Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2010
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Myanmar | 80.745 % | |
2 | Comoros | 80.461 % | |
3 | Afghanistan | 78.997 % | |
4 | Armenia | 77.624 % | |
5 | Nigeria | 76.877 % | |
6 | Cameroon | 76.021 % | |
7 | Yemen | 74.017 % | |
8 | Georgia | 72.068 % | |
9 | Turkmenistan | 70.999 % | |
10 | Tajikistan | 70.434 % | |
11 | Guinea | 69.292 % | |
12 | Bangladesh | 67.955 % | |
13 | Pakistan | 67.758 % | |
14 | Chad | 67.585 % | |
15 | India | 65.185 % | |
16 | Mauritania | 62.636 % | |
17 | Egypt | 62.628 % | |
18 | Togo | 62.27 % | |
19 | Sudan | 61.313 % | |
20 | Indonesia | 60.584 % | |
21 | Azerbaijan | 60.279 % | |
22 | Albania | 59.967 % | |
23 | Central African Republic | 59.52 % | |
24 | Iran | 59.397 % | |
25 | Guatemala | 58.949 % | |
26 | Equatorial Guinea | 58.062 % | |
27 | Uzbekistan | 58.045 % | |
28 | Grenada | 56.571 % | |
29 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 56.479 % | |
30 | Mali | 56.266 % | |
31 | Sierra Leone | 56.209 % | |
32 | Nepal | 56.204 % | |
33 | Morocco | 55.613 % | |
34 | Niger | 55.534 % | |
35 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 55.177 % | |
36 | Philippines | 54.846 % | |
37 | Saint Lucia | 54.763 % | |
38 | Paraguay | 53.929 % | |
39 | Sri Lanka | 53.298 % | |
40 | Mauritius | 52.317 % | |
41 | Syrian Arab Republic | 51.974 % | |
42 | Cambodia | 51.909 % | |
43 | Senegal | 48.677 % | |
44 | Eritrea | 48.655 % | |
45 | Guinea-Bissau | 48.05 % | |
46 | Trinidad and Tobago | 46.568 % | |
47 | Honduras | 46.263 % | |
48 | Ecuador | 45.26 % | |
49 | Lebanon | 43.585 % | |
50 | Mexico | 43.509 % | |
51 | Benin | 43.39 % | |
52 | Bulgaria | 43.141 % | |
53 | Cyprus | 43.106 % | |
54 | Kyrgyzstan | 43.092 % | |
55 | Liberia | 42.703 % | |
56 | Ethiopia | 42.29 % | |
57 | Congo | 42.154 % | |
58 | Tunisia | 42.106 % | |
59 | Ukraine | 41.842 % | |
60 | Singapore | 41.516 % | |
61 | China | 40.8 % | |
62 | Republic of Moldova | 40.432 % | |
63 | Maldives | 40.08 % | |
64 | Peru | 39.515 % | |
65 | Dominica | 38.801 % | |
66 | South Korea | 38.779 % | |
67 | Barbados | 38.097 % | |
68 | El Salvador | 37.809 % | |
69 | North Macedonia | 37.789 % | |
70 | Nicaragua | 37.489 % | |
71 | Uganda | 37.391 % | |
72 | Latvia | 37.186 % | |
73 | Jamaica | 37.11 % | |
74 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 37.05 % | |
75 | Dominican Republic | 36.446 % | |
76 | Serbia | 36.403 % | |
77 | Madagascar | 36.15 % | |
78 | State of Palestine | 36 % | |
79 | Laos | 35.96 % | |
80 | Russia | 35.326 % | |
81 | Guyana | 34.747 % | |
82 | Vietnam | 34.674 % | |
83 | Chile | 34.468 % | |
84 | Zimbabwe | 34.431 % | |
85 | Ghana | 34.302 % | |
86 | Malaysia | 34.117 % | |
87 | Haiti | 33.31 % | |
88 | Bolivia | 33.277 % | |
89 | Malta | 33.026 % | |
90 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 32.235 % | |
91 | Tanzania | 31.894 % | |
92 | Panama | 31.44 % | |
93 | Burkina Faso | 30.83 % | |
94 | Kenya | 30.179 % | |
95 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 30.076 % | |
96 | Libya | 29.974 % | |
97 | Brazil | 29.385 % | |
98 | Belarus | 29.165 % | |
99 | Algeria | 28.882 % | |
100 | Greece | 28.259 % | |
101 | Burundi | 28.186 % | |
102 | Cabo Verde | 28.084 % | |
103 | Mongolia | 28.055 % | |
104 | Bahamas | 27.599 % | |
105 | Lithuania | 27.591 % | |
106 | Hungary | 27.416 % | |
107 | Kazakhstan | 27.296 % | |
108 | Bahrain | 26.745 % | |
109 | Argentina | 26.668 % | |
110 | Djibouti | 26.462 % | |
111 | Iraq | 26.032 % | |
112 | Sao Tome and Principe | 25.696 % | |
113 | Gabon | 25.506 % | |
114 | Costa Rica | 25.384 % | |
115 | Portugal | 24.708 % | |
116 | Antigua and Barbuda | 24.684 % | |
117 | Belize | 24.628 % | |
118 | Switzerland | 24.066 % | |
