Agricultural land 1970
Agricultural land measures the area dedicated to farming and cultivation in countries, impacting food production and sustainability. Understanding this statistic is crucial for assessing agricultural capacity and economic development.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | China | 3,746,000 sq. km |
2 | Brazil | 1,903,280 sq. km |
3 | Canada | 631,610 sq. km |
4 | Chad | 479,000 sq. km |
5 | Colombia | 430,300 sq. km |
6 | France | 324,950 sq. km |
7 | Bolivia | 302,970 sq. km |
8 | Botswana | 260,010 sq. km |
9 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 253,500 sq. km |
10 | Germany | 190,230 sq. km |
11 | Côte d'Ivoire | 162,517 sq. km |
12 | Chile | 151,000 sq. km |
13 | Ghana | 117,000 sq. km |
14 | Congo | 105,475 sq. km |
15 | Greece | 91,550 sq. km |
16 | Burkina Faso | 90,200 sq. km |
17 | Cameroon | 79,780 sq. km |
18 | Bulgaria | 60,100 sq. km |
19 | Cuba | 50,220 sq. km |
20 | Ecuador | 48,550 sq. km |
21 | Central African Republic | 48,300 sq. km |
22 | Czech Republic | 42,820 sq. km |
23 | Cambodia | 34,190 sq. km |
24 | Georgia | 32,290 sq. km |
25 | Denmark | 29,750 sq. km |
26 | Egypt | 28,430 sq. km |
27 | Finland | 27,242 sq. km |
28 | Croatia | 24,040 sq. km |
29 | Dominican Republic | 23,350 sq. km |
30 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22,000 sq. km |
31 | Burundi | 18,800 sq. km |
32 | Costa Rica | 18,560 sq. km |
33 | Gabon | 18,123.8 sq. km |
34 | Eswatini | 14,940 sq. km |
35 | Estonia | 13,740 sq. km |
36 | Djibouti | 13,010 sq. km |
37 | El Salvador | 11,881 sq. km |
38 | Gambia | 5,340 sq. km |
39 | Cyprus | 3,980 sq. km |
40 | Bhutan | 3,820 sq. km |
41 | Fiji | 2,210 sq. km |
42 | Equatorial Guinea | 1,328.5 sq. km |
43 | Faroe Islands | 965.32 sq. km |
44 | Comoros | 950 sq. km |
45 | Cabo Verde | 650 sq. km |
46 | French Polynesia | 423.701 sq. km |
47 | Brunei Darussalam | 240 sq. km |
48 | Dominica | 190 sq. km |
49 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 130 sq. km |
50 | British Virgin Islands | 80 sq. km |
51 | Cayman Islands | 27 sq. km |
52 | Eritrea | NaN sq. km |
53 | Ethiopia | NaN sq. km |
54 | Australia | 4,934,320 sq. km |
55 | Russia | 2,216,310 sq. km |
56 | Mongolia | 1,406,840 sq. km |
57 | Mexico | 976,350 sq. km |
58 | Nigeria | 551,520 sq. km |
59 | Mauritania | 395,330 sq. km |
60 | Namibia | 386,510 sq. km |
61 | Pakistan | 358,650 sq. km |
62 | Madagascar | 353,700 sq. km |
63 | Mozambique | 345,890 sq. km |
64 | Mali | 317,780 sq. km |
65 | Niger | 312,000 sq. km |
66 | Morocco | 257,050 sq. km |
67 | Poland | 195,430 sq. km |
68 | Peru | 179,420 sq. km |
69 | Romania | 149,300 sq. km |
70 | New Zealand | 130,880 sq. km |
71 | Libya | 130,250 sq. km |
72 | Paraguay | 112,540 sq. km |
73 | Myanmar | 108,010 sq. km |
74 | Philippines | 83,100 sq. km |
75 | Portugal | 39,290 sq. km |
76 | Malaysia | 38,850.1 sq. km |
77 | Malawi | 37,070 sq. km |
78 | Nicaragua | 35,850 sq. km |
79 | Lithuania | 33,890 sq. km |
80 | Republic of Moldova | 25,600 sq. km |
81 | North Korea | 22,320 sq. km |
82 | Liberia | 11,347.6 sq. km |
83 | Montenegro | 5,150 sq. km |
84 | Mauritius | 1,120 sq. km |
85 | Liechtenstein | 90 sq. km |
86 | Luxembourg | NaN sq. km |
87 | United States | 4,393,330 sq. km |
88 | Kazakhstan | 2,214,630 sq. km |
89 | India | 1,780,520 sq. km |
90 | Argentina | 1,273,830 sq. km |
91 | South Africa | 954,650 sq. km |
92 | Saudi Arabia | 864,200 sq. km |
93 | Iran | 597,000 sq. km |
94 | Angola | 452,050 sq. km |
95 | Algeria | 442,160 sq. km |
96 | Somalia | 439,500 sq. km |
97 | Ukraine | 419,290 sq. km |
98 | Turkey | 381,780 sq. km |
99 | Afghanistan | 380,060 sq. km |
100 | Turkmenistan | 353,500 sq. km |
101 | Indonesia | 332,032 sq. km |
