Agricultural land 1972
Agricultural land measures the area dedicated to farming and cultivation in countries, impacting food production and sustainability. Understanding this statistic is crucial for assessing agricultural capacity and economic development.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | China | 3,838,700 sq. km |
2 | Brazil | 1,973,400 sq. km |
3 | Canada | 630,500 sq. km |
4 | Chad | 479,000 sq. km |
5 | Colombia | 450,680 sq. km |
6 | France | 325,150 sq. km |
7 | Bolivia | 312,700 sq. km |
8 | Botswana | 260,020 sq. km |
9 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 254,500 sq. km |
10 | Germany | 189,490 sq. km |
11 | Côte d'Ivoire | 163,100 sq. km |
12 | Chile | 156,000 sq. km |
13 | Ghana | 117,000 sq. km |
14 | Congo | 105,509 sq. km |
15 | Greece | 91,600 sq. km |
16 | Burkina Faso | 90,200 sq. km |
17 | Cameroon | 80,950 sq. km |
18 | Bulgaria | 60,220 sq. km |
19 | Cuba | 55,810 sq. km |
20 | Ecuador | 49,750 sq. km |
21 | Central African Republic | 48,500 sq. km |
22 | Czech Republic | 42,820 sq. km |
23 | Georgia | 32,290 sq. km |
24 | Denmark | 29,560 sq. km |
25 | Egypt | 28,550 sq. km |
26 | Finland | 26,137 sq. km |
27 | Cambodia | 24,500 sq. km |
28 | Croatia | 24,040 sq. km |
29 | Dominican Republic | 23,700 sq. km |
30 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22,000 sq. km |
31 | Burundi | 19,060 sq. km |
32 | Costa Rica | 18,870 sq. km |
33 | Gabon | 18,473.8 sq. km |
34 | Eswatini | 15,130 sq. km |
35 | Estonia | 13,740 sq. km |
36 | Djibouti | 13,010 sq. km |
37 | El Salvador | 12,238 sq. km |
38 | Gambia | 5,420 sq. km |
39 | Cyprus | 3,940 sq. km |
40 | Bhutan | 3,850 sq. km |
41 | Fiji | 2,300 sq. km |
42 | Equatorial Guinea | 1,298.5 sq. km |
43 | Faroe Islands | 965.32 sq. km |
44 | Comoros | 950 sq. km |
45 | Cabo Verde | 650 sq. km |
46 | French Polynesia | 418.268 sq. km |
47 | Dominica | 190 sq. km |
48 | Brunei Darussalam | 180 sq. km |
49 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 120 sq. km |
50 | British Virgin Islands | 80 sq. km |
51 | Cayman Islands | 27 sq. km |
52 | Eritrea | NaN sq. km |
53 | Ethiopia | NaN sq. km |
54 | Australia | 4,998,150 sq. km |
55 | Russia | 2,216,310 sq. km |
56 | Mongolia | 1,406,830 sq. km |
57 | Mexico | 971,500 sq. km |
58 | Nigeria | 554,470 sq. km |
59 | Mauritania | 394,930 sq. km |
60 | Namibia | 386,530 sq. km |
61 | Pakistan | 355,050 sq. km |
62 | Madagascar | 354,200 sq. km |
63 | Mozambique | 346,080 sq. km |
64 | Mali | 317,780 sq. km |
65 | Niger | 311,770 sq. km |
66 | Morocco | 261,700 sq. km |
67 | Poland | 193,710 sq. km |
68 | Peru | 185,650 sq. km |
69 | Romania | 149,430 sq. km |
70 | New Zealand | 134,858 sq. km |
71 | Libya | 134,380 sq. km |
72 | Paraguay | 114,180 sq. km |
73 | Myanmar | 108,050 sq. km |
74 | Philippines | 84,300 sq. km |
75 | Malaysia | 40,800.3 sq. km |
76 | Portugal | 39,410 sq. km |
77 | Malawi | 39,070 sq. km |
78 | Nicaragua | 36,100 sq. km |
79 | Lithuania | 33,890 sq. km |
80 | Republic of Moldova | 25,600 sq. km |
81 | North Korea | 22,455 sq. km |
82 | Liberia | 11,347.6 sq. km |
83 | Montenegro | 5,150 sq. km |
84 | Mauritius | 1,130 sq. km |
85 | Liechtenstein | 90 sq. km |
86 | Luxembourg | NaN sq. km |
87 | United States | 4,346,870 sq. km |
88 | Kazakhstan | 2,214,630 sq. km |
89 | India | 1,779,460 sq. km |
90 | Argentina | 1,273,830 sq. km |
91 | South Africa | 950,080 sq. km |
92 | Saudi Arabia | 865,170 sq. km |
93 | Iran | 608,000 sq. km |
94 | Algeria | 453,960 sq. km |
95 | Angola | 451,600 sq. km |
96 | Somalia | 439,600 sq. km |
97 | Ukraine | 419,290 sq. km |
98 | Turkey | 388,260 sq. km |
99 | Afghanistan | 380,480 sq. km |
100 | Turkmenistan | 353,500 sq. km |
101 | Indonesia | 339,659 sq. km |
