Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2010
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 2,360,982.8 % | |
2 | Russia | 905,656.25 % | |
3 | United States | 518,400 % | |
4 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
5 | Indonesia | 434,660.16 % | |
6 | India | 190,500 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 160,396 % | |
8 | Spain | 147,225.97 % | |
9 | France | 113,100 % | |
10 | Turkey | 93,473.05 % | |
11 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
12 | Italy | 65,879 % | |
13 | Chile | 61,363.086 % | |
14 | Cuba | 51,035.008 % | |
15 | Serbia | 39,679.004 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 38,814.016 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 36,200 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 35,964 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Belarus | 35,700 % | |
21 | Poland | 27,000 % | |
22 | Montenegro | 20,100 % | |
23 | Nepal | 16,741.016 % | |
24 | Lithuania | 15,000 % | |
25 | Romania | 14,900 % | |
26 | Latvia | 13,112.012 % | |
27 | Hungary | 12,521.997 % | |
28 | United Kingdom | 10,500 % | |
29 | North Korea | 10,217.969 % | |
30 | Bhutan | 9,929.004 % | |
31 | Estonia | 9,713.013 % | |
32 | Ireland | 9,002.002 % | |
33 | Japan | 9,000 % | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 6,230.002 % | |
35 | Kenya | 6,226.001 % | |
36 | Georgia | 6,180.005 % | |
37 | Fiji | 6,064.002 % | |
38 | Germany | 5,500 % | |
39 | Syrian Arab Republic | 5,121.002 % | |
40 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.994 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 4,527.002 % | |
42 | Switzerland | 3,853.992 % | |
43 | Ukraine | 3,800 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 3,744 % | |
45 | Tunisia | 3,558.997 % | |
46 | Croatia | 3,500 % | |
47 | Costa Rica | 3,169.995 % | |
48 | Republic of Moldova | 3,010.001 % | |
49 | Mauritania | 2,627.002 % | |
50 | Austria | 2,350 % | |
51 | Belgium | 2,257.001 % | |
52 | South Sudan | 2,200 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 2,047.998 % | |
54 | Iceland | 1,652 % | |
55 | Slovakia | 1,650 % | |
56 | Denmark | 1,474.005 % | |
57 | Czech Republic | 1,472.998 % | |
58 | Slovenia | 1,400 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 1,398.001 % | |
60 | Albania | 1,277.002 % | |
61 | Greece | 1,190.015 % | |
62 | Rwanda | 700.998 % | |
63 | United Arab Emirates | 457.999 % | |
64 | Cabo Verde | 440 % | |
65 | Réunion | 302 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 288.001 % | |
67 | Luxembourg | 200 % | |
68 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
69 | Martinique | 155 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 123 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 117.004 % | |
72 | Israel | 100 % | |
73 | Palau | 98 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 98 % | |
75 | French Polynesia | 91 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 90 % | |
77 | Andorra | 79 % | |
78 | Singapore | 73 % | |
79 | Kuwait | 40 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 34 % | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 27 % | |
82 | Liechtenstein | 17 % | |
83 | Egypt | 17 % | |
84 | Guernsey | 15 % | |
85 | Cook Islands | 2 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 % | |
87 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
88 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
89 | Aruba | 0 % | |
90 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
92 | Barbados | 0 % | |
93 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
94 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
95 | Botswana | 0 % | |
96 | Burundi | 0 % | |
97 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
98 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
99 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
101 | Greenland | 0 % | |
102 | Grenada | 0 % | |
103 | Guam | 0 % | |
104 | Iran | 0 % | |
105 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
106 | Jersey | 0 % | |
107 | Jordan | 0 % | |
108 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
109 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
110 | Maldives | 0 % | |
111 | Malta | 0 % | |
112 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
113 | Monaco | 0 % | |
114 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
115 | Nauru | 0 % | |
116 | Northern Mariana Islands | 0 % | |
117 | Oman | 0 % | |
118 | Qatar | 0 % | |
119 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
120 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
121 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
122 | San Marino | 0 % | |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
124 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
125 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
126 | Tonga | 0 % | |
127 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
128 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
129 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
130 | Holy See | 0 % | |
131 | Yemen | 0 % | |
132 | British Virgin Islands | -1 % | |
133 | Niue | -6 % | |
134 | Dominica | -19 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | -21 % | |
136 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -22 % | |
137 | Armenia | -35.001 % | |
138 | Sao Tome and Principe | -54 % | |
139 | Antigua and Barbuda | -67 % | |
140 | Guadeloupe | -71.999 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | -86 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -154 % | |
