Urban Population Share 2050 2006
Urban population share by 2050 shows urbanization trends. Discover which countries will be most urbanized.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Anguilla | 100 % | |
2 | Bermuda | 100 % | |
3 | Cayman Islands | 100 % | |
4 | Gibraltar | 100 % | |
5 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 100 % | |
6 | Kuwait | 100 % | |
7 | China, Macao SAR | 100 % | |
8 | Monaco | 100 % | |
9 | Nauru | 100 % | |
10 | Saint Barthélemy | 100 % | |
11 | Saint Martin (French part) | 100 % | |
12 | Singapore | 100 % | |
13 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 100 % | |
14 | Holy See | 100 % | |
15 | Guadeloupe | 98.404 % | |
16 | Qatar | 97.583 % | |
17 | Réunion | 96.777 % | |
18 | Martinique | 96.293 % | |
19 | San Marino | 95.208 % | |
20 | United States Virgin Islands | 94.088 % | |
21 | Puerto Rico | 93.964 % | |
22 | Guam | 93.889 % | |
23 | Malta | 93.799 % | |
24 | Bahrain | 92.719 % | |
25 | Uruguay | 92.485 % | |
26 | Iceland | 92.195 % | |
27 | Israel | 91.683 % | |
28 | Curaçao | 91.193 % | |
29 | Northern Mariana Islands | 90.653 % | |
30 | Argentina | 90.303 % | |
31 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | 89.942 % | |
32 | Andorra | 89.379 % | |
33 | Venezuela | 88.687 % | |
34 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 88.481 % | |
35 | Libya | 88.16 % | |
36 | American Samoa | 87.498 % | |
37 | Mayotte | 87.404 % | |
38 | Japan | 87.146 % | |
39 | Lebanon | 86.932 % | |
40 | Chile | 86.813 % | |
41 | Luxembourg | 86.774 % | |
42 | Denmark | 86.25 % | |
43 | Western Sahara | 86.184 % | |
44 | New Zealand | 85.936 % | |
45 | Australia | 85.749 % | |
46 | Netherlands | 84.653 % | |
47 | Sweden | 84.455 % | |
48 | Gabon | 84.085 % | |
49 | Belgium | 83.858 % | |
50 | Brazil | 83.267 % | |
51 | Greenland | 82.847 % | |
52 | United Arab Emirates | 82.559 % | |
53 | Bahamas | 82.04 % | |
54 | State of Palestine | 81.761 % | |
55 | French Guiana | 81.641 % | |
56 | South Korea | 81.566 % | |
57 | Saudi Arabia | 81.201 % | |
58 | United Kingdom | 80.546 % | |
59 | United States | 80.371 % | |
60 | Canada | 80.219 % | |
61 | Germany | 80.196 % | |
62 | Taiwan | 79.027 % | |
63 | Jordan | 78.756 % | |
64 | Palau | 78.307 % | |
65 | Norway | 78.088 % | |
66 | Spain | 77.497 % | |
67 | France | 77.347 % | |
68 | Mexico | 76.498 % | |
69 | Colombia | 76.162 % | |
70 | Cuba | 76.112 % | |
71 | Peru | 75.277 % | |
72 | Greece | 74.718 % | |
73 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 74.464 % | |
74 | Brunei Darussalam | 74.015 % | |
75 | Czech Republic | 73.579 % | |
76 | Switzerland | 73.512 % | |
77 | Russia | 73.244 % | |
78 | Belarus | 72.611 % | |
79 | Oman | 72.392 % | |
80 | Cook Islands | 72.106 % | |
81 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 71.411 % | |
82 | Marshall Islands | 71.208 % | |
83 | Djibouti | 71.025 % | |
84 | Bulgaria | 70.508 % | |
85 | Dominican Republic | 69.334 % | |
86 | Finland | 68.759 % | |
87 | Iraq | 68.559 % | |
88 | Iran | 68.31 % | |
89 | Cyprus | 68.253 % | |
90 | Ukraine | 68.029 % | |
91 | Malaysia | 67.919 % | |
92 | Latvia | 67.874 % | |
93 | Italy | 67.681 % | |
94 | Estonia | 67.556 % | |
95 | Hungary | 67.016 % | |
96 | Austria | 67.001 % | |
97 | Suriname | 66.697 % | |
98 | Lithuania | 66.638 % | |
99 | Dominica | 66.545 % | |
