Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2016
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yemen | 83.712 % | |
2 | Armenia | 80.647 % | |
3 | Myanmar | 76.673 % | |
4 | Turkmenistan | 76.156 % | |
5 | Afghanistan | 75.974 % | |
6 | Nigeria | 75.187 % | |
7 | Cameroon | 73.388 % | |
8 | Bangladesh | 71.495 % | |
9 | Comoros | 71.266 % | |
10 | Sudan | 71.186 % | |
11 | Azerbaijan | 70.029 % | |
12 | Equatorial Guinea | 69.09 % | |
13 | Tajikistan | 66.003 % | |
14 | Guinea-Bissau | 64.583 % | |
15 | Togo | 63.402 % | |
16 | India | 63.206 % | |
17 | Pakistan | 62.128 % | |
18 | Georgia | 60.7 % | |
19 | Eritrea | 59 % | |
20 | Egypt | 58.997 % | |
21 | Niger | 58.51 % | |
22 | Kyrgyzstan | 57.213 % | |
23 | Albania | 56.517 % | |
24 | Guatemala | 56.061 % | |
25 | Cambodia | 56.054 % | |
26 | Mauritania | 55.745 % | |
27 | Grenada | 55.744 % | |
28 | Nepal | 55.44 % | |
29 | Central African Republic | 55.21 % | |
30 | Chad | 55.146 % | |
31 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 54.896 % | |
32 | Uzbekistan | 54.659 % | |
33 | Senegal | 51.141 % | |
34 | Philippines | 50.492 % | |
35 | Sri Lanka | 50.122 % | |
36 | Honduras | 49.765 % | |
37 | Guinea | 49.762 % | |
38 | Benin | 49.556 % | |
39 | Morocco | 48.847 % | |
40 | Ukraine | 48.358 % | |
41 | Mauritius | 48.161 % | |
42 | Liberia | 46.755 % | |
43 | Laos | 46.442 % | |
44 | Republic of Moldova | 46.292 % | |
45 | Saint Lucia | 45.425 % | |
46 | Barbados | 45.057 % | |
47 | Syrian Arab Republic | 45.032 % | |
48 | Somalia | 44.987 % | |
49 | Cyprus | 44.607 % | |
50 | Congo | 44.257 % | |
51 | Iraq | 44.252 % | |
52 | Sierra Leone | 43.706 % | |
53 | Latvia | 43.323 % | |
54 | Bulgaria | 43.255 % | |
55 | Trinidad and Tobago | 43.117 % | |
56 | Paraguay | 42.922 % | |
57 | State of Palestine | 42.7 % | |
58 | Mexico | 41.372 % | |
59 | Vietnam | 41.356 % | |
60 | Uganda | 40.61 % | |
61 | Russia | 40.485 % | |
62 | Serbia | 40.454 % | |
63 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 40.012 % | |
64 | Tunisia | 39.756 % | |
65 | Montenegro | 38.233 % | |
66 | Indonesia | 38.124 % | |
67 | Ghana | 37.824 % | |
68 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 37.292 % | |
69 | Iran | 36.553 % | |
70 | South Korea | 36.485 % | |
71 | Malaysia | 35.948 % | |
72 | China | 35.906 % | |
73 | Mali | 35.751 % | |
74 | Kazakhstan | 35.673 % | |
75 | Ethiopia | 35.432 % | |
76 | North Macedonia | 35.32 % | |
77 | Haiti | 35.29 % | |
78 | Angola | 35.209 % | |
79 | Malta | 35.128 % | |
80 | Nicaragua | 35.016 % | |
81 | Mongolia | 34.818 % | |
82 | Chile | 34.751 % | |
83 | El Salvador | 34.538 % | |
84 | Greece | 34.308 % | |
85 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 32.956 % | |
86 | Jordan | 32.947 % | |
87 | Algeria | 32.895 % | |
88 | Panama | 32.698 % | |
89 | Singapore | 32.624 % | |
90 | Libya | 32.495 % | |
91 | Lithuania | 32.317 % | |
92 | Dominica | 32.226 % | |
93 | Lebanon | 31.975 % | |
94 | Burkina Faso | 31.394 % | |
95 | Gambia | 30.499 % | |
96 | Ecuador | 30.01 % | |
97 | Guyana | 29.935 % | |
98 | Peru | 29.597 % | |
99 | Dominican Republic | 29.478 % | |
100 | Portugal | 29.432 % | |
101 | Jamaica | 29.005 % | |
102 | Cabo Verde | 28.666 % | |
103 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 28.614 % | |
104 | Burundi | 28.368 % | |
105 | Bahamas | 28.303 % | |
106 | Bolivia | 28.021 % | |
107 | Bahrain | 27.989 % | |
108 | Hungary | 27.689 % | |
109 | Antigua and Barbuda | 27.52 % | |
110 | Belarus | 26.714 % | |
111 | Argentina | 26.476 % | |
112 | Seychelles | 25.307 % | |
113 | Kenya | 25 % | |
114 | Zimbabwe | 24.649 % | |
115 | Brazil | 24.421 % | |
116 | Estonia | 23.738 % | |
117 | Italy | 23.694 % | |
118 | Djibouti | 23.179 % | |
119 | Madagascar | 23.058 % | |
120 | Israel | 22.823 % | |
121 | Poland | 22.746 % | |