143 | Seychelles | -217 % | |
144 | Western Sahara | -231 % | |
145 | New Zealand | -232.031 % | |
146 | Morocco | -296.973 % | |
147 | Libya | -333 % | |
148 | Mauritius | -357 % | |
149 | Haiti | -400 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -423.999 % | |
151 | Mayotte | -438 % | |
152 | Samoa | -481 % | |
153 | Comoros | -548 % | |
154 | Namibia | -645.02 % | |
155 | Algeria | -675 % | |
156 | Solomon Islands | -738.013 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -898.999 % | |
158 | Iraq | -1,332.001 % | |
159 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
160 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
161 | Brunei Darussalam | -1,700 % | |
162 | Gabon | -1,835.938 % | |
163 | Vanuatu | -2,384.998 % | |
164 | Togo | -2,958.997 % | |
165 | El Salvador | -2,970.001 % | |
166 | Bangladesh | -3,208.997 % | |
167 | Suriname | -3,996.094 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -4,293.994 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,396.021 % | |
170 | Guyana | -4,441.016 % | |
171 | Norway | -4,919.043 % | |
172 | Gambia | -5,787 % | |
173 | Eritrea | -5,979.004 % | |
174 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
175 | Kazakhstan | -7,475 % | |
176 | Sri Lanka | -7,517.993 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,590.002 % | |
178 | Mongolia | -8,000 % | |
179 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,300 % | |
180 | South Korea | -8,900 % | |
181 | Sweden | -9,000 % | |
182 | Portugal | -9,669.019 % | |
183 | Panama | -11,414.99 % | |
184 | Congo | -12,000 % | |
185 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
186 | Pakistan | -15,207.983 % | |
187 | Senegal | -15,545.02 % | |
188 | Cambodia | -19,176.953 % | |
189 | Sierra Leone | -19,727.002 % | |
190 | Finland | -20,364.062 % | |
191 | Papua New Guinea | -21,917.969 % | |
192 | Central African Republic | -34,991.797 % | |
193 | Zambia | -35,800 % | |
194 | Honduras | -38,478.027 % | |
195 | Liberia | -38,898 % | |
196 | Laos | -38,945.02 % | |
197 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
198 | Philippines | -46,953.953 % | |
199 | Guatemala | -47,081.008 % | |
200 | Uganda | -50,146.996 % | |
201 | Guinea | -66,997.02 % | |
202 | Cameroon | -69,700.98 % | |
203 | Ecuador | -70,212.984 % | |
204 | Ethiopia | -72,800 % | |
205 | Malaysia | -74,369.92 % | |
206 | Somalia | -76,750 % | |
207 | Chad | -82,270.016 % | |
208 | Venezuela | -84,952.734 % | |
209 | Nicaragua | -99,320.016 % | |
210 | Mali | -100,546 % | |
211 | Zimbabwe | -105,719.05 % | |
212 | Madagascar | -106,810.06 % | |
213 | Colombia | -113,860.16 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | -116,481.01 % | |
215 | Nigeria | -126,883.01 % | |
216 | Burkina Faso | -134,310.02 % | |
217 | Benin | -141,004.98 % | |
218 | Mexico | -143,800.78 % | |
219 | Bolivia | -158,621.88 % | |
220 | Australia | -173,615.62 % | |
221 | Sudan | -174,140.03 % | |
222 | Mozambique | -267,029.3 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Myanmar | -342,710.94 % | |
225 | Argentina | -371,476.94 % | |
226 | Paraguay | -376,996.1 % | |
227 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
228 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
229 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -674,987.5 % | |
230 | Brazil | -3,563,293.8 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #230
Brazil
- #229
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #228
Angola
- #227
Tanzania
- #226
Paraguay
- #225
Argentina
- #224
Myanmar
- #223
Peru
- #222
Mozambique
- #221
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, China led the world in the Annual Forest Area Change Rate with a staggering increase of 2360982.8%, while globally, countries experienced a wide range of forest area changes from a minimum of -50147.00% to a maximum of 2360982.80%. The average global change rate stood at 27717.12%, with a median value of 0.00%, reflecting the diverse environmental policies and geographic factors influencing forest expansion or loss worldwide.
Economic Growth and Reforestation Efforts
The significant forest area change in China can largely be attributed to its aggressive reforestation policies and afforestation projects. As the world’s most populous nation, China has invested heavily in environmental restoration to combat desertification and improve air quality. Similarly, India, with a change rate of 190500%, has implemented various national campaigns to plant trees and restore forest cover, driven by both environmental needs and socio-economic benefits such as job creation in rural areas.
In addition to China and India, countries like Vietnam and Turkey have also shown substantial positive changes in their forest areas, with rates of 160396% and 93473.05% respectively. These changes are often supported by government policies promoting sustainable land management and international cooperation on environmental issues.
Deforestation Pressures in Developing Regions
Conversely, countries at the bottom of the list, such as Uganda with a decrease of -50146.996% and Guatemala at -47081.008%, face significant deforestation challenges. These reductions are often driven by agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and inadequate enforcement of environmental regulations. In many developing regions, economic pressures and population growth exacerbate the demand for land, leading to forest loss.
