Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2008
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Comoros | 83.374 % | |
2 | Myanmar | 82.459 % | |
3 | Turkmenistan | 78.48 % | |
4 | Afghanistan | 75.403 % | |
5 | Cameroon | 74.246 % | |
6 | Nigeria | 72.757 % | |
7 | Sierra Leone | 71.598 % | |
8 | Armenia | 71.437 % | |
9 | Guinea | 70.949 % | |
10 | Pakistan | 69.989 % | |
11 | India | 69.148 % | |
12 | Chad | 68.816 % | |
13 | Yemen | 68.618 % | |
14 | Tajikistan | 68.584 % | |
15 | Bangladesh | 67.831 % | |
16 | Georgia | 66.546 % | |
17 | Togo | 66.346 % | |
18 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.55 % | |
19 | Mali | 63.222 % | |
20 | Sudan | 62.403 % | |
21 | Mauritius | 61.842 % | |
22 | Egypt | 61.824 % | |
23 | Nepal | 61.625 % | |
24 | Mauritania | 60.94 % | |
25 | Paraguay | 60.468 % | |
26 | Saint Lucia | 59.59 % | |
27 | Guatemala | 59.048 % | |
28 | Central African Republic | 57.972 % | |
29 | Philippines | 57.45 % | |
30 | Uzbekistan | 57.316 % | |
31 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 56.862 % | |
32 | Azerbaijan | 56.541 % | |
33 | Morocco | 56.413 % | |
34 | Albania | 56.231 % | |
35 | Equatorial Guinea | 55.937 % | |
36 | Iran | 55.479 % | |
37 | Grenada | 55.201 % | |
38 | Syrian Arab Republic | 52.761 % | |
39 | Uganda | 52.742 % | |
40 | Gabon | 52.71 % | |
41 | Niger | 52.612 % | |
42 | Ecuador | 52.45 % | |
43 | Honduras | 51.416 % | |
44 | Cyprus | 51.4 % | |
45 | Cambodia | 51.076 % | |
46 | Sri Lanka | 50.641 % | |
47 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 49.687 % | |
48 | Indonesia | 49.368 % | |
49 | Kyrgyzstan | 48.676 % | |
50 | Mexico | 48.596 % | |
51 | Republic of Moldova | 48.422 % | |
52 | Guinea-Bissau | 47.651 % | |
53 | China | 47.368 % | |
54 | Trinidad and Tobago | 46.72 % | |
55 | Singapore | 46.458 % | |
56 | Lebanon | 44.86 % | |
57 | Dominica | 44.35 % | |
58 | Benin | 44 % | |
59 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 43.913 % | |
60 | Peru | 43.35 % | |
61 | Burundi | 42.897 % | |
62 | Tunisia | 42.793 % | |
63 | Bulgaria | 42.629 % | |
64 | El Salvador | 42.007 % | |
65 | Senegal | 41.628 % | |
66 | South Korea | 41.628 % | |
67 | Dominican Republic | 41.579 % | |
68 | Jamaica | 41.129 % | |
69 | Ghana | 41.081 % | |
70 | Nicaragua | 40.909 % | |
71 | Haiti | 38.58 % | |
72 | Ethiopia | 38.477 % | |
73 | Congo | 37.851 % | |
74 | Ukraine | 37.788 % | |
75 | Chile | 37.43 % | |
76 | Latvia | 37.306 % | |
77 | Madagascar | 37.189 % | |
78 | State of Palestine | 35.8 % | |
79 | Malaysia | 35.536 % | |
80 | Barbados | 35.451 % | |
81 | Burkina Faso | 35.397 % | |
82 | Guyana | 35.326 % | |
83 | Serbia | 35.147 % | |
84 | Liberia | 34.845 % | |
85 | Vietnam | 34.576 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 34.437 % | |
87 | Kenya | 34.097 % | |
88 | Maldives | 33.1 % | |
89 | Malta | 32.992 % | |
90 | Eritrea | 32.596 % | |
91 | Tanzania | 32.585 % | |
92 | Libya | 32.266 % | |
93 | Greece | 32.208 % | |
94 | North Macedonia | 32.029 % | |
95 | Jordan | 31.941 % | |
96 | Antigua and Barbuda | 31.909 % | |
97 | Russia | 31.549 % | |
98 | Laos | 31.378 % | |
99 | Seychelles | 31.158 % | |
100 | Brazil | 30.884 % | |
101 | Bolivia | 30.368 % | |
102 | Sao Tome and Principe | 30.232 % | |
103 | Argentina | 30.048 % | |
104 | Belarus | 29.839 % | |
105 | Costa Rica | 29.511 % | |
106 | Panama | 29.217 % | |
107 | Lithuania | 28.174 % | |
108 | Bahrain | 27.911 % | |
109 | Djibouti | 27.902 % | |
110 | Bahamas | 27.807 % | |
111 | Switzerland | 26.498 % | |
112 | Portugal | 26.394 % | |
113 | Hungary | 26.349 % | |
114 | Algeria | 26.147 % | |
115 | Israel | 25.347 % | |
