Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2017
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yemen | 87.904 % | |
2 | Armenia | 84.348 % | |
3 | Cameroon | 78.462 % | |
4 | Nigeria | 77.388 % | |
5 | Myanmar | 75.687 % | |
6 | Afghanistan | 75.483 % | |
7 | Turkmenistan | 73.065 % | |
8 | Sudan | 72.546 % | |
9 | Azerbaijan | 71.849 % | |
10 | Equatorial Guinea | 70.597 % | |
11 | Bangladesh | 70.09 % | |
12 | Guinea-Bissau | 68.414 % | |
13 | Guinea | 64.598 % | |
14 | Comoros | 63.844 % | |
15 | Tajikistan | 63.152 % | |
16 | Georgia | 62.444 % | |
17 | Togo | 61.466 % | |
18 | Chad | 59.879 % | |
19 | Cambodia | 58.236 % | |
20 | Iraq | 58.047 % | |
21 | Pakistan | 57.842 % | |
22 | Nepal | 57.375 % | |
23 | Albania | 57.181 % | |
24 | Uzbekistan | 56.688 % | |
25 | Central African Republic | 56.416 % | |
26 | Egypt | 56.398 % | |
27 | Kyrgyzstan | 56.377 % | |
28 | India | 55.112 % | |
29 | Grenada | 55.11 % | |
30 | Sierra Leone | 54.496 % | |
31 | Guatemala | 54.134 % | |
32 | Mauritania | 54.063 % | |
33 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 53.365 % | |
34 | Philippines | 50.148 % | |
35 | Honduras | 49.704 % | |
36 | Sri Lanka | 49.252 % | |
37 | Ukraine | 49.178 % | |
38 | Senegal | 48.896 % | |
39 | Niger | 48.314 % | |
40 | Benin | 47.979 % | |
41 | Morocco | 47.966 % | |
42 | Mauritius | 47.397 % | |
43 | Eritrea | 46.974 % | |
44 | Laos | 46.237 % | |
45 | Saint Lucia | 46.116 % | |
46 | Congo | 45.59 % | |
47 | Barbados | 45.555 % | |
48 | Haiti | 45.402 % | |
49 | Cyprus | 44.758 % | |
50 | Liberia | 44.119 % | |
51 | Syrian Arab Republic | 43.803 % | |
52 | Paraguay | 43.775 % | |
53 | Republic of Moldova | 43.634 % | |
54 | Vietnam | 42.588 % | |
55 | Bulgaria | 42.194 % | |
56 | Montenegro | 42.166 % | |
57 | Mexico | 41.788 % | |
58 | Latvia | 41.788 % | |
59 | State of Palestine | 41.732 % | |
60 | North Macedonia | 41.042 % | |
61 | Trinidad and Tobago | 40.806 % | |
62 | Serbia | 40.639 % | |
63 | Tunisia | 40.52 % | |
64 | Russia | 40.493 % | |
65 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 40.125 % | |
66 | Somalia | 39.685 % | |
67 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 39.215 % | |
68 | Uganda | 38.09 % | |
69 | Mongolia | 38.048 % | |
70 | Mali | 37.502 % | |
71 | El Salvador | 37.281 % | |
72 | Indonesia | 36.178 % | |
73 | China | 36.05 % | |
74 | Malaysia | 35.934 % | |
75 | South Korea | 35.789 % | |
76 | Malta | 35.225 % | |
77 | Greece | 34.995 % | |
78 | Ethiopia | 34.402 % | |
79 | Angola | 34.121 % | |
80 | Cabo Verde | 34.121 % | |
81 | Jordan | 33.997 % | |
82 | Algeria | 33.937 % | |
83 | Nicaragua | 33.844 % | |
84 | Libya | 33.781 % | |
85 | Chile | 33.305 % | |
86 | Kazakhstan | 33.144 % | |
87 | Lebanon | 33.066 % | |
88 | Iran | 32.803 % | |
89 | Lithuania | 32.276 % | |
90 | Singapore | 32.062 % | |
91 | Bahrain | 31.995 % | |
92 | Panama | 31.916 % | |
93 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 31.846 % | |
94 | Burkina Faso | 31.362 % | |
95 | Ecuador | 29.964 % | |
96 | Portugal | 29.688 % | |
97 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 29.119 % | |
98 | Burundi | 28.998 % | |
99 | Peru | 28.947 % | |
100 | Dominican Republic | 28.932 % | |
101 | Guyana | 28.841 % | |
102 | Dominica | 28.558 % | |
103 | Hungary | 27.249 % | |
104 | Belarus | 27.058 % | |
105 | Jamaica | 26.72 % | |
106 | Gambia | 26.669 % | |
107 | Antigua and Barbuda | 26.569 % | |
108 | Suriname | 26.38 % | |
109 | Djibouti | 26.04 % | |
110 | Madagascar | 25.635 % | |
111 | Gabon | 25.156 % | |
112 | Bolivia | 25.078 % | |
113 | Bahamas | 24.911 % | |
114 | Estonia | 24.807 % | |
115 | Seychelles | 24.599 % | |
116 | Brazil | 24.468 % | |
117 | Italy | 24.128 % | |
118 | Spain | 24.09 % | |
119 | Liechtenstein | 23.288 % | |
120 | Kenya | 23.281 % | |
121 | Belize | 23.141 % | |
122 | Poland | 22.736 % | |
123 | Ghana | 22.651 % | |
