Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2007
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Myanmar | 82.164 % | |
2 | Comoros | 81.813 % | |
3 | Afghanistan | 78.17 % | |
4 | Georgia | 75.674 % | |
5 | Cameroon | 75.568 % | |
6 | Sierra Leone | 72.2 % | |
7 | Guinea | 71.876 % | |
8 | Pakistan | 71.699 % | |
9 | Nigeria | 70.938 % | |
10 | India | 70.817 % | |
11 | Tajikistan | 70.614 % | |
12 | Yemen | 69.156 % | |
13 | Turkmenistan | 68.997 % | |
14 | Côte d'Ivoire | 68.755 % | |
15 | Togo | 67.004 % | |
16 | Bangladesh | 66.413 % | |
17 | Mauritania | 65.299 % | |
18 | Chad | 64.918 % | |
19 | Saint Lucia | 63.934 % | |
20 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 63.856 % | |
21 | Guatemala | 61.624 % | |
22 | Mali | 61.347 % | |
23 | Nepal | 60.962 % | |
24 | Egypt | 60.327 % | |
25 | Equatorial Guinea | 59.309 % | |
26 | Armenia | 58.229 % | |
27 | Uzbekistan | 58.131 % | |
28 | Sudan | 58.002 % | |
29 | Paraguay | 57.958 % | |
30 | Morocco | 57.183 % | |
31 | Philippines | 55.967 % | |
32 | Mauritius | 55.809 % | |
33 | Grenada | 55.37 % | |
34 | Uganda | 54.484 % | |
35 | Niger | 53.659 % | |
36 | Iran | 53.215 % | |
37 | Ecuador | 53.106 % | |
38 | Azerbaijan | 52.608 % | |
39 | Mexico | 52.497 % | |
40 | Syrian Arab Republic | 51.687 % | |
41 | China | 51.291 % | |
42 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 51.09 % | |
43 | Honduras | 49.799 % | |
44 | Central African Republic | 49.708 % | |
45 | Indonesia | 49.546 % | |
46 | Gabon | 49.5 % | |
47 | Albania | 49.402 % | |
48 | Trinidad and Tobago | 49.283 % | |
49 | Congo | 49.157 % | |
50 | Cyprus | 48.798 % | |
51 | Singapore | 48.468 % | |
52 | Benin | 48.278 % | |
53 | Guinea-Bissau | 48.078 % | |
54 | Maldives | 47.225 % | |
55 | Cambodia | 46.534 % | |
56 | Dominican Republic | 46.181 % | |
57 | Republic of Moldova | 45.099 % | |
58 | Sri Lanka | 44.852 % | |
59 | Senegal | 44.273 % | |
60 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.271 % | |
61 | Eritrea | 44.093 % | |
62 | Lebanon | 44.08 % | |
63 | Dominica | 42.96 % | |
64 | Kyrgyzstan | 42.912 % | |
65 | Tunisia | 42.868 % | |
66 | Bulgaria | 42.593 % | |
67 | Peru | 42.542 % | |
68 | Liberia | 42.223 % | |
69 | Nicaragua | 41.945 % | |
70 | El Salvador | 41.639 % | |
71 | Burundi | 41.131 % | |
72 | Jamaica | 40.835 % | |
73 | South Korea | 40.575 % | |
74 | Haiti | 40.12 % | |
75 | Ghana | 39.58 % | |
76 | Chile | 39.187 % | |
77 | State of Palestine | 37.3 % | |
78 | North Macedonia | 37.286 % | |
79 | Ethiopia | 36.996 % | |
80 | Barbados | 36.837 % | |
81 | Latvia | 36.828 % | |
82 | Ukraine | 36.457 % | |
83 | Kenya | 36.45 % | |
84 | Jordan | 36.048 % | |
85 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 35.816 % | |
86 | Sao Tome and Principe | 35.332 % | |
87 | Laos | 35.171 % | |
88 | Malaysia | 35.123 % | |
89 | Serbia | 34.713 % | |
90 | Vietnam | 34.669 % | |
91 | Greece | 34.223 % | |
92 | Burkina Faso | 34.203 % | |
93 | Libya | 33.442 % | |
94 | Brazil | 33.094 % | |
95 | Guyana | 32.99 % | |
96 | Kazakhstan | 32.774 % | |
97 | Madagascar | 32.655 % | |
98 | Antigua and Barbuda | 32.527 % | |
99 | Russia | 31.448 % | |
100 | Argentina | 31.177 % | |
101 | Malta | 31.078 % | |