102 | Spain | 321,190 sq. km |
103 | Tanzania | 280,000 sq. km |
104 | Uzbekistan | 277,240 sq. km |
105 | Kenya | 251,013 sq. km |
106 | Yemen | 234,180 sq. km |
107 | Italy | 201,800 sq. km |
108 | Venezuela | 199,330 sq. km |
109 | Zambia | 198,740 sq. km |
110 | United Kingdom | 188,490 sq. km |
111 | Uruguay | 154,810 sq. km |
112 | Thailand | 142,480 sq. km |
113 | Guinea | 138,448 sq. km |
114 | Syrian Arab Republic | 134,590 sq. km |
115 | Zimbabwe | 107,133 sq. km |
116 | Kyrgyzstan | 100,880 sq. km |
117 | Uganda | 99,800 sq. km |
118 | Bangladesh | 96,970 sq. km |
119 | Belarus | 93,910 sq. km |
120 | Tunisia | 90,530 sq. km |
121 | Iraq | 89,930 sq. km |
122 | Senegal | 88,640 sq. km |
123 | Hungary | 68,750 sq. km |
124 | Japan | 66,960 sq. km |
125 | Vietnam | 64,170 sq. km |
126 | Ireland | 47,943 sq. km |
127 | Tajikistan | 44,890 sq. km |
128 | Azerbaijan | 44,462 sq. km |
129 | Sweden | 37,530 sq. km |
130 | Nepal | 37,020 sq. km |
131 | Serbia | 35,370 sq. km |
132 | Austria | 33,358 sq. km |
133 | Togo | 30,750 sq. km |
134 | Honduras | 30,400 sq. km |
135 | Guatemala | 27,550 sq. km |
136 | Sierra Leone | 26,640 sq. km |
137 | Latvia | 25,300 sq. km |
138 | Slovakia | 24,460 sq. km |
139 | Lesotho | 24,270 sq. km |
140 | Sri Lanka | 23,330 sq. km |
141 | South Korea | 23,240 sq. km |
142 | Netherlands | 22,013 sq. km |
143 | Iceland | 20,010 sq. km |
144 | Belgium | 17,630 sq. km |
145 | Benin | 17,066.7 sq. km |
146 | Haiti | 17,050 sq. km |
147 | Panama | 16,840 sq. km |
148 | Switzerland | 16,739 sq. km |
149 | Laos | 14,770 sq. km |
150 | Rwanda | 14,040 sq. km |
151 | Guyana | 13,710 sq. km |
152 | North Macedonia | 13,070 sq. km |
153 | Albania | 12,300 sq. km |
154 | Armenia | 11,700 sq. km |
155 | Jordan | 11,040 sq. km |
156 | Oman | 10,420 sq. km |
157 | Norway | 9,540 sq. km |
158 | Lebanon | 6,250 sq. km |
159 | Papua New Guinea | 6,240 sq. km |
160 | Slovenia | 5,640 sq. km |
161 | Puerto Rico | 5,520 sq. km |
162 | Israel | 5,250 sq. km |
163 | Jamaica | 5,070 sq. km |
164 | Guinea-Bissau | 4,996.7 sq. km |
165 | State of Palestine | 4,840 sq. km |
166 | New Caledonia | 2,630 sq. km |
167 | Timor-Leste | 2,430 sq. km |
168 | Greenland | 2,350 sq. km |
169 | United Arab Emirates | 2,120 sq. km |
170 | Kuwait | 1,350 sq. km |
171 | Vanuatu | 1,200 sq. km |
172 | Trinidad and Tobago | 980 sq. km |
173 | Belize | 820 sq. km |
174 | Samoa | 635 sq. km |
175 | Solomon Islands | 550 sq. km |
176 | Qatar | 510 sq. km |
177 | Suriname | 480 sq. km |
178 | Kiribati | 380 sq. km |
179 | Sao Tome and Principe | 360 sq. km |
180 | Tonga | 320 sq. km |
181 | Isle of Man | 316 sq. km |
182 | Andorra | 260 sq. km |
183 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 225 sq. km |
184 | Grenada | 220 sq. km |
185 | Barbados | 190 sq. km |
186 | Saint Lucia | 190 sq. km |
187 | Guam | 170 sq. km |
188 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 150 sq. km |
189 | United States Virgin Islands | 150 sq. km |
190 | Malta | 140 sq. km |
191 | Marshall Islands | 120 sq. km |
192 | Singapore | 120 sq. km |
193 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 110 sq. km |
194 | Bahamas | 100 sq. km |
195 | Bahrain | 100 sq. km |
196 | Antigua and Barbuda | 90 sq. km |
197 | Maldives | 50 sq. km |
198 | Seychelles | 50 sq. km |
199 | Palau | 43 sq. km |
200 | Northern Mariana Islands | 40 sq. km |
201 | Aruba | 20 sq. km |
202 | Tuvalu | 20 sq. km |
203 | American Samoa | 19.3 sq. km |
204 | San Marino | 10 sq. km |
205 | South Sudan | NaN sq. km |
206 | Sudan | NaN sq. km |
207 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 10 sq. km |
208 | Nauru | 4 sq. km |
209 | Bermuda | 3 sq. km |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
