Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2014
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Armenia | 82.481 % | |
2 | Yemen | 79.965 % | |
3 | Afghanistan | 73.056 % | |
4 | Nigeria | 71.854 % | |
5 | Bangladesh | 70.759 % | |
6 | Cameroon | 68.985 % | |
7 | Turkmenistan | 68.208 % | |
8 | Azerbaijan | 67.548 % | |
9 | Georgia | 67.038 % | |
10 | Sudan | 67.032 % | |
11 | India | 67.014 % | |
12 | Myanmar | 66.035 % | |
13 | Comoros | 65.514 % | |
14 | Pakistan | 65.507 % | |
15 | Equatorial Guinea | 63.921 % | |
16 | Tajikistan | 62.185 % | |
17 | Iraq | 62.03 % | |
18 | Nepal | 60.048 % | |
19 | Albania | 59.181 % | |
20 | Guinea | 58.359 % | |
21 | Cambodia | 58.098 % | |
22 | Togo | 57.305 % | |
23 | Kyrgyzstan | 56.324 % | |
24 | Chad | 55.721 % | |
25 | Guatemala | 55.555 % | |
26 | Guinea-Bissau | 55.388 % | |
27 | Egypt | 55.121 % | |
28 | Niger | 54.674 % | |
29 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 53.709 % | |
30 | Philippines | 52.377 % | |
31 | Grenada | 51.891 % | |
32 | Saint Lucia | 51.305 % | |
33 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 51.143 % | |
34 | Eritrea | 50.962 % | |
35 | Laos | 50.879 % | |
36 | Senegal | 50.376 % | |
37 | Mauritius | 50.18 % | |
38 | Morocco | 49.156 % | |
39 | Honduras | 48.688 % | |
40 | Sri Lanka | 48.683 % | |
41 | Ukraine | 48.132 % | |
42 | Mauritania | 47.621 % | |
43 | Syrian Arab Republic | 46.923 % | |
44 | Benin | 46.494 % | |
45 | Central African Republic | 46.463 % | |
46 | Uzbekistan | 45.41 % | |
47 | Indonesia | 45.247 % | |
48 | Cyprus | 45.111 % | |
49 | Ghana | 45.051 % | |
50 | Liberia | 44.754 % | |
51 | State of Palestine | 44.4 % | |
52 | Paraguay | 44.386 % | |
53 | Barbados | 43.634 % | |
54 | Trinidad and Tobago | 42.831 % | |
55 | Vietnam | 41.028 % | |
56 | Mexico | 40.872 % | |
57 | Bulgaria | 40.241 % | |
58 | Uganda | 40.146 % | |
59 | Iran | 40.109 % | |
60 | Serbia | 39.945 % | |
61 | Somalia | 39.599 % | |
62 | Montenegro | 39.115 % | |
63 | Latvia | 39.106 % | |
64 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 38.716 % | |
65 | Ethiopia | 38.474 % | |
66 | Republic of Moldova | 38.349 % | |
67 | Tunisia | 38.005 % | |
68 | South Korea | 37.552 % | |
69 | Greece | 37.2 % | |
70 | El Salvador | 36.574 % | |
71 | China | 36.565 % | |
72 | Malta | 36.468 % | |
73 | Guyana | 35.954 % | |
74 | Russia | 35.826 % | |
75 | Dominica | 35.745 % | |
76 | Lebanon | 35.564 % | |
77 | Jamaica | 35.426 % | |
78 | Nicaragua | 35.33 % | |
79 | Sierra Leone | 35.035 % | |
80 | North Macedonia | 34.977 % | |
81 | Belarus | 34.894 % | |
82 | Mongolia | 34.676 % | |
83 | Chile | 34.269 % | |
84 | Burkina Faso | 34.078 % | |
85 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 34.013 % | |
86 | Libya | 33.626 % | |
87 | Mali | 33.551 % | |
88 | Singapore | 33.3 % | |
89 | Malaysia | 33.045 % | |
90 | Panama | 31.799 % | |
91 | Peru | 31.772 % | |
92 | Lithuania | 31.493 % | |
93 | Congo | 31.186 % | |
94 | Dominican Republic | 31.054 % | |
95 | Haiti | 31.015 % | |
96 | Burundi | 31.001 % | |
97 | Ecuador | 30.958 % | |
98 | Bolivia | 30.904 % | |
99 | Portugal | 29.335 % | |
100 | Kenya | 29.222 % | |
101 | Suriname | 28.983 % | |
102 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 28.922 % | |
103 | Algeria | 28.564 % | |
104 | Hungary | 28.339 % | |
105 | Bahamas | 28.324 % | |
106 | Brazil | 28.18 % | |
107 | Madagascar | 28.167 % | |
108 | Gabon | 28.13 % | |
109 | Maldives | 28.117 % | |
110 | Seychelles | 27.476 % | |
111 | Angola | 26.876 % | |
112 | Gambia | 26.827 % | |
113 | Argentina | 26.693 % | |
114 | Bahrain | 26.143 % | |
115 | Tanzania | 25.982 % | |
116 | Cabo Verde | 25.699 % | |
117 | Antigua and Barbuda | 25.344 % | |
118 | Zimbabwe | 24.832 % | |
119 | Spain | 24.653 % | |