102 | Costa Rica | 30.912 % | |
103 | Bolivia | 30.762 % | |
104 | Bahrain | 30.236 % | |
105 | Djibouti | 30.181 % | |
106 | Panama | 29.96 % | |
107 | Iraq | 29.548 % | |
108 | United Arab Emirates | 28.876 % | |
109 | Bahamas | 28.731 % | |
110 | Tanzania | 28.474 % | |
111 | Lithuania | 28.404 % | |
112 | Angola | 28.384 % | |
113 | Algeria | 28.089 % | |
114 | Slovakia | 27.37 % | |
115 | Switzerland | 27.333 % | |
116 | Israel | 26.663 % | |
117 | Poland | 26.291 % | |
118 | Hungary | 26.261 % | |
119 | Belize | 26.128 % | |
120 | Portugal | 25.906 % | |
121 | Belarus | 25.795 % | |
122 | Zambia | 24.832 % | |
123 | Lesotho | 24.052 % | |
124 | Turkey | 23.884 % | |
125 | Uruguay | 23.363 % | |
126 | Mongolia | 23.281 % | |
127 | Estonia | 22.972 % | |
128 | Cabo Verde | 22.916 % | |
129 | Spain | 21.908 % | |
130 | Italy | 21.516 % | |
131 | Kuwait | 21.346 % | |
132 | Belgium | 20.607 % | |
133 | San Marino | 20.026 % | |
134 | Suriname | 19.5 % | |
135 | Colombia | 19.249 % | |
136 | Seychelles | 19.236 % | |
137 | Austria | 19.23 % | |
138 | Australia | 19.003 % | |
139 | Finland | 18.998 % | |
140 | Qatar | 18.724 % | |
141 | Timor-Leste | 18.26 % | |
142 | Palau | 18.05 % | |
143 | Andorra | 17.937 % | |
144 | Romania | 17.596 % | |
145 | Saudi Arabia | 16.739 % | |
146 | Sweden | 16.624 % | |
147 | Iceland | 16.47 % | |
148 | Norway | 16.072 % | |
149 | Canada | 15.612 % | |
150 | Fiji | 15.587 % | |
151 | Japan | 15.515 % | |
152 | Gambia | 15.068 % | |
153 | Thailand | 14.814 % | |
154 | Denmark | 14.562 % | |
155 | United Kingdom | 14.425 % | |
156 | Bhutan | 14.337 % | |
157 | Germany | 13.76 % | |
158 | Slovenia | 13.631 % | |
159 | Czech Republic | 13.631 % | |
160 | United States | 13.597 % | |
161 | Samoa | 13.095 % | |
162 | Brunei Darussalam | 12.785 % | |
163 | Rwanda | 12.49 % | |
164 | Croatia | 12.394 % | |
165 | Eswatini | 12.136 % | |
166 | Mozambique | 12.019 % | |
167 | Malawi | 11.715 % | |
168 | Ireland | 11.571 % | |
169 | New Zealand | 11.454 % | |
170 | Oman | 11.27 % | |
171 | Luxembourg | 10.307 % | |
172 | Tonga | 9.831 % | |
173 | Cuba | 9.783 % | |
174 | South Africa | 9.703 % | |
175 | France | 9.528 % | |
176 | Vanuatu | 9.428 % | |
177 | Netherlands | 7.889 % | |
178 | Papua New Guinea | 7.782 % | |
179 | Monaco | 6.85 % | |
180 | Botswana | 6.773 % | |
181 | Namibia | 5.446 % | |
182 | Tuvalu | 4.652 % | |
183 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 4.466 % | |
184 | Solomon Islands | 2.918 % | |
185 | Nauru | 2.301 % | |
186 | Marshall Islands | 1.24 % | |
187 | Kiribati | 0.166 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #187
Kiribati
- #186
Marshall Islands
- #185
Nauru
- #184
Solomon Islands
- #183
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #182
Tuvalu
- #181
Namibia
- #180
Botswana
- #179
Monaco
- #178
Papua New Guinea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2007, Myanmar led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with a staggering 82.16%, while the global range of spending varied significantly from 0.17% to 82.16%. The average out-of-pocket expenditure across the globe stood at 35.07%, providing a broad context for understanding healthcare financial burdens worldwide.
