Annual Forest Area Change Rate 2011
Annual forest area change rate indicates how quickly a country's forests are expanding or shrinking each year.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 1,936,775 % | |
2 | Canada | 512,606.25 % | |
3 | Russia | 340,850 % | |
4 | United States | 275,000 % | |
5 | Australia | 267,275 % | |
6 | India | 266,400 % | |
7 | Vietnam | 134,760.16 % | |
8 | Turkey | 109,444.14 % | |
9 | Malaysia | 103,314.06 % | |
10 | South Africa | 87,567.97 % | |
11 | France | 83,400 % | |
12 | Romania | 77,191.99 % | |
13 | Greece | 75,439.99 % | |
14 | Cuba | 61,929.98 % | |
15 | Kazakhstan | 45,256.008 % | |
16 | Uzbekistan | 39,959.96 % | |
17 | Serbia | 39,681.984 % | |
18 | Chile | 35,773.83 % | |
19 | Ghana | 35,720.02 % | |
20 | Philippines | 34,885.938 % | |
21 | Finland | 33,400 % | |
22 | Ukraine | 30,400 % | |
23 | Uruguay | 27,691.992 % | |
24 | Bulgaria | 19,200 % | |
25 | United Kingdom | 19,200 % | |
26 | Poland | 18,200 % | |
27 | Burundi | 17,140.002 % | |
28 | Estonia | 17,079.98 % | |
29 | Costa Rica | 14,741.992 % | |
30 | Rwanda | 14,558.002 % | |
31 | Portugal | 11,990.039 % | |
32 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 11,568.018 % | |
33 | North Korea | 11,354.004 % | |
34 | New Caledonia | 10,717.993 % | |
35 | Azerbaijan | 9,080.005 % | |
36 | Denmark | 7,583.997 % | |
37 | Ireland | 6,857.996 % | |
38 | North Macedonia | 6,794.006 % | |
39 | Dominican Republic | 5,710.01 % | |
40 | Latvia | 5,300 % | |
41 | Germany | 4,880.078 % | |
42 | Fiji | 4,634.009 % | |
43 | South Sudan | 4,159.961 % | |
44 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,019.995 % | |
45 | Jamaica | 3,800 % | |
46 | Nepal | 3,504.004 % | |
47 | Lithuania | 3,400 % | |
48 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3,058.002 % | |
49 | Albania | 3,021.997 % | |
50 | Hungary | 2,886.011 % | |
51 | Austria | 2,818.018 % | |
52 | Switzerland | 2,795.996 % | |
53 | Mauritania | 2,628.003 % | |
54 | Czech Republic | 2,579.981 % | |
55 | Republic of Moldova | 2,379.999 % | |
56 | Tajikistan | 2,359.998 % | |
57 | Israel | 2,200 % | |
58 | Bhutan | 1,977.979 % | |
59 | Spain | 1,832.031 % | |
60 | Iceland | 898 % | |
61 | Guam | 854 % | |
62 | Northern Mariana Islands | 808 % | |
63 | Slovakia | 767.993 % | |
64 | Belarus | 700 % | |
65 | Cabo Verde | 512 % | |
66 | Western Sahara | 454.004 % | |
67 | Réunion | 412.001 % | |
68 | Croatia | 400 % | |
69 | Armenia | 382.001 % | |
70 | United Arab Emirates | 334.003 % | |
71 | Tunisia | 300 % | |
72 | Guadeloupe | 270 % | |
73 | Saint Lucia | 200 % | |
74 | Martinique | 200 % | |
75 | Slovenia | 200 % | |
76 | United States Virgin Islands | 146 % | |
77 | Kuwait | 140 % | |
78 | State of Palestine | 118 % | |
79 | Lebanon | 98.001 % | |
80 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 88 % | |
81 | Palau | 86 % | |
82 | El Salvador | 76.001 % | |
83 | Andorra | 42 % | |
84 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 28 % | |
85 | Djibouti | 10 % | |
86 | Guernsey | 10 % | |
87 | Niue | 10 % | |
88 | Afghanistan | 0 % | |
89 | Anguilla | 0 % | |
90 | Aruba | 0 % | |
91 | Bahamas | 0 % | |
92 | Bahrain | 0 % | |
93 | Barbados | 0 % | |
94 | Bermuda | 0 % | |
95 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 % | |
96 | Botswana | 0 % | |
97 | Brunei Darussalam | 0 % | |
98 | Cayman Islands | 0 % | |
99 | Cook Islands | 0 % | |
100 | Curaçao | 0 % | |
101 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 0 % | |
102 | Faroe Islands | 0 % | |
103 | French Polynesia | 0 % | |
104 | Georgia | 0 % | |
105 | Gibraltar | 0 % | |
106 | Greenland | 0 % | |
107 | Grenada | 0 % | |
108 | Iran | 0 % | |
109 | Isle of Man | 0 % | |
110 | Jersey | 0 % | |
111 | Jordan | 0 % | |
112 | Kiribati | 0 % | |
113 | Lesotho | 0 % | |
114 | Luxembourg | 0 % | |