122 | Belize | 22.578 % | |
123 | Gabon | 22.551 % | |
124 | Costa Rica | 22.203 % | |
125 | Spain | 21.956 % | |
126 | Tanzania | 21.894 % | |
127 | Suriname | 21.82 % | |
128 | Switzerland | 21.272 % | |
129 | Liechtenstein | 21.184 % | |
130 | Romania | 20.755 % | |
131 | Fiji | 20.638 % | |
132 | Bhutan | 20.13 % | |
133 | Austria | 20.046 % | |
134 | Finland | 19.273 % | |
135 | Belgium | 18.941 % | |
136 | Maldives | 18.935 % | |
137 | Slovakia | 17.889 % | |
138 | Palau | 17.151 % | |
139 | Iceland | 16.747 % | |
140 | Australia | 16.634 % | |
141 | Turkey | 16.466 % | |
142 | Uruguay | 16.439 % | |
143 | United Arab Emirates | 15.992 % | |
144 | Lesotho | 15.838 % | |
145 | United Kingdom | 15.68 % | |
146 | Colombia | 15.612 % | |
147 | Canada | 15.607 % | |
148 | Sweden | 14.633 % | |
149 | New Zealand | 14.61 % | |
150 | Saudi Arabia | 14.451 % | |
151 | Czech Republic | 14.285 % | |
152 | Norway | 14.271 % | |
153 | Sao Tome and Principe | 13.914 % | |
154 | Denmark | 13.521 % | |
155 | Ireland | 13.472 % | |
156 | Kuwait | 13.282 % | |
157 | Rwanda | 13.244 % | |
158 | Japan | 12.854 % | |
159 | Andorra | 12.482 % | |
160 | Malawi | 12.415 % | |
161 | San Marino | 12.366 % | |
162 | Germany | 12.185 % | |
163 | Zambia | 12.14 % | |
164 | Slovenia | 11.981 % | |
165 | United States | 11.626 % | |
166 | Samoa | 11.293 % | |
167 | Netherlands | 11.286 % | |
168 | Croatia | 10.974 % | |
169 | Thailand | 10.813 % | |
170 | Luxembourg | 10.744 % | |
171 | France | 10.714 % | |
172 | Eswatini | 10.585 % | |
173 | Mozambique | 10.539 % | |
174 | Vanuatu | 10.506 % | |
175 | Cuba | 10.285 % | |
176 | Papua New Guinea | 10.145 % | |
177 | Timor-Leste | 7.905 % | |
178 | Namibia | 7.712 % | |
179 | Tonga | 6.889 % | |
180 | Monaco | 6.376 % | |
181 | Qatar | 6.28 % | |
182 | South Africa | 5.786 % | |
183 | Oman | 5.56 % | |
184 | Brunei Darussalam | 4.98 % | |
185 | Botswana | 3.307 % | |
186 | Solomon Islands | 2.983 % | |
187 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 2.396 % | |
188 | Marshall Islands | 1.153 % | |
189 | Nauru | 1.135 % | |
190 | Kiribati | 0.796 % | |
191 | Tuvalu | 0.711 % |
- #1
Yemen
- #2
Armenia
- #3
Myanmar
- #4
Turkmenistan
- #5
Afghanistan
- #6
Nigeria
- #7
Cameroon
- #8
Bangladesh
- #9
Comoros
- #10
Sudan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #191
Tuvalu
- #190
Kiribati
- #189
Nauru
- #188
Marshall Islands
- #187
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #186
Solomon Islands
- #185
Botswana
- #184
Brunei Darussalam
- #183
Oman
- #182
South Africa
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2016, Yemen recorded the highest Out-of-Pocket Health Spending at 83.71%, while Tuvalu reported the lowest at 0.71%. The global range of this financial burden on individuals was significant, with a global average of 32.39%, highlighting the disparity in healthcare accessibility and affordability worldwide.
Economic Factors Influencing High Out-of-Pocket Health Spending
Economic instability and limited public healthcare funding are key factors driving high out-of-pocket health spending in several countries. For instance, Yemen and Armenia, with out-of-pocket spending of 83.71% and 80.65% respectively, face significant economic challenges. In Yemen, ongoing conflict has severely disrupted public services, including healthcare, forcing individuals to bear the brunt of medical expenses. Similarly, Armenia's economic constraints limit government healthcare support, shifting costs to individuals.
In Africa, Nigeria and Cameroon exhibit high out-of-pocket expenses, at 75.19% and 73.39% respectively. Despite Nigeria having Africa's largest economy, the healthcare system remains underfunded, leading to significant personal financial burdens. These examples illustrate how economic factors can exacerbate healthcare costs for individuals.
