Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2013
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Armenia | 82.876 % | |
2 | Sudan | 74.834 % | |
3 | Yemen | 74.583 % | |
4 | Myanmar | 72.231 % | |
5 | Afghanistan | 72.048 % | |
6 | Nigeria | 70.927 % | |
7 | Cameroon | 69.719 % | |
8 | Bangladesh | 69.622 % | |
9 | Georgia | 69.306 % | |
10 | India | 69.073 % | |
11 | Comoros | 68.008 % | |
12 | Turkmenistan | 66.847 % | |
13 | Azerbaijan | 66.25 % | |
14 | Guinea-Bissau | 64.341 % | |
15 | Nepal | 63.533 % | |
16 | Equatorial Guinea | 63.22 % | |
17 | Sierra Leone | 62.779 % | |
18 | Pakistan | 62.744 % | |
19 | Tajikistan | 61.918 % | |
20 | Guinea | 61.901 % | |
21 | Cambodia | 59.982 % | |
22 | Chad | 58.638 % | |
23 | Iraq | 58.572 % | |
24 | Egypt | 57.935 % | |
25 | Togo | 57.87 % | |
26 | Albania | 57.729 % | |
27 | Philippines | 57.574 % | |
28 | Niger | 56.544 % | |
29 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 56.448 % | |
30 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 56.159 % | |
31 | Uzbekistan | 56.052 % | |
32 | Senegal | 55.239 % | |
33 | Grenada | 55.125 % | |
34 | Guatemala | 54.619 % | |
35 | Mauritius | 53.18 % | |
36 | Morocco | 51.667 % | |
37 | Saint Lucia | 51.339 % | |
38 | Indonesia | 50.9 % | |
39 | Mauritania | 50.209 % | |
40 | Honduras | 49.258 % | |
41 | Sri Lanka | 48.934 % | |
42 | Eritrea | 48.773 % | |
43 | Laos | 48.703 % | |
44 | Ukraine | 48.154 % | |
45 | Iran | 47.862 % | |
46 | Paraguay | 47.504 % | |
47 | Kyrgyzstan | 46.415 % | |
48 | Central African Republic | 45.238 % | |
49 | Syrian Arab Republic | 44.736 % | |
50 | Trinidad and Tobago | 43.173 % | |
51 | State of Palestine | 42.7 % | |
52 | Cyprus | 42.599 % | |
53 | Benin | 42.584 % | |
54 | Republic of Moldova | 42.576 % | |
55 | Uganda | 42.518 % | |
56 | Ethiopia | 42.404 % | |
57 | Montenegro | 42.077 % | |
58 | Bulgaria | 41.862 % | |
59 | Vietnam | 41.587 % | |
60 | Barbados | 40.42 % | |
61 | Liberia | 40.073 % | |
62 | Mexico | 39.879 % | |
63 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 39.433 % | |
64 | Tunisia | 39.064 % | |
65 | Ghana | 38.876 % | |
66 | Latvia | 38.471 % | |
67 | South Korea | 38.264 % | |
68 | Somalia | 38.242 % | |
69 | China | 38.16 % | |
70 | Guyana | 37.957 % | |
71 | Serbia | 37.867 % | |
72 | El Salvador | 37.396 % | |
73 | Mongolia | 37.1 % | |
74 | Lebanon | 36.95 % | |
75 | Nicaragua | 36.896 % | |
76 | Jamaica | 36.52 % | |
77 | Haiti | 36.242 % | |
78 | Singapore | 36.199 % | |
79 | Ecuador | 35.976 % | |
80 | Madagascar | 35.588 % | |
81 | Dominica | 35.362 % | |
82 | Peru | 35.278 % | |
83 | Mali | 34.849 % | |
84 | Russia | 34.832 % | |
85 | Bolivia | 34.009 % | |
86 | Belarus | 33.792 % | |
87 | Greece | 33.739 % | |
88 | North Macedonia | 33.707 % | |
89 | Malaysia | 33.669 % | |
90 | Chile | 33.638 % | |
91 | Burkina Faso | 33.537 % | |
92 | Lithuania | 32.821 % | |
93 | Maldives | 32.29 % | |
94 | Panama | 32.277 % | |
95 | Dominican Republic | 32.209 % | |
96 | Kenya | 32.132 % | |
97 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 32.122 % | |
98 | Congo | 30.653 % | |
99 | Malta | 30.222 % | |
100 | Zimbabwe | 29.756 % | |
101 | Algeria | 29.278 % | |
102 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 29.068 % | |
103 | Portugal | 28.794 % | |
104 | Gabon | 28.593 % | |
105 | Hungary | 28.36 % | |
106 | Brazil | 28.177 % | |
107 | Bahamas | 27.931 % | |
108 | Suriname | 27.872 % | |
109 | Bahrain | 26.918 % | |
110 | Antigua and Barbuda | 26.763 % | |
111 | Libya | 26.548 % | |
112 | Argentina | 26.439 % | |
113 | Kazakhstan | 25.955 % | |
114 | Belize | 25.364 % | |
115 | Cabo Verde | 24.25 % | |
116 | Spain | 24.24 % | |
117 | Tanzania | 24.09 % | |
118 | Djibouti | 24.058 % | |
119 | Poland | 23.646 % | |
120 | Estonia | 23.605 % | |
121 | Slovakia | 23.322 % | |
122 | Costa Rica | 23.226 % | |
123 | Switzerland | 22.771 % | |
124 | Italy | 22.742 % | |
125 | Israel | 22.654 % | |
126 | Fiji | 22.547 % | |
127 | Jordan | 22.133 % | |
128 | Angola | 21.349 % | |
129 | Gambia | 20.9 % | |