115 | Maldives | 0 % | |
116 | Malta | 0 % | |
117 | Marshall Islands | 0 % | |
118 | Monaco | 0 % | |
119 | Montenegro | 0 % | |
120 | Montserrat | 0 % | |
121 | Nauru | 0 % | |
122 | Oman | 0 % | |
123 | Qatar | 0 % | |
124 | Saint Barthélemy | 0 % | |
125 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0 % | |
126 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0 % | |
127 | San Marino | 0 % | |
128 | Saudi Arabia | 0 % | |
129 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 % | |
130 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
131 | Tonga | 0 % | |
132 | Turkmenistan | 0 % | |
133 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 0 % | |
134 | Tuvalu | 0 % | |
135 | Holy See | 0 % | |
136 | Yemen | 0 % | |
137 | British Virgin Islands | -2 % | |
138 | Mauritius | -12 % | |
139 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | -24 % | |
140 | Cyprus | -25.998 % | |
141 | Antigua and Barbuda | -66 % | |
142 | American Samoa | -68 % | |
143 | Mayotte | -72 % | |
144 | Dominica | -112 % | |
145 | Belgium | -114.001 % | |
146 | Seychelles | -218 % | |
147 | Singapore | -254 % | |
148 | New Zealand | -301.953 % | |
149 | Libya | -334 % | |
150 | Trinidad and Tobago | -424.002 % | |
151 | Samoa | -480.002 % | |
152 | Comoros | -548 % | |
153 | Sao Tome and Principe | -594 % | |
154 | Namibia | -643.945 % | |
155 | Puerto Rico | -654.004 % | |
156 | Algeria | -673.999 % | |
157 | Solomon Islands | -737.988 % | |
158 | Bangladesh | -987.988 % | |
159 | Mongolia | -1,114.063 % | |
160 | Morocco | -1,160.059 % | |
161 | Timor-Leste | -1,400 % | |
162 | Eswatini | -1,500 % | |
163 | Netherlands | -1,730.005 % | |
164 | Vanuatu | -2,383.997 % | |
165 | Togo | -2,960.01 % | |
166 | Haiti | -3,180.005 % | |
167 | Norway | -3,261.914 % | |
168 | French Guiana | -3,300 % | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | -4,237.988 % | |
170 | Japan | -4,400 % | |
171 | Papua New Guinea | -4,605.469 % | |
172 | Suriname | -4,681.836 % | |
173 | Gambia | -5,785.999 % | |
174 | Eritrea | -5,980.005 % | |
175 | Panama | -6,375.977 % | |
176 | Thailand | -7,000 % | |
177 | Belize | -7,532.007 % | |
178 | Equatorial Guinea | -8,472.021 % | |
179 | Iraq | -9,138 % | |
180 | South Korea | -10,000 % | |
181 | Sri Lanka | -11,541.992 % | |
182 | Guyana | -11,690.234 % | |
183 | Gabon | -12,125.781 % | |
184 | Niger | -12,419.995 % | |
185 | Senegal | -15,543.945 % | |
186 | Guatemala | -16,924.023 % | |
187 | Sweden | -18,600 % | |
188 | Sierra Leone | -19,725.977 % | |
189 | Congo | -20,339.844 % | |
190 | Nicaragua | -22,120.02 % | |
191 | Italy | -24,208.008 % | |
192 | Pakistan | -25,756.006 % | |
193 | Central African Republic | -34,992.188 % | |
194 | Ecuador | -41,833.984 % | |
195 | Malawi | -42,000 % | |
196 | Honduras | -43,537.99 % | |
197 | Uganda | -50,146.047 % | |
198 | Cameroon | -56,000 % | |
199 | Laos | -58,237.89 % | |
200 | Ethiopia | -59,040.234 % | |
201 | Zimbabwe | -59,666.016 % | |
202 | Guinea | -66,998.05 % | |
203 | Colombia | -93,595.31 % | |
204 | Kenya | -98,918.016 % | |
205 | Mali | -100,546.09 % | |
206 | Venezuela | -100,564.06 % | |
207 | Côte d'Ivoire | -109,858.01 % | |
208 | Liberia | -116,641.99 % | |
209 | Burkina Faso | -119,860.06 % | |
210 | Mexico | -122,478.125 % | |
211 | Nigeria | -126,883.984 % | |
212 | Chad | -127,916.016 % | |
213 | Benin | -151,426.03 % | |
214 | Somalia | -153,900 % | |
215 | Madagascar | -160,132.03 % | |
216 | Bolivia | -162,514.06 % | |
217 | Sudan | -174,139.84 % | |
218 | Zambia | -188,179.69 % | |
219 | Indonesia | -255,460.94 % | |
220 | Argentina | -256,685.94 % | |
221 | Mozambique | -267,027.34 % | |
222 | Myanmar | -289,712.12 % | |
223 | Peru | -299,337.5 % | |
224 | Cambodia | -348,482.03 % | |
225 | Paraguay | -354,016 % | |
226 | Tanzania | -403,000 % | |