China
- #2
Brazil
- #3
Canada
- #4
Chad
- #5
Colombia
- #6
France
- #7
Bolivia
- #8
Botswana
- #9
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #10
Germany
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #209
Bermuda
- #208
Nauru
- #207
Turks and Caicos Islands
- #206
Sudan
- #205
South Sudan
- #204
San Marino
- #203
American Samoa
- #202
Tuvalu
- #201
Aruba
- #200
Northern Mariana Islands
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Agricultural land, a fundamental component of global geography and environmental science, measures the area designated for farming and cultivation within countries. In 1970, it was evident that the extent of agricultural land had a consequential impact on food production, sustainability, and economic development worldwide. This article delves into the diverse aspects of agricultural land distribution in 1970, exploring its significance, geographic patterns, and the socio-economic implications.
Global Distribution and Key Players
In 1970, the distribution of agricultural land across the globe revealed significant disparities among countries. Australia led with an impressive 4,934,320 square kilometers of agricultural land, showcasing its vast landscapes conducive to farming. Following closely were the United States and China, with 4,393,330 and 3,746,000 square kilometers, respectively. These nations not only contributed significantly to global food production but also underscored the economic importance of agriculture in their national agendas.
Conversely, smaller nations like American Samoa and Aruba had minimal agricultural land, with values as low as 19.3 and 20 square kilometers, respectively. Such figures highlight the inherent geographic and environmental limitations faced by these regions, often relying on imports to meet their food requirements. The stark contrast between these extremes illustrates the varied capacity for agricultural development worldwide.
Yearly Changes and Trends
The year 1970 also marked notable shifts in agricultural land areas due to changes in policy, technology, and environmental factors. China's agricultural expansion increased by 46,000 square kilometers, a 1.2% rise, reflecting efforts to boost food production amidst a growing population. The United States exhibited a similar trend with an increment of 38,860 square kilometers, illustrating ongoing initiatives to enhance agricultural efficiency.
On the contrary, Australia experienced a decrease of 174,560 square kilometers, a 3.4% reduction, possibly due to environmental challenges or shifts in land use strategies. Other countries like Niger and France also saw declines, prompting considerations of sustainable practices and land management policies to mitigate adverse effects on agricultural capacity.
Economic Implications of Agricultural Land
The extent of agricultural land directly correlates with a country's economic strength and its ability to sustain its population. In nations like Brazil and India, substantial agricultural areas (1,903,280 and 1,780,520 square kilometers, respectively) supported large-scale production and export of agricultural commodities, fueling economic growth and job creation. The importance of agriculture in these economies is further emphasized by its contribution to GDP and trade balances.
In contrast, countries with limited agricultural land often faced economic challenges, relying heavily on imports to fulfill demand. This reliance could result in trade deficits and heightened vulnerability to global market fluctuations. Thus, the scope of agricultural land in 1970 was not merely a measure of physical space but a crucial determinant of economic stability and development prospects.
