Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2021
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Armenia | 78.656 % | |
2 | Turkmenistan | 77.477 % | |
3 | Afghanistan | 77.214 % | |
4 | Nigeria | 76.243 % | |
5 | Bangladesh | 76.148 % | |
6 | Cameroon | 70.641 % | |
7 | Chad | 69.48 % | |
8 | Togo | 69.005 % | |
9 | Yemen | 68.819 % | |
10 | Azerbaijan | 66.032 % | |
11 | Tajikistan | 65.134 % | |
12 | Equatorial Guinea | 64.894 % | |
13 | Liberia | 61.672 % | |
14 | Guinea-Bissau | 61.009 % | |
15 | Uzbekistan | 60.313 % | |
16 | Albania | 59.704 % | |
17 | Syrian Arab Republic | 59.462 % | |
18 | Guatemala | 58.445 % | |
19 | Sudan | 58.245 % | |
20 | Comoros | 55.553 % | |
21 | Benin | 55.365 % | |
22 | Egypt | 54.902 % | |
23 | Myanmar | 54.101 % | |
24 | Guinea | 53.467 % | |
25 | Nepal | 53.126 % | |
26 | Georgia | 51.899 % | |
27 | Honduras | 51.706 % | |
28 | Grenada | 51.507 % | |
29 | Sierra Leone | 51.41 % | |
30 | Pakistan | 50.675 % | |
31 | Iraq | 49.909 % | |
32 | Eritrea | 49.672 % | |
33 | Central African Republic | 49.575 % | |
34 | Mauritania | 48.191 % | |
35 | Senegal | 46.878 % | |
36 | Trinidad and Tobago | 46.744 % | |
37 | Haiti | 45.453 % | |
38 | Ukraine | 45.294 % | |
39 | India | 45.109 % | |
40 | Mali | 44.094 % | |
41 | Niger | 42.528 % | |
42 | Morocco | 41.795 % | |
43 | North Macedonia | 41.74 % | |
44 | Iran | 41.701 % | |
45 | Cambodia | 41.668 % | |
46 | Somalia | 41.503 % | |
47 | Mexico | 41.371 % | |
48 | Philippines | 41.218 % | |
49 | Burkina Faso | 41.191 % | |
50 | Sri Lanka | 40.739 % | |
51 | Algeria | 40.502 % | |
52 | Vietnam | 40.464 % | |
53 | Mauritius | 40.417 % | |
54 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 39.129 % | |
55 | Kyrgyzstan | 39.054 % | |
56 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 38.807 % | |
57 | Barbados | 38.774 % | |
58 | Montenegro | 38.084 % | |
59 | Panama | 37.332 % | |
60 | Tunisia | 37.217 % | |
61 | Ethiopia | 37.007 % | |
62 | Paraguay | 35.938 % | |
63 | Jordan | 35.78 % | |
64 | China | 34.395 % | |
65 | Bulgaria | 33.729 % | |
66 | Saint Lucia | 33.44 % | |
67 | State of Palestine | 33.393 % | |
68 | Greece | 33.319 % | |
69 | Serbia | 32.927 % | |
70 | Madagascar | 32.712 % | |
71 | Chile | 32.635 % | |
72 | Lebanon | 32.36 % | |
73 | Malaysia | 32.081 % | |
74 | Mongolia | 30.871 % | |
75 | South Sudan | 30.863 % | |
76 | Nicaragua | 30.817 % | |
77 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 30.715 % | |
78 | Laos | 30.706 % | |
79 | El Salvador | 30.509 % | |
80 | Lithuania | 29.931 % | |
81 | South Korea | 29.717 % | |
82 | Malta | 29.669 % | |
83 | Ecuador | 29.429 % | |
84 | Republic of Moldova | 29.416 % | |
85 | Portugal | 29.119 % | |
86 | Russia | 28.738 % | |
87 | Bhutan | 28.525 % | |
88 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 28.367 % | |
89 | Venezuela | 28.055 % | |
90 | Guyana | 27.688 % | |
91 | Gambia | 27.615 % | |
92 | Uganda | 27.356 % | |
93 | Djibouti | 27.342 % | |
94 | Indonesia | 27.167 % | |
95 | Latvia | 26.982 % | |
96 | Seychelles | 26.948 % | |
97 | Bahamas | 26.788 % | |
98 | Ghana | 26.498 % | |
99 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 26.195 % | |
100 | Angola | 26.117 % | |
101 | Bahrain | 25.767 % | |
102 | Argentina | 25.599 % | |
103 | Tanzania | 25.442 % | |
104 | Brazil | 25.268 % | |
105 | Peru | 25.107 % | |
106 | Kazakhstan | 25.03 % | |
107 | Fiji | 24.71 % | |
108 | Hungary | 24.64 % | |
109 | Libya | 24.391 % | |
110 | Burundi | 24.289 % | |
111 | Dominica | 23.991 % | |
112 | Congo | 23.578 % | |
113 | Singapore | 23.469 % | |
114 | Dominican Republic | 23.311 % | |
115 | Cabo Verde | 23.01 % | |
116 | Italy | 22.814 % | |
117 | Bolivia | 22.738 % | |
118 | Kenya | 22.652 % | |
119 | Estonia | 22.155 % | |
120 | Belize | 22.028 % | |
