89 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
90 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
91 | Aruba | 0 % | |
92 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
93 | Barbados | 0 % | |
94 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
95 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
96 | Brunei Darussalam | 0 % | |
97 | Burundi | 0 % | |
98 | Cayman Islands | 0 % | |
99 | Cook Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
101 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
102 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
103 | French Polynesia | 0 % | |
104 | Georgia | 0 % | |
105 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
106 | Greenland | 0 % | |
107 | Grenada | 0 % | |
108 | Guam | 0 % | |
109 | Iran | 0 % | |
110 | Jordan | 0 % | |
111 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
112 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
113 | Luxembourg | 0 % | |
114 | Maldives | 0 % | |
115 | Monaco | 0 % | |
116 | Montenegro | 0 % | |
117 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
118 | Nauru | 0 % | |
119 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
120 | Oman | 0 % | |
121 | Qatar | 0 % | |
122 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
123 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
124 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
125 | San Marino | 0 % | |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
127 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
128 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
129 | Tonga | 0 % | |
130 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
131 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
132 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
133 | Holy See | 0 % | |
134 | Yemen | 0 % | |
135 | Mauritius | -2 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -24 % | |
137 | Andorra | -26 % | |
138 | Cyprus | -34.003 % | |
139 | Armenia | -36.005 % | |
140 | Dominica | -46 % | |
141 | Mayotte | -56 % | |
142 | Antigua and Barbuda | -66 % | |
143 | Singapore | -134 % | |
144 | Seychelles | -218 % | |
145 | Libya | -334 % | |
146 | Comoros | -338.001 % | |
147 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
148 | Samoa | -479.999 % | |
149 | Namibia | -645.996 % | |
150 | Algeria | -673.999 % | |
151 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -724.023 % | |
152 | Solomon Islands | -733.984 % | |
153 | Hungary | -764.014 % | |
154 | Slovenia | -834.009 % | |
155 | South Sudan | -900 % | |
156 | Bangladesh | -988.013 % | |
157 | Tunisia | -1,185.999 % | |
158 | Western Sahara | -1,257.996 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Vanuatu | -2,384.009 % | |
162 | Norway | -2,434.18 % | |
163 | Republic of Moldova | -2,639.996 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,961.987 % | |
165 | Panama | -3,013.965 % | |
166 | French Guiana | -3,429.981 % | |
167 | Belgium | -3,755.994 % | |
168 | Ethiopia | -3,900 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,237.988 % | |
170 | Israel | -5,000 % | |
171 | Japan | -5,000 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | -5,214.002 % | |
173 | Gambia | -5,786.002 % | |
174 | Eritrea | -5,979.981 % | |
175 | Chile | -6,153.906 % | |
176 | Iraq | -6,607.996 % | |
177 | Gabon | -6,732.031 % | |
178 | Belize | -7,532.007 % | |
179 | South Korea | -7,800 % | |
180 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,360.01 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,200 % | |
182 | Guyana | -9,203.906 % | |
183 | Niger | -12,420.02 % | |
184 | Guatemala | -13,925.977 % | |
185 | Suriname | -14,630.078 % | |
186 | Senegal | -15,544.141 % | |
187 | Sierra Leone | -19,726.025 % | |
188 | Papua New Guinea | -21,060.156 % | |
189 | Nicaragua | -22,113.965 % | |
190 | Congo | -25,900 % | |
191 | Uganda | -28,095.996 % | |
192 | Laos | -31,338.086 % | |
193 | Benin | -37,382.03 % | |
194 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
195 | Central African Republic | -46,524.22 % | |
196 | Côte d'Ivoire | -54,055.957 % | |
197 | Zimbabwe | -54,332.03 % | |
198 | Malaysia | -55,896.094 % | |
199 | Guinea | -66,996 % | |
200 | Ecuador | -71,622.07 % | |
201 | Zambia | -79,006.25 % | |
202 | Honduras | -82,913.97 % | |
203 | Mali | -100,545.9 % | |
204 | Liberia | -101,429.984 % | |
205 | Venezuela | -108,906.25 % | |
206 | Burkina Faso | -119,859.96 % | |
207 | Madagascar | -120,425.98 % | |
208 | Nigeria | -126,882.03 % | |
209 | Mexico | -127,767.19 % | |
210 | Chad | -127,913.97 % | |
211 | Somalia | -153,900 % | |
212 | United States | -168,000 % | |
213 | Colombia | -168,096.1 % | |
214 | Sudan | -174,140.23 % | |
215 | Cameroon | -178,496.1 % | |
216 | Peru | -179,601.56 % | |
217 | Argentina | -189,685.94 % | |
218 | Cambodia | -193,996.1 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -223,621.88 % | |
220 | Paraguay | -250,745.9 % | |
221 | Mozambique | -267,030.47 % | |
222 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -282,887.5 % | |
223 | Myanmar | -289,711.72 % | |
224 | Tanzania | -469,000 % | |
225 | Angola | -510,031.25 % | |
226 | Brazil | -2,628,412.5 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #226
Brazil
- #225
Angola
- #224
Tanzania
- #223
Myanmar
- #222
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #221
Mozambique
- #220
Paraguay
- #219
Bolivia
- #218
Cambodia
- #217
Argentina
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The country with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2017 was China, with a remarkable increase of 1,760,750 hectares. Globally, the range of forest area change rates varied from a minimum of -71,622.07 hectares in Ecuador to China's maximum. The global average change rate was 20,921.22 hectares, while the median stood at 0.00, indicating a balanced distribution between forest gain and loss worldwide.