Environmental Sustainability and Challenges
Agricultural practices in 1970 were also closely linked to environmental sustainability. The extensive use of land for cultivation raised concerns about soil degradation, deforestation, and biodiversity loss. In regions like Mongolia, which possessed 1,406,840 square kilometers of agricultural land, sustainable practices were essential to prevent long-term environmental damage and ensure ongoing productivity.
Efforts to promote sustainable agriculture included crop rotation, reduced chemical usage, and conservation agriculture. Understanding the environmental impact of farming was crucial for maintaining ecological balance and supporting future generations. This intersection of agriculture and environmental stewardship was a pivotal theme in 1970, shaping policies and initiatives aimed at harmonizing productivity with ecological health.
Policy Developments and Future Directions
The dynamics of agricultural land in 1970 also prompted significant policy considerations. Governments worldwide began recognizing the importance of policy frameworks to manage land use effectively and address both economic and environmental objectives. For instance, land reform policies in countries with vast agricultural areas aimed at equitable distribution and improved management.
Looking forward, the trends observed in 1970 laid the groundwork for future advancements in agricultural methods and policies. Emphasis on technological innovation, sustainability, and international cooperation would become increasingly crucial in navigating the challenges of feeding a growing global population while preserving the planet's resources.
In conclusion, the global landscape of agricultural land in 1970 was a multifaceted tableau of economic potential, environmental stewardship, and policy innovation. The insights gained from this year continue to resonate, informing contemporary discussions on agricultural practices and their broader implications for society and the environment.
Insights by country
Antigua and Barbuda
In 1970, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 190 out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, which amounted to 90 square kilometers. This statistic reflects the limited arable land available in the twin-island nation, highlighting the challenges faced in agricultural production.
The small size of the islands, along with their geography and climate, contributes to the restricted agricultural landscape. The majority of land is either urbanized or used for tourism-related activities, which limits the extent of agricultural development. Additionally, the islands have a history of reliance on imported food products, which has further reduced the emphasis on local agricultural production.
Despite these challenges, agriculture has historically played a role in the economy, particularly in the production of crops such as sugar cane and cotton. The limited agricultural land also underscores the importance of sustainable practices and innovation in maximizing productivity within the constraints of the environment.
Marshall Islands
The Marshall Islands ranked 185th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land in the year 1970. At that time, the country had a total of 120 square kilometers designated as agricultural land, reflecting its limited capacity for large-scale agriculture due to its geographical characteristics.
The relatively small amount of agricultural land can be attributed to the Marshall Islands' status as a low-lying archipelago, where many atolls have limited soil depth and are prone to flooding. This geographical limitation has historically constrained agricultural production, leading to a reliance on imported food and goods.
Additionally, the agricultural practices in the Marshall Islands primarily focused on subsistence farming, with crops such as taro and breadfruit being cultivated. The country's agricultural sector has faced challenges, including vulnerability to climate change and rising sea levels, which continue to impact food security and land use.
Nauru
Nauru ranks 203rd out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, with a total of 4 square kilometers designated for this purpose in the year 1970. This limited agricultural area reflects the island's small landmass and unique geographical features, which are primarily dominated by phosphate reserves rather than arable land.
The scarcity of fertile soil and freshwater resources has historically constrained agricultural development on the island. As a result, Nauru has relied heavily on imported food products, which affects food security and local nutrition. The reliance on a narrow economic base, predominantly phosphate mining, has also contributed to the minimal use of land for agriculture.
In addition to these challenges, Nauru's isolation in the Pacific Ocean further complicates agricultural exports and local farming initiatives. This situation underscores the significant challenges small island nations face in achieving self-sufficiency in food production and highlights the importance of sustainable agricultural practices and diversification of the economy.
Serbia
In 1970, Serbia ranked 92nd out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a total area of 35,370 square kilometers. This substantial area of agricultural land reflects the country's historical reliance on agriculture as a key sector of its economy, which provided livelihoods for a significant portion of the population.
The prominence of agricultural land in Serbia can be attributed to its fertile plains, particularly in regions such as Vojvodina, which is known for its extensive arable land. Factors contributing to the agricultural capacity include favorable climatic conditions, diverse soil types, and a long tradition of farming. In 1970, Serbia's agricultural sector was crucial for food production and export, bolstering the economy during a time of political and social changes in the region.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that during this period, agriculture was not only a source of sustenance but also a significant contributor to the cultural identity of Serbia, influencing customs and community life. The legacy of this agricultural foundation continues to shape Serbia's rural landscape and economic strategies today.
