Out-of-Pocket Health Spending 2005
Out-of-pocket health spending measures the personal financial burden of healthcare costs in different countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Myanmar | 82.503 % | |
2 | Georgia | 79.585 % | |
3 | Afghanistan | 78.97 % | |
4 | Côte d'Ivoire | 76.736 % | |
5 | Comoros | 76.201 % | |
6 | Togo | 74.85 % | |
7 | Cameroon | 74.339 % | |
8 | Turkmenistan | 73.828 % | |
9 | India | 73.149 % | |
10 | Sierra Leone | 70.348 % | |
11 | Guinea | 70.151 % | |
12 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 69.364 % | |
13 | Equatorial Guinea | 67.66 % | |
14 | Mauritania | 67.134 % | |
15 | Liberia | 67.081 % | |
16 | Tajikistan | 66.1 % | |
17 | Nigeria | 65.971 % | |
18 | Pakistan | 65.867 % | |
19 | Bangladesh | 65.383 % | |
20 | Yemen | 64.781 % | |
21 | Egypt | 64.583 % | |
22 | Armenia | 62.936 % | |
23 | Guatemala | 62.477 % | |
24 | Ecuador | 61.823 % | |
25 | Cambodia | 61.243 % | |
26 | Morocco | 59.656 % | |
27 | Azerbaijan | 59.336 % | |
28 | Paraguay | 57.925 % | |
29 | China | 57.69 % | |
30 | Uzbekistan | 57.628 % | |
31 | Mali | 57.018 % | |
32 | Chad | 56.223 % | |
33 | Iran | 56.095 % | |
34 | Saint Lucia | 55.969 % | |
35 | Maldives | 55.659 % | |
36 | Indonesia | 55.328 % | |
37 | Sudan | 54.631 % | |
38 | Mexico | 54.59 % | |
39 | Dominican Republic | 53.877 % | |
40 | Guinea-Bissau | 53.007 % | |
41 | Philippines | 52.107 % | |
42 | Congo | 51.979 % | |
43 | Gabon | 51.966 % | |
44 | Central African Republic | 51.72 % | |
45 | Niger | 51.344 % | |
46 | Singapore | 49.994 % | |
47 | Cyprus | 49.832 % | |
48 | Mauritius | 49.588 % | |
49 | Albania | 49.311 % | |
50 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.287 % | |
51 | Nepal | 49.218 % | |
52 | Honduras | 49.065 % | |
53 | Uganda | 48.599 % | |
54 | Grenada | 48.582 % | |
55 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 47.983 % | |
56 | Lebanon | 47.323 % | |
57 | Benin | 46.525 % | |
58 | Trinidad and Tobago | 46.248 % | |
59 | Haiti | 46.016 % | |
60 | Kenya | 45.227 % | |
61 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 45.2 % | |
62 | Jamaica | 44.665 % | |
63 | South Korea | 44.419 % | |
64 | El Salvador | 44.026 % | |
65 | Laos | 43.722 % | |
66 | Burkina Faso | 43.412 % | |
67 | Republic of Moldova | 42.764 % | |
68 | Kyrgyzstan | 42.57 % | |
69 | Chile | 42.471 % | |
70 | Angola | 42.333 % | |
71 | Tunisia | 42.116 % | |
72 | Latvia | 41.691 % | |
73 | North Macedonia | 41.238 % | |
74 | Sri Lanka | 40.503 % | |
75 | Jordan | 40.076 % | |
76 | Dominica | 40.025 % | |
77 | Senegal | 39.516 % | |
78 | Burundi | 39.187 % | |
79 | Nicaragua | 39.169 % | |
80 | Bulgaria | 38.867 % | |
81 | Malaysia | 38.044 % | |
82 | Ukraine | 37.958 % | |
83 | State of Palestine | 37 % | |
84 | Greece | 36.875 % | |
85 | Brazil | 35.876 % | |
86 | Panama | 35.804 % | |
87 | Libya | 35.347 % | |
88 | Djibouti | 35.31 % | |
89 | Eritrea | 35.239 % | |
90 | Guyana | 35.117 % | |
91 | Barbados | 35.041 % | |
92 | Vietnam | 34.642 % | |
93 | Kazakhstan | 34.412 % | |
94 | Lesotho | 34.388 % | |
95 | Peru | 34.021 % | |
96 | Tanzania | 33.715 % | |
97 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 33.553 % | |
98 | Sao Tome and Principe | 33.395 % | |
99 | Timor-Leste | 33.203 % | |
100 | Belize | 33.11 % | |
101 | Madagascar | 33.027 % | |
102 | Lithuania | 32.779 % | |