119 | Israel | 23.812 % | |
120 | Poland | 23.714 % | |
121 | Suriname | 23.581 % | |
122 | Lesotho | 23.46 % | |
123 | Estonia | 22.814 % | |
124 | Slovakia | 22.801 % | |
125 | Fiji | 22.371 % | |
126 | Seychelles | 22.154 % | |
127 | Jordan | 21.855 % | |
128 | Spain | 21.373 % | |
129 | Belgium | 21.369 % | |
130 | Italy | 20.549 % | |
131 | Uruguay | 20.473 % | |
132 | Australia | 19.749 % | |
133 | Romania | 19.631 % | |
134 | Angola | 19.344 % | |
135 | Austria | 19.237 % | |
136 | Saudi Arabia | 18.945 % | |
137 | Finland | 18.804 % | |
138 | Qatar | 18.726 % | |
139 | Iceland | 18.661 % | |
140 | Gambia | 18.032 % | |
141 | United Arab Emirates | 17.946 % | |
142 | Palau | 17.7 % | |
143 | Colombia | 17.004 % | |
144 | Turkey | 16.872 % | |
145 | Sweden | 16.508 % | |
146 | Bhutan | 16.483 % | |
147 | Canada | 15.615 % | |
148 | Norway | 15.046 % | |
149 | Japan | 14.57 % | |
150 | Thailand | 14.497 % | |
151 | Kuwait | 14.332 % | |
152 | Zambia | 14.233 % | |
153 | Croatia | 13.957 % | |
154 | Czech Republic | 13.855 % | |
155 | Ireland | 13.796 % | |
156 | San Marino | 13.734 % | |
157 | Denmark | 13.708 % | |
158 | Germany | 13.303 % | |
159 | United Kingdom | 13.174 % | |
160 | Slovenia | 12.64 % | |
161 | Samoa | 12.632 % | |
162 | United States | 12.368 % | |
163 | Papua New Guinea | 12.284 % | |
164 | New Zealand | 11.79 % | |
165 | Andorra | 11.619 % | |
166 | Timor-Leste | 11.565 % | |
167 | France | 11.445 % | |
168 | Rwanda | 11.091 % | |
169 | Malawi | 10.928 % | |
170 | Eswatini | 10.455 % | |
171 | Oman | 10.407 % | |
172 | Luxembourg | 10.232 % | |
173 | Cuba | 9.182 % | |
174 | Netherlands | 9.096 % | |
175 | Vanuatu | 8.857 % | |
176 | Tonga | 8.502 % | |
177 | Namibia | 8.495 % | |
178 | Brunei Darussalam | 8.261 % | |
179 | South Africa | 7.995 % | |
180 | Mozambique | 7.112 % | |
181 | Tuvalu | 5.802 % | |
182 | Monaco | 5.38 % | |
183 | Botswana | 4.994 % | |
184 | Solomon Islands | 4.091 % | |
185 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 3.234 % | |
186 | Nauru | 2.418 % | |
187 | Marshall Islands | 1.073 % | |
188 | Kiribati | 0.634 % |
- #1
Myanmar
- #2
Comoros
- #3
Afghanistan
- #4
Armenia
- #5
Nigeria
- #6
Cameroon
- #7
Yemen
- #8
Georgia
- #9
Turkmenistan
- #10
Tajikistan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #188
Kiribati
- #187
Marshall Islands
- #186
Nauru
- #185
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #184
Solomon Islands
- #183
Botswana
- #182
Monaco
- #181
Tuvalu
- #180
Mozambique
- #179
South Africa
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, Myanmar led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with a staggering rate of 80.74%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 0.63% to a maximum of 80.74%. The average out-of-pocket expenditure across 188 countries was 33.50%, highlighting significant disparities in healthcare affordability worldwide.
Economic Factors and High Out-of-Pocket Health Spending
Countries with high out-of-pocket health spending often face economic challenges that limit public healthcare funding. In Myanmar, Comoros (80.46%), and Afghanistan (79.00%), limited governmental health expenditures force citizens to bear the brunt of medical costs. These nations frequently experience political instability, which diverts resources away from public health infrastructure. Additionally, a lack of comprehensive health insurance systems exacerbates the financial burden on individuals.
For instance, Nigeria (76.88%) has Africa's largest economy, yet significant portions of its population live in poverty, leading to high personal healthcare expenses. Similarly, Yemen (74.02%) suffers from ongoing conflict, which disrupts healthcare services and shifts costs to individuals.