100 | Costa Rica | 66.17 % | |
101 | Tunisia | 65.521 % | |
102 | Aruba | 64.811 % | |
103 | New Caledonia | 64.751 % | |
104 | Bolivia | 64.663 % | |
105 | Armenia | 64.476 % | |
106 | Algeria | 64.415 % | |
107 | Panama | 64.355 % | |
108 | Turkey | 64.287 % | |
109 | Mongolia | 63.839 % | |
110 | Montenegro | 63.111 % | |
111 | Ecuador | 62.21 % | |
112 | El Salvador | 61.907 % | |
113 | Congo | 61.624 % | |
114 | Poland | 61.42 % | |
115 | Sao Tome and Principe | 60.973 % | |
116 | Ireland | 60.77 % | |
117 | South Africa | 60.528 % | |
118 | Barbados | 60.196 % | |
119 | North Korea | 59.834 % | |
120 | Botswana | 59.642 % | |
121 | Portugal | 59.034 % | |
122 | Paraguay | 59.02 % | |
123 | Cabo Verde | 58.533 % | |
124 | Serbia | 58.171 % | |
125 | North Macedonia | 57.88 % | |
126 | French Polynesia | 57.583 % | |
127 | Angola | 56.894 % | |
128 | Nicaragua | 56.106 % | |
129 | Morocco | 55.963 % | |
130 | Croatia | 55.469 % | |
131 | Slovakia | 55.246 % | |
132 | Trinidad and Tobago | 55.178 % | |
133 | Kazakhstan | 54.414 % | |
134 | Syrian Arab Republic | 54.06 % | |
135 | Georgia | 53.359 % | |
136 | Romania | 53.257 % | |
137 | Gambia | 53.16 % | |
138 | Jamaica | 52.971 % | |
139 | Azerbaijan | 52.654 % | |
140 | Uzbekistan | 51.464 % | |
141 | Isle of Man | 51.115 % | |
142 | Slovenia | 50.567 % | |
143 | Tuvalu | 50.523 % | |
144 | Fiji | 50.229 % | |
145 | Nepal | 49.506 % | |
146 | Cameroon | 49.204 % | |
147 | Honduras | 48.779 % | |
148 | Guatemala | 48.768 % | |
149 | Nigeria | 48.424 % | |
150 | Ghana | 48.139 % | |
151 | Albania | 47.07 % | |
152 | Indonesia | 47.002 % | |
153 | Turkmenistan | 46.806 % | |
154 | Belize | 46.408 % | |
155 | Liberia | 46.232 % | |
156 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 45.585 % | |
157 | Côte d'Ivoire | 45.504 % | |
158 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.475 % | |
159 | China | 44.343 % | |
160 | British Virgin Islands | 44.218 % | |
161 | Equatorial Guinea | 43.93 % | |
162 | Kiribati | 43.735 % | |
163 | Haiti | 43.285 % | |
164 | Egypt | 42.973 % | |
165 | Seychelles | 42.788 % | |
166 | Senegal | 42.205 % | |
167 | Philippines | 41.831 % | |
168 | Mauritania | 41.374 % | |
169 | Mauritius | 40.961 % | |
170 | Benin | 40.788 % | |
171 | Saint Helena | 39.858 % | |
172 | Thailand | 39.442 % | |
173 | Republic of Moldova | 39.218 % | |
174 | Guinea-Bissau | 38.687 % | |
175 | Central African Republic | 38.134 % | |
176 | Zambia | 37.839 % | |
177 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 37.802 % | |
178 | Namibia | 37.672 % | |
179 | Sierra Leone | 37.17 % | |
180 | Faroe Islands | 36.458 % | |
181 | Somalia | 35.998 % | |
182 | Grenada | 35.912 % | |
183 | Togo | 35.795 % | |
184 | Niue | 35.658 % | |
185 | Kyrgyzstan | 35.3 % | |
186 | Eritrea | 35.253 % | |
187 | Maldives | 34.868 % | |
188 | Pakistan | 34.093 % | |
189 | Jersey | 33.4 % | |
190 | Guinea | 32.687 % | |
191 | Zimbabwe | 32.664 % | |
192 | Sudan | 32.47 % | |
193 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 31.836 % | |
194 | Bhutan | 31.566 % | |
195 | Mozambique | 30.174 % | |
196 | India | 29.431 % | |
197 | Yemen | 29.238 % | |
198 | Kenya | 28.983 % | |
199 | Myanmar | 28.552 % | |
200 | Antigua and Barbuda | 28.435 % | |
201 | Guernsey | 28.178 % | |
202 | Comoros | 28.114 % | |
