Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2002
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Afghanistan | 85.376 % | |
2 | Equatorial Guinea | 82.379 % | |
3 | Myanmar | 82.235 % | |
4 | Togo | 79.719 % | |
5 | Tajikistan | 78.167 % | |
6 | Georgia | 77.129 % | |
7 | Comoros | 76.193 % | |
8 | Côte d'Ivoire | 75.832 % | |
9 | Armenia | 75.235 % | |
10 | India | 73.374 % | |
11 | Sierra Leone | 72.995 % | |
12 | Azerbaijan | 72.339 % | |
13 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 71.288 % | |
14 | Cameroon | 70.181 % | |
15 | Mauritania | 69.985 % | |
16 | Nigeria | 65.049 % | |
17 | Chad | 64.735 % | |
18 | Egypt | 63.767 % | |
19 | Bangladesh | 62.935 % | |
20 | China | 62.851 % | |
21 | Guatemala | 62.113 % | |
22 | Uzbekistan | 62.071 % | |
23 | Mali | 61.751 % | |
24 | Ecuador | 61.425 % | |
25 | Congo | 61.423 % | |
26 | Sudan | 61.421 % | |
27 | Turkmenistan | 61.135 % | |
28 | Cambodia | 60.83 % | |
29 | Niger | 59.452 % | |
30 | Guinea | 59.405 % | |
31 | Guinea-Bissau | 57.387 % | |
32 | Saint Lucia | 56.906 % | |
33 | Burkina Faso | 56.125 % | |
34 | Paraguay | 56.072 % | |
35 | Senegal | 55.33 % | |
36 | Iran | 54.746 % | |
37 | Mexico | 54.359 % | |
38 | Gabon | 54.137 % | |
39 | Lebanon | 54.115 % | |
40 | Syrian Arab Republic | 53.991 % | |
41 | Morocco | 53.847 % | |
42 | Liberia | 53.579 % | |
43 | Dominican Republic | 53.451 % | |
44 | Singapore | 53.088 % | |
45 | Cyprus | 52.772 % | |
46 | Trinidad and Tobago | 52.286 % | |
47 | Nepal | 51.956 % | |
48 | Maldives | 51.881 % | |
49 | Honduras | 51.851 % | |
50 | Benin | 51.766 % | |
51 | Kyrgyzstan | 51.661 % | |
52 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 51.345 % | |
53 | Grenada | 50.987 % | |
54 | Pakistan | 50.965 % | |
55 | Albania | 50.855 % | |
56 | Burundi | 49.843 % | |
57 | Laos | 49.669 % | |
58 | Angola | 49.662 % | |
59 | Central African Republic | 49.598 % | |
60 | Haiti | 48.178 % | |
61 | Philippines | 47.767 % | |
62 | Latvia | 47.582 % | |
63 | Yemen | 46.677 % | |
64 | Republic of Moldova | 46.519 % | |
65 | Indonesia | 46.378 % | |
66 | Eritrea | 46.022 % | |
67 | Kazakhstan | 45.895 % | |
68 | Nicaragua | 45.29 % | |
69 | Ukraine | 45.117 % | |
70 | Mauritius | 44.872 % | |
71 | El Salvador | 44.853 % | |
72 | Kenya | 44.625 % | |
73 | Uganda | 44.012 % | |
74 | North Macedonia | 42.57 % | |
75 | Tanzania | 42.52 % | |
76 | Chile | 42.484 % | |
77 | Sao Tome and Principe | 41.911 % | |
78 | Dominica | 41.705 % | |
79 | Djibouti | 40.902 % | |
80 | South Korea | 40.765 % | |
81 | Sri Lanka | 40.453 % | |
82 | Guyana | 40.305 % | |
83 | Tunisia | 40.205 % | |
84 | Peru | 39.941 % | |
85 | Bulgaria | 39.794 % | |
86 | Jordan | 39.482 % | |
87 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 38.456 % | |
88 | Jamaica | 37.861 % | |
89 | Madagascar | 37.577 % | |
90 | Ethiopia | 37.463 % | |
91 | Greece | 37.38 % | |
92 | Barbados | 36.522 % | |
93 | Brazil | 36.406 % | |
94 | State of Palestine | 36 % | |
95 | Malaysia | 34.644 % | |
96 | Vietnam | 34.542 % | |
97 | Belize | 33.937 % | |
98 | Bolivia | 33.921 % | |
99 | Libya | 33.089 % | |
100 | Panama | 32.603 % | |
101 | Ghana | 31.974 % | |
102 | Russia | 31.213 % | |
103 | Costa Rica | 30.691 % | |
104 | Argentina | 30.245 % | |
105 | Lesotho | 30.136 % | |
106 | Switzerland | 29.05 % | |
107 | Bahamas | 28.807 % | |
108 | Malta | 28.736 % | |
109 | Rwanda | 28.464 % | |
110 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 28.459 % | |
111 | Zambia | 28.44 % | |
112 | United Arab Emirates | 28.042 % | |
113 | Mozambique | 27.982 % | |
114 | Thailand | 27.897 % | |
115 | Israel | 27.843 % | |
116 | Qatar | 27.513 % | |
117 | Hungary | 27.513 % | |
118 | Bahrain | 26.955 % | |
119 | Poland | 26.449 % | |
120 | Lithuania | 25.603 % | |
121 | San Marino | 25.194 % | |
122 | Spain | 24.6 % | |
123 | Italy | 24.125 % | |
