Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2001
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Myanmar | 85.898 % | |
2 | Comoros | 81.272 % | |
3 | Togo | 80.529 % | |
4 | Sierra Leone | 77.773 % | |
5 | Côte d'Ivoire | 77.221 % | |
6 | Mauritania | 77.126 % | |
7 | Tajikistan | 76.522 % | |
8 | Georgia | 76.438 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 75.105 % | |
10 | India | 74.106 % | |
11 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.38 % | |
12 | Azerbaijan | 69.622 % | |
13 | Mali | 67.793 % | |
14 | Bangladesh | 65.805 % | |
15 | China | 64.191 % | |
16 | Egypt | 63.826 % | |
17 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.458 % | |
18 | Guinea | 63.414 % | |
19 | Cambodia | 62.394 % | |
20 | Guatemala | 62.315 % | |
21 | Sudan | 62.281 % | |
22 | Turkmenistan | 61.265 % | |
23 | Uzbekistan | 60.844 % | |
24 | Nigeria | 60.748 % | |
25 | Niger | 60.256 % | |
26 | Ecuador | 59.587 % | |
27 | Iran | 59.237 % | |
28 | Chad | 58.261 % | |
29 | Burkina Faso | 58.226 % | |
30 | Syrian Arab Republic | 58.164 % | |
31 | Maldives | 57.464 % | |
32 | Liberia | 57.298 % | |
33 | Saint Lucia | 56.879 % | |
34 | Grenada | 56.116 % | |
35 | Eritrea | 55.928 % | |
36 | Pakistan | 55.793 % | |
37 | Singapore | 55.59 % | |
38 | Cyprus | 55.216 % | |
39 | Lebanon | 54.842 % | |
40 | Dominican Republic | 54.504 % | |
41 | Equatorial Guinea | 54.326 % | |
42 | Central African Republic | 54.103 % | |
43 | Mexico | 53.428 % | |
44 | Morocco | 53.254 % | |
45 | Kyrgyzstan | 53.165 % | |
46 | Senegal | 52.764 % | |
47 | Honduras | 52.52 % | |
48 | Paraguay | 52.39 % | |
49 | Republic of Moldova | 51.941 % | |
50 | Trinidad and Tobago | 51.313 % | |
51 | Nepal | 51.265 % | |
52 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 51.07 % | |
53 | Armenia | 50.88 % | |
54 | Gabon | 50.823 % | |
55 | Albania | 49.128 % | |
56 | Benin | 49.055 % | |
57 | Latvia | 48.851 % | |
58 | Djibouti | 48.033 % | |
59 | Ukraine | 47.165 % | |
60 | Kenya | 46.398 % | |
61 | Congo | 45.785 % | |
62 | Libya | 45.528 % | |
63 | Burundi | 45.434 % | |
64 | Haiti | 45.205 % | |
65 | El Salvador | 45.137 % | |
66 | Angola | 45.091 % | |
67 | Yemen | 44.626 % | |
68 | Philippines | 44.617 % | |
69 | Laos | 43.971 % | |
70 | Mauritius | 43.82 % | |
71 | Bulgaria | 43.706 % | |
72 | Sao Tome and Principe | 43.621 % | |
73 | Uganda | 43.391 % | |
74 | Kazakhstan | 42.713 % | |
75 | Chile | 42.615 % | |
76 | North Macedonia | 42.383 % | |
77 | Guyana | 42.259 % | |
78 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 41.352 % | |
79 | South Korea | 41.318 % | |
80 | Dominica | 41.145 % | |
81 | Sri Lanka | 41.091 % | |
82 | Tanzania | 40.908 % | |
83 | Peru | 40.651 % | |
84 | Indonesia | 40.492 % | |
85 | Nicaragua | 40.383 % | |
86 | State of Palestine | 40 % | |
87 | Tunisia | 39.448 % | |
88 | Zambia | 38.813 % | |
89 | Madagascar | 38.775 % | |
90 | Jordan | 38.474 % | |
91 | Jamaica | 38.417 % | |
92 | Barbados | 38.059 % | |
93 | Brazil | 37.807 % | |
94 | Malaysia | 35.693 % | |
95 | Greece | 34.778 % | |
96 | Ethiopia | 34.554 % | |
97 | Belize | 34.013 % | |
98 | Thailand | 33.989 % | |
99 | Ghana | 33.579 % | |
100 | Bolivia | 33.053 % | |
101 | Panama | 31.895 % | |
102 | Costa Rica | 31.633 % | |
103 | Russia | 30.792 % | |
104 | Israel | 30.33 % | |
105 | Switzerland | 30.12 % | |
106 | Argentina | 29.838 % | |
107 | Vietnam | 29.701 % | |
108 | Malta | 29.667 % | |
109 | Poland | 28.978 % | |
110 | Hungary | 28.814 % | |
111 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 28.611 % | |
112 | Serbia | 28.49 % | |
113 | Lesotho | 28.387 % | |
114 | Bahamas | 28.232 % | |
115 | Rwanda | 27.677 % | |
116 | Lithuania | 27.585 % | |
117 | Qatar | 27.415 % | |
118 | Suriname | 27.327 % | |
119 | Bahrain | 26.774 % | |
120 | Mozambique | 26.688 % | |
121 | Portugal | 25.109 % | |
122 | Spain | 24.852 % | |
123 | Italy | 24.476 % | |
124 | San Marino | 24.399 % | |
125 | Uruguay | 24.063 % | |
126 | Turkey | 23.432 % | |
127 | Cabo Verde | 23.331 % | |