Other countries like Philippines and Malawi, with change rates of -46953.953% and -42000% respectively, highlight the ongoing struggle between economic development and environmental conservation. The need for land for agriculture and infrastructure often takes precedence over forest preservation, resulting in negative change rates.
Policy Drivers of Forest Area Change
The stark differences in forest area change rates underscore the impact of national policies and international agreements. Russia and the United States, which both show positive change rates of 905656.25% and 518400% respectively, have implemented comprehensive forest management practices that promote sustainable use and conservation. These policies are crucial in maintaining and enhancing forest cover in these vast nations.
In contrast, countries with negative change rates often lack the resources and governance structures to enforce effective forest conservation policies. For instance, Liberia and Honduras, with change rates of -38898% and -38478.027% respectively, illustrate the challenges faced by nations with limited capacity to regulate land use and combat illegal logging.
Year-over-Year Stability in Forest Area Change
Interestingly, the data reveals that the year-over-year change rate for the top and bottom countries was 0.00%, indicating a level of stability or stagnation in their respective forest management strategies. This lack of fluctuation suggests that while some countries have established effective policies to maintain their forest areas, others may be stuck in a cycle of deforestation that is difficult to break without significant intervention.
Overall, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2010 highlights the complex interplay of economic, geographic, and policy factors that influence forest dynamics globally. As countries continue to balance development with environmental conservation, understanding these patterns is crucial for crafting effective strategies to preserve and enhance forest ecosystems.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2010
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2010?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2010, with a rate of 2,360,983%.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2010?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2010, with a rate of -3,563,294%.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2010?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2010 was -15,472%.
What was the median annual forest area change rate in 2010?
The median annual forest area change rate in 2010 was 0%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2010?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2010 were China, Russia, and the United States.
How many countries were included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2010?
The dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2010 included 230 countries.
Insights by country
India
In 2010, India achieved a global rank of #6 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 190500 %. This rate is significantly higher than many countries, indicating a substantial increase in forest areas compared to the global average. Key drivers include India's aggressive reforestation policies and initiatives aimed at increasing green cover to combat climate change and promote biodiversity.
Myanmar
In 2010, Myanmar had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -342710.94 %, ranking #224 out of 230 countries. This drastic rate of deforestation significantly exceeds the global average, reflecting severe environmental degradation. Contributing factors include extensive logging, agricultural expansion, and political instability, which hinder effective forest management and conservation efforts.
Solomon Islands
In 2010, the Solomon Islands had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -738.0127 %, ranking #156 out of 230 countries. This decline is significantly worse than many Pacific neighbors, indicating severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include logging activities and agricultural expansion, which have led to substantial forest loss in this ecologically rich region.
Botswana
Botswana ranked #92 globally in 2010 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %. This figure is notably lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting a trend of minimal forest loss or gain compared to regional averages. The stability in Botswana's forest area can be attributed to its low population density and effective land management policies aimed at conservation, which prioritize sustainable practices over extensive agricultural expansion.
Angola
In 2010, Angola had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -510029.7 %, ranking #228 out of 230 countries. This significant decline in forest area contrasts sharply with many countries in the region that are working to improve forest conservation. The primary drivers of this drastic change include extensive deforestation for agricultural expansion and logging, coupled with the impacts of civil conflict that have historically hindered sustainable land management practices.
Belarus
In 2010, Belarus achieved a remarkable 20 global rank in the Annual Forest Area Change Rate with a value of 35700 %. This figure is significantly higher than many of its neighbors, reflecting a trend of reforestation and sustainable forest management practices in the country. The key drivers behind this statistic include Belarus's commitment to environmental policies and its extensive forest cover, which constitutes more than 40% of its land area.
Chad
In 2010, Chad ranked #207 globally with an alarming annual forest area change rate of -82270.016 %. This figure is significantly worse than many neighboring countries, illustrating the severe deforestation challenges faced in the region. The primary drivers of this deforestation include unsustainable agricultural practices, overgrazing, and the impacts of climate change, which have led to increased desertification and loss of arable land.
Denmark
In 2010, Denmark achieved a global rank of #56 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 1474.0051 %. This figure is notably higher than many neighboring countries, indicating a significant increase in forest area compared to the global average. The key drivers behind this growth include Denmark's robust environmental policies and a strong emphasis on sustainability, which have encouraged afforestation and reforestation initiatives across the nation.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan achieved a global rank of #41 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 4527.002 % in 2010. This rate is significantly higher than many countries, indicating a robust increase in forest area compared to global trends. Key drivers for this impressive growth include government initiatives focused on reforestation and sustainable land management, as well as the country's diverse climate that supports a variety of forest ecosystems.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2010, Bosnia and Herzegovina had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -898.999 %, ranking #157 out of 230 countries. This significant decline is stark compared to the global average, reflecting severe deforestation challenges. Key drivers include a history of conflict that has hindered sustainable land management practices and economic pressures leading to illegal logging activities.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data