Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars 1962
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Afghanistan | NaN $ |
2 | Albania | NaN $ |
3 | Algeria | 2,001,444,543.919 $ |
4 | American Samoa | NaN $ |
5 | Andorra | NaN $ |
6 | Angola | NaN $ |
7 | Antigua and Barbuda | NaN $ |
8 | Argentina | 18,337,691,145.369 $ |
9 | Armenia | NaN $ |
10 | Aruba | NaN $ |
11 | China | 47,310,737,754.229 $ |
12 | Canada | 42,336,211,555.827 $ |
13 | Australia | 19,953,923,192.628 $ |
14 | Denmark | 7,953,274,741.293 $ |
15 | Austria | 7,793,042,529.16 $ |
16 | Azerbaijan | NaN $ |
17 | Brazil | 19,231,747,851.533 $ |
18 | Chile | 5,765,971,144.471 $ |
19 | Colombia | 4,955,543,963.369 $ |
20 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 3,779,841,428.571 $ |
21 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 1,612,346,412.265 $ |
22 | Cameroon | 694,247,864.379 $ |
23 | Côte d'Ivoire | 645,284,473.734 $ |
24 | Costa Rica | 479,180,824.349 $ |
25 | Burkina Faso | 379,567,099.249 $ |
26 | Chad | 357,635,713.419 $ |
27 | Burundi | 213,500,006 $ |
28 | Bahamas | 212,170,033.947 $ |
29 | Bahrain | NaN $ |
30 | Bangladesh | 5,081,413,541.667 $ |
31 | Barbados | 88,782,583.46 $ |
32 | Belarus | NaN $ |
33 | Belgium | 13,436,827,166.519 $ |
34 | Bolivia | 448,400,673.401 $ |
35 | Benin | 236,434,954.039 $ |
36 | Congo | 166,521,239.65 $ |
37 | Central African Republic | 124,482,773.833 $ |
38 | Bermuda | 80,700,000 $ |
39 | Botswana | 35,644,956.643 $ |
40 | Belize | 31,857,591.858 $ |
41 | Bhutan | NaN $ |
42 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN $ |
43 | Brunei Darussalam | NaN $ |
44 | Bulgaria | NaN $ |
45 | Cabo Verde | NaN $ |
46 | Cambodia | NaN $ |
47 | Cayman Islands | NaN $ |
48 | China, Macao SAR | NaN $ |
49 | Comoros | NaN $ |
50 | Croatia | NaN $ |
51 | Cuba | NaN $ |
52 | Curaçao | NaN $ |
53 | Cyprus | NaN $ |
54 | Czech Republic | NaN $ |
55 | Djibouti | NaN $ |
56 | Dominica | NaN $ |
57 | Germany | 105,895,435,234.343 $ |
58 | France | 75,196,980,365.033 $ |
59 | Japan | 64,987,857,541.626 $ |
60 | Italy | 52,413,872,628.004 $ |
61 | India | 42,161,481,858.082 $ |
62 | Finland | 6,407,796,042.704 $ |
63 | Greece | 5,140,542,929.421 $ |
64 | Iran | 4,693,566,416.483 $ |
65 | Egypt | 4,035,462,027.398 $ |
66 | Israel | 2,966,154,031.331 $ |
67 | Ireland | 2,329,372,971.892 $ |
68 | Kuwait | 1,828,107,502.8 $ |
69 | Iraq | 1,784,174,540.73 $ |
70 | Ecuador | 1,518,207,703.49 $ |
71 | Dominican Republic | 824,100,000 $ |
72 | El Salvador | NaN $ |
73 | Ghana | 1,382,515,654.473 $ |
74 | Guatemala | 1,143,600,000 $ |
75 | Kenya | 868,111,400.755 $ |
76 | Jamaica | 777,727,688.909 $ |
77 | Libya | 619,725,784.91 $ |
78 | Honduras | 532,450,000 $ |
79 | Iceland | 299,309,938.066 $ |
80 | Haiti | 281,896,800 $ |
81 | Guyana | 194,949,512.626 $ |
82 | Liberia | 191,861,800 $ |
83 | Gabon | 182,796,536.266 $ |
84 | Fiji | 122,906,434.958 $ |
85 | Equatorial Guinea | 37,253,333.333 $ |
86 | Eritrea | NaN $ |
87 | Estonia | NaN $ |
88 | Ethiopia | 1,747,566,307.1 $ |
89 | Eswatini | 45,927,961.629 $ |
90 | Faroe Islands | NaN $ |
91 | French Polynesia | NaN $ |
92 | Gambia | NaN $ |
93 | Georgia | NaN $ |
94 | Greenland | NaN $ |
95 | Grenada | NaN $ |
96 | Guam | NaN $ |
97 | Guinea | NaN $ |
98 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN $ |
99 | Hungary | NaN $ |
100 | Indonesia | NaN $ |
101 | Isle of Man | NaN $ |
102 | Jordan | NaN $ |
103 | Kazakhstan | NaN $ |
104 | Kiribati | NaN $ |
105 | Kosovo | NaN $ |
106 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN $ |
107 | Laos | NaN $ |
108 | Latvia | NaN $ |
109 | Lebanon | NaN $ |
110 | Lesotho | 41,859,983.256 $ |
111 | Liechtenstein | NaN $ |
112 | Lithuania | NaN $ |
113 | Netherlands | 15,847,582,341.166 $ |
114 | Norway | 6,107,076,928.634 $ |
115 | Philippines | 4,954,593,071.828 $ |
116 | Nigeria | 4,909,399,176.24 $ |