227 | Angola | -510,029.7 % | |
228 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -1,004,496.9 % | |
229 | Brazil | -1,915,700 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #229
Brazil
- #228
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #227
Angola
- #226
Tanzania
- #225
Paraguay
- #224
Cambodia
- #223
Peru
- #222
Myanmar
- #221
Mozambique
- #220
Argentina
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The country with the highest Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2011 was China with a remarkable increase of 1,936,775%, while globally, the range spanned from a minimum of -59,040.23% to a maximum of 1,936,775%. The global average forest area change rate stood at 21,124.74% with a median value of 0.00%, highlighting significant disparities in forest management and environmental policies worldwide.
Economic Growth and Afforestation Efforts
Countries such as China and India lead the world in forest area expansion due to their robust afforestation programs and economic policies supporting sustainable development. In China, the government has implemented large-scale tree planting initiatives, resulting in an impressive increase of 1,936,775%. Similarly, India has expanded its forest area by 266,400%, driven by policy measures like the National Afforestation Program. These efforts are closely tied to economic growth, as both countries aim to balance industrial expansion with environmental sustainability.
Decreasing Forest Areas and Underlying Causes
Conversely, several countries are experiencing significant forest area reductions. Ethiopia registered the most severe decrease at -59,040.23%, followed by Laos and Cameroon with rates of -58,237.89% and -56,000%, respectively. The primary causes include agricultural expansion, illegal logging, and inadequate enforcement of environmental regulations. In many developing regions, economic pressures lead to deforestation as forests are cleared for agriculture and urban development, often without sustainable practices in place.
Policy Impacts on Forest Area Change
Countries with positive forest area changes often have robust environmental policies and international support for conservation efforts. Vietnam and Turkey, with increases of 134,760.16% and 109,444.14% respectively, have benefited from both government-led initiatives and international funding focused on reforestation and sustainable forest management. In contrast, countries like Uganda and Honduras face challenges due to weak policy frameworks, resulting in negative change rates of -50,146.047% and -43,537.99%.
Year-over-Year Trends and Major Movers
The Annual Forest Area Change Rate for 2011 shows notable year-over-year shifts. The average change was -8,055.76%, indicating a general decline. However, some countries exhibited significant positive changes. The Philippines saw an increase of 81,839.89%, and Greece recorded a remarkable surge of 74,249.98%, likely due to improved forest management practices and recovery from previous deforestation events. Conversely, Russia and China experienced substantial decreases of -564,806.25% and -424,207.80%, respectively, suggesting challenges in maintaining previous growth rates or possible changes in data reporting and classification.
Overall, the data for 2011 underscores the diverse factors influencing forest area changes globally. Economic development, policy frameworks, and international cooperation play pivotal roles in shaping these trends, with varying outcomes across different regions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing effective strategies to balance economic growth with environmental conservation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2011
Which country had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2011?