130 | Burundi | 20.862 % | |
131 | Belgium | 20.553 % | |
132 | Bhutan | 20.314 % | |
133 | Romania | 20.176 % | |
134 | Austria | 19.604 % | |
135 | Australia | 19.527 % | |
136 | Liechtenstein | 19.257 % | |
137 | Seychelles | 19.069 % | |
138 | Iceland | 18.143 % | |
139 | Finland | 17.794 % | |
140 | Uruguay | 17.694 % | |
141 | United Arab Emirates | 17.156 % | |
142 | Colombia | 17.153 % | |
143 | Turkey | 16.927 % | |
144 | Palau | 16.002 % | |
145 | United Kingdom | 15.759 % | |
146 | Sweden | 14.928 % | |
147 | Norway | 14.594 % | |
148 | Canada | 14.562 % | |
149 | Kuwait | 14.485 % | |
150 | Saudi Arabia | 14.36 % | |
151 | Czech Republic | 14.332 % | |
152 | Sao Tome and Principe | 14.243 % | |
153 | Lesotho | 13.933 % | |
154 | Ireland | 13.76 % | |
155 | Denmark | 13.348 % | |
156 | Andorra | 13.344 % | |
157 | Japan | 12.701 % | |
158 | Germany | 12.685 % | |
159 | Thailand | 12.54 % | |
160 | Slovenia | 12.455 % | |
161 | Rwanda | 12.307 % | |
162 | United States | 12.283 % | |
163 | Cuba | 12.271 % | |
164 | New Zealand | 11.859 % | |
165 | Zambia | 11.709 % | |
166 | Netherlands | 11.535 % | |
167 | Luxembourg | 11.199 % | |
168 | Samoa | 11.076 % | |
169 | San Marino | 10.941 % | |
170 | Eswatini | 10.53 % | |
171 | France | 10.178 % | |
172 | Brunei Darussalam | 9.407 % | |
173 | Namibia | 8.884 % | |
174 | Tonga | 8.856 % | |
175 | Croatia | 8.832 % | |
176 | Mozambique | 8.017 % | |
177 | South Africa | 7.61 % | |
178 | Vanuatu | 7.24 % | |
179 | Oman | 6.97 % | |
180 | Timor-Leste | 6.968 % | |
181 | Qatar | 6.909 % | |
182 | Malawi | 6.706 % | |
183 | Papua New Guinea | 6.572 % | |
184 | Monaco | 5.759 % | |
185 | Tuvalu | 5.199 % | |
186 | Botswana | 3.784 % | |
187 | Solomon Islands | 3.178 % | |
188 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 2.727 % | |
189 | Marshall Islands | 1.546 % | |
190 | Nauru | 1.077 % | |
191 | Kiribati | 0.549 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #191
Kiribati
- #190
Nauru
- #189
Marshall Islands
- #188
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #187
Solomon Islands
- #186
Botswana
- #185
Tuvalu
- #184
Monaco
- #183
Papua New Guinea
- #182
Malawi
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2013, Armenia led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with a staggering 82.88%, while the global range spanned from 0.55% to 82.88%. The average out-of-pocket health expenditure globally stood at 32.75%, providing a benchmark for understanding the financial burden of healthcare costs on individuals across different nations.
Economic Disparities and Health Spending
The stark contrast in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending percentages across countries often reflects underlying economic disparities. In Armenia and Sudan, with spending at 82.88% and 74.83% respectively, high out-of-pocket costs are indicative of limited public healthcare funding and insurance coverage, forcing individuals to bear the brunt of medical expenses. Conversely, countries like Kiribati and Nauru report minimal spending of 0.55% and 1.08%, largely due to robust government-funded healthcare systems that alleviate personal financial burdens.
The economic structure of a country significantly impacts healthcare financing. For instance, Nigeria, Africa's largest economy, still reports a high out-of-pocket spending rate of 70.93%, underscoring the disconnect between economic size and equitable healthcare access. In contrast, Botswana demonstrates a more balanced approach with only 3.78% out-of-pocket spending, reflecting successful health policy implementations.
Policy and Infrastructure Influence
Healthcare policies and infrastructure development play crucial roles in determining out-of-pocket expenditures. Countries like Myanmar and Bangladesh, with spending rates of 72.23% and 69.62%, respectively, often face challenges such as inadequate healthcare infrastructure and limited insurance penetration. This situation forces citizens to rely on private health services, which are costly.