102 | Spain | 325,680 sq. km |
103 | Tanzania | 290,000 sq. km |
104 | Uzbekistan | 277,240 sq. km |
105 | Kenya | 251,178 sq. km |
106 | Yemen | 234,370 sq. km |
107 | Zambia | 200,930 sq. km |
108 | Venezuela | 200,650 sq. km |
109 | United Kingdom | 187,560 sq. km |
110 | Italy | 175,080 sq. km |
111 | Uruguay | 154,000 sq. km |
112 | Thailand | 152,300 sq. km |
113 | Syrian Arab Republic | 141,610 sq. km |
114 | Guinea | 138,633 sq. km |
115 | Zimbabwe | 109,711 sq. km |
116 | Uganda | 101,000 sq. km |
117 | Kyrgyzstan | 100,880 sq. km |
118 | Bangladesh | 99,910 sq. km |
119 | Belarus | 93,910 sq. km |
120 | Iraq | 91,600 sq. km |
121 | Tunisia | 91,560 sq. km |
122 | Senegal | 89,460 sq. km |
123 | Hungary | 68,460 sq. km |
124 | Japan | 64,710 sq. km |
125 | Vietnam | 64,470 sq. km |
126 | Ireland | 48,274 sq. km |
127 | Tajikistan | 44,890 sq. km |
128 | Azerbaijan | 44,462 sq. km |
129 | Nepal | 38,220 sq. km |
130 | Sweden | 37,340 sq. km |
131 | Serbia | 35,370 sq. km |
132 | Austria | 33,071 sq. km |
133 | Honduras | 30,800 sq. km |
134 | Togo | 28,800 sq. km |
135 | Guatemala | 28,000 sq. km |
136 | Sierra Leone | 26,740 sq. km |
137 | Latvia | 25,300 sq. km |
138 | Slovakia | 24,460 sq. km |
139 | Lesotho | 23,590 sq. km |
140 | Sri Lanka | 23,450 sq. km |
141 | South Korea | 22,700 sq. km |
142 | Netherlands | 21,217 sq. km |
143 | Iceland | 19,810 sq. km |
144 | Benin | 17,867.2 sq. km |
145 | Belgium | 17,480 sq. km |
146 | Panama | 17,430 sq. km |
147 | Switzerland | 16,628 sq. km |
148 | Haiti | 15,840 sq. km |
149 | Laos | 15,120 sq. km |
150 | Rwanda | 15,080 sq. km |
151 | Guyana | 13,740 sq. km |
152 | North Macedonia | 13,070 sq. km |
153 | Albania | 11,740 sq. km |
154 | Armenia | 11,700 sq. km |
155 | Jordan | 11,090 sq. km |
156 | Oman | 10,440 sq. km |
157 | Norway | 9,100 sq. km |
158 | Papua New Guinea | 6,580 sq. km |
159 | Lebanon | 6,350 sq. km |
160 | Slovenia | 5,640 sq. km |
161 | Israel | 5,270 sq. km |
162 | Puerto Rico | 5,150 sq. km |
163 | Jamaica | 5,070 sq. km |
164 | Guinea-Bissau | 4,996.7 sq. km |
165 | State of Palestine | 4,840 sq. km |
166 | New Caledonia | 2,640 sq. km |
167 | Timor-Leste | 2,450 sq. km |
168 | Greenland | 2,350 sq. km |
169 | United Arab Emirates | 2,120 sq. km |
170 | Kuwait | 1,350 sq. km |
171 | Vanuatu | 1,200 sq. km |
172 | Trinidad and Tobago | 1,010 sq. km |
173 | Belize | 830 sq. km |
174 | Samoa | 640 sq. km |
175 | Solomon Islands | 550 sq. km |
176 | Suriname | 530 sq. km |
177 | Qatar | 510 sq. km |
178 | Kiribati | 380 sq. km |
179 | Sao Tome and Principe | 370 sq. km |
180 | Tonga | 330 sq. km |
181 | Isle of Man | 320 sq. km |
182 | Andorra | 250 sq. km |
183 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 225 sq. km |
184 | Grenada | 200 sq. km |
185 | Saint Lucia | 200 sq. km |
186 | Barbados | 190 sq. km |
187 | Guam | 170 sq. km |
188 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 150 sq. km |
189 | United States Virgin Islands | 150 sq. km |
190 | Malta | 140 sq. km |
191 | Marshall Islands | 120 sq. km |
192 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 110 sq. km |
193 | Singapore | 110 sq. km |
194 | Bahamas | 100 sq. km |
195 | Bahrain | 100 sq. km |
196 | Antigua and Barbuda | 90 sq. km |
197 | Maldives | 60 sq. km |
198 | Seychelles | 50 sq. km |
199 | Palau | 43 sq. km |
200 | Northern Mariana Islands | 40 sq. km |
201 | Aruba | 20 sq. km |
202 | Tuvalu | 20 sq. km |
203 | American Samoa | 19.3 sq. km |
204 | San Marino | 10 sq. km |
205 | South Sudan | NaN sq. km |
206 | Sudan | NaN sq. km |
207 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 10 sq. km |
208 | Nauru | 4 sq. km |
209 | Bermuda | 3 sq. km |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
China
- #2
Brazil
- #3
Canada