103 | Costa Rica | 32.774 % | |
104 | Argentina | 32.542 % | |
105 | Bolivia | 32 % | |
106 | Russia | 31.932 % | |
107 | Mongolia | 31.496 % | |
108 | Ethiopia | 31.34 % | |
109 | Bahamas | 30.365 % | |
110 | Israel | 30.243 % | |
111 | United Arab Emirates | 30.139 % | |
112 | Serbia | 29.818 % | |
113 | Iraq | 29.044 % | |
114 | Malta | 28.859 % | |
115 | Algeria | 28.094 % | |
116 | Poland | 27.746 % | |
117 | Thailand | 27.583 % | |
118 | Bahrain | 27.474 % | |
119 | Switzerland | 27.144 % | |
120 | Antigua and Barbuda | 27.075 % | |
121 | Zambia | 26.098 % | |
122 | Uruguay | 25.942 % | |
123 | Hungary | 25.764 % | |
124 | Cabo Verde | 24.591 % | |
125 | Turkey | 24.177 % | |
126 | Rwanda | 23.8 % | |
127 | Portugal | 23.68 % | |
128 | Slovakia | 23.61 % | |
129 | Ghana | 23.533 % | |
130 | Estonia | 23.025 % | |
131 | Spain | 22.629 % | |
132 | San Marino | 21.87 % | |
133 | Belarus | 21.783 % | |
134 | Italy | 21.606 % | |
135 | Kuwait | 21.474 % | |
136 | Suriname | 20.863 % | |
137 | Belgium | 20.25 % | |
138 | Australia | 19.643 % | |
139 | Finland | 19.576 % | |
140 | Austria | 19.509 % | |
141 | Qatar | 18.612 % | |
142 | Romania | 18.499 % | |
143 | Seychelles | 17.861 % | |
144 | Iceland | 17.589 % | |
145 | Sweden | 16.859 % | |
146 | Bhutan | 16.79 % | |
147 | Norway | 16.714 % | |
148 | Palau | 16.555 % | |
149 | Saudi Arabia | 16.492 % | |
150 | Colombia | 16.408 % | |
151 | Brunei Darussalam | 16.334 % | |
152 | Andorra | 15.999 % | |
153 | Japan | 15.673 % | |
154 | Canada | 15.368 % | |
155 | Cuba | 14.844 % | |
156 | Denmark | 14.709 % | |
157 | New Zealand | 14.07 % | |
158 | United States | 13.913 % | |
159 | Germany | 13.565 % | |
160 | Ireland | 13.553 % | |
161 | United Kingdom | 13.43 % | |
162 | Croatia | 13.391 % | |
163 | Eswatini | 13.245 % | |
164 | Samoa | 13.061 % | |
165 | Slovenia | 13.019 % | |
166 | Luxembourg | 12.928 % | |
167 | Mozambique | 12.318 % | |
168 | Fiji | 12.088 % | |
169 | Gambia | 11.507 % | |
170 | South Africa | 11.313 % | |
171 | Czech Republic | 11.093 % | |
172 | Tonga | 10.644 % | |
173 | Oman | 10.547 % | |
174 | Netherlands | 9.886 % | |
175 | Vanuatu | 9.818 % | |
176 | Malawi | 9.1 % | |
177 | Botswana | 8.499 % | |
178 | Papua New Guinea | 8.196 % | |
179 | France | 7.369 % | |
180 | Monaco | 5.805 % | |
181 | Namibia | 5.769 % | |
182 | Nauru | 4.428 % | |
183 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 3.203 % | |
184 | Solomon Islands | 2.172 % | |
185 | Tuvalu | 1.694 % | |
186 | Marshall Islands | 1.156 % | |
187 | Kiribati | 0.118 % |
- #1
Myanmar
- #2
Georgia
- #3
Afghanistan
- #4
Côte d'Ivoire
- #5
Comoros
- #6
Togo
- #7
Cameroon
- #8
Turkmenistan
- #9
India
- #10
Sierra Leone
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #187
Kiribati
- #186
Marshall Islands
- #185
Tuvalu
- #184
Solomon Islands
- #183
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #182
Nauru
- #181
Namibia
- #180
Monaco
- #179
France
- #178
Papua New Guinea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2005, Myanmar led the world in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending with a staggering 82.50%, while the global range spanned from 0.12% to 82.50%. The global average for this metric was 35.94%, offering a glimpse into the varied financial burden of healthcare across different nations.
Economic Disparities and Healthcare Burden