117 | Pakistan | 4,310,163,796.724 $ |
118 | Portugal | 3,835,883,663.251 $ |
119 | Peru | 3,284,322,201.278 $ |
120 | Puerto Rico | 2,094,400,000 $ |
121 | Malaysia | 2,001,489,602.185 $ |
122 | Luxembourg | 747,846,862.21 $ |
123 | Madagascar | 739,286,907.593 $ |
124 | Malawi | NaN $ |
125 | Maldives | NaN $ |
126 | Mali | NaN $ |
127 | Malta | NaN $ |
128 | Marshall Islands | NaN $ |
129 | Mexico | 15,200,000,000 $ |
130 | Morocco | 2,379,611,124.614 $ |
131 | Panama | 652,120,900 $ |
132 | Paraguay | 360,698,412.698 $ |
133 | Papua New Guinea | 261,184,041.789 $ |
134 | Mauritius | 197,738,207.858 $ |
135 | Mauritania | 164,271,557.513 $ |
136 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | NaN $ |
137 | Monaco | NaN $ |
138 | Mongolia | NaN $ |
139 | Montenegro | NaN $ |
140 | Mozambique | NaN $ |
141 | Myanmar | 634,528,872.02 $ |
142 | Namibia | NaN $ |
143 | Nauru | NaN $ |
144 | Nepal | 574,091,101.194 $ |
145 | New Caledonia | NaN $ |
146 | New Zealand | 6,133,158,532.217 $ |
147 | Niger | 531,736,599.25 $ |
148 | Nicaragua | 269,283,803.687 $ |
149 | Northern Mariana Islands | NaN $ |
150 | North Macedonia | NaN $ |
151 | Oman | 56,273,202.197 $ |
152 | Palau | NaN $ |
153 | Poland | NaN $ |
154 | Qatar | NaN $ |
155 | Republic of Moldova | NaN $ |
156 | Romania | NaN $ |
157 | Russia | NaN $ |
158 | Rwanda | 125,000,008 $ |
159 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 14,524,963.688 $ |
160 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 12,541,635.313 $ |
161 | Saint Martin (French part) | NaN $ |
162 | Saint Lucia | NaN $ |
163 | Samoa | NaN $ |
164 | San Marino | NaN $ |
165 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN $ |
166 | United States | 603,639,413,793.103 $ |
167 | United Kingdom | 81,247,564,156.825 $ |
168 | Sweden | 18,794,066,990.061 $ |
169 | Spain | 16,609,632,790.584 $ |
170 | South Africa | 9,813,996,074.402 $ |
171 | Turkey | 8,922,222,222.222 $ |
172 | Venezuela | 8,814,309,884.212 $ |
173 | Thailand | 3,308,912,796.935 $ |
174 | Tanzania | 3,101,589,992.664 $ |
175 | South Korea | 2,826,923,076.923 $ |
176 | Saudi Arabia | 2,130,606,531.778 $ |
177 | Sri Lanka | 1,434,156,378.601 $ |
178 | Sudan | 1,328,259,624.722 $ |
179 | Zimbabwe | 1,118,172,225.65 $ |
180 | Senegal | 1,085,475,790.591 $ |
181 | Serbia | NaN $ |
182 | Uruguay | 1,710,004,407.228 $ |
183 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,110,565,880.759 $ |
184 | Tunisia | 880,027,733.333 $ |
185 | Singapore | 826,239,211.818 $ |
186 | Zambia | 679,279,728.56 $ |
187 | Uganda | 449,158,233.391 $ |
188 | Sierra Leone | 342,721,416.491 $ |
189 | Seychelles | 12,642,025.916 $ |
190 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | NaN $ |
191 | Slovakia | NaN $ |
192 | Slovenia | NaN $ |
193 | Solomon Islands | NaN $ |
194 | Somalia | 203,531,927.547 $ |
195 | South Sudan | NaN $ |
196 | State of Palestine | NaN $ |
197 | Switzerland | 12,989,649,694.281 $ |
198 | Trinidad and Tobago | 619,322,810.026 $ |
199 | Togo | 186,745,757.859 $ |
200 | Suriname | 116,150,000 $ |
201 | Tajikistan | NaN $ |
202 | Timor-Leste | NaN $ |
203 | Tonga | NaN $ |
204 | Turkmenistan | NaN $ |
205 | Turks and Caicos Islands | NaN $ |
206 | Tuvalu | NaN $ |
207 | Ukraine | NaN $ |
208 | United Arab Emirates | NaN $ |
209 | United States Virgin Islands | NaN $ |
210 | Uzbekistan | NaN $ |
211 | Vanuatu | NaN $ |
212 | Vietnam | NaN $ |
213 | Yemen | NaN $ |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Afghanistan
- #2
Albania
- #3
Algeria
- #4
American Samoa
- #5
Andorra
- #6
Angola
- #7
Antigua and Barbuda
- #8
Argentina
- #9
Armenia
- #10
Aruba
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #213
Yemen
- #212
Vietnam
- #211
Vanuatu
- #210
Uzbekistan
- #209
United States Virgin Islands
- #208
United Arab Emirates
- #207
Ukraine
- #206
Tuvalu
- #205
Turks and Caicos Islands
- #204