Low Out-of-Pocket Spending and Effective Public Health Systems
Countries with low out-of-pocket health spending often have robust public health systems and substantial government subsidies. Tuvalu, Kiribati, and Nauru, with spending at 0.71%, 0.80%, and 1.13% respectively, benefit from effective public health policies and external aid, which alleviate individual financial burdens. Such systems ensure that citizens receive necessary healthcare without significant personal expense, demonstrating the impact of effective public policy and funding on reducing out-of-pocket costs.
In Brunei Darussalam and Oman, where spending is 4.98% and 5.56% respectively, government investment in healthcare infrastructure ensures widespread access to medical services, further reducing the need for personal expenditure.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes in Health Spending
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals which countries experienced the most substantial shifts in out-of-pocket spending. Eritrea saw the largest increase, with a rise of 16.10 percentage points, representing a 37.5% increase. Such changes may reflect economic downturns or policy shifts that increase individual financial burdens. Similarly, Congo and Sierra Leone experienced increases of 11.80 and 8.11 percentage points, respectively, indicating potential reductions in public healthcare funding or increased healthcare demands.
Conversely, Iraq recorded the most significant decrease in out-of-pocket spending, dropping by 31.94 percentage points, a 41.9% reduction. This decrease may be attributed to improved healthcare funding or international aid efforts. Belarus and Sudan also saw decreases of 9.49 and 8.22 percentage points, respectively, potentially reflecting efforts to strengthen public healthcare systems and reduce individual costs.
Regional Disparities and Policy Implications
Regional disparities in out-of-pocket health spending highlight the importance of tailored healthcare policies. In Asia, countries like Myanmar and Bangladesh, with spending at 76.67% and 71.49%, face significant healthcare access challenges. These high costs can deter individuals from seeking necessary care, leading to adverse health outcomes and increased long-term costs.
In contrast, countries with lower spending, such as South Africa at 5.79%, emphasize the role of comprehensive health insurance schemes and government investment in healthcare infrastructure. Such policies not only reduce individual financial burdens but also improve overall health outcomes and economic productivity.
Understanding these patterns underscores the need for international cooperation and policy innovation to reduce out-of-pocket health spending and improve healthcare access globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2016
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2016?
Yemen had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2016, with 83.71%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2016?
Tuvalu had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2016, with 0.71%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending percentage across all countries in 2016?
The average out-of-pocket health spending percentage across all countries in 2016 was 32.39%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending percentage in 2016?
The median out-of-pocket health spending percentage in 2016 was 30.01%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2016?
The top 3 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2016 were Yemen (83.71%), Armenia (80.65%), and Myanmar (76.67%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for out-of-pocket health spending in 2016?
The dataset included 191 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2016.
Insights by country
Fiji
In 2016, Fiji's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending was 20.638285 %, ranking #131 out of 191 countries. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Fiji's limited public health funding and the high cost of medical services, which disproportionately affects lower-income populations in the country.
Afghanistan
In 2016, Afghanistan ranked #5 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 75.974335 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include a lack of comprehensive health insurance coverage and ongoing conflict, which disrupts the healthcare infrastructure and limits access to public health services.
Bangladesh
In 2016, Bangladesh ranked #8 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 71.49494 %. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. The high out-of-pocket expenditure is driven by limited public health financing and a growing population that often faces barriers to accessing affordable healthcare.
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
In 2016, Micronesia (Fed. States of) ranked #187 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 2.395603 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a reliance on external funding sources for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited economic resources and a small population spread across numerous islands, which complicates the delivery of health services and drives up costs for individuals.
Vietnam
In 2016, Vietnam ranked #59 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 41.35648 %. This level of spending is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a reliance on private financing for healthcare. Key drivers include a developing healthcare system and limited public funding, which compel many Vietnamese citizens to pay for medical services directly.
Ghana
In 2016, Ghana ranked #67 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 37.823727 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant financial burden on individuals seeking healthcare services. Contributing factors include limited public healthcare funding and a reliance on private healthcare providers, which can lead to high out-of-pocket costs for citizens.
Zimbabwe
In 2016, Zimbabwe ranked #114 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 24.649107 %. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal financing for healthcare. Contributing factors include economic challenges, limited public health funding, and a high prevalence of diseases, which strain the already inadequate healthcare infrastructure.
Uganda
In 2016, Uganda ranked #60 globally with an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 40.60964 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include a limited public healthcare budget and high levels of poverty, which compel many Ugandans to pay for medical services directly rather than through insurance or government support.
New Zealand
In 2016, New Zealand ranked #149 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending at 14.610116 %. This figure is notably higher than many developed nations, reflecting a greater reliance on private health expenditures compared to countries with universal healthcare systems. Key drivers include New Zealand's mixed public-private healthcare model and demographic factors that influence healthcare access and affordability.
Jamaica
In 2016, Jamaica had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending rate of 29.00499 %, ranking #101 out of 191 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include a limited public health system and economic constraints that affect government health spending. Additionally, Jamaica's demographic challenges, such as a growing population with increasing healthcare needs, further strain financial resources for health services.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.