124 | Israel | 22.431 % | |
125 | Switzerland | 21.559 % | |
126 | Tanzania | 21.265 % | |
127 | Costa Rica | 21.255 % | |
128 | Argentina | 20.748 % | |
129 | Maldives | 20.585 % | |
130 | Romania | 20.488 % | |
131 | Austria | 20.11 % | |
132 | South Sudan | 19.193 % | |
133 | Belgium | 19.126 % | |
134 | Finland | 19.046 % | |
135 | Slovakia | 18.712 % | |
136 | Turkey | 17.384 % | |
137 | Palau | 16.955 % | |
138 | Uruguay | 16.498 % | |
139 | Iceland | 16.325 % | |
140 | Australia | 16.313 % | |
141 | United Kingdom | 15.829 % | |
142 | Canada | 15.828 % | |
143 | Lesotho | 15.775 % | |
144 | Fiji | 15.594 % | |
145 | Colombia | 15.363 % | |
146 | Sao Tome and Principe | 14.757 % | |
147 | New Zealand | 14.549 % | |
148 | Norway | 14.512 % | |
149 | Saudi Arabia | 14.324 % | |
150 | Sweden | 14.236 % | |
151 | Czech Republic | 14.136 % | |
152 | Rwanda | 14.049 % | |
153 | Denmark | 13.694 % | |
154 | Bhutan | 13.306 % | |
155 | Ireland | 13.109 % | |
156 | Kuwait | 12.927 % | |
157 | Malawi | 12.695 % | |
158 | Japan | 12.655 % | |
159 | San Marino | 12.386 % | |
160 | Slovenia | 12.322 % | |
161 | Andorra | 12.091 % | |
162 | Germany | 12.017 % | |
163 | Samoa | 12.014 % | |
164 | Thailand | 11.838 % | |
165 | United Arab Emirates | 11.417 % | |
166 | United States | 11.349 % | |
167 | Netherlands | 11.049 % | |
168 | Croatia | 10.967 % | |
169 | Cuba | 10.701 % | |
170 | Luxembourg | 10.661 % | |
171 | Zambia | 10.656 % | |
172 | France | 10.64 % | |
173 | Zimbabwe | 10.548 % | |
174 | Eswatini | 10.497 % | |
175 | Vanuatu | 10.365 % | |
176 | Mozambique | 9.686 % | |
177 | Papua New Guinea | 8.999 % | |
178 | Timor-Leste | 8.345 % | |
179 | Namibia | 7.806 % | |
180 | Qatar | 6.881 % | |
181 | Monaco | 6.291 % | |
182 | Tonga | 6.285 % | |
183 | Oman | 5.937 % | |
184 | South Africa | 5.835 % | |
185 | Brunei Darussalam | 5.411 % | |
186 | Solomon Islands | 3.146 % | |
187 | Botswana | 2.993 % | |
188 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 2.554 % | |
189 | Marshall Islands | 1.44 % | |
190 | Nauru | 0.885 % | |
191 | Kiribati | 0.71 % | |
192 | Tuvalu | 0.59 % |
- #1
Yemen
- #2
Armenia
- #3
Cameroon
- #4
Nigeria
- #5
Myanmar
- #6
Afghanistan
- #7
Turkmenistan
- #8
Sudan
- #9
Azerbaijan
- #10
Equatorial Guinea
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #192
Tuvalu
- #191
Kiribati
- #190
Nauru
- #189
Marshall Islands
- #188
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #187
Botswana
- #186
Solomon Islands
- #185
Brunei Darussalam
- #184
South Africa
- #183
Oman
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2017, Yemen led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with a staggering 87.90%, highlighting the global range from a minimum of 0.59% to this maximum. The global average stood at 32.17%, providing a benchmark for understanding the financial burden individuals face across different nations.
Economic Disparities and Health Spending
The significant variation in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending across countries often reflects underlying economic disparities. The top countries, including Yemen (87.90%) and Armenia (84.35%), typically have less robust public health systems, requiring individuals to bear more of their healthcare costs. In contrast, countries like Tuvalu (0.59%) and Kiribati (0.71%) demonstrate minimal out-of-pocket spending, likely due to stronger public health funding and comprehensive healthcare programs.
In Yemen, ongoing conflict and a fragile economy exacerbate the lack of accessible public healthcare, forcing citizens to spend a substantial portion of their income on medical services. Similarly, Armenia and Cameroon (78.46%) face challenges in healthcare infrastructure, resulting in high personal expenditure. In stark contrast, countries like Oman (5.94%) benefit from government-funded healthcare systems, reducing the need for personal spending.