Turkmenistan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars is a fundamental measure of a nation's economic performance, reflecting the total monetary value of all finished goods and services produced within a country's borders in a specific time period. In 1962, this metric not only illustrated the financial health and growth potential of nations but also provided insights into the global economic landscape. This analysis focuses on how these figures varied across countries, revealing patterns of wealth distribution and economic development during this period.
Global Economic Landscape in 1962
In 1962, global economic dynamics were heavily influenced by post-World War II reconstruction, technological advancements, and geopolitical tensions. The United States led the world with a staggering GDP of approximately $603.6 billion. This immense economic output was driven by a robust industrial base, technological innovation, and a burgeoning consumer market. Western European countries like Germany ($105.9 billion), the United Kingdom ($81.2 billion), and France ($75.2 billion) also demonstrated significant economic strength, reflecting their recovery and growth after the war.
The influence of geopolitical factors was evident in the economic performance of different regions. Japan, with a GDP of $64.9 billion, was experiencing rapid industrialization and economic expansion, a period often referred to as the Japanese economic miracle. This growth was supported by industrial policies, international trade, and technological enhancements, positioning Japan as an emerging economic powerhouse in Asia.
Wealth Distribution Patterns
The 1962 GDP data revealed stark contrasts in wealth distribution across countries. Developed nations dominated the top ranks, underscoring the economic disparity between industrialized and developing countries. For instance, while the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom showcased formidable economic figures, countries like India ($42.1 billion) and China ($47.3 billion) had significantly lower GDPs, indicative of different stages of economic development and industrialization.
At the lower end of the spectrum, smaller economies like Saint Kitts and Nevis ($12.5 million) and Seychelles ($12.6 million) highlighted the challenges faced by small island nations, including limited resources and market access. These discrepancies were crucial for policymakers to consider in formulating economic strategies aimed at addressing global inequality.
Year-over-Year Economic Changes
The year 1962 marked notable changes in economic performance for several countries. The United States saw a GDP increase of approximately $41.7 billion, representing a 7.4% growth rate. This increase was largely driven by consumer spending and industrial production. Germany and France also experienced significant GDP growth with increases of 9.7% and 12.0%, respectively, reflecting robust industrial activity and investment.
Conversely, certain countries experienced declines. The Philippines faced a dramatic GDP reduction of 39.4%, while China noted a 5.7% decrease. These declines were attributed to various factors, including political instability and adverse economic policies. Such fluctuations emphasized the importance of stable governance and sound economic strategies in sustaining growth.
Regional Economic Development
Regional economic patterns in 1962 highlighted the varied levels of development across continents. North America and Western Europe emerged as economic leaders, supported by strong industrial bases and international trade. In contrast, many African and Latin American countries were still grappling with post-colonial transitions and economic challenges that hindered growth. For instance, economies like Botswana ($35.6 million) and Lesotho ($41.8 million) relied heavily on agriculture and faced significant barriers to industrialization.