120 | Costa Rica | 24.413 % | |
121 | Kazakhstan | 23.802 % | |
122 | Estonia | 23.522 % | |
123 | Israel | 23.01 % | |
124 | Italy | 22.956 % | |
125 | Belize | 22.782 % | |
126 | Poland | 22.737 % | |
127 | Djibouti | 22.66 % | |
128 | Switzerland | 22.614 % | |
129 | Bhutan | 21.171 % | |
130 | Jordan | 20.891 % | |
131 | Liechtenstein | 20.454 % | |
132 | Romania | 20.314 % | |
133 | Belgium | 20.008 % | |
134 | Fiji | 19.896 % | |
135 | Austria | 19.613 % | |
136 | Slovakia | 18.008 % | |
137 | Australia | 17.847 % | |
138 | Iceland | 17.847 % | |
139 | United Arab Emirates | 17.808 % | |
140 | Turkey | 17.725 % | |
141 | Finland | 17.637 % | |
142 | Uruguay | 17.095 % | |
143 | Colombia | 16.277 % | |
144 | United Kingdom | 15.744 % | |
145 | Palau | 15.692 % | |
146 | Sao Tome and Principe | 15.042 % | |
147 | Sweden | 14.943 % | |
148 | Canada | 14.713 % | |
149 | Czech Republic | 14.459 % | |
150 | Norway | 14.379 % | |
151 | Lesotho | 14.19 % | |
152 | Ireland | 13.987 % | |
153 | Kuwait | 13.929 % | |
154 | Zambia | 13.82 % | |
155 | Denmark | 13.339 % | |
156 | Saudi Arabia | 13.136 % | |
157 | Slovenia | 12.983 % | |
158 | Japan | 12.87 % | |
159 | Thailand | 12.856 % | |
160 | New Zealand | 12.841 % | |
161 | Andorra | 12.752 % | |
162 | Germany | 12.35 % | |
163 | Rwanda | 12.055 % | |
164 | San Marino | 11.977 % | |
165 | United States | 11.976 % | |
166 | Netherlands | 11.588 % | |
167 | Croatia | 11.276 % | |
168 | France | 11.105 % | |
169 | Luxembourg | 11.073 % | |
170 | Samoa | 10.852 % | |
171 | Eswatini | 10.55 % | |
172 | Mozambique | 10.424 % | |
173 | Cuba | 9.639 % | |
174 | Namibia | 9.037 % | |
175 | Vanuatu | 8.852 % | |
176 | Malawi | 8.183 % | |
177 | Timor-Leste | 7.906 % | |
178 | Brunei Darussalam | 7.335 % | |
179 | Tonga | 7.19 % | |
180 | Papua New Guinea | 5.955 % | |
181 | Monaco | 5.906 % | |
182 | Oman | 5.684 % | |
183 | South Africa | 5.664 % | |
184 | Qatar | 5.648 % | |
185 | Botswana | 3.717 % | |
186 | Tuvalu | 3.564 % | |
187 | Solomon Islands | 2.898 % | |
188 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 2.626 % | |
189 | Marshall Islands | 1.504 % | |
190 | Nauru | 1.356 % | |
191 | Kiribati | 0.503 % |
- #1
Armenia
- #2
Yemen
- #3
Afghanistan
- #4
Nigeria
- #5
Bangladesh
- #6
Cameroon
- #7
Turkmenistan
- #8
Azerbaijan
- #9
Georgia
- #10
Sudan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #191
Kiribati
- #190
Nauru
- #189
Marshall Islands
- #188
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #187
Solomon Islands
- #186
Tuvalu
- #185
Botswana
- #184
Qatar
- #183
South Africa
- #182
Oman
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2014, Armenia reported the highest Out-of-Pocket Health Spending at a staggering 82.48%, while the global range for this metric spanned from 0.50% to 82.48%. The global average for out-of-pocket health spending was 32.23%, providing a benchmark for understanding the financial burden faced by individuals across different nations.
Economic Factors Influencing Health Spending
The variation in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending across countries in 2014 is often tied to economic conditions and healthcare policy frameworks. Countries like Armenia (82.48%) and Yemen (79.97%) exhibited some of the highest levels of personal financial burden for healthcare. This is largely due to limited public health funding and high reliance on private healthcare services. In developing nations such as Nigeria (71.85%), the lack of comprehensive health insurance systems compels citizens to pay substantial out-of-pocket expenses. Conversely, countries with lower spending like Kiribati (0.50%) and Nauru (1.36%) benefit from robust public health programs that alleviate personal healthcare costs.