In contrast, Monaco and Solomon Islands, with spending rates of 5.76% and 3.18%, benefit from comprehensive public healthcare systems that ensure broader access to medical services. These systems are often supported by substantial government investment in healthcare infrastructure and services, reducing the need for individuals to pay out of pocket.
Year-over-Year Trends and Movements
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals significant fluctuations in out-of-pocket spending. Equatorial Guinea experienced the largest increase of 9.87% (18.5%), a surge that may be attributed to economic instability or policy shifts reducing public healthcare funding. Similarly, Sudan saw a 9.38% (14.3%) rise, reflecting potential declines in government health subsidies or increased healthcare costs.
Conversely, the Central African Republic and Mali experienced substantial decreases of 12.84% (22.1%) and 9.89% (22.1%), respectively. These reductions could be linked to international aid efforts or reforms aimed at strengthening public healthcare systems, thereby reducing individual financial burdens.
Geopolitical and Regional Influences
Regional dynamics also influence out-of-pocket health spending. In South Asia, countries like Bangladesh and India report high expenditures of 69.62% and 69.07%, often due to dense populations and under-resourced public health facilities. In contrast, Pacific Island nations such as Kiribati and Nauru benefit from smaller populations and effective health policies, resulting in lower spending.
In Africa, Cameroon and Nigeria show high spending rates of 69.72% and 70.93%, respectively, highlighting the challenges of delivering healthcare in regions with diverse geographical and socio-economic landscapes. Meanwhile, countries like Malawi manage to keep spending at 6.71%, possibly due to targeted international support and community health programs.
Overall, Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2013 reflects a complex interplay of economic conditions, policy decisions, and regional characteristics. Understanding these factors is crucial for policymakers aiming to reduce individual financial burdens and improve healthcare access globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2013
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2013?
Armenia had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2013, with 82.88%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2013?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2013, with 0.55%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2013?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2013 was 32.75%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2013?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2013 was 32.13%.
How many countries are included in the out-of-pocket health spending dataset for 2013?
The dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2013 includes 191 countries.
What is the range of out-of-pocket health spending values in 2013?
The range of out-of-pocket health spending values in 2013 spans from 0.55% in Kiribati to 82.88% in Armenia.
Insights by country
South Africa
In 2013, South Africa ranked #177 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 7.6100473 %. This figure is significantly higher than many developed nations, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures amidst a struggling public healthcare system. Key factors contributing to this statistic include high levels of inequality and a dual healthcare system where many citizens face substantial out-of-pocket costs for medical services.
Myanmar
In 2013, Myanmar ranked #4 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 72.231445 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public healthcare funding, ongoing economic challenges, and a lack of comprehensive health insurance coverage, which places a substantial financial burden on individuals seeking medical care.
Bahrain
Bahrain's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2013 was 26.917974 %, ranking it #109 out of 191 countries. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Bahrain's small population and limited public healthcare funding, which places a greater financial burden on individuals seeking medical services.
Bhutan
In 2013, Bhutan had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending rate of 20.313904 %, ranking #132 out of 191 countries. This figure is relatively high compared to many neighboring countries, indicating a significant burden on households for health expenses. Key drivers of this spending include Bhutan's limited healthcare infrastructure and reliance on out-of-pocket payments due to insufficient insurance coverage and government funding for health services.
Belize
In 2013, Belize had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 25.364029 %, ranking #114 out of 191 countries. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Belize's limited public healthcare funding and a small population that may struggle to access affordable health services, leading to increased out-of-pocket expenses for medical care.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde ranked #115 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2013, with a value of 24.250147 %. This figure is notably higher than the average in sub-Saharan Africa, reflecting challenges in accessing affordable healthcare services. Economic constraints, coupled with a reliance on tourism, limit government investment in health infrastructure, leading to significant out-of-pocket expenses for residents.
Antigua and Barbuda
In 2013, Antigua and Barbuda ranked #110 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 26.763391 %. This figure is notable when compared to the Caribbean regional average, which tends to be lower due to varying healthcare funding models. High out-of-pocket expenses in Antigua and Barbuda can be attributed to limited public healthcare resources and a reliance on private health services, which often leads to increased costs for individuals. Additionally, the small population size can limit the government's ability to negotiate better healthcare prices.
Angola
In 2013, Angola's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending was 21.349277 %, ranking the country #128 out of 191 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Angola's developing economy, which limits public health funding, and a healthcare system that struggles to provide comprehensive services to its population.
Denmark
In 2013, Denmark had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 13.347527 %, ranking #155 out of 191 countries. This percentage is notably higher than many of its Nordic neighbors, who typically benefit from more comprehensive public healthcare systems. Denmark's relatively high out-of-pocket spending can be attributed to its mixed healthcare model, where private expenditures supplement public funding, alongside a strong emphasis on patient choice and accessibility.
Bolivia
In 2013, Bolivia had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 34.009167 %, ranking #85 out of 191 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Bolivia's limited public healthcare infrastructure and economic challenges that restrict government funding for health services, leading to increased out-of-pocket expenses for citizens.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.