121 | Jamaica | 21.958 % | |
122 | Belarus | 21.927 % | |
123 | Gabon | 21.566 % | |
124 | Switzerland | 21.359 % | |
125 | Spain | 21.304 % | |
126 | Romania | 20.942 % | |
127 | Antigua and Barbuda | 20.619 % | |
128 | Costa Rica | 20.517 % | |
129 | Belgium | 20.344 % | |
130 | Poland | 19.847 % | |
131 | Slovakia | 19.404 % | |
132 | Liechtenstein | 19.116 % | |
133 | Suriname | 18.86 % | |
134 | Israel | 17.473 % | |
135 | Maldives | 17.115 % | |
136 | Finland | 16.663 % | |
137 | Turkey | 16.271 % | |
138 | Cyprus | 16.231 % | |
139 | Palau | 16.08 % | |
140 | Austria | 16.026 % | |
141 | Uruguay | 15.814 % | |
142 | Lesotho | 14.668 % | |
143 | Iceland | 14.543 % | |
144 | Australia | 14.461 % | |
145 | Canada | 14.224 % | |
146 | Norway | 13.853 % | |
147 | Colombia | 13.693 % | |
148 | New Zealand | 13.565 % | |
149 | Denmark | 13.304 % | |
150 | Sweden | 13.093 % | |
151 | United Kingdom | 13.023 % | |
152 | Slovenia | 12.876 % | |
153 | Czech Republic | 12.482 % | |
154 | Samoa | 12.339 % | |
155 | San Marino | 11.856 % | |
156 | Sao Tome and Principe | 11.656 % | |
157 | Malawi | 11.537 % | |
158 | Ireland | 11.526 % | |
159 | Germany | 11.363 % | |
160 | Andorra | 11.303 % | |
161 | Netherlands | 10.908 % | |
162 | Japan | 10.82 % | |
163 | Eswatini | 10.768 % | |
164 | United States | 10.73 % | |
165 | United Arab Emirates | 10.468 % | |
166 | Papua New Guinea | 10.354 % | |
167 | Saudi Arabia | 10.156 % | |
168 | Kuwait | 9.997 % | |
169 | Mozambique | 9.446 % | |
170 | Croatia | 9.399 % | |
171 | France | 9.169 % | |
172 | Thailand | 9.044 % | |
173 | Zimbabwe | 8.886 % | |
174 | Luxembourg | 8.798 % | |
175 | Cuba | 8.394 % | |
176 | Vanuatu | 7.806 % | |
177 | Namibia | 7.281 % | |
178 | Zambia | 7.078 % | |
179 | Brunei Darussalam | 6.927 % | |
180 | Monaco | 6.918 % | |
181 | South Africa | 6.61 % | |
182 | Qatar | 6.558 % | |
183 | Timor-Leste | 5.891 % | |
184 | Oman | 5.469 % | |
185 | Tonga | 5.088 % | |
186 | Rwanda | 5 % | |
187 | Botswana | 4.265 % | |
188 | Solomon Islands | 3.636 % | |
189 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 2.81 % | |
190 | Marshall Islands | 1.193 % | |
191 | Nauru | 0.678 % | |
192 | Kiribati | 0.667 % | |
193 | Tuvalu | 0.17 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #193
Tuvalu
- #192
Kiribati
- #191
Nauru
- #190
Marshall Islands
- #189
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #188
Solomon Islands
- #187
Botswana
- #186
Rwanda
- #185
Tonga
- #184
Oman
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2021, Armenia led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending at 78.66%, while the global range spanned from 0.17% to 78.66%. The global average for this metric was 29.57%, providing a benchmark to understand the financial burden of healthcare costs across different countries.
Economic Disparities and Health Spending Burdens
The stark differences in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending across countries often reflect underlying economic disparities. In Armenia and Turkmenistan, where spending is among the highest, the healthcare systems rely heavily on direct payments from individuals, indicating limited public health coverage. This contrasts sharply with countries like Tuvalu and Kiribati, where the spending is minimal, at 0.17% and 0.67% respectively. These nations benefit from substantial external aid or government-funded health services, reducing the burden on individuals.
Countries with high out-of-pocket expenses, such as Nigeria (76.24%) and Bangladesh (76.15%), often lack comprehensive health insurance schemes, leading to a reliance on private healthcare payments. In contrast, the low figures in countries like Oman (5.47%) suggest effective health policies and government intervention in subsidizing healthcare costs.