203 | Vietnam | 28.046 % | |
204 | Laos | 28.038 % | |
205 | Guyana | 27.46 % | |
206 | Timor-Leste | 27.122 % | |
207 | Madagascar | 26.759 % | |
208 | Tajikistan | 26.532 % | |
209 | Bangladesh | 25.948 % | |
210 | Tanzania | 25.374 % | |
211 | Lesotho | 23.333 % | |
212 | Vanuatu | 23.289 % | |
213 | Tonga | 23.18 % | |
214 | Burkina Faso | 22.553 % | |
215 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 22.328 % | |
216 | Saint Lucia | 22.202 % | |
217 | Eswatini | 22.151 % | |
218 | Chad | 21.763 % | |
219 | Mali | 21.299 % | |
220 | Samoa | 20.957 % | |
221 | Afghanistan | 20.11 % | |
222 | Cambodia | 19.23 % | |
223 | Solomon Islands | 18.054 % | |
224 | South Sudan | 16.951 % | |
225 | Rwanda | 16.911 % | |
226 | Niger | 16.268 % | |
227 | Ethiopia | 16.215 % | |
228 | Sri Lanka | 15.483 % | |
229 | Malawi | 15.175 % | |
230 | Uganda | 14.585 % | |
231 | Liechtenstein | 14.539 % | |
232 | Papua New Guinea | 13.05 % | |
233 | Burundi | 9.465 % | |
234 | Montserrat | 9.375 % | |
235 | Tokelau | 0 % | |
236 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 0 % |
- #1
Anguilla
- #2
Bermuda
- #3
Cayman Islands
- #4
Gibraltar
- #5
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #6
Kuwait
- #7
China, Macao SAR
- #8
Monaco
- #9
Nauru
- #10
Saint Barthélemy
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #236
Wallis and Futuna Islands
- #235
Tokelau
- #234
Montserrat
- #233
Burundi
- #232
Papua New Guinea
- #231
Liechtenstein
- #230
Uganda
- #229
Malawi
- #228
Sri Lanka
- #227
Ethiopia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Urban Population Share 2050 in 2006 reveals that the Holy See, along with nine other territories, is projected to be fully urbanized, each with a share of 100%. In contrast, Antigua and Barbuda is at the lower end with 28.44%. The global urban population share averages at 65.52%, providing a comprehensive view of future urbanization trends.
Understanding the Extremes: Full Urbanization and Its Implications
The data indicates that several countries and territories, including the Holy See, Cayman Islands, and Kuwait, are projected to reach a full 100% urban population share by 2050. This trend can be attributed to their small geographical sizes, which naturally limit rural areas, and their high levels of economic development. For example, Singapore, a global financial hub, benefits from strategic urban planning and infrastructure investments that support such dense urbanization.
These urbanized nations often exhibit high GDP per capita and advanced service sectors, suggesting that economic factors heavily influence urbanization levels. Additionally, policy-driven urbanization, such as in China, Macao SAR, reflects government initiatives aimed at consolidating urban growth to boost economic development.
Challenges Faced by Less Urbanized Nations
On the opposite end of the spectrum, countries like Antigua and Barbuda and Myanmar have urban population shares below 30%. This indicates significant rural populations and potentially limited urban infrastructure development. In countries like India and Kenya, rapid population growth and rural economic reliance hinder urbanization efforts. These countries face challenges such as inadequate urban infrastructure and services, which can exacerbate socio-economic disparities.