Slovakia
In 1970, Slovakia ranked 106th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a total of 24,460 square kilometers. This area constituted a significant portion of the country's land use, highlighting the importance of agriculture in the Slovak economy during this period.
The relatively extensive agricultural land in Slovakia can be attributed to its favorable climate and fertile soil, which are conducive to various forms of crop cultivation and livestock farming. In the context of the broader Czechoslovak economy at the time, agriculture played a crucial role, providing employment and contributing to food security.
While the size of agricultural land was substantial, the agricultural practices were influenced by state policies under the socialist regime, which emphasized collectivization and large-scale farming operations. This approach often resulted in inefficiencies and challenges in agricultural productivity compared to Western standards.
Uganda
In 1970, Uganda ranked 65th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a total area of 99,800 square kilometers. This significant portion of land underscores the importance of agriculture as a cornerstone of Uganda's economy, providing livelihoods for a large segment of the population.
The prominence of agricultural land in Uganda can be attributed to its favorable climatic conditions, including fertile soils and diverse agro-ecological zones, which support a variety of crops such as coffee, tea, and matoke (plantains). Additionally, the country’s historical reliance on subsistence farming has shaped its agricultural landscape, with many rural communities engaged in farming for both consumption and trade.
Moreover, the agricultural sector in Uganda has been influenced by various factors such as land tenure systems, population growth, and government policies aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for evaluating Uganda's agricultural development and food security efforts over the decades.
Malaysia
In 1970, Malaysia ranked 87th out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a total area of 38,850.1 square kilometers. This significant portion of land was primarily utilized for the cultivation of cash crops such as rubber and palm oil, which have been pivotal to Malaysia's economy.
The extent of agricultural land in Malaysia during this period can be attributed to its favorable tropical climate, which supports a diverse range of agricultural activities. Additionally, government policies in the post-independence era focused on agricultural development, leading to increased investment in infrastructure and technology.
As a point of interest, Malaysia has evolved into one of the world's largest exporters of palm oil, a trend that began in the 1970s and has had profound implications on both the economy and the environment in the region.
Myanmar
In 1970, Myanmar ranked 61st out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, with a total area of 108,010 square kilometers devoted to agriculture. This substantial proportion of land reflects the country's reliance on agriculture as a primary sector for economic development and sustenance of the population.
The significant agricultural land in Myanmar can be attributed to its favorable climatic conditions and fertile plains, especially in the Irrawaddy Delta region. Historically, agriculture has played a vital role in Myanmar's economy, providing employment for a large segment of the population and contributing to food security.
Additionally, factors such as traditional farming practices and the cultivation of staple crops like rice have influenced the extent of agricultural land use. Despite these advantages, the agricultural sector has faced challenges, including political instability and resource management issues, which have affected productivity and sustainability.
Zimbabwe
In 1970, Zimbabwe was ranked 62nd out of 209 countries in terms of agricultural land, encompassing a total of 107,133 square kilometers. This significant portion of land was vital for the nation, primarily due to its reliance on agriculture as a key sector of the economy, providing employment and sustenance for a large segment of the population.
The extent of agricultural land in Zimbabwe can be attributed to its favorable climate and diverse ecosystems, which support a variety of crops and livestock. However, the agricultural sector faced challenges, including land tenure issues and socio-political factors that would later impact productivity and land distribution in subsequent decades.
Notably, agriculture has historically been a cornerstone of Zimbabwe's economy, with the country being known for its production of crops such as tobacco and maize. The importance of agricultural land is underscored by its role in food security and rural livelihoods, which have been critical for the nation, particularly in the face of economic fluctuations.
South Sudan
In 1970, South Sudan was ranked a lowly 208 out of 209 countries regarding the availability of agricultural land, with an actual value of null sq. km. This ranking reflects the severe challenges faced by the region in terms of agricultural development, largely due to ongoing conflict and political instability.
The lack of agricultural land can be attributed to various factors, including prolonged civil wars, which disrupted farming activities and displaced many communities. Additionally, the country's geography, characterized by vast swamps and limited infrastructure, hindered agricultural expansion and productivity.
Despite its rich natural resources, South Sudan's agricultural potential has remained largely untapped, contributing to food insecurity and economic challenges. As of this period, the country struggled to establish a stable agricultural base, which would be critical for its long-term development and self-sufficiency.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agricultural land data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data