- #4
Chad
- #5
Colombia
- #6
France
- #7
Bolivia
- #8
Botswana
- #9
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #10
Germany
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #209
Bermuda
- #208
Nauru
- #207
Turks and Caicos Islands
- #206
Sudan
- #205
South Sudan
- #204
San Marino
- #203
American Samoa
- #202
Tuvalu
- #201
Aruba
- #200
Northern Mariana Islands
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Agricultural land, a crucial metric for understanding the global capacity for food production and economic development, measures the area dedicated to farming and cultivation across countries. In 1972, this statistic offered vital insights into how nations were utilizing their land resources to sustain their populations and economies. Here, we delve into the intricate patterns and disparities of agricultural land distribution in 1972, highlighting its profound implications on global and regional scales.
Global Landscape of Agricultural Land in 1972
In 1972, the total area of agricultural land varied significantly across the globe, with 200 countries contributing data to this crucial metric. The minimum agricultural land recorded was a mere 19.30 square kilometers, while Australia led with a staggering 4,998,150 square kilometers, highlighting the vast differences in land use and availability. The average agricultural land across these countries was approximately 220,691.66 square kilometers, with a median value of 28,000 square kilometers, indicating a wide range of agricultural capacities among nations.
Notably, countries like the United States (4,346,870 sq. km) and China (3,838,700 sq. km) followed closely behind Australia, underscoring their significant roles in global food production. On the contrary, smaller nations such as American Samoa and Aruba, with 19.3 and 20 square kilometers respectively, had limited agricultural land, often relying on imports and trade to meet their food requirements.
Economic and Environmental Impact
The distribution and use of agricultural land in 1972 were not only vital for food security but also held significant economic implications. Countries with extensive agricultural land, like Brazil and India, utilized these resources to bolster their economies through exports and self-sufficiency in food production. Increases in agricultural land, such as those seen in China (+46,200 sq. km) and Brazil (+35,060 sq. km), pointed towards economic expansion and investment in agricultural infrastructure.
Conversely, nations experiencing a decrease in agricultural land, such as the United States (-23,230 sq. km) and South Africa (-2,260 sq. km), faced challenges in sustaining their agricultural output, potentially due to urban expansion or environmental degradation. These changes could lead to increased dependency on imports and shifts in economic policies to mitigate food security risks.
Regional Disparities and Trends
Regional variations in agricultural land use were stark in 1972. While continents like Oceania and North America boasted large tracts of agricultural land, smaller island nations in the Pacific and Caribbean struggled with limited arable land. This disparity influenced regional food security and economic strategies, with smaller nations often prioritizing tourism or niche agricultural products to sustain their economies.
Additionally, the year-over-year changes in agricultural land use reflected regional trends. For instance, Thailand's increase of 5.8% in agricultural land highlighted the Southeast Asian region's push towards enhancing food production and agricultural self-reliance. Conversely, a dramatic 7.4% decrease in Haiti's agricultural land underscored the environmental and socio-political challenges facing the Caribbean region.