The lower urbanization rates can also reflect cultural and historical preferences for rural lifestyles, as observed in Bhutan, where traditional rural living remains prevalent despite modernization efforts.
Year-over-Year Trends: Movers and Shakers
Analyzing year-over-year changes highlights significant shifts in urbanization rates. Nepal experienced the largest increase, with a 4.00% rise, indicating rapid urban expansion possibly driven by rural-to-urban migration and economic reforms. Similarly, Mayotte and the Dominican Republic saw increases of 2.43% and 1.76%, respectively, suggesting improvements in urban infrastructure and economic opportunities that attract populations to urban centers.
Conversely, Antigua and Barbuda recorded a -0.74% decrease, reflecting potential economic challenges or shifts in population distribution. Declines in urbanization rates, such as seen in Andorra and Barbados, might also indicate economic saturation or policy shifts prioritizing rural development.
Global Urbanization Patterns and Future Outlook
The global average urban population share of 65.52% underscores a significant trend towards urban living, driven by economic development and policy initiatives. Urbanization is often associated with improved access to services, better living standards, and economic opportunities. However, it also presents challenges such as infrastructure strain, environmental concerns, and socio-economic inequality.
Countries projected to have high urbanization rates are typically those that have invested heavily in urban infrastructure and economic diversification. As nations like Singapore and Kuwait show, strategic urban planning can lead to sustainable urban environments. Conversely, nations with low urbanization projections face the challenge of balancing rural development with urban growth.
Overall, the data from 2006 provides a crucial insight into future urbanization trends, highlighting the diverse paths countries are taking towards urban development by 2050.
Frequently Asked Questions About Urban Population Share 2050 in 2006
Which country has the highest urban population share projected for 2050 according to the 2006 data?
The Holy See is projected to have the highest urban population share in 2050, with 100%.
What is the average urban population share for 2050 across all countries in the dataset?
The average urban population share for 2050 across all 236 countries in the dataset is 58.53%.
Which country has the lowest projected urban population share for 2050?
The Wallis and Futuna Islands have the lowest projected urban population share for 2050, with 0%.
What is the median urban population share for 2050 in the dataset?
The median urban population share for 2050 in the dataset is 60.01%.
How many countries are included in the dataset for urban population share in 2050?
The dataset includes 236 countries for urban population share in 2050.
Which countries are in the top 10 for urban population share in 2050?
The top 10 countries for urban population share in 2050, all with 100%, are Holy See, Cayman Islands, Kuwait, Nauru, Sint Maarten (Dutch part), Gibraltar, Saint Barthélemy, Anguilla, Singapore, and China, Macao SAR.
Insights by country
Comoros
In 2006, Comoros had an Urban Population Share 2050 of 28.11432 %, ranking #202 out of 236 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating limited urbanization compared to more developed nations. Factors contributing to this statistic include Comoros' small island geography, which restricts urban expansion, and economic challenges that hinder migration to urban centers.
Bahamas
In 2006, the Bahamas ranked #53 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 82.03961%. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant trend towards urbanization. The Bahamas' urban population growth is driven by its economic reliance on tourism and services, which are concentrated in urban areas, alongside its geographic structure that promotes coastal city development.
Bhutan
In 2006, Bhutan ranked #194 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 31.566494 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a slower pace of urbanization compared to many countries. Key drivers of this statistic include Bhutan's rugged geography, which limits urban expansion, and a strong emphasis on preserving traditional lifestyles and culture, which influences migration patterns.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde ranked #123 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 58.533268 % in 2006. This figure is slightly below the average for Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating a gradual urbanization trend compared to its neighbors. The country's urban growth is driven by economic opportunities in tourism and services, alongside a young population migrating from rural areas to urban centers for better livelihoods.
Haiti
In 2006, Haiti ranked #163 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 43.284645 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing challenges in urbanization compared to more developed nations. Key drivers of this statistic include Haiti's economic instability and lack of infrastructure, which hinder urban migration and development.