Asian countries presented a mixed picture. While Japan's rapid growth stood in contrast to the economic challenges faced by countries like India and China, this diversity underscored the region's complex economic landscape. The varying stages of development across Asia pointed to the potential for future economic shifts, influenced by policy changes and globalization.
Economic Policies and Global Trends
Economic policies played a pivotal role in shaping the GDP figures of 1962. The era was marked by significant government intervention in many economies, aiming to stimulate growth and stabilize markets. The United States' New Deal programs and Japan's economic reforms were key examples of how policy interventions could drive industrial growth and economic expansion. Additionally, the increasing integration of global markets hinted at the early stages of globalization, which would later become a dominant force in shaping international economic trends.
In conclusion, the GDP data from 1962 paints a vivid picture of global economic conditions during this period. It highlights the dominance of developed countries, the challenges faced by developing nations, and the pivotal role of policy decisions in influencing economic outcomes. As nations navigated the complexities of post-war recovery and emerging global markets, these figures provided valuable insights for investors and policymakers alike, guiding strategies for economic growth and development.
Insights by country
Bulgaria
In 1962, Bulgaria was ranked 130th out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measured in current US dollars. During this year, the specific value of Bulgaria's GDP was recorded as null $, indicating either a lack of available data or an unmeasured economy in this context.
This ranking reflects Bulgaria's economic context during the early 1960s, a period characterized by its status as a socialist state within the Eastern Bloc. Economic policies were heavily centralized, with significant state control over production and resources, which often led to inefficiencies and limited growth compared to Western countries.
Factors contributing to Bulgaria's economic situation at the time included a focus on heavy industry and collectivized agriculture, along with restricted access to international markets. Despite these challenges, the country had a relatively high literacy rate and educational attainment, which laid the groundwork for future economic development.
El Salvador
In 1962, El Salvador ranked 143rd out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measured in current US dollars. The actual GDP value for this year is recorded as null $, indicating insufficient data or reporting inconsistencies for accurate economic assessment.
This ranking reflects the economic challenges faced by El Salvador during the early 1960s, a period characterized by political instability and social unrest. The country's economy was primarily agrarian, heavily reliant on coffee exports, which made it vulnerable to fluctuations in global commodity prices.
Additionally, factors such as high levels of inequality and limited industrialization contributed to the low GDP ranking. The country was experiencing growing tensions that would later culminate in civil conflict in the late 1970s and 1980s, further complicating its economic landscape.
Israel
In 1962, Israel ranked 41st out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country, with a total GDP of $2,966,154,031.33 in current US dollars. This ranking reflects Israel's economic development and the growth of its industries during the early years of its statehood.
The significant GDP value can be attributed to various factors, including the country's focus on agriculture, technology, and the establishment of a robust industrial base following its independence in 1948. The influx of Jewish immigrants and the support of international aid, particularly from the United States, also contributed to economic growth during this period.
Additionally, Israel's innovative approaches to agriculture and technology set the stage for its future as a "Start-Up Nation," which would later be evident in its high-tech sector development. By 1962, the groundwork for a diverse economy was being laid, which would continue to evolve and expand in subsequent decades.
State of Palestine
In 1962, the State of Palestine was ranked 200 out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measured in current US dollars. The exact GDP value for that year is recorded as null $, indicating a lack of sufficient economic data or formal recognition at the time.
This ranking and GDP figure reflect the challenging economic conditions the region faced during the early 1960s, particularly amidst ongoing political instability and conflict. The lack of a defined statehood and economic infrastructure contributed significantly to the absence of measurable economic output.
Furthermore, the socioeconomic conditions of the Palestinian people during this period were characterized by limited access to resources, high levels of unemployment, and restricted trade, all of which would have had a profound impact on economic development. The situation has evolved over subsequent decades, with ongoing international efforts to improve economic conditions and stability in the region.
Congo
In 1962, Congo ranked 99th out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), with a reported value of 166,521,239.65 USD. This figure reflects a period shortly after the country gained independence from Belgium in 1960, during which it was navigating the complexities of establishing a stable economic framework.
The GDP value at that time can be attributed to several factors, including the country's rich natural resources, particularly minerals such as copper and diamonds, which were pivotal to its economy. However, the fledgling state faced challenges such as political instability, economic mismanagement, and the lingering effects of colonial exploitation, which hindered more robust economic growth.