Geographical and Demographic Influences
Geographical and demographic factors also play a critical role in shaping out-of-pocket health spending. In many African and Asian nations, including Bangladesh (70.76%) and Cameroon (68.98%), the combination of large rural populations and limited access to healthcare facilities increases the reliance on out-of-pocket expenses. This is often exacerbated by the lack of infrastructure and healthcare professionals in remote areas. Meanwhile, countries with smaller populations and centralized healthcare, such as the Marshall Islands (1.50%) and Micronesia (2.63%), demonstrate lower personal spending due to consolidated healthcare delivery systems that are more accessible to the population.
Policy and Systemic Drivers
National healthcare policies significantly impact out-of-pocket spending. In Turkmenistan (68.21%) and Azerbaijan (67.55%), minimal government intervention in healthcare financing leads to greater personal financial responsibility. These countries often lack comprehensive insurance schemes, resulting in higher direct payments by individuals. Alternatively, nations like Qatar (5.65%) and Oman (5.68%) showcase the benefits of government-funded healthcare systems, which reduce the financial burden on citizens through state-sponsored medical services and insurance coverage.
Year-over-Year Trends and Changes
Analyzing year-over-year changes in 2014 reveals significant shifts in out-of-pocket health spending. Burundi experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 10.14% (48.6%), likely due to economic instability and policy changes that increased healthcare costs for individuals. In contrast, Sierra Leone saw the most substantial decrease of 27.74% (-44.2%), potentially reflecting improvements in public health funding or international aid efforts following the Ebola outbreak. Other notable decreases occurred in Uzbekistan (-10.64%) and Guinea-Bissau (-8.95%), indicating policy shifts towards reducing the personal financial burden of healthcare.
In summary, the 2014 landscape of Out-of-Pocket Health Spending highlights a complex interplay of economic, demographic, and policy factors that influence the financial burden of healthcare on individuals globally. While some nations benefit from comprehensive public health systems, others remain challenged by high personal costs, underscoring the importance of systemic reforms to ensure equitable healthcare access worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2014
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2014?
Armenia had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2014, with 82.48%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2014?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2014, with 0.5%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2014?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2014 was 32.23%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2014?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2014 was 31%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2014?
The top 3 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2014 were Armenia, Yemen, and Afghanistan.
How many countries were included in the dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2014?
The dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2014 included 191 countries.
Insights by country
Austria
In 2014, Austria ranked #135 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 19.61263 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal health expenditures compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Austria's robust healthcare system, which is primarily funded through social insurance, and a cultural tendency towards comprehensive health services, leading to higher out-of-pocket costs for individuals.
Senegal
In 2014, Senegal had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending rate of 50.375618 %, ranking #36 out of 191 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public health funding and a growing population, which places additional strain on existing healthcare resources in the country.
United States
The United States ranked #165 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2014, with a value of 11.9760685 %. This figure is notably higher than many developed nations, where public health spending typically covers a larger share of healthcare costs. The high out-of-pocket expenses are largely driven by the fragmented healthcare system and the prevalence of high-deductible insurance plans, which place significant financial burdens on individuals seeking medical care.
Sudan
In 2014, Sudan ranked #10 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 67.031784 %. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include a struggling economy and limited public health infrastructure, which compel individuals to pay out-of-pocket for medical services. Additionally, ongoing conflicts and instability have exacerbated the challenges in accessing affordable healthcare.
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic ranked #149 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2014, with a value of 14.458653 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant burden on households for health-related expenses. Factors contributing to this statistic include the Czech Republic's relatively low public health expenditure and a healthcare system that encourages private spending, which can lead to higher out-of-pocket costs for patients.
Singapore
In 2014, Singapore had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending value of 33.30003 %, ranking #88 out of 191 countries. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include Singapore's mixed healthcare financing system, where government subsidies coexist with personal payments, and a strong emphasis on individual responsibility for health costs.
Dominica
In 2014, Dominica ranked #75 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 35.744804 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include the country's limited healthcare infrastructure and the economic challenges faced by its population, which often necessitate out-of-pocket expenditures for essential health services.
Dominican Republic
The Dominican Republic ranked #94 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2014, with a value of 31.05365 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include limited public healthcare funding and a growing private healthcare sector, which often leads citizens to pay out-of-pocket for medical services.
Cuba
Cuba had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 9.638878 % in 2014, ranking #173 out of 191 countries. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on private health expenditures. The high out-of-pocket costs can be attributed to Cuba's economic challenges and the limited availability of resources in its public health system, which struggles to meet the population's needs despite a strong emphasis on healthcare access.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2014, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 34.01258 %, ranking #85 out of 191 countries. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include a limited public healthcare budget and a high prevalence of non-communicable diseases, which increases individual financial burdens for health services.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.