Economic Growth and Reforestation Initiatives
The data reveals that countries with strong economic growth often exhibit positive forest area change rates, largely due to substantial reforestation initiatives. China, leading the list, has implemented aggressive afforestation policies driven by the need to combat air pollution and soil erosion. Similarly, India and Australia have prioritized reforestation as part of their environmental strategies, with gains of 296,200 and 156,721.88 hectares, respectively. Economic incentives and government policies in these countries have facilitated significant investments in forest restoration projects.
Deforestation Challenges in Developing Nations
Conversely, many developing nations face challenges that result in negative forest area change rates. Ecuador, with the most significant decrease of -71,622.07 hectares, is a prime example. This trend is often driven by agricultural expansion and logging activities, which are prevalent in regions like Guinea and Malaysia, with declines of -66,996 and -55,896.094 hectares, respectively. These activities are frequently exacerbated by limited regulatory frameworks and the economic necessity to exploit natural resources for growth.
Policy Impact on Forest Conservation
Countries that have successfully balanced economic development with environmental conservation often exhibit stable or positive forest area change rates. Canada, with a change rate of 174,762.5 hectares, benefits from stringent environmental regulations and a strong emphasis on sustainable forestry practices. In Russia, which reported an increase of 1,045,200 hectares, state-driven conservation initiatives have played a pivotal role. These examples underscore the importance of robust policy frameworks in mitigating deforestation and promoting forest expansion.
Stability and Trends in Forest Area Change
Interestingly, the data indicates no significant year-over-year change in the average forest area change rate, suggesting a period of stability in global deforestation and reforestation efforts. This stability can be attributed to a balance between countries experiencing forest losses and those with significant gains. For instance, while Vietnam and Turkey reported increases of 123,071.875 and 118,011.72 hectares, countries like Zimbabwe and Côte d'Ivoire faced declines of -54,332.03 and -54,055.957 hectares, respectively. Such dynamics highlight the critical role of international cooperation and sustainable practices in maintaining global forest resources.
Overall, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate data for 2017 illustrates a complex interplay of economic, environmental, and policy factors influencing global forest dynamics. These insights emphasize the importance of targeted strategies to address deforestation while promoting reforestation and sustainable land use practices worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2017
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2017?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2017, with a rate of 1,760,750%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2017?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2017, with a rate of -2,628,412%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2017?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2017 was -14,331%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2017?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2017 was 0%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2017?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2017 were China, Russia, and India.
How many countries are included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2017?
The dataset includes 226 countries for the annual forest area change rate in 2017.
Insights by country
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked #187 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -19726.025 % in 2017. This rate is among the highest rates of deforestation worldwide, significantly exceeding the global average. Key drivers include extensive logging for timber and agricultural expansion, particularly for cash crops, which have led to severe forest loss in the country.
Saint Martin (French part)
In 2017, Saint Martin (French part) had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #126 out of 226 countries. This figure is notably lower than many Caribbean neighbors, which often experience more dynamic changes in forest areas due to varying land use practices.
The lack of change in forest area can be attributed to the island's limited landmass and the impact of tourism development, which prioritizes infrastructure over natural preservation. Additionally, local policies may focus more on economic growth than on environmental sustainability, leading to stagnation in forest area expansion.
Cameroon
In 2017, Cameroon had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -178496.1 %, ranking #215 out of 226 countries. This drastic decline is significantly worse than many neighboring countries, reflecting severe deforestation issues in the region. Key drivers include extensive logging activities, agricultural expansion, and insufficient enforcement of environmental regulations, which have all contributed to the rapid loss of forest cover.
Latvia
In 2017, Latvia achieved a global rank of #39 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 7101.953 %. This figure significantly exceeds the global average, highlighting Latvia's commitment to forest preservation and expansion compared to many other countries. Key drivers of this high change rate include extensive reforestation efforts and sustainable forestry practices, supported by national policies aimed at enhancing biodiversity and combating climate change.
Holy See
In 2017, Holy See achieved a global rank of #106 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %. This rate is notably lower than many countries, reflecting its unique urban landscape and limited land area, which is primarily occupied by the Vatican City. The absence of significant forested areas is driven by Holy See's status as a landlocked enclave, where urban development and historical preservation take precedence over forestry initiatives.
Paraguay
In 2017, Paraguay ranked #220 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -250745.9 %. This significant loss places Paraguay among the bottom countries for forest area change, far exceeding the deforestation rates of its regional neighbors. The primary drivers of this alarming statistic include extensive agricultural expansion, particularly for soy cultivation, and inadequate enforcement of environmental protections, leading to widespread habitat destruction.
Mali
Mali ranked #203 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -100545.9 % in 2017. This significant decline contrasts sharply with the global average, highlighting severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include unsustainable agricultural practices, land degradation, and the impact of climate change, which have exacerbated forest loss in the region.
Nepal
Nepal achieved a global rank of #29 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 16579.98 % in 2017. This figure is significantly higher than many neighboring countries, indicating a notable increase in forest cover compared to the global average. Key drivers for this change include government reforestation initiatives and community forestry programs that empower local populations to manage forest resources sustainably.
Saint Barthélemy
In 2017, Saint Barthélemy had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #123 out of 226 countries. This rate is notably lower than many Caribbean nations, which often face deforestation challenges due to tourism and agriculture. The island's limited land area and strict environmental regulations contribute to its stable forest area, reflecting a commitment to preserving its natural landscape.
Guam
In 2017, Guam had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #105 out of 226 countries. This rate is notably lower than many neighboring regions, reflecting a stable forest area compared to areas facing deforestation challenges. The lack of significant change can be attributed to Guam's limited land area and strict land use policies aimed at preserving its natural resources.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data