Additionally, it is important to note that the economic landscape of Congo during this era was marked by significant external influences, including foreign investments and the impact of Cold War dynamics, which shaped its political and economic trajectory. This foundational period would set the stage for both subsequent challenges and opportunities in the decades to follow.
Azerbaijan
In 1962, Azerbaijan was ranked 124th out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars. The specific GDP value for Azerbaijan during this year is recorded as null dollars, indicating a lack of available data or reporting for the economic output of the country at that time.
This ranking reflects the economic conditions of Azerbaijan, which was then part of the Soviet Union. The region's economy was largely based on industrial production and agriculture, heavily influenced by centralized planning and state control. Factors such as political stability, resource allocation, and economic policies during this era significantly impacted the measurement of GDP.
Despite the absence of a specific GDP value, it is notable that Azerbaijan had access to rich natural resources, particularly oil and gas, which would later become crucial to its economy post-independence in 1991. The country’s economic landscape has evolved significantly since the 1960s, transitioning from a Soviet system to a more market-oriented economy.
Cameroon
In 1962, Cameroon ranked 69th out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), with a total GDP valued at 694,247,864.38 USD. This figure reflects the country's economic activities during a period of post-colonial transition, as Cameroon was gaining independence from France in 1960.
The relatively modest GDP at the time can be attributed to several factors, including the early stages of industrialization, reliance on agriculture, and the nascent development of infrastructure. Additionally, the political landscape and the establishment of governance structures following independence played significant roles in shaping economic progress.
Moreover, during the early 1960s, Cameroon was primarily dependent on the export of commodities such as cocoa and coffee, which influenced its economic performance. As a point of interest, by the late 20th century, Cameroon would experience fluctuations in its GDP due to shifts in global commodity prices and domestic policy changes.
Egypt
In 1962, Egypt ranked 35th out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measured in current US dollars, with a total GDP value of $4,035,462,027.40. This substantial economic output positioned Egypt as one of the leading economies in Africa and the Middle East during this period.
The high GDP value can be attributed to several factors, including the country's strategic location, its agricultural base, and the nationalization policies implemented under President Gamal Abdel Nasser, which aimed to modernize and industrialize the economy. Additionally, the expansion of the Suez Canal and the associated revenues played a significant role in bolstering the economy.
During this time, Egypt was experiencing a wave of post-colonial development, with significant investments in infrastructure and education, further contributing to its economic growth. The GDP value from this era reflects a period of optimism and state-led initiatives aimed at enhancing economic self-sufficiency.
Kenya
In 1962, Kenya ranked 63rd out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measured in current US dollars, with a total GDP of $868,111,400.76. This figure reflects the economic landscape of Kenya shortly after gaining independence from British colonial rule, marking a pivotal moment in the country's economic development.
The relatively modest GDP at this time can be attributed to several factors, including the nascent stages of economic diversification, reliance on agriculture, and the impacts of colonial economic structures that had prioritized export-oriented cash crops. Additionally, the country was beginning to establish its own governance and economic policies, which would gradually evolve in the coming decades.
By the early 1960s, Kenya was predominantly agrarian, with agriculture accounting for a significant portion of its GDP and employment. This period laid the foundation for subsequent economic reforms and development strategies that would later aim to enhance industrialization and service sector growth.
Czech Republic
In 1962, the Czech Republic, then part of Czechoslovakia, was ranked 140 out of 213 countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measured in current US dollars. Notably, the GDP value for this year is recorded as null $, indicating a lack of available data or reporting for this specific measure during that time.
This statistic is indicative of the economic conditions in Czechoslovakia during the early 1960s, a period characterized by state-controlled economic policies and significant industrial output. Factors contributing to the GDP ranking may include the impact of post-World War II reconstruction, centralized planning, and the integration into the Eastern Bloc economic framework, which constrained market dynamics.
Additionally, Czechoslovakia's economy was primarily industrial, with a strong focus on manufacturing and heavy industries, which influenced its economic performance. By the 1960s, the country was known for its production of machinery, vehicles, and consumer goods, yet it faced challenges such as inefficiencies inherent in centrally planned economies.
Data Source
World Bank (WB)
The World Bank is like a cooperative, made up of 189 member countries. These member countries, or shareholders, are represented by a Board of Governors, who are the ultimate policymakers at the World Bank. Generally, the governors are member countries' ministers of finance or ministers of development. They meet once a year at the Annual Meetings of the Boards of Governors of the World Bank Group and the International Monetary Fund.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data