124 | Serbia | 23.832 % | |
125 | Cabo Verde | 23.524 % | |
126 | Portugal | 23.18 % | |
127 | Belarus | 23.024 % | |
128 | Suriname | 23.009 % | |
129 | Antigua and Barbuda | 22.74 % | |
130 | Algeria | 22.525 % | |
131 | Uruguay | 21.696 % | |
132 | Kuwait | 21.54 % | |
133 | Mongolia | 20.994 % | |
134 | Belgium | 20.847 % | |
135 | Finland | 20.745 % | |
136 | Estonia | 20.559 % | |
137 | Turkey | 20.321 % | |
138 | Australia | 19.92 % | |
139 | Austria | 19.458 % | |
140 | Cuba | 19.377 % | |
141 | Croatia | 18.632 % | |
142 | Palau | 18.532 % | |
143 | Saudi Arabia | 18.452 % | |
144 | Romania | 17.835 % | |
145 | United Kingdom | 17.388 % | |
146 | Iceland | 17.304 % | |
147 | Eswatini | 16.884 % | |
148 | Norway | 16.825 % | |
149 | Sweden | 16.783 % | |
150 | Brunei Darussalam | 16.411 % | |
151 | New Zealand | 16.057 % | |
152 | Japan | 15.979 % | |
153 | Canada | 15.908 % | |
154 | Andorra | 15.05 % | |
155 | Malawi | 14.99 % | |
156 | Denmark | 14.728 % | |
157 | United States | 14.327 % | |
158 | Luxembourg | 13.862 % | |
159 | South Africa | 13.558 % | |
160 | Samoa | 13.301 % | |
161 | Gambia | 13.148 % | |
162 | Slovenia | 12.555 % | |
163 | Seychelles | 12.482 % | |
164 | Tonga | 12.374 % | |
165 | Fiji | 12.319 % | |
166 | Germany | 12.048 % | |
167 | Colombia | 11.49 % | |
168 | Bhutan | 11.153 % | |
169 | Slovakia | 11.017 % | |
170 | Ireland | 10.467 % | |
171 | Oman | 10.149 % | |
172 | Czech Republic | 10.002 % | |
173 | Netherlands | 9.812 % | |
174 | Vanuatu | 8.864 % | |
175 | Papua New Guinea | 8.749 % | |
176 | Botswana | 8.745 % | |
177 | France | 7.138 % | |
178 | Monaco | 6.828 % | |
179 | Namibia | 6.339 % | |
180 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 5.411 % | |
181 | Nauru | 3.803 % | |
182 | Solomon Islands | 2.589 % | |
183 | Marshall Islands | 1.584 % | |
184 | Tuvalu | 1.248 % | |
185 | Kiribati | 0.11 % |
- #1
Afghanistan
- #2
Equatorial Guinea
- #3
Myanmar
- #4
Togo
- #5
Tajikistan
- #6
Georgia
- #7
Comoros
- #8
Côte d'Ivoire
- #9
Armenia
- #10
India
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #185
Kiribati
- #184
Tuvalu
- #183
Marshall Islands
- #182
Solomon Islands
- #181
Nauru
- #180
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #179
Namibia
- #178
Monaco
- #177
France
- #176
Botswana
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2002, Afghanistan led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with an expenditure of 85.38%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 0.11% to a maximum of 85.38%. The global average for this metric was 36.92%, providing a benchmark for understanding the financial burden of healthcare on individuals across different countries.
Economic Factors Influencing High Spending
Several countries exhibit significantly high Out-of-Pocket Health Spending due to economic constraints and limited government healthcare funding. Afghanistan (85.38%), Myanmar (82.23%), and Togo (79.72%) are among the top contributors to this trend. These nations often face economic instability, which limits public investment in healthcare infrastructure and results in higher personal expenditures. For instance, in Afghanistan, ongoing conflict has diverted resources away from healthcare, compelling citizens to bear a larger share of medical expenses.
Low Spending Through Comprehensive Health Systems
In contrast, countries like Kiribati (0.11%), Tuvalu (1.25%), and France (7.14%) maintain low out-of-pocket expenditures due to robust healthcare systems funded by the state. These nations have implemented policies that minimize financial barriers to healthcare access. France, for instance, benefits from a comprehensive national health insurance program, which significantly reduces the need for personal healthcare spending. Such systems effectively alleviate the financial burden on individuals, ensuring equitable access to medical services.