Economic Influence on Health Spending
The substantial variation in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending across countries often reflects underlying economic conditions. In countries like Myanmar (82.16%) and Comoros (81.81%), high out-of-pocket expenses are indicative of limited public healthcare funding and insurance coverage. These nations typically have lower GDP per capita, which limits the government's ability to subsidize healthcare costs, thus transferring the financial burden onto individuals. Conversely, countries with minimal out-of-pocket expenses, such as Kiribati (0.17%) and the Marshall Islands (1.24%), often benefit from stronger public health infrastructures and international aid, reducing the individual financial burden.
Policy and Healthcare Infrastructure
Government policies and the robustness of healthcare infrastructure play a crucial role in determining out-of-pocket spending levels. For instance, India (70.82%) and Nigeria (70.94%) have high out-of-pocket expenses despite having rapidly growing economies. This is largely due to underdeveloped health insurance systems and inadequate public healthcare services, which force individuals to rely on private healthcare providers. On the other hand, Monaco (6.85%) and Botswana (6.77%) demonstrate how effective public health policies and comprehensive insurance coverage can significantly reduce personal healthcare costs.
Geographic and Demographic Patterns
Geographic and demographic factors also influence out-of-pocket health spending. In regions like Sub-Saharan Africa, represented by countries such as Cameroon (75.57%) and Sierra Leone (72.20%), high out-of-pocket expenses are often exacerbated by rural populations with limited access to healthcare facilities. These areas face logistical challenges in healthcare delivery, increasing costs for individuals who must travel long distances for medical services. In contrast, smaller island nations like Micronesia (Fed. States of) (4.47%) benefit from centralized healthcare systems that are easier to manage and subsidize due to their compact geography.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Movements
The year-over-year changes in out-of-pocket health spending reveal significant shifts in some countries. Nepal experienced the largest increase, rising by 18.46% to reach 43.4%, driven by a growing reliance on private healthcare providers amid public service inadequacies. Similarly, Eritrea saw a 9.64% increase (28.0%) due to economic challenges limiting government health spending. Conversely, Liberia recorded the most substantial decrease of 22.29% (-34.6%), potentially due to enhanced international aid and post-conflict reconstruction efforts improving public healthcare access. These shifts highlight how economic and political changes can swiftly impact healthcare affordability.
In summary, the data on Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2007 underscores the complex interplay of economic, policy, and geographic factors affecting healthcare costs worldwide. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to reduce financial barriers to healthcare access and improve public health outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2007
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2007?
Myanmar had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2007, with 82.16%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2007?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2007 was 35.07%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2007?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2007, with 0.17%.
What is the median out-of-pocket health spending value for countries in 2007?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value for countries in 2007 was 33.09%.
What is the range of out-of-pocket health spending percentages in 2007?
The range of out-of-pocket health spending percentages in 2007 spans from 0.17% in Kiribati to 82.16% in Myanmar.
Which countries were in the top 10 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2007?
The top 10 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2007 were Myanmar, Comoros, Afghanistan, Georgia, Cameroon, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Pakistan, Nigeria, and India.
Insights by country
Tunisia
Tunisia ranked #65 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2007, with a value of 42.868134 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include limited public healthcare funding and a growing private sector that drives costs up, leading to increased out-of-pocket expenses for citizens.
Burundi
In 2007, Burundi ranked #71 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 41.13089 %. This figure is notably high compared to global averages, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Burundi’s limited healthcare infrastructure and ongoing economic challenges, which hinder the government's ability to finance public health services effectively.