China had the highest annual forest area change rate in 2011 with 1,936,775 %.
Which country had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2011?
Brazil had the lowest annual forest area change rate in 2011 with -1,915,700 %.
What was the average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2011?
The average annual forest area change rate across all countries in 2011 was -17,088 %.
What was the median annual forest area change rate among countries in 2011?
The median annual forest area change rate among countries in 2011 was 0 %.
How many countries are included in the dataset for annual forest area change rate in 2011?
The dataset includes 229 countries for the annual forest area change rate in 2011.
Which countries were in the top 3 for annual forest area change rate in 2011?
The top 3 countries for annual forest area change rate in 2011 were China, Canada, and Russia.
Insights by country
Austria
In 2011, Austria achieved a global rank of #51 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 2818.0176 %. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating robust forest management practices. Austria's extensive forest cover, which constitutes about 47% of its land area, is driven by strong environmental policies and a cultural emphasis on sustainability.
Denmark
In 2011, Denmark achieved a global rank of #36 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 7583.9966 %. This figure is significantly higher than many neighboring countries, indicating a positive trend in forest area expansion. Key drivers behind this remarkable growth include Denmark's strong environmental policies and a commitment to sustainable forestry practices, which have been integral in enhancing forest cover in the region.
Montenegro
In 2011, Montenegro had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #113 out of 229 countries. This rate is notably lower than many regional neighbors, reflecting a stagnation in forest area growth. Contributing factors include the country's limited economic resources for environmental management and ongoing pressures from urban development and agriculture.
Bahamas
In 2011, the Bahamas had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 0 %, ranking #89 out of 229 countries. This rate is notably lower than many Caribbean neighbors, indicating a relatively stable forest area compared to regions facing deforestation challenges. The Bahamas' geographic isolation and commitment to conservation policies, along with its focus on tourism, have contributed to maintaining its forest resources.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka's Annual Forest Area Change Rate in 2011 was -11541.992 %, ranking the country #181 out of 229 countries. This figure reflects a significant loss of forest area, considerably worse than many of its regional neighbors. Key drivers include rapid agricultural expansion, urbanization, and deforestation policies that have prioritized economic development over environmental conservation.
Argentina
In 2011, Argentina ranked #220 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -256685.94 %. This figure indicates significant deforestation, particularly when compared to neighboring countries like Brazil, which has a more balanced forest area change rate. The primary drivers of this alarming rate include agricultural expansion, particularly for soy production, and inadequate enforcement of environmental regulations, leading to widespread land conversion.
Dominica
In 2011, Dominica ranked #144 globally with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -112.000275 %. This significant decline in forest area is stark compared to many Caribbean neighbors, where sustainable practices have been more effectively implemented. The primary drivers of this change include increased agricultural expansion and a lack of comprehensive environmental policies that could mitigate deforestation in the region.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan achieved a global rank of #35 with an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of 9080.005 % in 2011. This figure significantly outpaces many regional neighbors and reflects a robust commitment to reforestation efforts, particularly in the context of environmental restoration initiatives. Key drivers include government policies aimed at increasing forest cover and enhancing biodiversity, alongside efforts to combat desertification in various regions of the country.
Turks and Caicos Islands
In 2011, the Annual Forest Area Change Rate for Turks and Caicos Islands was 0 %, ranking the country #132 out of 229 nations. This rate is notably lower than many Caribbean neighbors, reflecting a lack of significant deforestation or reforestation activities. The islands' limited land area and focus on tourism development have contributed to a stable forest area, as economic activities prioritize coastal and urban environments over forested regions.
Burkina Faso
In 2011, Burkina Faso had an Annual Forest Area Change Rate of -119860.06 %, ranking #209 out of 229 countries. This figure starkly contrasts with many neighboring countries in West Africa, which generally experience less severe deforestation rates. Key drivers of this alarming rate include widespread agricultural expansion and illegal logging, compounded by a lack of effective environmental policies and enforcement mechanisms.
Data Source
Annual change in forest area | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive datasets on global development, including statistics on annual changes in forest area by country. The dataset offers insights into deforestation and reforestation trends, enabling comparisons across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual Forest Area Change Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data