The wide disparity in Out-of-Pocket Health Spending percentages reflects significant economic differences among countries. Developing nations such as Myanmar (82.50%), Georgia (79.59%), and Afghanistan (78.97%) exhibit some of the highest levels of personal financial burden. This is often due to limited government healthcare funding and high poverty rates, which force individuals to bear a significant portion of healthcare costs themselves. In contrast, nations like Kiribati (0.12%) and the Marshall Islands (1.16%) have lower out-of-pocket expenses, likely due to stronger healthcare systems or significant international aid.
Policy Impact on Health Spending
Countries with robust public health policies tend to exhibit lower out-of-pocket expenditures. For instance, France (7.37%) and Monaco (5.80%) benefit from comprehensive healthcare systems that reduce the financial burden on individuals. These systems often include widespread insurance coverage and government subsidies, which mitigate the need for personal spending on health services. Conversely, in countries like India (73.15%) and Sierra Leone (70.35%), limited insurance coverage and inadequate public health infrastructure contribute to higher individual costs.
Geographical and Demographic Influences
Geography and demographics also play crucial roles in determining out-of-pocket health spending. Island nations such as Kiribati and Tuvalu (1.69%) often have lower spending due to smaller populations and potentially more manageable healthcare systems. However, countries with large populations and diverse geographies, like India, face challenges in uniformly providing healthcare, leading to higher personal costs. Additionally, regions with high poverty levels, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, tend to report higher out-of-pocket expenses due to limited access to affordable healthcare services.
Year-over-Year Trends and Their Implications
Examining year-over-year changes reveals critical shifts in healthcare spending dynamics. Uganda saw the most significant increase, with a rise of 10.22% (26.6%), indicating possible reductions in governmental healthcare funding or increased healthcare costs. Similarly, Indonesia and Mongolia experienced notable increases of 9.42% (20.5%) and 6.83% (27.7%), respectively. These changes could suggest economic pressures or policy shifts that transferred more costs to individuals.
Conversely, countries like Senegal and Ghana experienced significant decreases in out-of-pocket spending by -15.58% (-28.3%) and -8.92% (-27.5%), respectively. Such reductions might be attributed to improved healthcare policies, increased international aid, or successful implementation of health insurance programs that alleviate personal financial burdens.
Overall, the 2005 data on Out-of-Pocket Health Spending underscores the profound impact of economic conditions, policy decisions, and geographical factors on healthcare affordability worldwide. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to reduce financial burdens and improve healthcare access globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2005
Which country had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2005?
Myanmar had the highest out-of-pocket health spending in 2005, with 82.5%.
Which country had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2005?