Finland
In 2007, Finland ranked #139 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 18.998278 %. This figure is notably higher than many of its Nordic neighbors, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures compared to publicly funded systems. Contributing factors include Finland's mixed healthcare model, where public services are complemented by private options, and demographic pressures that drive healthcare costs up.
Greece
In 2007, Greece ranked #91 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 34.223377 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include Greece's economic challenges during this period, which limited public health funding, and a fragmented healthcare system that placed more financial burden on individuals seeking medical care.
Italy
In 2007, Italy ranked #130 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 21.515991 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal health expenditures. Contributing factors include Italy's universal healthcare system, which, while comprehensive, often leads to additional out-of-pocket costs for patients due to service limitations and regional disparities in care quality.
Uganda
In 2007, Uganda ranked #34 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 54.483856 %. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public healthcare funding and a high prevalence of poverty, which forces many Ugandans to pay for medical services directly out of their own pockets.
Spain
In 2007, Spain ranked #129 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 21.907936 %. This figure is relatively high compared to many European countries, indicating a significant burden on individuals for health expenses. Factors contributing to this statistic include Spain's healthcare financing structure, which relies heavily on public funding, yet has gaps that necessitate out-of-pocket payments, particularly for certain services and medications.
Mali
Mali ranked #22 globally in 2007 for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, at 61.347298 % of total health expenditure. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include limited public health funding and a high prevalence of poverty, which forces many citizens to pay out-of-pocket for essential medical care.
Samoa
Samoa's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2007 was 13.095059 %, ranking #161 out of 187 countries. This figure is significantly higher than many neighboring Pacific nations, indicating a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include limited government funding for healthcare and a small population, which can strain public health resources and increase individual financial burdens for medical services.
Benin
In 2007, Benin ranked #52 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 48.27829 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include a limited public health infrastructure and economic constraints that hinder government investment in health services.
Kenya
In 2007, Kenya ranked #83 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 36.45012 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on private funding for healthcare services. Contributing factors include limited public healthcare funding and a high prevalence of poverty, which restricts access to affordable medical care for many Kenyans.
Comoros
In 2007, Comoros ranked #2 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 81.81255 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on personal funds for healthcare compared to many countries. Contributing factors include limited public health funding and a small economy that struggles to support comprehensive health insurance systems.
Eritrea
Eritrea ranked #61 globally in 2007 for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 44.093063 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal payments for healthcare services. Contributing factors include limited government funding for health services and ongoing economic challenges that restrict access to affordable care.
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
In 2007, Micronesia (Fed. States of) ranked #183 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 4.466363 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by many small island nations in providing comprehensive healthcare. Contributing factors include limited economic resources and a reliance on external aid, which impact the funding and accessibility of health services for its population.
Luxembourg
In 2007, Luxembourg had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 10.30742 %, ranking #171 out of 187 countries. This figure is notably higher than many of its European neighbors, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include Luxembourg's high standard of living and a healthcare system that encourages private spending alongside public funding, which can lead to increased out-of-pocket costs for residents.
Netherlands
The Netherlands ranked #177 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with a value of 7.8889623 % in 2007. This figure is notably higher than that of neighboring Belgium, which had a lower out-of-pocket expenditure. Contributing factors include the Netherlands' comprehensive health insurance system, which mandates basic coverage, but also places some financial responsibility on patients for certain services.
Suriname
In 2007, Suriname ranked #134 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 19.499664 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant burden on individuals for health care costs. Economic challenges, including a reliance on commodity exports and limited public health funding, contribute to this high out-of-pocket expenditure, affecting access to necessary health services for the population.
Saint Lucia
In 2007, Saint Lucia ranked #19 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 63.93407 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include the country's limited public health resources and the high cost of healthcare services, which compel residents to pay a larger share of their medical expenses directly.
Guatemala
In 2007, Guatemala ranked #21 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 61.623707 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting the country's reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include a limited public healthcare system and economic challenges that compel many Guatemalans to pay for medical services directly, often resulting in financial strain for families.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.