116 | United Arab Emirates | 25.137 % | |
117 | Cabo Verde | 24.45 % | |
118 | Poland | 24.431 % | |
119 | Suriname | 24.283 % | |
120 | Belize | 24.234 % | |
121 | Kazakhstan | 23.878 % | |
122 | Lesotho | 22.014 % | |
123 | Spain | 21.783 % | |
124 | Angola | 21.653 % | |
125 | Mongolia | 21.425 % | |
126 | Estonia | 21.393 % | |
127 | Italy | 21.339 % | |
128 | Iraq | 21.316 % | |
129 | Uruguay | 21.293 % | |
130 | Slovakia | 21.02 % | |
131 | Colombia | 20.853 % | |
132 | Zambia | 20.413 % | |
133 | Belgium | 19.945 % | |
134 | Kuwait | 19.809 % | |
135 | San Marino | 19.699 % | |
136 | Palau | 19.403 % | |
137 | Saudi Arabia | 19.369 % | |
138 | Turkey | 19.182 % | |
139 | Australia | 19.042 % | |
140 | Austria | 18.808 % | |
141 | Qatar | 18.781 % | |
142 | Finland | 18.573 % | |
143 | Romania | 18.182 % | |
144 | Fiji | 16.506 % | |
145 | Sweden | 16.475 % | |
146 | Gambia | 16.44 % | |
147 | Iceland | 16.271 % | |
148 | Czech Republic | 16.133 % | |
149 | Norway | 15.657 % | |
150 | Andorra | 15.56 % | |
151 | Canada | 15.505 % | |
152 | Bhutan | 15.474 % | |
153 | Japan | 15.238 % | |
154 | Thailand | 14.702 % | |
155 | Croatia | 14.514 % | |
156 | Samoa | 14.272 % | |
157 | Denmark | 14.118 % | |
158 | United Kingdom | 13.484 % | |
159 | Germany | 13.463 % | |
160 | United States | 13.359 % | |
161 | New Zealand | 12.877 % | |
162 | Slovenia | 12.64 % | |
163 | Oman | 12.449 % | |
164 | Ireland | 11.863 % | |
165 | Rwanda | 11.787 % | |
166 | Timor-Leste | 11.52 % | |
167 | Mozambique | 11.203 % | |
168 | Eswatini | 10.542 % | |
169 | Malawi | 10.37 % | |
170 | Brunei Darussalam | 10.108 % | |
171 | Luxembourg | 10.061 % | |
172 | France | 10.03 % | |
173 | Netherlands | 9.924 % | |
174 | Vanuatu | 8.941 % | |
175 | South Africa | 8.843 % | |
176 | Cuba | 8.838 % | |
177 | Papua New Guinea | 8.695 % | |
178 | Tuvalu | 7.975 % | |
179 | Tonga | 7.469 % | |
180 | Monaco | 6.434 % | |
181 | Namibia | 6.409 % | |
182 | Botswana | 5.816 % | |
183 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 4.099 % | |
184 | Solomon Islands | 3.701 % | |
185 | Nauru | 2.191 % | |
186 | Marshall Islands | 1.098 % | |
187 | Kiribati | 0.169 % |
- #1
Comoros
- #2
Myanmar
- #3
Turkmenistan
- #4
Afghanistan
- #5
Cameroon
- #6
Nigeria
- #7
Sierra Leone
- #8
Armenia
- #9
Guinea
- #10
Pakistan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #187
Kiribati
- #186
Marshall Islands
- #185
Nauru
- #184
Solomon Islands
- #183
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #182
Botswana
- #181
Namibia
- #180
Monaco
- #179
Tonga
- #178
Tuvalu
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2008, Comoros recorded the highest Out-of-Pocket Health Spending at 83.37%, while Kiribati had the lowest at 0.17%. This significant range highlights the disparity in personal healthcare financial burdens across countries. The global average for out-of-pocket spending was 34.63%, providing a benchmark for understanding individual country figures.
High Out-of-Pocket Spending: Economic and Policy Drivers
The countries with the highest out-of-pocket health spending, such as Comoros (83.37%), Myanmar (82.46%), and Turkmenistan (78.48%), often face economic and policy challenges that elevate personal healthcare costs. These regions typically have underfunded public health systems, leading to a heavier reliance on private healthcare services. In Afghanistan (75.40%) and Cameroon (74.25%), limited government investment in healthcare infrastructure compels individuals to bear a significant portion of their health expenses. Additionally, the absence of comprehensive health insurance schemes exacerbates the financial burden on citizens in these countries.