Future Implications and Policy Considerations
The patterns observed in 1972 laid the groundwork for future agricultural policies and global cooperation. The disparities in agricultural land highlighted the need for international collaboration to support nations with limited resources. Policies promoting sustainable land use, efficient water management, and technological advancements in agriculture became crucial to enhance productivity and address the challenges posed by urbanization and climate change.
Countries with significant agricultural capacities, like Russia and Kazakhstan, were poised to play pivotal roles in global food security, potentially influencing international trade dynamics and economic policies. Furthermore, understanding these trends helped policymakers anticipate future challenges and opportunities in the agricultural sector, ensuring that the global population's nutritional needs were met sustainably.
The year 1972 stands as a pivotal point in the understanding of agricultural land use, with its implications resonating through economic, environmental, and political spheres. As nations continue to navigate the complexities of land use and food production, the insights gleaned from this year provide a valuable foundation for shaping future strategies and policies.
Insights by country
Iran
In 1972, Iran ranked 14th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a substantial area of 608,000 square kilometers. This significant land allocation reflects Iran's historical reliance on agriculture as a vital sector of its economy, which played a crucial role in providing food security and employment for its population.
The extensive agricultural land available in Iran can be attributed to its diverse climatic regions and fertile plains, particularly in areas like the Caspian Sea region and the Zagros Mountains foothills. Factors such as traditional farming practices, irrigation methods, and crop diversity have historically contributed to the productivity of this land.
Iran's agricultural sector has also been influenced by socio-political conditions, including land reforms in the mid-20th century that aimed to increase agricultural output. Interestingly, in addition to its agricultural land, Iran is known for producing a variety of crops, including wheat, rice, and fruits, which not only serve domestic needs but also contribute to exports.
Colombia
In 1972, Colombia ranked 19th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, with a total area of 450,680 square kilometers designated for agricultural use. This substantial allocation of land for agriculture can be attributed to Colombia's diverse climatic regions and fertile soils, which support a variety of crops including coffee, flowers, and tropical fruits.
The prominence of agriculture in Colombia's economy during this period was influenced by factors such as a growing population, rising demand for food, and the country's historical reliance on agricultural exports. Additionally, Colombia's geographical advantages, including its location near the equator, allow for year-round cultivation, further enhancing its agricultural output.
Interestingly, Colombia's agricultural sector has evolved significantly since 1972, reflecting changes in technology, trade policies, and environmental challenges, yet it remains a critical component of the country's economy and cultural identity.
Comoros
In 1972, Comoros ranked 161st out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, with a total of 950 square kilometers designated for agricultural use. This figure reflects the limited arable land available on the islands, which are characterized by rugged volcanic terrain and a tropical climate.
The small size of the agricultural sector can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geography, which restricts large-scale farming and limits the types of crops that can be cultivated. Additionally, Comoros has historically faced challenges related to economic instability and reliance on cash crops such as cloves, which further influences land use and agricultural practices.
Interestingly, despite its limited agricultural land, Comoros has a rich biodiversity and is known for its unique flora and fauna, which could offer potential for sustainable agricultural practices and eco-tourism in the future.
Laos
In 1972, Laos ranked 125th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land utilization. The country had a total of 15,120 square kilometers designated as agricultural land, reflecting its predominantly agrarian economy.
This statistic underscores the importance of agriculture in Laos, where a significant portion of the population relies on farming for their livelihood. Factors contributing to the extent of agricultural land include the country’s fertile plains and river valleys, particularly around the Mekong River, which provide suitable conditions for rice cultivation and other crops.
Additionally, Laos' agricultural landscape has been influenced by historical practices and socio-economic conditions, such as subsistence farming and the effects of the Laotian Civil War on land use and ownership. The reliance on agriculture continues to play a crucial role in the nation's economy, with rice being the staple food for the majority of its population.
Aruba
In 1972, Aruba ranked 198th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, with a total of 20 square kilometers designated for agricultural purposes. This limited area reflects Aruba's geographical characteristics, including its small land area and arid climate, which are not conducive to extensive agricultural development.
The relatively low amount of agricultural land can be attributed to several factors, including the island's focus on tourism and services as the primary drivers of its economy. The lack of freshwater resources and the presence of sandy soils further hinder large-scale agricultural endeavors, leading to a reliance on imports for most food supplies. In the 1970s, Aruba began to shift towards tourism, diminishing the emphasis on agriculture.