128 | Antigua and Barbuda | 22.747 % | |
129 | Algeria | 21.669 % | |
130 | Finland | 21.219 % | |
131 | Mongolia | 20.77 % | |
132 | Belarus | 20.721 % | |
133 | Australia | 20.439 % | |
134 | Kuwait | 19.646 % | |
135 | Belgium | 19.566 % | |
136 | Austria | 19.457 % | |
137 | Estonia | 19.245 % | |
138 | Romania | 18.941 % | |
139 | Cuba | 18.706 % | |
140 | Malawi | 18.547 % | |
141 | Iceland | 18.082 % | |
142 | United Kingdom | 18.047 % | |
143 | Saudi Arabia | 18.034 % | |
144 | Eswatini | 17.862 % | |
145 | Sweden | 17.198 % | |
146 | Seychelles | 17.096 % | |
147 | New Zealand | 16.986 % | |
148 | Norway | 16.957 % | |
149 | Palau | 16.895 % | |
150 | Brunei Darussalam | 16.807 % | |
151 | Canada | 15.926 % | |
152 | Japan | 15.786 % | |
153 | Andorra | 15.543 % | |
154 | Denmark | 15.116 % | |
155 | United Arab Emirates | 15.086 % | |
156 | United States | 14.416 % | |
157 | Croatia | 14.39 % | |
158 | South Africa | 14.126 % | |
159 | Samoa | 14.055 % | |
160 | Luxembourg | 13.658 % | |
161 | Colombia | 13.398 % | |
162 | Gambia | 13.389 % | |
163 | Fiji | 13.178 % | |
164 | Slovenia | 12.903 % | |
165 | Tonga | 12.058 % | |
166 | Germany | 11.781 % | |
167 | Oman | 11.267 % | |
168 | Slovakia | 10.904 % | |
169 | Vanuatu | 10.892 % | |
170 | Ireland | 10.647 % | |
171 | Czech Republic | 10.643 % | |
172 | Netherlands | 10.467 % | |
173 | Botswana | 9.456 % | |
174 | Papua New Guinea | 8.865 % | |
175 | Bhutan | 8.033 % | |
176 | France | 7.336 % | |
177 | Monaco | 6.941 % | |
178 | Namibia | 6.674 % | |
179 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 4.811 % | |
180 | Solomon Islands | 4.634 % | |
181 | Nauru | 3.028 % | |
182 | Marshall Islands | 1.682 % | |
183 | Tuvalu | 0.714 % | |
184 | Kiribati | 0.1 % |
- #1
Myanmar
- #2
Comoros
- #3
Togo
- #4
Sierra Leone
- #5
Côte d'Ivoire
- #6
Mauritania
- #7
Tajikistan
- #8
Georgia
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
India
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #184
Kiribati
- #183
Tuvalu
- #182
Marshall Islands
- #181
Nauru
- #180
Solomon Islands
- #179
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #178
Namibia
- #177
Monaco
- #176
France
- #175
Bhutan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, Myanmar led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with a staggering 85.90%, while the global range extended from 0.10% to 85.90% across 184 countries. The global average for out-of-pocket health spending was 36.85%, with a median of 38.06%, highlighting significant variability in personal financial healthcare burdens worldwide.
Economic Factors Driving High Out-of-Pocket Spending
Countries with the highest out-of-pocket health spending often share common economic characteristics, such as limited public healthcare funding and underdeveloped insurance markets. In Myanmar (85.90%), Comoros (81.27%), and Togo (80.53%), low government expenditure on health services compels citizens to bear the brunt of medical costs directly. These nations frequently lack comprehensive health insurance systems, which results in greater personal financial responsibility for healthcare.
Furthermore, the economic structure in these nations often limits access to affordable healthcare. For instance, both Sierra Leone (77.77%) and Côte d'Ivoire (77.22%) are characterized by lower GDP per capita, restricting both government investment in healthcare infrastructure and individual capacity to afford insurance premiums. The absence of robust healthcare policies exacerbates the reliance on out-of-pocket expenditures.
Policy and Governance Impact on Health Spending
Government policy and governance quality play crucial roles in determining the extent of out-of-pocket health spending. In countries like Tajikistan (76.52%) and Georgia (76.44%), transitional economies and political instability have historically led to fragmented healthcare systems. This fragmentation often results in insufficient public funding and inefficient healthcare delivery, forcing citizens to pay out-of-pocket for essential services.