Low Out-of-Pocket Spending: Effective Health Policies
Conversely, countries with minimal out-of-pocket spending, such as Kiribati (0.17%) and the Marshall Islands (1.10%), benefit from robust public healthcare systems and effective policy implementations. These nations often provide universal healthcare coverage or substantial government subsidies, reducing the financial strain on individuals. Nauru (2.19%) and the Solomon Islands (3.70%) also exemplify how strategic investments in public health can alleviate personal financial burdens, ensuring greater access to medical services without excessive personal expenditure.
Year-over-Year Trends: Notable Changes in Spending
The analysis of year-over-year changes reveals significant shifts in out-of-pocket spending. Armenia experienced a remarkable increase of 13.21% (22.7%), likely due to economic transitions affecting healthcare funding. Similarly, Seychelles saw a substantial rise of 11.92% (62.0%), potentially linked to changes in healthcare policy or funding structures. On the other hand, the Democratic Republic of the Congo recorded the most significant decrease at -14.17% (-22.2%), possibly reflecting improvements in public health funding or international aid.
Regional Disparities and Their Implications
Regional disparities in out-of-pocket health spending are indicative of broader socio-economic trends. In Africa, countries like Nigeria (72.76%) face high out-of-pocket expenses despite having one of the continent's largest economies, pointing to systemic issues in healthcare funding and accessibility. Meanwhile, small island nations such as Tuvalu (7.98%) and Tonga (7.47%) demonstrate how geographic isolation and targeted policy interventions can lead to lower personal healthcare costs. These contrasts underscore the importance of tailored healthcare policies that address specific regional needs and challenges.
Overall, the data from 2008 on out-of-pocket health spending highlights the critical role of government policy and economic conditions in shaping public health funding and individual financial burdens. Countries with high personal spending often reflect systemic healthcare deficiencies, while those with lower expenditures benefit from effective policy frameworks and government support.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2008
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2008?
Comoros had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2008, with 83.37%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2008?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2008, with 0.17%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2008?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2008 was 34.63%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2008?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2008 was 32.03%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2008?
The top 3 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2008 were Comoros (83.37%), Myanmar (82.46%), and Turkmenistan (78.48%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2008?
The dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2008 included 187 countries.
Insights by country
Senegal
In 2008, Senegal had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending rate of 41.627815 %, ranking #66 out of 187 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include a relatively underfunded public health system and limited access to comprehensive health insurance, which places the financial burden on individuals and families seeking medical care.
Samoa
In 2008, Samoa had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending value of 14.272145 %, ranking #156 out of 187 countries. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavier reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Samoa's limited public health funding and a relatively small population, which can strain available resources and lead to increased out-of-pocket expenses for individuals.
Slovakia
In 2008, Slovakia had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 21.020145 %, ranking #130 out of 187 countries. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Slovakia's transitional economy and the historical underfunding of public health services, which has led to increased out-of-pocket expenses for citizens.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked #7 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2008, with a value of 71.5979 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include a weak healthcare infrastructure, ongoing economic challenges, and limited access to government-funded health services, which compel citizens to cover most medical expenses out of pocket.
Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe ranked #102 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2008, with a value of 30.232185 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal financing for healthcare. Contributing factors include the country's limited healthcare infrastructure and economic challenges, which hinder public investment in health services, leaving citizens to cover more costs out-of-pocket.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom ranked #158 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2008, with a value of 13.484006 %. This percentage is notably higher than many European neighbors, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures despite a publicly funded healthcare system. Contributing factors include the increasing costs of healthcare services and a demographic shift towards an aging population, which places additional strain on health resources.
Slovenia
In 2008, Slovenia ranked #162 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending value of 12.639945 %. This percentage is significantly higher than many EU countries, reflecting a reliance on personal expenditures for healthcare services. Key factors contributing to this statistic include Slovenia's relatively limited public healthcare funding and a healthcare system that encourages private sector involvement, impacting overall affordability for citizens.
Vietnam
In 2008, Vietnam ranked #85 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending value of 34.57613 %. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include limited public healthcare funding and a growing population that often seeks private care due to insufficient public services.
Saint Kitts and Nevis
In 2008, Saint Kitts and Nevis ranked #31 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 56.86151 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. The high out-of-pocket expenses can be attributed to the limited public healthcare funding and the small size of the population, which restricts the government's ability to subsidize health services effectively.
Cyprus
In 2008, Cyprus ranked #44 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 51.40008 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on private health expenditure. Contributing factors include Cyprus's small population, which can limit economies of scale in public health funding, and a healthcare system that encourages private sector involvement.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.