Malawi
In 2006, Malawi's Urban Population Share 2050 was 15.175399 %, ranking it #229 out of 236 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited urbanization compared to more developed nations. Key drivers include Malawi's predominantly agricultural economy, which limits migration to urban areas, and ongoing challenges in infrastructure development and accessibility in cities.
Japan
In 2006, Japan ranked #38 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 87.14609 %. This figure is notable as it reflects a significant urbanization trend, with Japan's urban population expected to be higher than the global average. Key drivers include Japan's advanced economy, extensive infrastructure, and a high standard of living that attract rural populations to urban centers.
Albania
In 2006, Albania ranked #151 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 47.070107 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating a slower pace of urbanization compared to many countries. Key drivers of this statistic include Albania's ongoing economic transition and the influence of historical rural migration patterns, which have shaped its demographic landscape. Additionally, infrastructural challenges and limited urban planning have further constrained rapid urban development.
Kiribati
In 2006, Kiribati had an Urban Population Share 2050 of 43.73498 %, ranking #162 out of 236 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to many Pacific Island nations, reflecting the region's unique challenges in urbanization. Key drivers for this statistic include Kiribati's geographic isolation and limited economic opportunities, which have historically constrained urban migration and development.
Israel
In 2006, Israel ranked #27 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 91.68258%. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant trend towards urbanization. Key drivers include Israel's robust economy, which attracts migration to urban centers, and its limited land area that encourages dense living arrangements. Additionally, ongoing technological advancements and infrastructure development further enhance urban living conditions.
Cyprus
In 2006, Cyprus ranked #89 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 68.25342 %. This figure is below the global average, reflecting a trend where many smaller nations experience slower urbanization compared to larger countries. Key drivers for Cyprus's urban population growth include its strategic geographic location as a hub for trade and tourism, alongside a relatively stable economy that attracts residents to urban centers.
Kazakhstan
In 2006, Kazakhstan ranked #133 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 54.413727 %. This figure is below the global average, reflecting challenges in urbanization compared to more developed nations. Key drivers for this statistic include Kazakhstan's vast geographic area, which leads to a dispersed population, and ongoing economic development that has not yet fully transitioned rural populations to urban centers.
Guam
In 2006, Guam ranked #22 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 93.88949 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a trend towards urbanization in many island territories. Key drivers of this urban concentration include Guam's limited land area, economic reliance on tourism and military presence, and a demographic shift towards urban living as infrastructure and services are concentrated in urban centers.
Finland
In 2006, Finland ranked #86 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 68.75883 %. This figure is below the European average, indicating a slower urbanization trend compared to many of its neighbors. Contributing factors include Finland's extensive rural areas, a strong emphasis on preserving natural landscapes, and a well-distributed population across its cities and towns.
Tuvalu
In 2006, Tuvalu had an Urban Population Share 2050 of 50.522987 %, ranking #143 out of 236 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global urbanization trend, which is projected to exceed 68% by 2050. The relatively low urban population share is driven by Tuvalu's small land area, limited economic opportunities, and a strong cultural emphasis on traditional lifestyles, which influence migration patterns and urban development.
Mayotte
In 2006, Mayotte ranked #37 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 87.40422 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a trend towards urbanization that is common in many developing regions. The high urban population share is driven by Mayotte's growing economy and its status as a French overseas department, which attracts migration and supports urban development initiatives.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2006, Equatorial Guinea ranked #161 globally with an Urban Population Share 2050 of 43.930126 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a slower urbanization rate compared to many developing nations. The country's urbanization is hampered by its reliance on oil exports, which has not translated into widespread infrastructure development or urban planning. Additionally, geographic factors and limited investment in rural areas contribute to the slow growth of urban populations.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan's Urban Population Share 2050 is projected to be 52.654015 %, ranking it #139 out of 236 countries as of 2006. This figure is below the global average urbanization rate, reflecting significant rural populations compared to other nations. Key drivers of this statistic include Azerbaijan's economic reliance on oil and gas, which has historically concentrated growth in urban areas like Baku, while many rural regions remain underdeveloped.
Data Source
Share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050 | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues, including the share of the population living in urban areas. The dataset projects urbanization trends up to 2050, offering country-level statistics to analyze shifts in population distribution.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Urban Population Share 2050 data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data