Policy Influence on Health Spending
Government policies significantly influence Out-of-Pocket Health Spending. Nations with comprehensive health insurance schemes or universal healthcare, such as Brunei Darussalam (5.41%), have lower out-of-pocket expenses. These systems alleviate the financial burden on individuals by covering a significant portion of healthcare costs through taxation or mandatory insurance.
Conversely, countries like Myanmar (75.69%) and Afghanistan (75.48%) lack extensive healthcare coverage, leading to higher personal expenditures. The absence of widespread insurance and limited government intervention in healthcare financing forces individuals to cover most medical expenses themselves.
Year-over-Year Trends and Influences
Analyzing the year-over-year trends, several countries experienced notable changes in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending from the previous year. Guinea saw the largest increase of 14.84 percentage points, reflecting a shift towards higher personal financial responsibility for healthcare. Similarly, Iraq increased by 13.79 percentage points, indicating potential economic or policy changes impacting healthcare costs.
In contrast, Ghana experienced a significant decrease of 15.17 percentage points, suggesting improvements in public health funding or insurance coverage. Zimbabwe also saw a substantial decrease of 14.10 percentage points, possibly due to policy reforms aimed at reducing individual healthcare burdens.
Geographic and Demographic Factors
Geographic and demographic factors also play a crucial role in determining Out-of-Pocket Health Spending. Countries with larger rural populations, such as Nigeria (77.39%), often face challenges in accessing healthcare services, leading to higher personal costs. The lack of infrastructure and healthcare facilities in rural areas necessitates travel and additional expenses for medical care.
Demographically, nations with younger populations may experience lower healthcare costs due to generally better health among younger individuals. However, countries with aging populations might see higher spending as healthcare needs increase with age. For instance, South Africa (5.83%) benefits from a relatively young population, combined with government health initiatives that mitigate personal expenses.
In conclusion, Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2017 reveals significant disparities driven by economic conditions, policy frameworks, and demographic factors. Understanding these influences helps explain why individuals in some nations face steeper financial burdens than others in accessing healthcare services.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2017
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2017?
Yemen had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2017, with 87.9%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2017?
Tuvalu had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2017, with 0.59%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2017?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2017 was 32.17%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2017?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2017 was 29.4%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2017?
The top 10 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2017 were Yemen, Armenia, Cameroon, Nigeria, Myanmar, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Sudan, Azerbaijan, and Equatorial Guinea.
How many countries were included in the dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2017?
The dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2017 included 192 countries.
Insights by country
Mozambique
Mozambique ranked #176 in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2017, with a value of 9.686149 %. This percentage is significantly higher than that of many neighboring countries, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures amidst limited public funding. Economic challenges, including high poverty rates and insufficient healthcare infrastructure, drive this reliance on out-of-pocket spending for essential health services.
Estonia
In 2017, Estonia had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 24.80668 %, ranking #114 out of 192 countries. This figure is notably higher than the average for European Union countries, which typically see lower out-of-pocket expenses due to more comprehensive public health funding. The high percentage reflects Estonia's ongoing transition to a more privatized healthcare model and the increasing costs of health services, which disproportionately affect individuals without supplementary insurance.
Eritrea
Eritrea ranked #43 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2017, with a value of 46.97372 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Eritrea's challenging economic conditions and limited public health infrastructure, which compel many citizens to pay for medical services directly out of their pockets.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka ranked #36 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2017, with a value of 49.25233 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include the country's limited public healthcare funding and a high prevalence of non-communicable diseases, which place additional financial burdens on households.
Iran
In 2017, Iran ranked #88 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 32.80345 %. This figure is significantly higher than many countries in the region, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures due to limited public funding. Economic sanctions and a struggling economy have constrained government health budgets, leading to increased out-of-pocket costs for Iranian citizens seeking medical care.
Latvia
In 2017, Latvia ranked #58 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 41.78833 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal expenditure for healthcare services. Contributing factors include Latvia's transitional economy and the ongoing challenges in public healthcare funding, which lead to increased out-of-pocket costs for citizens seeking medical care.
Israel
In 2017, Israel ranked #124 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending value of 22.431028 %. This figure is relatively high compared to many developed nations, indicating a greater reliance on personal health expenditures. Contributing factors include the country's mixed healthcare system and the significant costs associated with private health services, which many citizens opt for despite the public healthcare options available.
Argentina
In 2017, Argentina ranked #128 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 20.747978 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare expenses. Contributing factors include economic challenges and a healthcare system that often requires patients to cover a substantial portion of their medical costs directly, reflecting ongoing issues in public healthcare funding and accessibility.
Japan
In 2017, Japan ranked #158 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 12.654927 %. This figure is notably higher than many developed nations, reflecting a reliance on personal funds for healthcare despite Japan's universal health coverage system. Contributing factors include an aging population, which increases healthcare demand, and a healthcare financing structure that places some costs directly on patients.
India
In 2017, India ranked #28 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 55.112476 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include a largely unregulated private healthcare sector and limited public health funding, which compel many Indians to pay for medical expenses out of their own pockets.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.