Interestingly, as a small island nation, Aruba has historically depended on trade and external sources for food security, which has shaped its economic landscape and land use policies. The agricultural sector, while minimal, has included crops such as aloe vera and some vegetables, but it has never been a significant part of the economy.
Haiti
In 1972, Haiti ranked 123rd out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a total of 15,840 square kilometers. This figure indicates the significant reliance on agriculture within the Haitian economy, as agriculture has historically been a vital source of livelihood, employment, and sustenance for the majority of the population.
The relatively expansive area of agricultural land can be attributed to Haiti's diverse climate and geography, which supports various crops. However, the productivity of this land has been hampered by factors such as deforestation, soil erosion, and lack of infrastructure, which have historically limited agricultural output and contributed to food insecurity in the nation.
Additionally, Haiti's agricultural sector faces challenges from natural disasters, political instability, and economic hardship, which further complicate efforts to enhance agricultural productivity. Despite these challenges, agriculture remains a crucial aspect of Haitian society, with coffee, sugar, and mango being some of the key crops produced in the country.
Finland
In 1972, Finland ranked 102nd out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, with a total area of 26,137 square kilometers dedicated to agriculture. This figure reflects the country's commitment to farming, which plays a significant role in its economy and rural culture.
The relatively limited area of agricultural land in Finland can be attributed to its harsh climate and geographical conditions, which restrict the types of crops that can be cultivated. Despite these challenges, Finnish farmers have adapted through innovative practices and the cultivation of hardier crops, such as barley and rye, which are better suited to the cooler climate.
Interestingly, Finland's agricultural sector has historically been characterized by a small-scale, family-run farming model, which has contributed to the preservation of rural communities and traditional farming methods. Additionally, during this period, Finland was also undergoing significant social and economic changes, which influenced agricultural policies and land use practices.
Isle of Man
In 1972, the Isle of Man ranked 172nd out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land usage, with a total of 320 square kilometers designated for agricultural purposes. This measurement reflects the island's relatively limited amount of land available for farming, influenced by its geographical size and topography.
The Isle of Man, an autonomous British Crown dependency, has a total land area of approximately 572 square kilometers. As a result, agricultural land constituted a significant portion of its usable land, primarily dedicated to livestock farming and the cultivation of crops suited to its temperate maritime climate.
Several factors contributed to the extent of agricultural land in 1972, including historical reliance on agriculture for local sustenance, societal structures favoring small-scale farming, and economic conditions encouraging traditional farming practices. Interestingly, the Isle of Man has undergone various transformations since that time, with a gradual shift towards tourism and finance, impacting the agricultural sector's prominence in the local economy.
Burundi
In 1972, Burundi ranked 116th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a total area of 19,060 square kilometers. This statistic highlights the significance of agriculture in Burundi's economy, as the majority of the population relies on farming for their livelihood, with subsistence agriculture being prevalent throughout the country.
The relatively large proportion of agricultural land in Burundi can be attributed to its favorable climate and fertile soils, which support the cultivation of various crops, such as coffee, tea, and cassava. However, the agricultural sector has faced challenges, including land tenure issues, population pressure, and political instability that have historically affected productivity and food security.
Interestingly, agriculture remains a cornerstone of Burundi's economy, contributing significantly to both employment and exports, particularly coffee, which is one of the country’s largest export products. The reliance on agriculture continues to shape the socio-economic landscape of Burundi, underscoring the importance of sustainable agricultural practices to enhance food security and improve economic stability.
Brazil
In 1972, Brazil ranked sixth in the world for the amount of agricultural land, with a total area of 1,973,400 square kilometers dedicated to agriculture. This significant portion of land reflects Brazil's status as a major player in global agricultural production, particularly in commodities such as soybeans, coffee, and sugarcane.
The extensive agricultural land in Brazil can be attributed to its vast and diverse geographical landscape, which includes fertile plains and a favorable climate for farming. Additionally, government policies during the 20th century promoted agricultural expansion and modernization, contributing to the growth of the agribusiness sector.
As a noteworthy point, Brazil's agricultural sector not only supports the domestic economy but also plays a crucial role in global food supply, making it one of the largest exporters of agricultural products. In the years following 1972, the country continued to enhance its agricultural technologies, leading to increased productivity and further establishing its importance in international markets.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agricultural land data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data