Low Out-of-Pocket Spending and Government Intervention
Conversely, countries with low out-of-pocket health spending often benefit from robust government intervention in healthcare. Kiribati (0.63%) and Marshall Islands (1.07%) exemplify how small island nations can maintain low personal health expenses through effective public health policies and international aid. These countries often receive substantial external financial support, which helps subsidize healthcare costs for citizens.
In Botswana (4.99%) and South Africa (8.00%), governmental policies prioritize healthcare funding, reducing the need for out-of-pocket spending. Such countries often have established national health insurance schemes that alleviate the financial burden on individuals.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes in Health Spending
Year-over-year trends reveal significant shifts in out-of-pocket health spending for some countries. The Central African Republic saw the largest increase, with a rise of 11.68% (24.4%), attributed to economic instability and inadequate healthcare infrastructure. Similarly, Indonesia experienced a 11.36% (23.1%) increase, reflecting growing healthcare costs amidst rapid urbanization and a burgeoning population.
Conversely, Gabon recorded the largest decrease, with a reduction of 24.57% (-49.1%), likely due to improved government healthcare investments. Sierra Leone and Democratic Republic of the Congo also saw declines of 9.14% (-14.0%) and 8.36% (-18.4%), respectively, as these countries implemented policies aimed at reducing healthcare expenses for individuals.
Geographic and Policy Influences on Spending Patterns
Geographic and policy influences play crucial roles in shaping out-of-pocket health spending. In regions like Africa and Southeast Asia, limited infrastructure and high poverty rates contribute to elevated personal healthcare costs. For example, Cameroon (76.02%) and Turkmenistan (71.00%) face structural barriers that hinder access to affordable healthcare.
Conversely, in regions with strong policy frameworks, such as certain Pacific Island nations, government initiatives ensure that healthcare remains accessible and affordable. Countries like Micronesia (3.23%) and Solomon Islands (4.09%) benefit from strategic health policies that prioritize public funding over individual expenditures.
Overall, the disparities in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2010 underscore the importance of economic stability, government intervention, and policy frameworks in determining the financial burden of healthcare on individuals worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2010
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2010?
Myanmar had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2010, with 80.74%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2010?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2010, with 0.63%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2010?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across countries in 2010 was 33.5%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2010?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2010 was 30.13%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2010?
The top 10 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2010 were Myanmar, Comoros, Afghanistan, Armenia, Nigeria, Cameroon, Yemen, Georgia, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan.
How many countries are included in the dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2010?
The dataset includes 188 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2010.
Insights by country
Libya
In 2010, Libya had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending rate of 29.973637 %, ranking #96 out of 188 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Libya's economic instability and the impact of ongoing conflicts, which have strained public health resources and limited access to comprehensive healthcare services.
Gabon
In 2010, Gabon had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending value of 25.505648 %, ranking #113 out of 188 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Factors such as limited public health financing and a reliance on private healthcare services contribute to this high out-of-pocket expenditure in Gabon.
Romania
In 2010, Romania's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending was 19.631237 %, ranking #133 out of 188 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public health funding and a transitional economy struggling to provide comprehensive health services, which places a heavier financial burden on individuals.
Malta
In 2010, Malta ranked #89 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 33.02583 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Key drivers for this statistic include Malta's relatively small population and the structure of its healthcare system, which may lead to higher out-of-pocket expenses compared to larger countries with more comprehensive public health funding.
Liberia
In 2010, Liberia ranked #55 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 42.70298 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include a fragile healthcare infrastructure, compounded by economic challenges and limited government investment in public health services following years of civil conflict.
Monaco
In 2010, Monaco had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 5.379522 %, ranking #182 out of 188 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal health expenditures. Factors contributing to this high out-of-pocket spending include Monaco's affluent population and the limited public healthcare funding available in this small city-state, which often leads residents to seek private healthcare options.
Malaysia
In 2010, Malaysia ranked #86 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 34.1167 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Malaysia's dual healthcare system, where both public and private sectors coexist, and the increasing costs associated with private healthcare services, which often lead citizens to pay out-of-pocket.
Iran
In 2010, Iran ranked #24 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 59.39722 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include economic sanctions that have impacted public health funding and a healthcare system that often requires out-of-pocket expenses for services and medications.
Georgia
In 2010, Georgia ranked #8 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, at 72.06796 % of total health expenditure. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, where many countries strive for lower out-of-pocket costs to enhance healthcare accessibility. The high percentage is largely attributed to the country's economic transition post-Soviet Union, which resulted in limited public healthcare funding and a reliance on private payments for medical services.
Kuwait
Kuwait's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2010 was 14.332145 %, ranking #151 out of 188 countries. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures. Factors contributing to this statistic include a relatively high per capita income and a healthcare system that encourages private sector involvement, leading to increased out-of-pocket costs for citizens.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.