Policy Influences on Health Spending
The variation in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending is also influenced by national health policies and the availability of public healthcare infrastructure. For instance, Yemen (68.82%) and Chad (69.48%) exhibit high spending due to political instability and underfunded public health sectors, necessitating private expenditure. Meanwhile, countries with low spending, such as the Marshall Islands (1.19%), often have robust public health systems supported by international partnerships or government funding.
In Rwanda, where out-of-pocket spending is only 5%, the government has implemented successful community-based health insurance schemes that have significantly reduced the financial burden on individuals. This underscores how policy decisions can mitigate economic barriers to healthcare access.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes
The year 2021 saw notable shifts in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in several countries. Bhutan experienced the largest increase, with spending rising by 13.10% (an 84.9% increase), possibly due to increased healthcare demands and inadequate public health funding. Similarly, the Syrian Arab Republic saw a 23.0% increase, highlighting the impact of ongoing conflict on health infrastructure and personal spending.
Conversely, Cambodia and Myanmar recorded substantial decreases of 18.58% and 18.47%, respectively. These reductions may be attributed to improved health policy implementations or international financial support aimed at enhancing public health services. Such trends demonstrate the dynamic nature of health spending and its sensitivity to policy and economic changes.
Global Implications and Future Directions
The data on Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2021 underscores significant global inequalities in healthcare access and financial burden. Countries with high spending rates often face challenges such as inadequate public health infrastructure and economic instability, compelling citizens to bear a greater financial load. Conversely, nations with low spending rates benefit from robust health systems or external support, reducing individual financial pressures.
Addressing these disparities requires a multifaceted approach, including strengthening public healthcare systems, expanding health insurance coverage, and fostering international cooperation to support countries with limited resources. Understanding these patterns offers crucial insights for policymakers aiming to enhance healthcare accessibility and affordability worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2021
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2021?
Armenia had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2021, with 78.66%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2021?
Tuvalu had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2021, with 0.17%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2021?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2021 was 29.57%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2021?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2021 was 26.79%.
What is the range of out-of-pocket health spending percentages in 2021?
The range of out-of-pocket health spending percentages in 2021 spans from 0.17% in Tuvalu to 78.66% in Armenia.
Which countries were in the top 3 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2021?
The top 3 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2021 were Armenia (78.66%), Turkmenistan (77.48%), and Afghanistan (77.21%).
Insights by country
Hungary
In 2021, Hungary ranked #108 globally in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 24.640352 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, which indicates a significant financial burden on households for healthcare. Factors contributing to this high out-of-pocket spending include a relatively underfunded public health system and economic constraints that limit government health expenditures.
Chad
In 2021, Chad ranked #7 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 69.48041 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include Chad's limited public health infrastructure and economic challenges, which hinder government investment in health services, leaving individuals to bear most of the costs.
Bhutan
In 2021, Bhutan's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending was 28.524828 %, ranking #87 out of 193 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, which indicates a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include Bhutan's developing economy and limited public health funding, which affects access to affordable healthcare for its population.
Mali
Mali's Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2021 was 44.094025 %, ranking it #40 out of 193 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include Mali's underfunded public health system and limited access to affordable medical care, which disproportionately affects low-income populations in rural areas.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2021, Equatorial Guinea ranked #12 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 64.893745 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a substantial reliance on private health expenditures. The high out-of-pocket spending is largely driven by limited public healthcare infrastructure and a relatively small population that faces challenges in accessing affordable medical services.
Ireland
In 2021, Ireland had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending value of 11.525645 %, ranking #158 out of 193 countries. This percentage is notably higher than the European average, reflecting a reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include a mixed healthcare system where public services are often complemented by private insurance, as well as increasing healthcare costs associated with an aging population and chronic disease management.
State of Palestine
The State of Palestine ranked #67 globally in 2021 for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 33.39273 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited access to comprehensive health insurance and ongoing geopolitical challenges that strain the healthcare system, making out-of-pocket expenses a common burden for many Palestinians.
Jordan
In 2021, Jordan ranked #63 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 35.780033 %. This percentage is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a substantial burden on individuals for healthcare expenses. Contributing factors include Jordan's economic constraints and the influx of refugees, which strain the healthcare system and increase reliance on direct payments for services.
Australia
In 2021, Australia ranked #144 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 14.4608345 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant financial burden on individuals for healthcare services. Key drivers include Australia's mixed public-private healthcare system, which necessitates out-of-pocket expenses for various treatments, and a demographic trend towards an aging population that increases demand for health services.
Chile
In 2021, Chile ranked #71 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending at 32.63452 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal funds for healthcare. Factors contributing to this high out-of-pocket expenditure include a mixed healthcare system where private insurance plays a substantial role, alongside economic disparities that affect access to public health services.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.