Conversely, countries with lower out-of-pocket spending, such as France (7.34%) and Monaco (6.94%), benefit from well-established national health insurance schemes. These systems are typically funded through taxes and provide extensive coverage, significantly reducing the need for individuals to pay directly for healthcare services.
Geographical and Cultural Influences on Spending Patterns
Geographical and cultural factors also contribute to disparities in out-of-pocket health spending. In the Pacific island nations of Kiribati (0.10%), Tuvalu (0.71%), and Marshall Islands (1.68%), traditional community-based support systems and government-subsidized healthcare aid in minimizing personal health expenditures. These countries often have smaller populations, allowing for more manageable public health interventions.
In contrast, larger countries like India (74.11%) face challenges in uniformly implementing healthcare policies due to diverse populations and vast geographical areas. The cultural preference for private healthcare over public services in India also contributes to higher out-of-pocket spending, as many citizens opt for private providers perceived to offer better quality care.
Implications of High Out-of-Pocket Spending
The implications of high out-of-pocket health spending are profound, affecting both individual welfare and national economic stability. In countries like Cameroon (75.10%) and Mauritania (77.13%), high out-of-pocket costs can lead to catastrophic health expenditures, pushing families into poverty. This financial strain can deter individuals from seeking necessary medical care, exacerbating health inequities and reducing overall population health.
Addressing these challenges requires concerted efforts to establish comprehensive health insurance systems and increase public health funding. Such measures can alleviate the financial burden on individuals and improve access to essential healthcare services, fostering healthier populations and more resilient economies.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2001
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2001?
Myanmar had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2001, with 85.9%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2001?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2001, with 0.1%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2001?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2001 was 36.85%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2001?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2001 was 37.93%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2001?
The top 10 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2001 were Myanmar, Comoros, Togo, Sierra Leone, Côte d'Ivoire, Mauritania, Tajikistan, Georgia, Cameroon, and India.
Which countries were in the bottom 10 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2001?
The bottom 10 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2001 were Kiribati, Tuvalu, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Solomon Islands, Micronesia (Fed. States of), Namibia, Monaco, France, and Bhutan.
Insights by country
Georgia
In 2001, Georgia ranked #8 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 76.4383 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare expenses. Contributing factors include the country's economic challenges following its independence and limited public health funding, which compel many Georgians to pay for medical services out of pocket.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2001, Bosnia and Herzegovina ranked #78 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 41.352055 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal financial resources for healthcare. Contributing factors include the country's economic challenges in the post-war period and limited public health funding, which have necessitated greater out-of-pocket expenditures for citizens seeking medical services.
Solomon Islands
In 2001, the Solomon Islands ranked #180 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 4.6336555 %. This figure is significantly higher than the top-ranked country, which typically has lower out-of-pocket expenses due to robust public health systems. Contributing factors to this high spending include limited healthcare infrastructure, geographic isolation, and a reliance on private payments for medical services, which places a financial burden on households.
Switzerland
In 2001, Switzerland had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 30.119818 %, ranking #105 out of 184 countries. This figure is notably higher than many European neighbors, reflecting a trend towards significant personal expenditure on health care. Contributing factors include the high cost of medical services and a health insurance system that requires individuals to cover a substantial portion of their medical expenses directly.
Guatemala
In 2001, Guatemala ranked #20 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 62.315342 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public health funding and a relatively low level of health insurance coverage, which places a greater financial burden on individuals seeking medical care.
Guyana
In 2001, Guyana ranked #77 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 42.258625 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on personal finances for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public health infrastructure and economic challenges, which compel many citizens to cover their medical expenses directly.
Saudi Arabia
In 2001, Saudi Arabia ranked #143 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending at 18.033691 %. This figure is notably higher than many of its Gulf neighbors, reflecting a trend where individuals bear a significant portion of health costs. Contributing factors include the country's reliance on private healthcare services and a lack of comprehensive health insurance coverage for certain demographics, leading to increased out-of-pocket expenses for citizens and residents.
Barbados
In 2001, Barbados had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending rate of 38.058594 %, ranking #92 out of 184 countries. This figure is notably higher than many of its Caribbean neighbors, indicating a significant reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include the limited coverage of public health services and the high cost of healthcare, which places a greater financial burden on individuals seeking medical care.
Pakistan
In 2001, Pakistan ranked #36 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 55.7931 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a heavy reliance on personal finances for healthcare services. Contributing factors include limited public health funding, a growing population, and widespread poverty, which drive many to pay for medical expenses out of their own pockets.
Cameroon
In 2001, Cameroon ranked #9 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 75.1047 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal finances for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public health funding and a lack of comprehensive health insurance coverage, which places the financial burden on individuals, particularly in rural areas where access to healthcare services is often constrained.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.