Kiribati had the lowest out-of-pocket health spending in 2005, with 0.12%.
What was the average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2005?
The average out-of-pocket health spending across all countries in 2005 was 35.94%.
What was the median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2005?
The median out-of-pocket health spending value in 2005 was 34.39%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for out-of-pocket health spending in 2005?
The top 3 countries for out-of-pocket health spending in 2005 were Myanmar, Georgia, and Afghanistan.
What was the range of out-of-pocket health spending values in 2005?
The range of out-of-pocket health spending values in 2005 was from 0.12% in Kiribati to 82.5% in Myanmar.
Insights by country
Tajikistan
Tajikistan ranked #16 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in 2005, with a value of 66.09986 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal funds for healthcare services. Contributing factors include the country's limited public health financing and a struggling economy, which restricts government investment in healthcare infrastructure and services.
Belgium
In 2005, Belgium ranked #137 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 20.250114 %. This figure is significantly higher than the average spending in the European Union, indicating a reliance on personal finances for healthcare. Contributing to this high out-of-pocket expenditure are Belgium's mixed healthcare system and the presence of private health insurance, which often leads to additional costs for patients.
Myanmar
In 2005, Myanmar had the highest Out-of-Pocket Health Spending globally, at 82.502594 %, ranking #1 out of 187 countries. This figure significantly exceeds the global average, reflecting a lack of comprehensive public health funding and insurance coverage. Contributing factors include Myanmar's economic challenges and limited healthcare infrastructure, which compel individuals to bear the financial burden of medical expenses directly.
Cameroon
In 2005, Cameroon had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending of 74.33883 %, ranking #7 out of 187 countries. This figure is significantly higher than many neighboring countries, indicating a heavy reliance on private health expenditures rather than public funding. The high percentage reflects challenges in the health care system, including limited government investment in health services and widespread poverty, which forces individuals to cover most health costs directly.
Indonesia
In 2005, Indonesia ranked #36 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 55.32828 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a substantial reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include limited public health funding, a high prevalence of out-of-pocket payments due to inadequate insurance coverage, and a growing population that often faces economic challenges in accessing healthcare services.
Afghanistan
In 2005, Afghanistan had an Out-of-Pocket Health Spending rate of 78.970085 %, ranking #3 out of 187 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting the country's reliance on private health expenditures. Contributing factors include ongoing conflict, limited government funding for healthcare, and a lack of infrastructure, which force many Afghans to pay for medical services out of their own pockets.
Albania
In 2005, Albania ranked #49 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 49.311012 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant reliance on personal finances for healthcare. Contributing factors include Albania's transitional economy and limited public health funding, which compel many citizens to cover healthcare expenses directly. Additionally, the historical context of healthcare reforms has shaped the current landscape, impacting access and affordability for the population.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria ranked #80 globally in 2005 for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 38.867413 %. This figure is notably higher than the European Union average, reflecting a reliance on private funding for healthcare services. Contributing factors include a historically underfunded public health system and economic constraints that limit government health expenditure, resulting in increased out-of-pocket costs for citizens.
Cambodia
Cambodia ranked #25 globally in 2005 for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 61.24338 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a heavy reliance on personal finances for healthcare. Contributing factors include limited public health funding and a developing economy, which forces many Cambodians to pay for medical services directly. Additionally, the historical context and ongoing challenges in health infrastructure further exacerbate this situation.
Algeria
In 2005, Algeria ranked #115 globally for Out-of-Pocket Health Spending, with a value of 28.093613 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, which reflects challenges in public health financing. Contributing factors include Algeria's reliance on oil revenues, which can lead to fluctuations in healthcare funding, and a healthcare system that has faced pressures from a growing population and economic constraints.
Data Source
Share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on various global issues, including health, economics, and education. The dataset on the share of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare offers country-level statistics on the proportion of healthcare expenses paid directly by individuals, highlighting disparities in healthcare financing across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Out-of-Pocket Health Spending data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.