Year-over-Year Changes Highlight Policy Shifts
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals significant shifts in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in various countries. Equatorial Guinea experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 28.05% (51.6%), driven by economic challenges and limited healthcare investment. Similarly, Armenia saw a substantial increase of 24.35% (47.9%), indicating possible reductions in public healthcare funding.
Conversely, Libya recorded the most significant decrease of -12.44% (-27.3%), reflecting potential improvements in healthcare funding or policy changes aimed at reducing personal healthcare costs. Zambia also saw a decline of -10.37% (-26.7%), which might suggest increased government intervention or international aid improving healthcare accessibility.
Geographical and Cultural Impacts
Geographical and cultural factors also play a crucial role in shaping Out-of-Pocket Health Spending. In regions like Sub-Saharan Africa, represented by countries such as Togo (79.72%) and Côte d'Ivoire (75.83%), traditional healthcare practices and limited access to modern medical facilities contribute to higher personal expenses. Cultural reliance on alternative medicine can often lead to increased out-of-pocket costs as individuals seek supplementary treatments outside the public healthcare system.
In contrast, Pacific island nations like Kiribati (0.11%) and Tuvalu (1.25%) benefit from small, closely-knit communities where healthcare delivery is often subsidized or managed at a community level, significantly reducing personal expenditure.
Overall, the data on Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2002 highlights the diverse economic, policy, and cultural factors influencing healthcare costs worldwide. Understanding these dynamics can inform future healthcare reforms and aid in reducing the financial burden on individuals globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2002
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2002?
Afghanistan had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2002, with 85.38%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2002?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2002, with 0.11%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2002?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2002 was 36.92%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2002?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2002 was 36.41%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2002?
The top 10 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2002 were Afghanistan, Equatorial Guinea, Myanmar, Togo, Tajikistan, Georgia, Comoros, Côte d'Ivoire, Armenia, and India.
How many countries were included in the dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2002?
The dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2002 included 185 countries.
Insights by country
Denmark
In 2002, Denmark's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending was 14.728385 %, ranking #156 out of 185 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on private health expenditures in a system typically characterized by universal healthcare. Contributing factors include Denmark's robust welfare state model, which emphasizes public health funding, yet allows for significant individual contributions to healthcare costs, particularly for services not fully covered by public insurance.
Ethiopia
Ethiopia ranked #90 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2002, with a value of 37.462627 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for health care. Contributing factors include limited government health financing and a largely informal health sector, which places the financial burden on individuals, particularly in rural areas where access to affordable care is scarce.
Kenya
In 2002, Kenya ranked #72 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 44.62519 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal finances for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited government funding for health services and a high prevalence of out-of-pocket expenses due to inadequate insurance coverage among the population.
Guatemala
In 2002, Guatemala ranked #21 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 62.1133 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include limited public health resources, a high level of poverty, and a lack of comprehensive health insurance coverage, which forces many Guatemalans to pay for healthcare out of their own pockets.
Bhutan
In 2002, Bhutan's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending was 11.153113 %, ranking it #168 out of 185 countries. This percentage is notably higher than that of neighboring India, which has a more developed healthcare financing system. The high out-of-pocket spending in Bhutan can be attributed to limited public healthcare funding and a reliance on private healthcare services, which often leads to increased costs for individuals seeking medical care.
Afghanistan
In 2002, Afghanistan ranked #1 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a striking 85.3756 % of health expenditures coming from private sources. This percentage far exceeds the global average and highlights the lack of a robust public health financing system. The prolonged conflict and instability in Afghanistan have severely hindered the development of healthcare infrastructure, forcing individuals to bear the financial burden of medical expenses directly.
Barbados
In 2002, Barbados ranked #92 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 36.521736 %. This figure is notably higher than the average for many Caribbean nations, which often rely more on public healthcare funding. The relatively high out-of-pocket expenses can be attributed to a combination of limited public health resources and a healthcare system that encourages private sector involvement, impacting accessibility for lower-income populations.
Trinidad and Tobago
In 2002, Trinidad and Tobago ranked #46 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 52.28603 %. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include a relatively high cost of healthcare services and limited public health funding, which compel citizens to pay a substantial portion of their medical expenses directly.
Cuba
Cuba's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2002 was 19.377361 %, ranking it #140 out of 185 countries. This figure is notably higher than many of its Caribbean neighbors, which often benefit from more robust public health funding. The relatively high out-of-pocket expenses can be attributed to Cuba's economic constraints and the reliance on a dual currency system, impacting access to healthcare resources for the population.
Latvia
In 2002, Latvia had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 47.581665 %, ranking #62 out of 185 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include Latvia's transitional economy post-independence and limited public healthcare funding, which has led to increased out-of-pocket expenses for citizens.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.